MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« MLBTR Live Chat | Main | Padres Acquire Eulogio De La Cruz »

Rosenthal On Melky, Matthews, Pedro, Ohman

As usual, good stuff from Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports...

  • Rosenthal says the Yankees are open to moving Melky Cabrera, and opines that the White Sox would be a perfect fit.  Trading Cabrera would open up the Yankees' outfield picture for sure, but leave them shakier in center with Brett Gardner and Nick Swisher.  Rosenthal also says the White Sox have expressed some interest in a deal to acquire Gary Matthews Jr., assuming the Angels pay "the vast majority of the $33MM remaining on the final three years of his contract."
  • Pedro Martinez reached out to the Royals before they signed Sidney Ponson, but KC couldn't afford him.  Would Pedro have been a better signing than Horacio Ramirez and Willie Bloomquist?  Martinez's friends are telling him his $5MM asking price is unrealistic.  Rosenthal says that if Pedro drops it down to $1-2MM, he can probably get the Dodgers and other teams involved.
  • The Marlins are looking for relief help.  They like Will Ohman but not his $2MM asking price.
  • The A's thought they were close to a $1.7MM deal for Joe Beimel before he went to the Nats for $300K more.
  • Catcher Ronny Paulino, acquired by the Phillies from the Pirates in December, is available.  Rosenthal considers the Marlins a possible fit.


Comments

If Pedro drops down to 1 or 2, then he is on the Mets, and Livan is in the pen, and Redding is in the minors.

If RoPaul eats his way out of baseball, I heard Cartoon Network is casting a live version of Roly Poly Oly.

I'd rather the Sox trade for Brett Gardner but that's probably not gonna happen. I'd be happy with almost anything at this point, I like that Rosenthal keeps bringing things up so Kenny can keep getting grilled about it. Standing pat is not gonna fly.

Milky Cabrera is trash. I feel like he's someone that any team would wan't to upgrade over him. Pretty sure any team he is on will play well despite him, or lose because they arent getting anything from his spot.

surely Ohman's worth 2M. Braves should dig deep.

as soon as Ohman and Pedro realize they arent worth 2m and 5m, repectfully, then teams will get in. if pedro goes to 3m, the dodgers will sign him because we could have Mcdonald and Lindstrom in the pen, along with Pedro being able to help the young guys, AND he could help Schmidt learn to pitch with control instead of speed. Schmidt was clocked at 88mph at his minor league game.

with Ohman, we have tried about 10 guys to give the 2nd LHP spot in the pen to. None have worked out and he could be a great pickup for 1.5m. Like tim said in the chat, Ohman has only a week+ until the season and when the season starts, starters are more in demand than relievers.

GMJ to the Sox makes absolutely no sense. Why trade for a CF'er who can field but cant hit? They already have that in Brian Anderson.......accept Anderson is making chump change in comparison with GMJ's millions.

The Chisox are actually 1 team that Cabrera would be a 100% upgrade on at CF. Wise, Anderson and Owens are all AAAA players, none of which on many teams would even be deserving of a roster spot, much less a starter, yet one of these guys is probably going to end up the starting CF on a team that is attempting to win the AL West? How could the Chisox the entire off season and ST allowed this to happen and not gotten SOMEBODY to play the position, not an all star, just a major league caliber player.

The CF answer is not GMJ or Melky...don't want 'em, don't want to give anything up for them...just go with what you got KW, don't just get somebody else's problem to say you did something.Wait a month, bring up Beckham and move Ramirez to CF

"yet one of these guys is probably going to end up the starting CF on a team that is attempting to win the AL West?"

If the White Sox are attempting to win the AL West, then they will fail miserably, since they aren't in that division.

So many needs for the White Sox, in a ideal world, you trade for Melky for air and somehow land a 5th starter.

Do you think Pedro is just waiting for a few starters to go down with injury as the season is about to start? Is he hedging his bets on a desperate team ponying up not $5M but maybe $4M for a quick roster replacement? Maybe that is why he is not budging on price...unless its just an ego thing.

"How could the Chisox the entire off season and ST allowed this to happen and not gotten SOMEBODY to play the position, not an all star, just a major league caliber player. "

Something Melky really isn't. Cabrera wouldn't even be in the majors if Damon could still handle center fielder. Cabrera is neither a quality bat nor an above average fielder, he's the definition of AAAA and trading for him would be a fool's errand.

"So many needs for the White Sox, in a ideal world, you trade for Melky for air and somehow land a 5th starter".

Melky had a down year last year...but is still only 24, a switch hitter with some pop and has already led the AL in assists. Doubtful he's a superstar in the making, but his D and cannon arm alone make him worth more than just "air".

Actually anyone who thinks "The Melkman" is worth anything is full of hot air. For all the Bronx Hype he's still a AAAA guy at best!

"Melky had a down year last year...but is still only 24, a switch hitter with some pop and has already led the AL in assists. Doubtful he's a superstar in the making, but his D and cannon arm alone make him worth more than just "air". "

Yay! Intelligence! Completely agree. Melky is not crap.

"Melky had a down year last year...but is still only 24, a switch hitter with some pop and has already led the AL in assists. Doubtful he's a superstar in the making, but his D and cannon arm alone make him worth more than just "air"."

He's been an everyday player for 3 years and has only regressed the past 2. He's a terrible right handed hitter. He has no pop (hasn't slugged over 400).

He is worth more than air but he's had enough time to show what he is and that is a reserve OF.

Melky is a fine young outfielder. Kind of guy you keep around as a 4th or 5th outfielder. His defense is solid and his bat is passable in a pinch.

My gripe with Melky is two fold. One, he plays on a team that prints money. Why they decided to go cheap at CF is beyond me. Spend $5-10m and land someone decent. The Yanks wouldn't even notice the bump in payroll.

