![]() |
|
|
| |
« Indians Hope Mets Sign K-Rod | Main | Giants Rumors: Burrell, Turnbow, Sanchez »
9:06pm: Ken Williams speaks. No Dye trade, but plenty of interest.
6:26pm: Dusty Baker spoke about the Dye trade talks today, saying he thought they were "kind of off because of economics and because everybody wants your young players."
MONDAY, 4:24pm: McCoy talks more about the rumor he originated. He said a reliable White Sox insider told him the Dye deal was in place and wonders if Ken Williams changed his mind.
SUNDAY, 10:06pm: Walt Jocketty on the report: "Wrong. It's not even close." The Reds haven't had talks with the Sox since before Thanksgiving.
9:32pm: ESPN's Jerry Crasnick adds that Dye and his agent "haven't heard a word" about a trade. Reds assistant GM Bob Miller rejected the report, adding, "We haven't talked to White Sox since we got here."
8:51pm: Mark Gonzales of the Chicago Tribune says "a source familiar with the talks" rejected the report below. The Sox want more than just Bailey. Gonzales' source adds that talks with the Mets for Bobby Jenks fell apart over Omar Minaya's unwillingness to include Bobby Parnell.
7:46pm: According to Hal McCoy of the Dayton Daily News, a Major League source told him a Homer Bailey for Jermaine Dye trade "is done and will be announced this week."
It'd essentially be six years of Bailey for one of Dye (plus possible draft pick compensation), as Dye has a mutual option for 2010 at $12MM. Those almost never get fully exercised - if one side wants it, the other doesn't. It would be interesting to see what the White Sox could do with Bailey given their recent success developing young pitchers.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105364c3c62970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bailey-Dye Trade Report Shot Down:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: MPM | December 07, 2008 at 07:49 PM
...and after just a few months of speculation! well done!
Posted by: speedchaser9 | December 07, 2008 at 07:49 PM
I really hope there is more to this trade...
Posted by: Alan | December 07, 2008 at 07:49 PM
How long until this gets shot down?
Posted by: cheba63 | December 07, 2008 at 07:51 PM
id be fine with it. ive seen bailey pitch and he just does not have that top of rotation "stuff" he was made out to have. if it is true i wish him luck and hope he puts it together. but dye would be a great fit right between votto and bruce. with cueto , harang , arroyo , owings , volquez , ramierez , maloney , thompson , bailey was expendable to fill a hole that needed to be filled badly.
Posted by: redsfan | December 07, 2008 at 07:54 PM
Fuckin Ken Williams, dont trade Dye you idiot
Posted by: bearsfan545051 | December 07, 2008 at 07:56 PM
Stuff or not, Bailey's biggest problem was that he believed his own hype. The change of scenery and the shock of getting traded might do him some good. We'll see if Don Cooper is as good as they say.
Posted by: MickS | December 07, 2008 at 07:57 PM
White Sox gotta get more for Dye than just Bailey. If they could get another pitcher or Mesoraco or another solid prospect like that this trade would make a lot more sense.
I'd be disappointed if someone told me this:
The White Sox essentially traded Nick Swisher, Javier Vazquez and Jermaine Dye for Tyler Flowers, Homer Bailey, Brent Lillibridge, Jeff Marquez, Wilson Betemit, Jhonny Nunez, John Gilmore and Santos Rodriguez.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 07:58 PM
I hope for the White Sox's sake that they are getting more than Bailey. The guy has one pitch, and all his numbers in the majors are terrible.
Posted by: jtd | December 07, 2008 at 07:59 PM
Oh god no.
This isn't really a good deal for the Reds.
Although this is the year that the Reds could jump out and contend in the NL Central. With the Brewers weak on pitching, and the Cubs being the Cubs...
Posted by: melonis rex | December 07, 2008 at 07:59 PM
Dye wouldn't have been my first choice for that role, much rather have brought in Magglio, but he will do just fine and like has been said the Reds don't lack for young pitching and Bailey has been very disappointing.
