![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rockies Rumors: Iguchi, Cook, Kip, Holliday | Main | Five Teams Interested In Alexei Ramirez »
UPDATE, 12-6-07 at 1:38pm: Abraham has more than a no comment now - he confirms that the Yankees and Giants have discussed Matsui. Abraham speculates that Noah Lowry could make sense.
UPDATE, 12-6-07 at 12:29pm: Peter Abraham got a "no comment" from Cashman on Matsui. Abraham implies that the no comment could be telling. Abraham also adds that Matsui has said he would waive his no-trade clause.
FROM 12-6-07 at 10:31am:
Good stuff from the Toronto Sun's Bob Elliott today.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534ad9f47970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Giants Discuss Hideki Matsui, Reds Like Rios:


|
|
Move Matsui? Why? Hes one of the few yankee players i like, what the hell is wrong with this organization?
Posted by: 04Forever | December 06, 2007 at 10:34 AM
Yankees have released Carl Pavano, and re-signed him to a minor league contract according to 1050 ESPN Radio in New York.
Posted by: MLB Inisder | December 06, 2007 at 10:34 AM
another bad move, more wasted money
Posted by: 04Forever | December 06, 2007 at 10:36 AM
I wonder if the Cubs can match up with Matsui. This was one of the first guys who came to mind when I read the post about the Cubs wanting a big time left handed hitter. He would be nice in between Lee and A-Ram.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 06, 2007 at 10:44 AM
Assuming Cain/Lincecum are off the marker...
What would the Yanks want for Matsui?
Lowry? Sanchez? Hennessey? Lewis?
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | December 06, 2007 at 10:45 AM
I'd bet they'd take Lowry, how does the salary work though?
Posted by: NYCBaseball | December 06, 2007 at 10:47 AM
The reds have a ton of outfielders and only 4 starting pitchers. They aren't going to trade for Rios.
Posted by: sl | December 06, 2007 at 10:47 AM
Seriously, the Reds have upwards of 6 outfielders, what good would it do to get Rios?
Posted by: longfield | December 06, 2007 at 10:48 AM
1050 ESPN in New York is reporting that there is nothing to these rumors.
Posted by: MLB Inisder | December 06, 2007 at 10:50 AM
probably hennessey and lowry
Posted by: 04Forever | December 06, 2007 at 10:50 AM
I like this idea. Maybe a "Lowry/Roberts" deal, that would free up a bit of money, give the yanks another outfielder and a lefty in their rotation.
Posted by: TriplesAlley | December 06, 2007 at 10:51 AM
MLB Inisder- I hope your right cuz the Giants trading for Matsui has the smell of a the AJ trade all over it
Posted by: silentearth6 | December 06, 2007 at 10:52 AM
Lowry/Roberts would be more than fine with me...
I don't think the Yanks would go for it...
Lowry/Hennessey would give them a #3 starter and a long relief or #5 starter however they choose to use Henny
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | December 06, 2007 at 10:57 AM
I go by what I hear, hey it keeps me from doing work, which I need to get back to soon--
Posted by: MLB Inisder | December 06, 2007 at 10:57 AM
how about the reds trade one of there 6 OF's to the white sox, we need a proven CF'er.
Posted by: trober81 | December 06, 2007 at 11:00 AM
I think the Yankees have literally no use whatsoever for Noah Lowry. I wonder if they could trade Matsui for Pie and co., and then use Pie as the last piece for Johan.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 06, 2007 at 11:01 AM
griffey fits in the KW mold, old and almost washed up, and hes always had a hard on for him.
Posted by: trober81 | December 06, 2007 at 11:02 AM
I could see why the reds would want rios, they do have an excess of outfield but they need a guy that great and that good of value to fill the spots of other outfielders that will most likely be leaving because of trades or they can use rios as trade bait because alot of teams are looking fo outfielders.
Posted by: redsguy44 | December 06, 2007 at 11:04 AM
The only way the Yankees trade Matsui is if they get pieces to trade for Santana.