The second gripe is all the nonsense Yankee fans have tried to shove down our throats the past 3 years. We are tired of hearing about your over-hyped players. You know - the same guys who have told us that Kennedy is a top of the rotation starter. It gets really old to hear the same garbage year after year.

Other than that Melky is a good organizational type player. He has a role in the bigs and would be a decent addition to most teams. Just don't start him or have unrealistically high expectations.

I do think the Angels and White Sox could hook up on some sort of a deal. Here is how I would start the deal.

Take Konerko and Matthews as the big salary guys.

Konerko has 2/24 left
Matthews has 3/33 left

Konerko had a mediocre last season, posting an OPS+ of 102 (barely above LA). He was also injured missing 40 games. His 2007 season was fine (OPS+ of 116) but nearly 20 points lower than his previous 2 seasons. It's fair to say Konerko is showing signs of major performance degradation.

Matthews was awful in 08. He was injured and ineffective (although his injury was directly responsible for a portion of his ineffectiveness). Matthews was slightly below LA with the bat in 2007 (OPS+ of 93). That came on the heels of his one great year in 2006 (OPS+ 121).

I think it's entirely fair to say that Konerko as a 1st baseman is more valuable than GMJ as a CF. However, the gap isn't that large. GMJ appears still capable of posting an OPS+ close to 100 while Konerko is sliding. How quickly he slides is the real question.

Trading straight up simply won't work. So, we throw in another player. We add Kendry Morales to the trade. Morales costs nothing and immediately fills in Konerko's spot. Kendry is an unproven commodity but has plenty of upside.

Finally, you adjust the dollars. Have the Angels eat $4-5m of Matthews contract.

That brings the deal to:

Chicago gives up Konerko (2/$24m)
and receives
Matthews (3/$33) + Morales + $5m

The Angels dump the extra contract in the OF and get an established power hitter at 1B. The White Sox plug a hole in CF, save some money and get a young, controllable 1st baseman.

Kendry Morales sucks!GMJ sucks!I'll take my chances with Konerko and whoever in CF!You want the Sox to take two deadbeats for the team captain that had a down year because of injuries.Plus eat salary?Konerko actually had a pretty decent second half last year.

bjsguess-

I really don't think there's any way the White Sox make that deal.

By the time Konerko's contract has ran up, it's highly likely than Brandon Allen or Dayan Viciedo will be ready to take over, and I just really, really hate the idea of bringing GMJ and his crap contract to Chicago.

Matthews has never really been that good, he received an awfully huge amount of luck in 2006, and his defense really isn't good anymore. The upgrade from Anderson/Wise to Matthews is near nothing, and while I think Kendry Morales is an interesting piece, for sure, I also think Konerko is bound to bounce back some and regain some of his value.

I'd actually rather have Melky. While he's not the leadoff hitter they need, he plays solid defense and has shown the ability to get on base a little.

I'd rather keep Konerko, see what he does this year, look for different (cheaper!!!) solutions for center, and assume that one of Viciedo/Allen will take over at first when Konerko's contract runs up.

I'd rather have KW come out of retirement then trade for GMJ..

Whoever said that Melky Cabrera wouldn't be an upgrade on any team... I advise you to check out the sox current CF. He'd be an upgrade over any of the ones they have now.

Konerko looked like his old self in the second half last year (.270/.374/.535), despite a low BABIP (.255 vs. .281 career). Morales hasn't shown that he can hit big-league pitching yet - not to say he won't, but that's a huge step down at 1B for the short term. GMJ's and Konerko's salaries match up pretty well, but I don't see that happening.

Besides, I'll bet Kenny Lofton could roll out of bed tomorrow and easily outhit Matthews in the leadoff slot. He's still looking to play, isn't he? Why not give the guy a million bucks and see what he can do?

"Kendry Morales sucks!"

You are kidding, right? Morales is one of the best pure hitting prospects in all of baseball. That, and he can play 3B and the OF corners. Personally, I think the Angels would be really unwise to give up on Morales now, because I believe he is primed to hit .310/.360/.480 out of the box.

"I'll bet Kenny Lofton could roll out of bed tomorrow and easily outhit Matthews in the leadoff slot. He's still looking to play, isn't he? Why not give the guy a million bucks and see what he can do?"

Not for power and Kenny can't play CF anymore.

I do think the Angels and White Sox could hook up on some sort of a deal. Here is how I would start the deal.

Take Konerko and Matthews as the big salary guys.

Konerko has 2/24 left
Matthews has 3/33 left

Konerko had a mediocre last season, posting an OPS+ of 102 (barely above LA). He was also injured missing 40 games. His 2007 season was fine (OPS+ of 116) but nearly 20 points lower than his previous 2 seasons. It's fair to say Konerko is showing signs of major performance degradation.

Matthews was awful in 08. He was injured and ineffective (although his injury was directly responsible for a portion of his ineffectiveness). Matthews was slightly below LA with the bat in 2007 (OPS+ of 93). That came on the heels of his one great year in 2006 (OPS+ 121).

I think it's entirely fair to say that Konerko as a 1st baseman is more valuable than GMJ as a CF. However, the gap isn't that large. GMJ appears still capable of posting an OPS+ close to 100 while Konerko is sliding. How quickly he slides is the real question.

Trading straight up simply won't work. So, we throw in another player. We add Kendry Morales to the trade. Morales costs nothing and immediately fills in Konerko's spot. Kendry is an unproven commodity but has plenty of upside.

Finally, you adjust the dollars. Have the Angels eat $4-5m of Matthews contract.

That brings the deal to:

Chicago gives up Konerko (2/$24m)
and receives
Matthews (3/$33) + Morales + $5m

The Angels dump the extra contract in the OF and get an established power hitter at 1B. The White Sox plug a hole in CF, save some money and get a young, controllable 1st baseman.