Posted by: schellis | December 07, 2008 at 07:59 PM
I'm hoping it's Dye + 1 for Bailey and Dickerson
Posted by: glenallen's hill | December 07, 2008 at 08:00 PM
i think it could be good for both teams. just got and wait and see if its true and if there are any other pieces involved
Posted by: redsfan | December 07, 2008 at 08:03 PM
seems short-sighted for a team that i cant see competing next year
Posted by: chris knight | December 07, 2008 at 08:03 PM
Melonis, seriously?? You're claiming the Reds can compete because the Cubs are the Cubs? They won 97 games last year. They are willing to spend more this year, and are already looking to improve the team. There is no reason to think the Cubs wont win the Central again.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 07, 2008 at 08:04 PM
"I'm hoping it's Dye + 1 for Bailey and Dickerson"
Landing Dickerson would be great for Chicago, but I think that Cincinnati really needs Dickerson in the short term if they're going for it by moving Bailey for Dye.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 08:05 PM
short-sighted team being the reds
Posted by: chris knight | December 07, 2008 at 08:06 PM
"They are willing to spend more this year, and are already looking to improve the team."
Yes, because as we've learned the more you spend on a team the better it automatically gets. I get the point you're trying to make but that's a really crappy argument.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | December 07, 2008 at 08:06 PM
Normally I would say the White Sox got ripped off, but after all of the pitching Ken Williams has acquired, I think this one is going to need time before we say the Reds got the better end of the deal.
Let's not forget, Bailey is only a few years removed from being perhaps the top prospect in all of baseball.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 07, 2008 at 08:09 PM
I'll wait and see if there's a move made by Williams to accompany this before having a friggin' panic attack.
Posted by: TheSchmaranz | December 07, 2008 at 08:12 PM
I have been on board for dumping Vazquez and Swisher. But this trade, I hate it. Trading the most consistent bat since 2005 for a souring prospect seems a stretch.
Posted by: OmegaMan | December 07, 2008 at 08:12 PM
i wouldnt be surprised if white sox want stubbs
Posted by: arly2380 | December 07, 2008 at 08:13 PM
By spending money he meant were fixing our weak spots by adding players (lefty bat). If thats not a good argument for a team getting better im not sure what your looking for.
Posted by: chicubs25 | December 07, 2008 at 08:17 PM
"White Sox gotta get more for Dye than just Bailey. If they could get another pitcher or Mesoraco or another solid prospect like that this trade would make a lot more sense."
No, they don't. Dye is making fair market value. More prospects is a steal for the Sox.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 07, 2008 at 08:18 PM
KW is dumping a lot of salary and stock piling a lot of arms lately. Somethings cookin'.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 07, 2008 at 08:18 PM
I want Dickerson too! Dye has been the most consistent player for the Sox since the World Series! We need to fill a hole in the outfield now if Dye and Swisher are gone that leaves us with Carlos Quentin in RF and who else? Anderson and Owens? We better sign a player like Abreu or Dunn or frankly anybody. The Sox Outfield is looking shaky!!!
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 08:19 PM
My cousins are in Vegas this weekend and they're staying at the Bellagio. I just texted them saying if they see Kenny in the bar to punch him in the face for me.
Posted by: MPM | December 07, 2008 at 08:21 PM
Thank Walt Jocketty!!! I hated this guy as the Cards GM and now I love him as the Reds GM. Homer lost about 5 mph off his fastball and Jermaine fills a huge hole that the Reds can't fill internally this year. Maybe this even leads to them going hard at Furcal or Varitek, since it's apparent they think they can compete.
Posted by: Grizzlyfox | December 07, 2008 at 08:23 PM
MPM, no need for violence against Kenny Williams. Just take away his cell phone.
Posted by: OmegaMan | December 07, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Might make sense to hold off on analysis until we get confirmation from another journalist or until a deal is announced. We are gonna see a lot of stuff shot down over the next four days.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | December 07, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Sad news for sox fans. Even though trading Dye was for the best, If this was just Dye for Bailey, I'm questioning KW. Im questioning his perception of value. Dye isn't worth Bailey, he is worth Bailey and Dickerson. Please KW please have Dickerson in this deal to make this pill a lot easier to swallow.
