Service Time Considerations For Top Prospects

Timing the debuts of top prospects is essential for MLB teams. No club wants to expose a player to top competition before he's ready, but keeping a player in the minors when he could be contributing at the big league level is hardly appealing either. It's a balancing act.

Though a player's development generally determines his timeline to the Major Leagues, service time is undeniably a consideration. MLB teams can obtain an extra year of control from a player by delaying his debut and they can decrease his chances of qualifying for an additional year of arbitration with enough patience.

Heavily-hyped prospects often have carefully-timed debuts, and Baseball America's list of the game's top 100 prospects features those currently generating the most buzz. Of the 100 players on the list, 31 project to arrive in the Major Leagues in 2012. The chart below presents two key dates for each prospect who might make an impact this coming season.

First, there's the approximate date on which the team can call the player up while keeping him under control for an extra year — through 2018. Next, there's the approximate date on which the team can call the player up without setting him up for super two status and a fourth trip through arbitration. I've estimated conservatively when it comes to projecting super twos, since more players than before will qualify under the new CBA.

Updated ST Prospects '12

Yu Darvish and Yoenis Cespedes probably won’t be subject to service time manipulations given their distinctive contract statuses. The same likely applies to Matt Moore, who signed a long-term deal with the Rays, but I've included him on this list all the same. Keep in mind that many players not listed could also be subject to service time management by teams.


Full Story | 26 Comments | Categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

26 Comments on "Service Time Considerations For Top Prospects"


3 years 5 months ago

Terrific post. This is why I love this site

kräftig. entschieden
3 years 5 months ago

If Bryce Harper hits the FA market after ’17… he’ll just be turning 25. If he dominates like he’s supposed to, he’ll end up with the most ridiculous contract ever.

3 years 5 months ago

 That’s why if I’m the Nationals I wait as long as I have to to delay that.

Lunchbox45
3 years 5 months ago

or get him to sign one of those evan longoria/matt moore deals.

all the cool kids are doing it!

3 years 5 months ago

 Scott Boras

3 years 4 months ago

Norberto’s right on the money.  If you are the Nats and you want to have him in his prime when he’s 27 or so, why would you bring him up now?  As Tom says, he’s not going to sign an extension with Boras as his agent.  Wait 2 or 3 years to call him up and get to keep him through his presumed prime age 27-28 seasons.

3 years 4 months ago

That is an excellent idea in this way. The Nats could have their cake and eat it too. Boras has been playing games with teams for years. The Nats should forsce Boras’ hand by starting him at double A this year. Tell Boras they would be fine giving him three plus more years in the minors without any big league service time until May 2015 at which point Harper would be 22. This would allow the Nats to have him in 2015, 2016, 2017 at what ever price they want. Harper would be arbitration eligible in his 25-28 seasons not allowing him to hit free angency until he is 29 year old season. He already has 3 years remaining on his rookie deal at 2 million a year. Force Boras’ hand and the keep Harper locked up through the next decade or let him Put up mostrous numbers in triple A for the next couple years. If I were the Nationals I would leave him in tripple A this year and call him up in May of next year, afterall when was the last time a 19 year old position player made the team out of camp and really made a mark. Another year or two developing would be in the best interests of both parties.

3 years 1 month ago

That is phenomenal idea except for the fact that Nationals park would deteriorate because they would be constantly trumped by the Braves and the Mets if they didn’t.The Nationals felt that with the 2nd past offseason to get werth and the last offseason move to acquire Gonzalez was enough to contend also considering that Strasburg was coming back from season ending surgery.

Jose_Bautista
3 years 5 months ago

Just like Alex Rodriguez!

3 years 1 month ago

either that or this could end up being a Miguel Cabrera 2.I don’t think Washington would sell Harper’s soul for 6 lousy prospects from another team.

jondogg2010
3 years 5 months ago

Simply put, you have an above average prospect such as Harper, Trout or Strasburg. Who cares about contact timing if you have a player who will not only cost less in the here and now, but someone you drafted. That’s why certain teams have been losing for a long time. They feel taking a flyer on a free agent for a one year deal and paying them is better than playing their stud and having to worry about Super Two. I don’t get why there is even talk about this. If you have a player who needs more time in the minors, great! But if you have a stud, play him.

3 years 5 months ago

Because they want to retain the stud they developed a while longer. Now we are seeing teams extend young player and I think thats great but its an exception not the norm.

notsureifsrs
3 years 5 months ago

bryce harper’s age 19 season is not likely to be as good as his age 20 season, let alone his age 24 season. so it isn’t just a question of timing; it’s also a question of quality

on top of that, delaying the start of his rookie season by just a few months means gaining an entire additional season of control during his prime. that’s a season that’s potentially worth $10M-$20M, gained for the price of a couple months delay with a stopgap

throw in the fact that the nationals, for example, have a better shot at contending after 2012 than during, and you have a pretty easy decision there

3 years 4 months ago

less than one month delay necessary…so the math is, 1 month of his age 19 season versus his entire age 25 season…pretty simple really

Twins GM
3 years 4 months ago

GREAT IDEA!  Lets just keep him in the minors till he is out of options so when he is called up he will be in his prime years.  Age 22-27 is much better than 19-24.  After all you want to max out his talent so why not wait so you get more bang for your buck right?  Who cares if he is hitting 40+ HR’s each year in AAA we want to save money!!!

garylanglais
3 years 5 months ago

Nolan Arenado (BA Rank 42) should be on this list and with 0.000 service time he would be part of that top group.

Yes I saw that Ben said many others could be considered but it seemed this list dealt with the players in the BA top 100 who had a chance to play this season.  Arenado may break ST as the Rockies 3b.

notsureifsrs
3 years 5 months ago

arenado was just above average in high-A last year. it would be pretty reckless of the rockies to call him up

garylanglais
3 years 4 months ago

His competition is Casey Blake and little else. Dont sleep on him contributing as early as this season

PhillyTwins
2 years 10 months ago

Well right now, if you google Nolan Arenado it says, Nolan Arenado will not by part of September call-ups.

3 years 5 months ago

Oversight? Devin Mesoraco is listed as SD, when it should be Reds!

cubs223425
3 years 5 months ago

Probably a simple mixup with Grandal.

123Redsox
2 years 11 months ago

who said meseraco?

cubs223425
2 years 11 months ago

This is 6 months old. I don’t even remember what was going on in the slightest.

Sir_Larry
3 years 4 months ago

I’m confused…do the Rays gain anything by holding Matt Moore down in the minors this year, given he signed a contract already?  If not, why is he on this list?

MatthewWHall
3 years 4 months ago

You obviously didn’t read everything

MatthewWHall
3 years 4 months ago

You obviously didn’t read the whole thing.