Posted by: bjsguess | March 25, 2009 at 05:39 PM

Bjsguess,

That's a terrible trade for the white sox to make.
While Konerko has declined, he was also hurt for most of the first half of last year. If you look at his numbers in the second half when he was healthy, they were more in line with his what his career stats are. Konerko has no speed, probably won't hit higher then .260 if that, but when healthy he still is good for 25-35 HRS, 90-100 rbis and an OBP around .340. GMJ could play two seasons before he equals Konerkos HR and RBI total.

GMJ has had more then one bad year... if you look at Konerko and GMJ's stats... GMJ's best year was barely better then Konerko's worst year.

As for throwing in Kendry Morales. There's a reason he costs nothing cause He sucks.. I can piss further then he can hit. I'll take Konerko's upside a full year healthy over anything Morales could do.

While the white sox are trying to cut payroll and already have, I don't see them trading arguably their most popular player to do it especially before the year starts. I can definitely see them trading him in July if they are out of playoffs. The other thing is no way they want GMJ for three years unless the Angels pick up ALL of his contract

"Kendry Morales sucks!"

You are kidding, right? Morales is one of the best pure hitting prospects in all of baseball. That, and he can play 3B and the OF corners. Personally, I think the Angels would be really unwise to give up on Morales now, because I believe he is primed to hit .310/.360/.480 out of the box.

"I'll bet Kenny Lofton could roll out of bed tomorrow and easily outhit Matthews in the leadoff slot. He's still looking to play, isn't he? Why not give the guy a million bucks and see what he can do?"

Not for power and Kenny can't play CF anymore.

Posted by: AA | March 25, 2009 at 06:42 PM

AA,

With the line you just gave us on Morales avg/obp/ops... that is horrible for a position that is a power position. I'd also be willing to bet you my white sox season tickets (they are great seats by the way) that Morales hits nowhere near .310 and is even further away from a .360 obp. I don't know if he can play 3B, and the corner OFs or not, but if he can he sounds like he'd make a decent utility player...exactly what he probably will be or the next Mark Grace

just want to make sure i make it clear when i said his line was horrible for a 1B i was referring to the ops of .480 only... the .310 and .360 avg and obp would be very good for any 1B, i just dont see Morales coming anywhere close to either this year

"The second gripe is all the nonsense Yankee fans have tried to shove down our throats the past 3 years. We are tired of hearing about your over-hyped players. You know - the same guys who have told us that Kennedy is a top of the rotation starter. It gets really old to hear the same garbage year after year".

First of all...where do Yankee fans "shove players down your throat"? A Yankees thread where Yankees fans are discussing players...you show up for some odd reason and then get pi$$ed about what you read. Don't like what Yankee fans have to say...don't go onto Yankee threads...problem solved!

Secondly, ALL fans think their teams prospects can amount to something because they follow them through the system and listen to the internal hopes.

Thirdly, who has been "over-hyped" thus far? Joba? Hughes? Cano? Veras? Coke? Ramirez? Aceves? All of them have performed pretty well when healthy. Kennedy...whom you mentioned...has been in pro ball a TOTAL of two years...shot up thru A, AA and AAA in one summer...dominating every stop along the way in 2007 and then went 1-0 1.90 in 3 starts with the Yankees. YES... last year he regressed majorly and in 9 WHOLE starts had an 8.17 era. However, only an idiot would think a 24 year old with two total years in pro ball is now "over-hyped" and a piece of sheet because he had a 9 game set-back. The verdict is still out...he may be a decent starter, he may not. Nine good game or nine bad ones WON'T decide that.

You can pick out MANY stud pitchers baseball cards and see where they pitched well in a cup-o-coffee...then struggled...then came back and pitched well once they straightened themselves out. It's not a new concept.

"Kendry Morales sucks!"

You are kidding, right? Morales is one of the best pure hitting prospects in all of baseball. That, and he can play 3B and the OF corners. Personally, I think the Angels would be really unwise to give up on Morales now, because I believe he is primed to hit .310/.360/.480 out of the box.

"I'll bet Kenny Lofton could roll out of bed tomorrow and easily outhit Matthews in the leadoff slot. He's still looking to play, isn't he? Why not give the guy a million bucks and see what he can do?"

Not for power and Kenny can't play CF anymore.

Posted by: AA | March 25, 2009 at 06:42 PM

AA,

While I won't disagree with you about what you said about Kenny Lofton not being able to play CF anymore and not being to hit for power... but I'd like to know what year you remember Kenny Lofton being a power hitter

AA,

While I won't disagree with you about what you said about Kenny Lofton not being able to play CF anymore and not being to outhit GMJ for power... but I'd like to know what year you remember Kenny Lofton being a power hitter

Posted by: xxgochisox09 | March 25, 2009 at 07:14 PM


Sorry my typing has been horrible tonight. I think Im thinking faster then I can type and leaving words out

Kendry Morales is not a prospect. He is 26 years old and entering his peak years of production right now. Maybe he'll click right away and hit the ground running. If he doesn't, his learning curve is going to meet declining skills.

Ohman seems stubborn enough to try and hold out for what he wants as opposed to what he can get. I remember him nearly going to arb with the Cubs his last year there because he asked for more than he probably should have. I can't fault him for wanting to do the best he can but at some point he needs to be realistic and accept the best offer available to him and get in camp. He's already behind everyone else.

Kendry Morales hasn't proven himself in the bigs? Genius guys. He's had a total of 377 major league AB's. Of course he hasn't proven he can hit in the majors. You need to play in the majors before you can prove that you can hit in the majors. He has however, hit in the minors just fine. Posted a 919 OPS in 2008 and has a career minor league OPS of 901. Take spring training for what it is but so far he has accumulated a BA over 300 and shown good power. It's reasonable to expect an OPS anywhere between 800 and 850 (which is right around Konerko's last 2 years).

Hate on Matthews all you want. Take you chances - I'm sure it will work out just fine.