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | December 07, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Next post season's FA report for Dye:
No option picked up for Dye, because he blew his horrible kness out again and he is not offered arbitration and Homer Baily finally learned how to hit under the tutelage of harold Baines and away from the nagging of Dusty baker and is a 20 HR 80 Rbi .275 Avg guy, while Dye limps to 80 games and the reds get zipity for him by not being able to offer him arbitration and haveng to pay him 12 million to boot for the 2009 season.
Way to go Cincy, no wonder you guys are always fighting it out for the cellar..
Posted by: johns | December 07, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Johns what the heck are you talking about Bailey is a pitcher
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 08:27 PM
"No, they don't. Dye is making fair market value. More prospects is a steal for the Sox."
I'm just surprised that such an established quality bat would land just a prospect like Bailey, whose scouting reports have been slowing getting more negative for months.
I know this guy was one of the ten best prospects in baseball for two years, but that just doesn't seem like a ton of value, considering what one year of Matt Holliday landed.
Maybe I'm undervaluing Homer Bailey, but it just seems like reports from him have gotten really poor. Maybe Don Cooper helps him bounce back, shows him how to throw a nasty cutter or something.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 08:27 PM
Homer Bailey is a pitcher.
Posted by: Alan | December 07, 2008 at 08:27 PM
No option picked up for Dye, because he blew his horrible kness out again and he is not offered arbitration and Homer Baily finally learned how to "hit under the tutelage of harold Baines and away from the nagging of Dusty baker and is a 20 HR 80 Rbi .275 Avg guy, while Dye limps to 80 games and the reds get zipity for him by not being able to offer him arbitration and haveng to pay him 12 million to boot for the 2009 season."
Well Bailey is a SP but if he can hit 20 Hr's and 80 RBI's during inter league play, im all for it!
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | December 07, 2008 at 08:27 PM
ummmm.....Bailey finally learns how to hit? please tell me that was sarcasm?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 07, 2008 at 08:28 PM
Hahshaha...it took exactly 5 seconds for all of the posters to type their collective "WTF" @ johns....wow
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 07, 2008 at 08:29 PM
OOPS Was that a mistake by me above.. meant Bruce.. Did the Chisox get one on them maybe, got jay bruce and Homer bailey mixed up.. My horrific mistake...
Posted by: johns | December 07, 2008 at 08:29 PM
Haha johns that was the most ignorant post in the history of the internet.
Posted by: TheNatural | December 07, 2008 at 08:29 PM
HAHAHAHA I gotcha Guys. I am loco on that one! HAHAHAHA
Posted by: johns | December 07, 2008 at 08:29 PM
"Homer lost about 5 mph off his fastball and Jermaine fills a huge hole that the Reds can't fill internally this year."
?
2007 avg FB: 92.4
2008 avg FB: 91.5
I realize a mph is a big drop but he hardly lost 5 mph his FB this year.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 07, 2008 at 08:30 PM
johns,
I totally agree.
Posted by: BravesRed | December 07, 2008 at 08:31 PM
Would it be at all shocking if KW went after a big fish like CC, Tex, Perez, etc? Or maybe was collecting young arms to package for Peavy?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 07, 2008 at 08:31 PM
"No option picked up for Dye, because he blew his horrible kness out again and he is not offered arbitration and Homer Baily finally learned how to hit under the tutelage of harold Baines and away from the nagging of Dusty baker and is a 20 HR 80 Rbi .275 Avg guy, while Dye limps to 80 games and the reds get zipity for him by not being able to offer him arbitration and haveng to pay him 12 million to boot for the 2009 season."
Are you aware that Bailey is a pitcher?
Posted by: MickS | December 07, 2008 at 08:31 PM
"Homer Baily finally learned how to hit under the tutelage of harold Baines and away from the nagging of Dusty baker and is a 20 HR 80 Rbi .275 Avg guy"
...