Posted by: YankeeDudel | December 06, 2007 at 11:05 AM
Every team has use for a starting Lefty
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | December 06, 2007 at 11:07 AM
Not when that lefty walks as many as he strikes out.
Posted by: dcstack | December 06, 2007 at 11:21 AM
Why would the Giants even consider Matsui? They aren't going to contend this year, not the year after that either. I thought that when they let Bonds go, they had come to the realization that they didn't need an aging, overpaid, base-clogging, left fielder who doesn't deserve to actually play in the field. They are going to need to give up prospects to get him. Yet another indication that the Giants front office is the most backwards in baseball.
And you don't trade Lincecum! Pitching wins championships.
Posted by: TheAngelicDoctor | December 06, 2007 at 11:23 AM
I see just about no chance of the reds ever aquiring Rios...they have too much OF'ers....Griffey, Dunn, Freel, Hopper, Hamilton, Bruce....I dont know where exactly they'd fit Rios in there.....ESPECIALLY for Homer Bailey...although not proven, I just dont see the reds trading any P prospects for anything besides a pitching prospect
thats why this leads me to believe that if there is anything here that it could be a 3-Team Deal...but thats for another day
Posted by: cincy_11 | December 06, 2007 at 11:24 AM
besides a pitcher* (in general)
Posted by: cincy_11 | December 06, 2007 at 11:25 AM
Lowry was also a league leader in GIDP / Games giving up 3 or fewer runs.
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | December 06, 2007 at 11:40 AM
I could see the Reds trying to acquire Rios because in a few years they could have OF of Hamilton, Bruce, Rios all of whom would still be fairly cheap and free up cash to go out and get a SP. Now getting Rios this year with out making another move would be tough because there is no place to play him. Maybe there could be a three team trade that looks like this
Jays get
Lincecum/cain
Hennesy
Giants get
Dunn ( if they can work out extension)
Bailey
Reds get
Rios
Listch
Jays get the pitching the looking for, Giants get a big bat, and a SP prospect back, reds get young cheaper rising star OF and a SP. Just throwing it out there, and im not a fan of any of the three teams.
Posted by: thedeuce | December 06, 2007 at 12:06 PM
Adam Dunn would be a great fit for Toronto with his LHB.
I'm also interested in Keppinger (is that his name)? to play shortstop, and obviously Baily...a lot of pieces to get a Rios deal done. Also, Canadian Joey Votto.
Posted by: Guitar Hero | December 06, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Geez...we have to give up BOTH our potential Cy Young awards AND Hennessey??
Wow
Posted by: | December 06, 2007 at 12:34 PM
wow, this could actually happen. i bet they trade Matsui for Hennessey and Lowry and go straight to the twins with those two players
Posted by: 04Forever | December 06, 2007 at 12:36 PM
I'm ok with a Lowry package for Matsui...25 HR's and 100 RBIs..
Much better than Tim for Rios
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | December 06, 2007 at 12:40 PM
theduce:
I could see why that trade would be good for the Reds and Jays, but there's no way the Giants would go for that. Lincecum is better the Bailey and Dunn could be signed after 2008 as a free agent if they wanted him.
Posted by: kdub | December 06, 2007 at 01:04 PM
Yomouri would love to have the favorite son back. Oh wait not those Giants?
I wonder why the Reds would trade pitching when they need it most?
Posted by: coolpapabell | December 06, 2007 at 01:28 PM
This is the dumbest rumor I've heard throughout the entire meetings. The only way the Reds trade for Rios is if we planned on flipping him somewhere else to acquire a pitcher. The Reds are set on offense (perhaps a better hitting catcher is all they need), and are in the market for SPs and middle relief. These rumors are pointless, sounds like someone is just drawing names and teams out of a hat...
Posted by: TheNatural | December 06, 2007 at 01:33 PM
The Reds won't trade any pitching unless it's for another pitcher. Stop dreaming guys! As for the 3 team trade...the reds give up Bailey AND Dunn and get Rios and Listch? Yuck! That doesn't fit their needs at all!