Dewayne Wise has never had more than 162 AB's in a season (age 30). His career OPS is 639.

Then you have Anderson. 27 YO, has a career OBP of 277 (OPS of 656). He has accumalated 600 AB's over the past 4 seasons in the bigs. His AAA OPS is sub 800 over 2 years.

Finally, you have Jerry Owens. A guy with a subpar OBP of 321 and an even LOWER SLG% of 312. That's over nearly 400 AB's. He'll be 28YO. Over 6 years he sported a career Minor League OPS of 718.

Good luck with that. 3 guys that have subpar career minor league records. None of whom have done ANYTHING in the majors.

Kendry Morales hasn't proven himself in the bigs? Genius guys. He's had a total of 377 major league AB's. Of course he hasn't proven he can hit in the majors. You need to play in the majors before you can prove that you can hit in the majors. He has however, hit in the minors just fine. Posted a 919 OPS in 2008 and has a career minor league OPS of 901. Take spring training for what it is but so far he has accumulated a BA over 300 and shown good power. It's reasonable to expect an OPS anywhere between 800 and 850 (which is right around Konerko's last 2 years).

Hate on Matthews all you want. Take you chances - I'm sure it will work out just fine.

Dewayne Wise has never had more than 162 AB's in a season (age 30). His career OPS is 639.

Then you have Anderson. 27 YO, has a career OBP of 277 (OPS of 656). He has accumalated 600 AB's over the past 4 seasons in the bigs. His AAA OPS is sub 800 over 2 years.

Finally, you have Jerry Owens. A guy with a subpar OBP of 321 and an even LOWER SLG% of 312. That's over nearly 400 AB's. He'll be 28YO. Over 6 years he sported a career Minor League OPS of 718.

Good luck with that. 3 guys that have subpar career minor league records. None of whom have done ANYTHING in the majors.

Posted by: bjsguess | March 25, 2009 at 08:45 PM


Bjsguess,

You contradict yourself horribly it's not even funny in the post above.

You talk about how bad the white sox CFs are and think they should trade for a more proven guy like GMJ, but then in the same post you argue the white sox should trade a proven guy like Konerko for an unproven guy like Morales. Morales has shown as much as Owens and Anderson in the majors so far NOTHING. I'm glad Morales is having a good spring training, so is this the 5th or 6th year he's looked great in spring training then?

Here's the even more absurd part.. the white sox do need CF help. but the trade you suggest is stupid and one you can make on MLB the Show if it makes you feel better. You keep saying Konerko is going to decline, konerko is going to decline...GMJ ALREADY HAS DECLINED

The only thing I can think of is you must be a relative of GMJ. Next time you see him, see if he'll loan a bit of the $15 million he makes so you can buy a book and brush up on your baseball sense

Bjsguess,

I didn't even mention that not only has GMJ already declined. He's 34 and coming off knee surgery on top of that... I've wasted enough time debating this with you. It's obvious you're either related to GMJ or a huge Angels fan that badly wants them to get Konerko... I still think they might, if the sox are out of it by the trade deadline, but I can promise you that GMJ wont be the guy the sox want

"If Pedro drops down to 1 or 2, then he is on the Mets, and Livan is in the pen, and Redding is in the minors. "

I'll agree with that for the most part, but don't forget Redding has a Major League deal. Ideally, this would happen sooner than later. Pedro won't be ready for opening day at this point, but if he could be ready after a week or two, my guess is Livan stays in the minors and gets left there and Redding starts the season on the DL and slots into the pen when he comes off.

I don't really think this is all that big a deal though. Livan got off to a very good start last year and has looked sharp enough. At the very least, he should be a fine 5th starter for the first half, at which point you can either hope Niese is ready or evaluate the deadline trade market if you need to. Pedro obviously has more upside, but I'm not getting particularly excited about a few dominant innings against the Netherlands. But at this point I'm not really so worried about guaranteeing him a roster spot out of some misguided sense of loyalty either, its become clear he'll have to earn that status wherever he winds up.

Is there writing about a Konerko/Mathews swap? Cause if its just fans talking theres about 99% chance it wont happen.

And that GMjr. contrace for the angels a few years back is looking more and more horrible every day. That's a pretty rare mistake for the Angels. Besides giving up Kotchman and Marek to my Braves for 2 months of Teixera.

"Rosenthal says the Yankees are open to moving Melky Cabrera, and opines that the White Sox would be a perfect fit. Trading Cabrera would open up the Yankees' outfield picture for sure, but leave them shakier in center with Brett Gardner and Nick Swisher."

+++ Would be nice if Rosenthal would stop making $h!t up, first it was the Yankees were going to trade Nady/Swisher, now its they will move Cabrera to free up the outfield. Newsflash dead wrong.

Matsui, Damon, Nady are all FA at the end of the season, that will serve to free up something for sure. There is no reason this season the Yankees can't carry Cabrera and Swisher. Melky is insignificant in the broader picture.

He will be used as a reserve late in games, to pinch run, make starts in CF on some days, don't know when Gardner became Joe Dimaggio. Gardner is a nice young player but I doubt Cashman is carried away by him. He'll keep both of these guys on their toes to push each other over the season. Also Cabrera can be a late game defensive replacement for Johnny Damon in LF, to have a faster late inning outfield, with better defense, stronger arms. Quite a few times last season the Yankees would start Gardner in CF, with Damon in LF and late in the game replace Damon with Cabrera, sometimes shifting Cabrera to CF and Gardner to LF, because of Melky's arm.

Rostenthal should seriously stop making $h!+ up. Shouldn't he be talking about Derek Jeter's range or age or some more dumb crap. The Yankees have nothing to lose by keeping Cabrera as a reserve OF and rotating him with Damon in LF and Garnder in CF to keep them fresh and productive over the course of a long season. Nady and Swisher will figure themselves out in RF.