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 07, 2008 at 08:32 PM
Johns, Homer Bailey is a pitcher. Thanks.
''KW is dumping a lot of salary and stock piling a lot of arms lately. Somethings cookin'.''
My thoughts exactly. I know that Kenny Williams wanted to lower payroll and stockpile prospects, but for what? Is there a big deal coming via free agency or via trade (Peavy)?
Posted by: MattyMets | December 07, 2008 at 08:33 PM
Horrible trade for the Reds. Bailey's mechanics suck but he's worth more than an aging OF who can't field and has had only 2 good years since 2001.
Posted by: icedrake523 | December 07, 2008 at 08:35 PM
Peavy and Brian Roberts to the Sox in a 3 way blockbuster... kinda far fetched but a man can wish can't he
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 08:36 PM
Now Walt just needs to trade for one of Texas' catchers and sign a healthy Furcal to pair with Phillips up the middle.
Posted by: TheNatural | December 07, 2008 at 08:38 PM
Okay let's just drop the whole Bailey is a hitter post, that's done with.
"2007 avg FB: 92.4
2008 avg FB: 91.5
I realize a mph is a big drop but he hardly lost 5 mph his FB this year."
I think going to Chicago could end up being very interesting for Homer Bailey. If Cooper could help to revive his career in the way he did with Floyd, Contreras, Danks, Loaiza, etc. then that could be huge for Chicago.
Picture a 2010 (and on..) White Sox rotation of Danks, Bailey, Buehrle, Floyd and Poreda.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 08:38 PM
"Would it be at all shocking if KW went after a big fish like CC, Tex, Perez, etc?"
(Singing) One of these things is not like the other... one of these things just doesn't belong...
"Or maybe was collecting young arms to package for Peavy?"
I've actually thought about that at this point.
I could see the White Sox going huge, trying to land Peavy, and then sign Dunn to fill the outfield gap.
The only problem there would be the infield depth. Jerry Owens could play center, Dunn in left, Quentin in right... Ramirez at SS, Konerko at 1B, but then you're really going with Getz and Fields for second and third?
That could be bad. I suppose Betemit can fill in, but I don't know that you want to gamble on him being an everyday player (despite posting solid 162-game averages)
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 07, 2008 at 08:39 PM
would the ChiSox have any interest in Manny?
Posted by: GeneralManager | December 07, 2008 at 08:41 PM
Dunn could possibly be the Sox LF next year. I hope we can make a run for a top of the line pitcher as well
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 08:42 PM
From Cowley:
http://twitter.com/cst_sox/status/1044354168
Posted by: Alan | December 07, 2008 at 08:44 PM
Honestly though, with a big outfield or starting pitcher signing or trade... we still need a CF, 3B and 2B.... this is not looking good....
Posted by: whitesoxfan424 | December 07, 2008 at 08:47 PM
Does KW have a "no-Boras client" policy?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 07, 2008 at 08:49 PM
maybe if this trade actually happens we have another 12 mil cleared up.
padres supposedly wanted flowers and reyes for peavy, why not take bailey, (a right handed equivalent of reyes) and flip him with flowers to the padres for peavy?
Posted by: wsoxfan93 | December 07, 2008 at 08:50 PM
"I could see the White Sox going huge, trying to land Peavy, and then sign Dunn to fill the outfield gap."
I too have thought about this. If Peavy was wanted to play for the Cubs in Chicago, isn't there a decent chance he'd be okay with playing for a good team in Chicago with the White Sox?
The White Sox could easily build a deal around Aaron Poreda, and he would give the Padres the top pitching prospect they crave.
The Sox could offer something like Aaron Poreda, Brent Lillibridge/Chris Getz, Jordan Danks and Santos Rodriguez. '
They're saving like $18M this year on the Vazquez/Swisher trades, and the Dye trade would be another $12M.
Peavy would take up $8M of that, and then assuming the Dye trade went through, the other extra money would go towards the addition of an outfielder (on a two year deal hopefully) and a leadoff hitter.