Posted by: TheCincyKid | December 06, 2007 at 01:34 PM
The Duece:
I can see where you're going, but if the Giants "don't" get Rios as their big bat, they would surely need another piece.
Giants would have to also get Encarnacion or Votto in that mix with Bailey & Dunn. But Dunn would have to move to 1B, because I can't see an outfield of Dunn/Matsui/Winn all left handed outfilders none that are very good options for CF.
Posted by: TriplesAlley | December 06, 2007 at 01:37 PM
i see the yankees taking lowry over henny. lowrys a lefty who gets out lefties. if torre was still on board, this would be a done deal. they'd have to get roberts, because, considering if they still have to onclude melke in the santana deal, they're REALLY lean in the OF. this seems like the obligatory "bad trade" the giants are good for every year.
Posted by: totallysuperawesome | December 06, 2007 at 01:42 PM
Blue Jays:
Lincecum, Votto, Chulk
Giants:
Rios, Bailey, Encarnacion
Reds:
Burnett, Sanchez, Lind
Seems like equal value all around.
Posted by: TriplesAlley | December 06, 2007 at 01:43 PM
Don't forget that there's no point in the Giants acquiring Dunn unless they signed him to an extension since after this year he is a FA.
Posted by: TheNatural | December 06, 2007 at 01:43 PM
Triples, that's awful. Burnett is a FA after 2008 as well. The Reds would be trading their future 1B, #2 SP and starting 3B for one year of an oft-injured pitcher. Nice try
Posted by: TheNatural | December 06, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Trading Matsui for Lowry makes no sense to this Yankee fan. He's a softball pitcher with mediocre numbers in a weak NL division (aren't they all?) Bring him to the AL East and he'll have an ERA over five. No thank you.
Posted by: docgonzo | December 06, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Totallysuperawesome:
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Bad trade? Matsui for Lowry/Roberts would be good for the Giants. We'd have a hitter, and we'd get rid of a contract that we don't want. If we get Matsui for 2 years, and get rid of a 2 year contract at 7 million a year, then technically we're only paying about 6-7 million for Matsui that can hit .285 & 20 home runs and has a good arm in Left Field.
I like the trade for the Giants.
Posted by: TriplesAlley | December 06, 2007 at 01:47 PM
Natural: I thought Burnett was under 2 more years? my bad... However, if some sort of extension was done, then this would be a good trade. Sanchez is heat from the lefty position. Burnett is a great young arm, and Lind has pop in the OF.
Posted by: TriplesAlley | December 06, 2007 at 01:48 PM
Wouldn't do Matsui for Lowry, although I like Jonathan Sanchez.
Posted by: YankeeDudel | December 06, 2007 at 01:49 PM
We don't need another OF. Especially since I believe we will be signing Dunn to an extension.
Posted by: TheNatural | December 06, 2007 at 01:51 PM
Sanchez isn't even ranked in the top 50 prospects. Votto is 34th and Bailey is 9th. Trading 40+ HRs and 100+ RBI off the team in Dunn and those two prospects is absolutely not worth a package of Burnett, Sanchez and Lind, who wouldn't start in our OF.
Posted by: TheNatural | December 06, 2007 at 01:56 PM
Burnett's contract includes an opt-out clause after next year. That's the route to FA...
Posted by: TheNatural | December 06, 2007 at 02:01 PM
Lowry would get lit up badly in the AL east.
Please no!
Posted by: PinstripePride26 | December 06, 2007 at 02:10 PM
If cincinnati is going to give up votto, bailey, and encarnacion it better be for Bedard or Haren
Posted by: carolina03 | December 06, 2007 at 02:13 PM
The Natural,
All because a prospect is not ranked in the top 50 it does not determine his worth.
As for the Yanks, I would only trade Matsui + a Prospect for only Cain + Sanchez unless the Twins/A's wanted someone from the Giants organization to trade for Santana or Haren.