For as much as people laugh at the Yankees bench it is nice to know that late in the game they can pinch run with Cabrera, pinch hit with Swisher and make defensive replacements. All that goes into winning, in baseball no team stays healthy from beginning to end for 162 games.

"For as much as people laugh at the Yankees bench it is nice to know that late in the game they can pinch run with Cabrera, pinch hit with Swisher and make defensive replacements. All that goes into winning, in baseball no team stays healthy from beginning to end for 162 games. "

THANK YOU.

I mean, the A's have Nomar on the bench. A bunch of other teams have "expensive" players on the bench. The Yanks stocked up so they don't have to go get Holliday next offseason. And they won't be forced into a trade midseason if someone gets hurt, since they'd have to overpay in terms of prospects to get a OF/DH type. The Yanks gave up no top prospects for Swisher.

Mac Fan . .when did Melky Become Joe D ??

The Yanks don't NEED Melky . Yes Matsui , Damon , And Nady are free agents . But we can deal with that next season. The Yanks will resign one of the three .and if Gardner fails , big deal Austin Jackson will be up maybe mid season or next. Plus they'll grab a free agent to play outfield . But thats all next year .

This Year. Gardner won the competition.
And whats your idea of Melky becoming a late inning base runner .. When did he become rickey henderson . .He's not that fast . doesn't steal bases . and is overall a HORRIBLE base runner

What does Melky Offer. he couldn't hit water if he fell off the boat .. He has a great arm . .thats it .

Gardner offers SPEED . Game Changing Speed .

"THANK YOU.

I mean, the A's have Nomar on the bench. A bunch of other teams have "expensive" players on the bench. The Yanks stocked up so they don't have to go get Holliday next offseason. And they won't be forced into a trade midseason if someone gets hurt, since they'd have to overpay in terms of prospects to get a OF/DH type. The Yanks gave up no top prospects for Swisher."


++++ You're welcome, I don't know where this notion of trading Melky came from. Melky is not a star but can be a solid bench player in such a role as a 4th OF, able to start some days for Damon, Gardner, pinch run for guys like Nady, Matsui, even Teixeira, slow footed guys and come into games late defensively for say a Damon.

Having Swisher who can play 1B/OF can allow the Yankees to make many late game moves, they wouldn't have to worry about pinch running for say Teixeira and having him out of the game because Swisher can play 1st when Mark is out of the game.

Having someone like Melky who is solid defensively cannot hurt late in the game, the issue with Melky is his offense not his glove and arm.

Cashman would be foolish to trade him, when we don't know fully what Gardner is all about and its not like Damon will play 162 games, plus you weaken your bench and any flexibility having Melky provides.

From all indications I see the Yankees intend to keep Gardner and Cabrera and let them push each other over the course of the season.

Is there writing about a Konerko/Mathews swap? Cause if its just fans talking theres about 99% chance it wont happen.

And that GMjr. contrace for the angels a few years back is looking more and more horrible every day. That's a pretty rare mistake for the Angels. Besides giving up Kotchman and Marek to my Braves for 2 months of Teixera.

Posted by: bravesfansc | March 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM

Braves,

It was mentioned in this rumor that this comment thread is about. The discussion has been with some delirious guy, who not only thinks GMJ is a great player, but thinks the sox should trade konerko to get him. He references the sox needing CF help because all their guys have proven nothing at the major league level (which he is right about) but then in the same post expects the sox to trade a proven player like konerko for a guy who has done nothing at the majors like Kendry Morales. He seems to think cause Morales has had a great spring we should begin the write in campaign for the all-star game for him.

Basically he wants them to make a minimal upgrade in CF and get GMJ (who not only sucks, but is 34 and coming off knee surgery) and then potentially make a major downgrade at first in the same trade. To me it's like buying a car, turbocharging it and then changing the engine from an 8 to 4 cylinder... It's possible GMJ could be traded to the sox, but I'll almost guarentee it wont be for anyone like Konerko and the angels are going to have to pay at least 8 of his 11 million dollar a year salary

I've decided this guy has to either be a relative of Kendry Morales, GMJ's agent or a huge angels fan that really, really wants konerko.

And I also understand what you're saying about it just being fans talking to fans, but that's what these comment things are all about. I'm not the only one that thinks this would be an insane trade for the white sox to make. I admit i have been proven wrong and made to look foolish plenty of times on this site , but when I do I acknowledge it, usually credit the guys that proved me wrong, and definitely don't keep trying to hammer the same thing down everyone's throat. (in fact if you want a perfect example find the thread yesterday about the Peavy to the Brewers and the debate I had with a guy who proved me wrong in the end)

Mac Fan . .when did Melky Become Joe D ??

The Yanks don't NEED Melky . Yes Matsui , Damon , And Nady are free agents . But we can deal with that next season. The Yanks will resign one of the three .and if Gardner fails , big deal Austin Jackson will be up maybe mid season or next. Plus they'll grab a free agent to play outfield . But thats all next year .

This Year. Gardner won the competition.
And whats your idea of Melky becoming a late inning base runner .. When did he become rickey henderson . .He's not that fast . doesn't steal bases . and is overall a HORRIBLE base runner

What does Melky Offer. he couldn't hit water if he fell off the boat .. He has a great arm . .thats it .

Gardner offers SPEED . Game Changing Speed .

++++ I think you need to read the post again, I am not a Melky fan, what I am saying is that it provides flexibility late in the game for the Yankees having him on the bench. He is certainly faster than Swisher, Molina, Ransom, Berroa or any of the guys on the bench that is my point as a pinch runner, he is a solid glove and can be used in place of Damon late in games because of his stronger arm.

What I am suggesting is that he can fit a role on this team this season. The only way trading him made sense is if Matsui was going to play the oufield and on two bum knees Girardi has said that Matsui may only play the field in interleague play.