Sox go with a lineup of:
C- Pierzynski
1B- Konerko
2B- Getz/Lillibridge/Nix
3B- Fields/Betemit
SS- Ramirez
LF- Dunn/Ibanez/Abreu
CF- FA/TRADE LEADOFF
RF- Quentin
DH- Thome
Rotation: Buehrle, Danks, Floyd, Bailey and Richard.
The pitching may be too young though, so they may choose to persue a starter rather than a big name outfielder in this scenario.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 08:53 PM
wsoxfan93- The Padres wanted more than Flowers and Reyes for Peavy. It was more like Escobar, Flowers, and Reyes.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 07, 2008 at 08:54 PM
soxfan93 - I don't think Flowers and Bailey will be enough to land Peavy. Maybe Flowers, Bailey, and Broadway / Richard.
Soxfan424 -
I have faith that Getz can step in and be productive for the Sox next year. I also have faith that Viciedo and Beckham are going to prove they are major league talents and be up by the middle of the season and both producing. I feel the infield is ok. CF is what we need to focus on.... and of course another corner outfielder.
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 08:54 PM
"The Padres wanted more than Flowers and Reyes for Peavy. It was more like Escobar, Flowers, and Reyes."
Obviously. The Braves were clearly willing to move Flowers for a starter. If he could've been the centerpiece to a Peavy trade, it would've happened already. Maybe the Sox form some sort of Flowers and Poreda for Peavy trade, although I'm not sure if that's a great idea for Chicago
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 08:56 PM
If they got manny and peavy where would they rank in the AL?
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 07, 2008 at 08:58 PM
Scribble... your rotation doesn't make sense. You don't have Peavy in there, haha. I'm assuming you messed something up.
Anyhow, yeah... Poreda, Bailey, Flowers, Lillibridge for Peavy. That's a solid package. Add Clayton Richard if they want.
I don't think they'd even need to sign a CF; they'd be better off going with Jerry Owens in center and focusing on improving at shortstop or third base. My own personal opinion there though.
Peavy, Buerhle, Danks, Floyd, Contreras...
Eesh. As a Twins fan, I really hope I'm wrong about all this.
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 07, 2008 at 08:58 PM
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/chi-081207-chicago-white-sox-winter-meetings,0,7672373.story
this claims that the dayton daily news report is false
Posted by: redsfan | December 07, 2008 at 08:59 PM
Trade for Peavy and sign Dunn or Manny...
Kenny's never been a GM who likes to stay quiet. Ugh, I can actually see it happening.
Please no...
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 07, 2008 at 08:59 PM
MorneauVP- Contreras is done. If Clayton Richard and Poreda and Bailey are in the deal, then the 5th starter will be Lance Broadway. Which is good for division rivals.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 07, 2008 at 08:59 PM
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/chi-081207-chicago-white-sox-winter-meetings,0,7672373.story
Nope
Posted by: Alan | December 07, 2008 at 09:02 PM
MorneauVP - improving at SS? Are you forgetting about the runner-up for ROY Alexei Ramirez? SS is his natural position and he is going to play there next year, The Sox do not have a hole or a need to improve SS at all
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 09:02 PM
Forgot about Contreras.
Kenny could always just sign a mediocre fifth starter as well, though that would be fine with me too.
And Alvades,
The White Sox won the AL Central this year... and the World Series in 2005.
Fourth every year?
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 07, 2008 at 09:03 PM
I meant second base, my fault Tough.
Man, I'm struggling tonight, haha.
Posted by: MorneauVP | December 07, 2008 at 09:04 PM
If the Angels fail to get Tex do you think they might want Konerko for a couple of prospects?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 07, 2008 at 09:05 PM
YanksFan -
I'm not so sure Konerko would go for that. He did take less money to play in Chicago so I am thinking he wouldn;t trade his no trade clause in a trade to LAA. Seems like KW might be willing to do this trade though. He seems to be trading every veteran the Sox have
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 09:07 PM
as a twins fan, i'm excited about this trade because it makes them weaker, but kenny williams cutting tons of payroll right before the winter meetings scares me. i could see furcal going to the sox but what about tex or cc?