I do not see the Yanks trading a 100rbi guy for Lowry who will easily post a 4.75+ ERA in the AL.
Posted by: DRamos | December 06, 2007 at 02:19 PM
DRamos,
I obviously know that is the case. But when the discrepancy between the quality of the prospects is so large, it must be acknowledged when comparing their value.
Posted by: TheNatural | December 06, 2007 at 02:36 PM
Bailey, Votto & Encarnacion for Tim Lincecum
Posted by: TriplesAlley | December 06, 2007 at 02:43 PM
Matsui for CAIN? what? A 33 year old OF for a 23 year old Ace? you're insane.
Posted by: TriplesAlley | December 06, 2007 at 02:45 PM
It'd be Bailey and either Votto or Encarnacion....not both.
Posted by: TheNatural | December 06, 2007 at 02:55 PM
"Yankees have released Carl Pavano, and re-signed him to a minor league contract according to 1050 ESPN Radio in New York."
Breaking News: In a winterball game, Carl Pavano struck out the side in the first inning. Upon entering the dugout, Shelley Duncan proceded to give Pavano a celebratory slap on the ass, and a very hard one at that. Upon contact with Pavano's buttock, it was re-injured and Pavano will be out for 12 months. This disapointing news comes just hours after the Yankees reportedly signed Carl Pavano to a 4 year, 75 million dollar minor league deal.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 06, 2007 at 02:58 PM
"This is the dumbest rumor I've heard throughout the entire meetings."
Then you havent been listening very carefully. The Reds may have lots of outfielders, but that doesnt mean they wouldnt want a superstar in Rios. The Rox have some good pitchers, does that mean they would take Johan? Rios is far more valuable then any outfielder the Reds have.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 06, 2007 at 03:04 PM
Umm what about this:
Giants get:
Hideki Matsui + Cash
Reds get:
Lowry/Sanchez + Hennesy
White and Marquez from the Yankees.
Yankees get:
Joey Votto + a A/AA relief arm.
--
It clears the logjam in the Yankees OF and fills their 1B hole.
It gives the Giants a middle order bat that's cheap (Yankees eat a bit of the salary).
The Reds clear their 1B/OF jam and get 2-3 pitchers for their rotation/relief who're cheap.
Everyone's happy.
Posted by: | December 06, 2007 at 03:05 PM
Sanchez isn't on the top 50 because he is no longer a prospect. After pitching 40 innings for SF in 06 and 52 in 07 I don't think he is qualified as a "prospect"
Posted by: SDSU Aztec | December 06, 2007 at 03:05 PM
"The Rox"
Sox**
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 06, 2007 at 03:05 PM
Here's a thought. The Giants seriously need offense. If they made both trades they're supposedly looking at, they would lose Lincecum and Lowry but get Rios and Matsui. This would free up Winn to be traded, as the Giants already have three good outfielders in Davis, Rios and Matsui. For people wondering why Sabean would do this, consider this: Lowry had career highs in WHIP and walks, and almost had a career high in BAA. He also almost reached his career low in K's. Furthermore, Lowry has been trending towards all of those numbers since his first full season. Similarly, Randy Winn just posted only his second career season with a .300 avg. The Giants can't expect to get the same production out of either Lowry or Winn in 2008, but can certainly expect 2007 numbers out of both Matsui and Rios. Also, remember that Correia broke out as a solid starter at the end of last season. These trades would leave the Giants with a solid pitching staff, as well as solid 3-4-5 hitters.
Posted by: angryseals | December 06, 2007 at 03:22 PM
I doubt the Yanks take Lowry in a deal for Matsui.
Posted by: henry14theking | December 06, 2007 at 03:26 PM
Wait...Giants have to give up THREE quality arms including two lefties for Matsui at a discount?
Geez...where to people come up with these ideas??
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | December 06, 2007 at 03:54 PM
Umm Zito:
The Giants give up 2 in my trade proposal:
1 of Sanchez/Lowry and Hennesy.