You seem to be under the assumption that I am a Melky fanboy, I'm not by any stretch, I know he can't hit to save his life, but he can function as a decent bench player because of the defensive qualities I mentioned and he is faster than any of the other guys on the bench, so Ricky Henderson or not is besides the point.

If Melky is traded the bench is

Molina - C

Ranson - IF (when Arod returns)

Swisher - OF/IF

that is not much of a flexible bench dude, unless you expect all the starters to play for 162 games with no injuries and play every inning of every game from the beginning to end, with no strategic moves by Girardi late in the game.

My point is Melky provides late game flexibility, not offensively, but defensively and on the bases.

Why are you mentioning Gardner, Gardner will be the everyday starter as things currently stand, however he is not part of the equation I'm discussing the role of Melky for, a bench player who gives the Yankees options late on in the game.

Isn't it better to have Melky running the bases late instead of Matsui, Nady, Teixeira, even Swisher. Isn't it better to have Melky in a close game late in LF instead of Johnny Damon.

I'm talking about Melky in a bench role, you seem to think I'm implying he should be a starter, which I don't by any stretch. That was my point.

Sometimes I read stuff and it makes me laugh. You guys are creating a 25 man roster as if you're tolling thru a pack of baseball cards and just going by a guys 2008 stat line. Melky may or may not become a star one day. He certainly hasn't proven himself yet. However, he's absolutely shown ability to be a useful reserve player. If he is traded it will be because the Yanks choose not to carry a 5th OF since it seems as if Gardner has won the starting job and Swisher will be the 4th OF and back up 1B.

Say what you want about Melky, but he's 24 yrs old, has 415 games under his belt and has avg'd a line of .268/.329 130 hits, 20+ dbls and 8 hrs. Defensively, he's avg'd 12 OF assists a year. And DING, DING, DING..he's only making 1.4 mil a year. Look around baseball and Melky's numbers are comparable to other 4th OF'ers like Mark Kotsay (1.4 mil), Dave Dellucci (4 mil) and Gabe Kapler (1 mil).

If there were a 26 man roster I would have no problem keeping Melky and if someone went down I would feel comfortable with him filling in. And if people feel that a 24 yr old can't improve then that's just stupid.

"However, he's absolutely shown ability to be a useful reserve player."

That's beeen my point all along about this Melky subject, by no means do I think he should be the everday starter, but in a bench role he doesn't hurt. There is a lot of slow footed guys in the middle of the Yankees order, such as

Teixeira

Matsui

Posada

Nady

Having Swisher and Cabera on the team's bench allows the Yankees to pinch run for one of those guys above with Melky, use Swisher to replace a Teixeira, Swisher/Melky to replace Nady, Molina to replace Posada. Melky to replace Damon in the field

It may not be a big deal but that flexibility may mean an extra couple of late wins because of strategic moves. That is important in what will amount to a very close division race all year long.

Trading Melky would make a thin Yankees bench even thinner. What are we going to do trade Melky and keep Berroa, he of the god awful defense in the IF.


"Gardner offers SPEED . Game Changing Speed ." Even Yankee brass is worried about whether or not the guy can hit however, something he has really struggled with in the minors even and has shown almost no ability to hit for any kind of extra base. Speed will be his only attribute and he MUST be able to get on base to use it.

Cabrera probably has not already been traded for the very reason above.. Worry over Gardner's ability to get on base and no one else on the roster is really suited to play CF anymore since Damon is no longer the iron man he once was.

The talk of Mathews for Konerko above is really hard to fathom, why the Chisox would want to give up him in exchange for a likewise overpaid and lesser productive overpaid player is baffling. If they could get rid of Konerko and not have to eat another bad contract? Maybe, but to take on another as bad as Mathews, that is just crazy. Take Juan Pierre's at least so something is added to the team (speed/CF) that you need, not a useless piece in Mathews who is almost as bad as Andruw Jones.

"The discussion has been with some delirious guy, who not only thinks GMJ is a great player, but thinks the sox should trade konerko to get him. He references the sox needing CF help because all their guys have proven nothing at the major league level (which he is right about) but then in the same post expects the sox to trade a proven player like konerko for a guy who has done nothing at the majors like Kendry Morales. He seems to think cause Morales has had a great spring we should begin the write in campaign for the all-star game for him."

Actually, bjsguess is a pretty educated poster, it's just that you can see a little bias in his suggestion.

He clearly thinks too much of Matthews, a guy that's very talented, but outside of one great season, he's never been a terribly good player.

His once great defense has declined a lot, and he's posted UZR's of -7.1 and -8.9 the past two years.

He gets some walks, but he's always had issues with contact, and every good offensive year he's had has been fueled by a high BABIP. Now that he's slowing down and hitting less line drives, his BABIP will likely never hit those levels again, and I honestly think his upside is close to what he did in 2007 in his first year in LA.

I'm open to dealing Konerko, he's a good player but he's a tad overpaid, but I really don't think Gary Matthews is even close to the best option they have, especially when factoring in his HORRIBLE (!!!) contract.

And honestly, Morales does have some pretty legitimate offensive upside. He's consistently mashed AAA, and outside of 2007, his time in the majors has been plagued by godawful luck. He's solid defensively, makes a lot of contact, and has solid power. But he is getting rather old, and he really needs to prove himself now or be considered a bust. And Morales CANNOT play an adequate defensive third base, as bjsguess had claimed.

“You are kidding, right? Morales is one of the best pure hitting prospects in all of baseball. That, and he can play 3B and the OF corners. Personally, I think the Angels would be really unwise to give up on Morales now, because I believe he is primed to hit .310/.360/.480 out of the box.”

Are we thinking about the same Morales here?

