MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Pirates Rumors: Pearce, Swisher, Nady | Main | D'Backs Rotation Plans »

Odds And Ends: Johnson, Bloomquist, Smoltz

Links for Saturday:

  • We knew Dan Johnson was heading to Japan, but now it's official. He'll play for the Yokohama BayStars and earn $1.5MM in 2009.
  • Rob Neyer writes that the Willie Bloomquist signing caps an offseason that's cost the Royals a lot and left them with very little top talent.
  • Losing John Smoltz hasn't been easy for the Braves.
  • MLB.com's Tom Singer takes a look at some of the remaining free agent pitchers.
  • Buster Olney creates a team of the remaining free agents and it doesn't look bad. He also has a fun idea for teams who want to sign a Type A free agent without losing their top pick.
  • Jim Johnson seems likely to start the season in the bullpen for Baltimore.
  • Peter Schmuck writes that at a low enough price it would make sense for the O's to gamble on some pitchers to fill out the rotation.
  • Larry LaRue wonders whether the Mariners will hold onto Jamie Burke; Burke does too.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536ba6046970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Odds And Ends: Johnson, Bloomquist, Smoltz:

Comments

Neyer is right on. The Royals are one stupid organization.

Sorry KC fans.

Sure has been tough for us. That free agent team looks like a very solid team. I wouldnt mind that being a line-up for my team.

I think the O's should give Jim Johnson the opportunity to start, and if it doesn't work out, put him back in the bullpen. He has all the tools to become a good starter

KC did get Crisp from Boston and his glove and range should help cover ground that Guillen never would get to in the OF, only not sure that Fahrnsworth will take up the spot that they gave up in Ramirez quite as good.

Bloomquist may have chosen KC also only because they gave him a chance for a regular job and not as a super sub. If he had signed with a contender he certainly wouldn't be getting this negative backlash for such a excellent all around backup.

Worth noting that of course that free agent team looks good, even at discounted prices that is probably a 100 mil+ team payroll.

On Olneys idea about circumventing the system I really doubt it would work. The white sox would have lawyers on the phone quite quickly I would guess. Interesting how the contact said catchphrases instead of saying it was expressly illegal. If it is not I would not be surprised to see some team give it a try. I could see Olneys scenario but somethign would have to go to the white sox as well. They would probably take something over nothing.

"Neyer is right on. The Royals are one stupid organization."

While I don't agree with DM's recent signing, I truly believe you will be eating those words in the near future. This organization WAS stupid, but things are coming together for this organization and very soon it will be reflected in the wins and losses column.

Once upon a time, I was under the impression that a team couldn't trade after signing him as a free agent until at least June. That would seem to put the kabosh on Olney's proposal. Was that a rule once upon a time or am I imagining things?

Here's my question, where have the Royals gotten worse? Maybe the bullpen, but that's TBD still. The whole bullpen was a question mark at this time last year as Soria and Mahay were the only proven commodities on the roster.

They've added an excellent glove in center field with Crisp, who also brings speed on the basepaths.

They added a player with 32 home runs last season in a similarly big ballpark. And don't talk about his defense, cause it's not like they had any gold glovers over there before him. Unless you want Ross Gload playing there everyday again.

Certain truths: water will boil at 100 degree celcius, the sun rises in the east and Rob Neyer will always hate every move teh Royals make.

Honestly, if someone can point out an article he has written in the last 15 years where he has said anything more complimentary than, "that was an okay move" and I'll be shocked.

And he'll always have this vague justification for hating a move. Essentially all of Neyer's arguments regardin the royals can be boiled down to him thinking, they are stupid for making a move or they are stupid for not making the move. They can't win in his eyes.

The fact is since Dayton Moore has came in the Royals have increased their wins by 32%. Sure they had no where to go but up but that isn't something to sneeze at. And they have managed to it all while never making a smart move in Neyer's eyes. Hard to believe what they would have done if they did what Rob thought.

Don't get me wrong Rob is a really really really talented writer and anaylis and should get more national credit than he does. but he is way to bias when it comes to the Royals.

Finally, I don't think you'll hear Dayton Moore and the Glass family about not being able to spend money to compete this year. so his argument at the end of the article is really moat.

Apparently, in some people's eyes the only good moves are when you sign top notch free agents or make trades for top notch players. Small signings like this one or trading for a guy like Mike Jacobs or Coco Crisp don't do enough in their book.

Here's my question though. How much better did the Royals get by replacing Ross Gload at first base? At least 3-5 wins in my estimation. Adding in Crisp at center adds another 1-3 wins. Subtracting Leo Nunez and Ramon Ramirez, replacing them with Kyle Farnsworth/TBD and you maybe lose 1 win. So, overall they gain 3-7 wins.

Apparently that's not good enough for Rob Neyer though.

I agree with you Michael but Mike Jacobs will win the Royals atleast 5-6 more games over Ross Gload just because of all his power that he brings.

You guys are being way too generous with your win appropriations. Jacobs is a replacement level first baseman. Shealy or Butler would have given about the same production over Gload.

And it really should worry you that Gload got so much playing time last year, because Bloomquist is the exact same type of player and its likely to happen again.

Oh, and Crisp really isn't very good.

Shealy and Butler haven't done jack squat. Combined they have 38 home runs in their careers. Jacobs had almost that many just last year! And Butler will most likely be the everyday DH, so he'll still get his 500 AB's.

Bloomquist will end up with maybe as many at bats as Esteban German had last year, 216. That's really who Bloomquist is replacing on the roster in my opinion. He has everything German has (versatility and speed), but he's a better defender than German, who was atrocious defensively.

As for Crisp, he's shown that he can be good in the past. He's battled injuries and lack of playing time last year in Boston. Look at his Cleveland numbers though, they aren't that bad.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.