They get Matsui and cash (to lower the salary from... 13 mil a year to say.. 9?).
Besides... Lowry's line and trends aren't exactly promising.
The Reds would get back-end starters (Lowry, White, Marquez) and a relief arm (Hennessey).
The Yank's get a 1B.
Each team loses someone from their surplus and gains someone for their needs.
Posted by: henry14theking | December 06, 2007 at 04:06 PM
http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/story/2007/12/6/17331/2509
Posted by: Game555 | December 06, 2007 at 04:13 PM
@Game555:
I don't like that deal.
A productive outfielder for a pitcher who's wet the bed both times he's been called up?
Don't the Yanks have mediocre arms?
Posted by: henry14theking | December 06, 2007 at 04:21 PM
Wow. Why are the Yankees trading Matsui? His production doesn't seem to be too bad.
Posted by: SierraM | December 06, 2007 at 04:22 PM
Sanchez for Matsui? Um...Yes please.
Sanchez has shown NOTHING since he's been called up. Matsui will help the Giants not be as horrible on offense. Nice.
Posted by: NW | December 06, 2007 at 04:36 PM
Sanchez for Matsui? Um...Yes please.
Sanchez has shown NOTHING since he's been called up. Matsui will help the Giants not be as horrible on offense. Nice.
Posted by: NW | December 06, 2007 at 04:36 PM
the yankees should trade matsui for players who then they could turn around and trade to the twins. any ideas?
Posted by: jpnyre | December 06, 2007 at 04:47 PM
3:45 p.m., from Jayson Stark
• A source says the Giants did call the Yankees about Hideki Matsui. They're offering their starting pitchers (Tim Lincecum, Matt Cain or Noah Lowry) for bats, but they are just exploring to see if there is a match. Matsui has a full no-trade clause, and it isn't known whether he would waive it to go to San Francisco or anywhere else
-please, trade matsui and a prospect or two for cain or linecum
Posted by: | December 06, 2007 at 05:10 PM
Giants have Lincecum/Cain signed cheap through 2011-2012... They wouldn't put either of them in a package for Miguel Cabrera deal, it doesn't seem like one of them will go for 26 year old Alex Rios...
And you're saying Matsui and a "prospect" for one of them? Sabean interviwed today said "I don't want prospects"
So, basically, a 34 year old Matsui with 2 years left on his contract (injured the last two years)for Cain/Lincecum 23 year old Co-Ace's signed for the next 5 years?
*blanks stare*
Posted by: TriplesAlley | December 06, 2007 at 06:34 PM
Fay of the Enquierer says "he doubts there is anything" to the Rios/Reds idea. No real suprise here...i dont see the reds even attempting to bring in a new OF...
Posted by: cincy_11 | December 06, 2007 at 07:33 PM
Cain and Lincecum won't go anywhere unless its for an elite young hitter who's under control for at least 3 years. They wouldn't move one of them for Delmon Young or Miggy so there is no way they'll move one for Matsui unless that "prospect" happens to be like Ian Kennedy or Hughes, which it would never be. Lets just dismiss that whole idea.
And I'd be shocked if the Reds went after Rios unless they completely lowballed the Jays just hoping they could rip them off. Which they wont because I think the Jays are fully aware of how good Rios is.
Posted by: scribbletones | December 06, 2007 at 07:57 PM
matsui wont go anywhere with his no trade clause. I think he will retire as a yankee. his image in japan will be badly damaged if he is traded. something which really doesnt happen with top profile players in japan.
Posted by: puroYakyu | December 06, 2007 at 10:02 PM
I doubt that Matsui would waive his no trade clause. I like Matsui and do believe he is way better than Damon but would agree to this deal for Lowhry. The Yankees need a left hander in their rotation and he is only 27. The problem is that Lowhry had a 4.00 ERA in the NL that would translate to a 4.60- 5.00 ERA in the AL and especially in the AL east.
Posted by: yankfan1 | December 07, 2007 at 06:53 AM