.315/.362/.534/.896 in 2005 A+/AA (age 22)
.320/.359/.520/.879 in 2006 AAA (age 23)
.341/.385/.486/.871 in 2007 AAA (age 24)
.341/.376/.543/.919 in 2008 AAA (age 25)

This is a player who has had but 1 season of 900+ OPS in the minors, and it came in his third season at AAA at the advanced age of 25. He isnt a real prospect because of his age, and a three year career .335/.374/.518 line in AAA doesn’t get close to saying “best pure hitting prospect in all of baseball”. The Major League equivalent of that line is right around .300/.340/.430/.770. That would be absolutely horrid from a 1B/DH.

And where did the “can play 3B” come from? He played 3 games there at A+ in his first year in professional baseball. Similarly, he also can not be expected to play in the outfield unless it is an absolute pinch. 1B/DH is his destiny, and a 1B/DH with a career AAA OPS of .892 without getting real playing time in the majors before he turns 26 just doesn’t say much for his future.

Without the names on the back of the jerseys, I imagine most people would take Matt Murton to Kendry Morales if they had seen their minor league careers to the age 26 season. Murton has better overall production with more of an eye, some speed and seems more inclined to handle the outfield. Cant understand why Morales comes with so much more hype though, and it might be time to lower some of the unrealistic expectations placed on him.

So few Angels prospects have lived up to the hype they came with, the hitter friendly minor league clubs the Angels just inflate the numbers too much to get a real gauge of their prospects values. Morales will be just another in this line. But think of it this way. Kotchman’s minor league numbers pummel those of Morales, and were put up when he was 2 years younger (the two are the same age now), yet Kotchman is considered a player who is more of a placeholder than real impact player at 1B. How can Morales be considered anything more than that himself? Its unrealistic.

xxgochisox - You really need to pay more attention to posts. I never said Kenny Lofton was a power hitter. While those of us old enough to have watched his whole career know he had a fair bit of pop for a speed demon, he was hardly a power hitter and more of the 1990s version of Carl Crawford in CF.

I was saying that GMJ has more power than Lofton and is still able to play a respectable CF when healthy, while Lofton has little power left and his game doesn't really play in center any more.

"With the line you just gave us on Morales avg/obp/ops... that is horrible for a position that is a power position."

That wasn't the line. It would be mathematically impossible to put up a .480 OPS with a .310 AVG and a .360 OBP. The minimum, if you have a pure singles hitter, the OPS would be .670. The third slash line I gave you was the traditional third slash line, which is slugging. A line of .310/.360/.480 would translate to an OPS of .840 with a healthy portion of the OBP coming from AVG, which is better than coming from walks and HBP.

"Are we thinking about the same Morales here?"

Yeah, the guy who absolutely raked through the minors and is raking in spring training. If MLEs actually meant something in reality, Albert Pujols would have an OPS of .810 and Brandon Wood would have come out dominating last year. The truth is, you don't know how a player will perform until they hit the majors and get truly consistent playing time. Until then, they are nothing more than a prospect(ive major league player).

“Yeah, the guy who absolutely raked through the minors and is raking in spring training. If MLEs actually meant something in reality, Albert Pujols would have an OPS of .810 and Brandon Wood would have come out dominating last year. The truth is, you don't know how a player will perform until they hit the majors and get truly consistent playing time. Until then, they are nothing more than a prospect(ive major league player).”

Brandon Wood had all of one poor season of AAA and a pretty mediocre AA (park factors taken into consideration) under his belt going into 2008. To expect him to come out dominating last year would have been as foolish as expecting Morales to drastically improve at the much tougher ML level over the numbers shown in three straight years of AAA (since his lines in AAA have been close to each other outside a slight power increase last year).

If you want to somehow think that a player who’s AAA stats translate to the 300/340/430 range, that has posted a fairly consistent 250/300/408 in 3 ML stints, is going to drasticly improve and come out to hit 310/360/480. Well, more power to you I guess. Just please don’t expect us to believe it, as nothing in his career has pointed to that being a realistic possibility. Could it happen? Sure, Brady Anderson once hit 50. But it’s probably just as likely that Matthew Brown (also a 1B on that same SLK team) comes out and posts that line.

Also, Albert Pujols played a total of 490 AB in the minors, and only 14 AB above A ball. Pujuols never had ML Equivalents, and if he had, they would have been rather strong based off the .324/.383/.565 he posted in pitcher friendly Peoria in his only real Minor League stop. So not sure what your point was there, that didn’t really make sense at all.

“The truth is, you don't know how a player will perform until they hit the majors and get truly consistent playing time”

But if that is your argument, would that not mean that Ben Johnson (another 1B/DH type on that SLK club) has just as much chance to excel as Morales? Neither has produced at the ML level, so we either take their Minor League numbers and get a gauge as to what to expect (what I did) or just take the ‘hype’ (which ironically is based off the numbers/projections I used), dismiss the actual evidence we have and then say “they need to play in the Majors to really know what they will become” leveling the field to everyone being equal until stats are provided on the ML stage. If your stance boils down to ‘ignore the evidence, go with a feeling’ though, then I am not sure how that would be the safe bet for any team to take. The more telling evidence for any team to look at is the fact that Morales wasn’t good enough to unseat Kotchman and the Angels attempted to add other pieces in front of him once more. If that club feels they can, and would like to, upgrade over Kendry, then is that not evidence enough that the hype probably isnt in line with what we should expect?

P.S. Kendry Morals never “raked” in the minors. “Raking” would be an OPS over 1.000 (like many, many superior talents provide). Kendry struggled to post an OPS over .900. Terry Evans has “raked” in the minors more than Kendry Morales ever has, and that is rather sad when you think about it.

xxgochisox - You really need to pay more attention to posts. I never said Kenny Lofton was a power hitter. While those of us old enough to have watched his whole career know he had a fair bit of pop for a speed demon, he was hardly a power hitter and more of the 1990s version of Carl Crawford in CF.

I was saying that GMJ has more power than Lofton and is still able to play a respectable CF when healthy, while Lofton has little power left and his game doesn't really play in center any more.