Posted by: minnesotawins | December 07, 2008 at 09:08 PM
"Scribble... your rotation doesn't make sense. You don't have Peavy in there, haha. I'm assuming you messed something up.
Anyhow, yeah... Poreda, Bailey, Flowers, Lillibridge for Peavy. That's a solid package. Add Clayton Richard if they want."
Wow yeah I blanked there.
And by the way, the White Sox wouldn't include Poreda, Bailey and Flowers all in the same package. More likely it'd be Flowers and one of the pitchers, with additional prospects like Lillibridge, Richard or maybe CF Jordan Danks.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 09:09 PM
Hal McCoy is more reliable than the Tribune guy. Dye is a Red and Bailey is with the White Sox.
Posted by: Cobra Commander | December 07, 2008 at 09:13 PM
ChiCity -
Rumor has it Viciedo is going to turn out to be a pretty hefty guy so firstbase is where he is gonig to be playing eventually. I thought the Swisher trade would make us not trade any OF but that didn't happen so who knows whats going to happen
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 09:17 PM
And there is the answer to my question in the fourth post.
Posted by: cheba63 | December 07, 2008 at 09:18 PM
Whew! I called off my goons....for now!
Posted by: MPM | December 07, 2008 at 09:19 PM
The Reds shouldn't trade Bailey for Dye even up, let alone add anything.
Posted by: Rich | December 07, 2008 at 09:21 PM
"Hal McCoy is more reliable than the Tribune guy."
Oh this is so true. For the love of the Lord, Chicago is so starved for good baseball writers. DeLuca and Cowley are at best ok, but Rogers, Wittenmeyer? To call them "hacks" would be an insult to "hacks".
Posted by: forlife61 | December 07, 2008 at 09:23 PM
This is what I would like to see go down, I think it helps both teams.
Homer Bailey, EE, Matt Maloney, and Freel to the White Sox for Dye, Lillibridge, and Josh Fields
Sox get two young arms to mold which is something that they have proven to be very good at doing. A young 3B that is more a LF/1B/DH type that is a solid offensive plaeyr and a spark plug type.
Reds get a RH power bat to put between Bruce and Votto, a solid SS prospect to give them another MI option and a 3B that like Bailey probably needs a change of scenery.
Posted by: schellis | December 07, 2008 at 09:24 PM
MPM
in my young life i have seen things done by the dodgers front office that has absolutely made me depressed..
this trade would of seemed like one of those depressing moments.
i dont know how people think dye is a elite hitter, hes just not
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 07, 2008 at 09:24 PM
Despite the denials, I expect a deal involving these two will get done eventually. Kenny Williams is very smart. He's cutting payroll because the coming financial disaster will likely cost baseball some 40% in revenue in 2009. 2010 could get much much worse. His boss is never one to be willing to lose money.
Also, don't look for the SOX to invest in more than a single year to any free agent or veteran acquisition. They'll pare that payroll down to $80M by New Years. PK is next to go.
Posted by: TheDel | December 07, 2008 at 09:27 PM
Dye has been one of the Sox best hitters the past 4 years, I wouldn't say he's elite, but he's definitely not bad.
Fields doesn't need a change of scenery, he supposedly is a better fielder than EE at 3rd base, and he hit his first 1/2 season up, but he was hurt a lot last year.
Posted by: rype123 | December 07, 2008 at 09:28 PM
Hal a good writer, but he's been bashing Bailey for years. He absolutely wants this to be true...kinda like Dan Rather and the W documents.
You need to give him a break though, he is legally blind.
Posted by: Dave from Louisville | December 07, 2008 at 09:28 PM
This is what I would like to see go down, I think it helps both teams.
Homer Bailey, EE, Matt Maloney, and Freel to the White Sox for Dye, Lillibridge, and Josh Fields
Sox get two young arms to mold which is something that they have proven to be very good at doing. A young 3B that is more a LF/1B/DH type that is a solid offensive plaeyr and a spark plug type.
Reds get a RH power bat to put between Bruce and Votto, a solid SS prospect to give them another MI option and a 3B that like Bailey probably needs a change of scenery.
Posted by: schellis | December 07, 2008 at 09:29 PM
Pretty much the majority of ML 3Bs are better fielders then EE. I said he was more a LF/1B/DH. Sorry about the double post, didn't show up when I looked for any replies.
Posted by: schellis | December 07, 2008 at 09:30 PM
problem is the Sox still need a 3b, I doubt they trade Fields unless it fills another void, or they get a 3b. He also had a down year/injured year, so they would probably be selling low, which isn't a good idea.
Posted by: rype123 | December 07, 2008 at 09:34 PM
"Homer Bailey, EE, Matt Maloney, and Freel to the White Sox for Dye, Lillibridge, and Josh Fields"
I think that deal is better a little too generous to Chicago. The Reds probably wouldn't give up Bailey and Encarnacion in the same deal, unless they were getting back some serious talent, and I don't think Dye, Lillibridge and Fields is that.
I think that something like Bailey, Stubbs, and Freel for Dye, Fields and Brian Anderson makes a tad more sense.
The Sox get a starter with ace potential that they can develop, an athletic young speed/power combo CF prospect, and a short term CF/leadoff solution, while the Reds get a short term middle of the order hitter and RF, a 4th OF/long term CF option, and a potential short term 3B replacement if the Reds choose to deal Encarnacion.
Maybe then the Reds could move EE to the Rangers for Salty, and call it a day, with a lineup of Salty, Votto, Phillips, Fields, Gonzalez, Dye, Dickerson and Bruce.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 09:40 PM
661dodgerblue
The reason I would be depressed is because if Kenny trades Dye for young talent it tells me he's playing for 2010 not 2009. I think Baily could be a good pitcher but I doubt he could help the Sox win in '09 as much as Dye can. This team did win the division for crying out loud!
Posted by: MPM | December 07, 2008 at 09:44 PM
scribbletone -
The problem with that is Anderson. He has already shown his displeasure in coming off the bench and being a 4th outfielder. If you are going to trade for Anderson it is in your best interest to make him an everyday player or he will potentially become a cancer in the clubhouse.
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 09:44 PM
Reds aren't trading EE. He was on Walt's untouchables list earlier in the offseason.
Posted by: TheNatural | December 07, 2008 at 09:49 PM
John fay shots the dead horse.
http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=blog07&plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3ae57bcc87-152a-4f72-96fb-cc08b1f396efPost%3ac3e801e6-bcc1-4264-83a4-0a80fefc87b9&sid=sitelife.cincinnati.com
Posted by: Dave from Louisville | December 07, 2008 at 09:49 PM
Rangers wouldn't trade Salty for Encarnacion...
Posted by: metzfan22 | December 07, 2008 at 09:51 PM
"Rangers wouldn't trade Salty for Encarnacion..."
If they could, they might. Think about Encarnacion's potential while playing in Texas. That guy could put up 35-40 HR numbers while playing there. A lineup with Hamilton, Kinsler, Davis, Encarnacion, Young and Murphy would be scary.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 07, 2008 at 09:54 PM
Well deal is offically shot, I got worked up for nothing. Thank you KW for showing your not an idiot
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | December 07, 2008 at 09:55 PM
So glad I didn't see this when it was first reported, as a Sox fan, I'd have SNAPPED!
Posted by: astralpanda | December 07, 2008 at 10:00 PM
Dear Hal McCoy -
You are no longer a creditable source. Thanks for writing a bogus report just to get your name out there. You my friend are worthless as a news reporter.
Posted by: Tough | December 07, 2008 at 10:10 PM
This is easily the best time for Dye to be moved. It will happen. It's just a matter of when and to where.
Posted by: Alan | December 07, 2008 at 10:11 PM