"With the line you just gave us on Morales avg/obp/ops... that is horrible for a position that is a power position."

That wasn't the line. It would be mathematically impossible to put up a .480 OPS with a .310 AVG and a .360 OBP. The minimum, if you have a pure singles hitter, the OPS would be .670. The third slash line I gave you was the traditional third slash line, which is slugging. A line of .310/.360/.480 would translate to an OPS of .840 with a healthy portion of the OBP coming from AVG, which is better than coming from walks and HBP.

"Are we thinking about the same Morales here?"

Yeah, the guy who absolutely raked through the minors and is raking in spring training. If MLEs actually meant something in reality, Albert Pujols would have an OPS of .810 and Brandon Wood would have come out dominating last year. The truth is, you don't know how a player will perform until they hit the majors and get truly consistent playing time. Until then, they are nothing more than a prospect(ive major league player).

Posted by: AA | March 26, 2009 at 01:25 PM

AA,

I don't have to read your posts any closer. I know Kenny Lofton was never a power hitter.

When I said what I said there, my point was it's stupid to use GMJ having more power then Kenny Lofton as a good reason to bring him to chicago. So does 90 % of every other player in baseball. What great inside piece of wisdom are you going to give us in your next post? Carl Crawford is faster Benji Molina.

I also know the line of the power thing...That's why I was saying any player that has that great an avg and OBP and most of it isnt due to power hitting is not good for a 1B.

The comment about comparing Albert Pujols to Brandon Wood, I'm not even going to justify making a reply to...

On this site, it would be nice if you would stick to one name... bjsguess or AA ? I know you have to be the same guy... there can't be two people this dumb posting on the same thread

"Are we thinking about the same Morales here?"

Yeah, the guy who absolutely raked through the minors and is raking in spring training. If MLEs actually meant something in reality, Albert Pujols would have an OPS of .810 and Brandon Wood would have come out dominating last year. The truth is, you don't know how a player will perform until they hit the majors and get truly consistent playing time. Until then, they are nothing more than a prospect(ive major league player).


AA,


One last thing.. a 26 year old guy who consistently rakes in the minors and in spring training (which Morales hasn't done) but let's let him use it for his argument and can't get consistent playng time is not called a prospect. He's called a bust or a AAAA guy... The angels showed all they thought about Kendry Morales last year when they traded for a 2 month rental player in Mark Texiera.

P.S.S.

Projections on Kendry Morales for 2009
.291/.327/.456/.783 – Bill James
.275/.319/.429/.748 – CHONE
.260/.322/.422/.744 – Marcel
.282/.321/.449/.770 – Oliver
.281/.317/.433/.750 – ZiPS

and you say .310/.360/.480/.840? You have to be a die-hard Angels fan, aren’t you?

Can be seen here
http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=8610&position=1B

"a 26 year old guy who consistently rakes in the minors and in spring training (which Morales hasn't done)"

.382/.407/.618

Not raking at all this spring, huh?

"but let's let him use it for his argument and can't get consistent playng time is not called a prospect. He's called a bust or a AAAA guy..."

AAAA guys and busts get their chances in the majors. Morales has had nothing resembling a consistent chance.

"The angels showed all they thought about Kendry Morales last year when they traded for a 2 month rental player in Mark Texiera."

Um. Morales was already blocked.

"Projections on Kendry Morales for 2009...

and you say .310/.360/.480/.840? You have to be a die-hard Angels fan, aren’t you?"

The projection systems are crap for projecting minors to majors. Other than James, they all are very hard on Matt Wieters, with CHONE projecting a .791 OPS. I don't think most people see that coming.

I'm not saying whether the guy will break out, but his ability is well known and he is certainly not in the sunset of his career like Konerko.

SuzysMan-

1B is a "power" position, you are correct, but that is primarily because the MAJORITY of 1B in MLB are poor defenders. Quintessentially DHs. Think Prince Fielder, Ryan Howard, Jason Giambi, Paul Konerko, etc. These guys need power to be worth playing them at a non-DH spot.

A good defensive 1B does not have to mash at the plate. I can think of two 1B who both absolutely mash at the plate AND play good D, and one is the absolute god known as Pujols and the other is Teixeira, who just got a 180MM contract.

Morales has the defense to mitigate for a lack of power.

Think Casey Kotchman.

And, projection systems are especially wonky/weird in projecting young players with minimal MLB playing time. I think an .800 OPS with elite defense is perfectly reasonable for Kendry. And the defense will make him a good player.

Enough with the Morales stuff. We can all agree he hasn't had a chance, but can some Angels' fans concede he hasn't exactly dazzled in the minors and even if you want to claim Kotchmna's defense made him unseatable, you will have a hrd time explaining how Morales could not unseat Juan Rivera's 2.46/.282/.438 from the DH role.

But even if people finally realize this is a bad deal does not mean the Angels and White Sox don't match up. Wouldn't a Reggie Willets/Josh Fields trade make more sense for both teams?

Willets could be the leadoff/CF guy the White Sox need, and if they give 3b to Betemit over Fields, they cna live with a few less solo home runs. And the Angels have Willets in the 5th/6th OF slot and Kendry Morales unchallenged at 1b. If nothing else, Fields represents a better place for depth given the inexperience in the Angels' corner INF spots, assuming Josh does not win the job over Morales outright.

The problem comes in the fact that an 800 OPS and superior defense is not enough to earn a steady ML job. Just ask Doug Mientkiewicz. Such a player will always be more of a placeholder until someone better comes along. Well, it is also a possibility that he catches on with a perennial loser who sees no pressing need to upgrade. (Similar to Sean Casey in Cincinnati)

By the way, Morales is not that great of a fielder. He might be a bit better than average, but that is mainly because the average is rather low considering most teams do treat first more like DH-2. And I do think Casey Kotchman, with less bat and a lot less glove. But Morales was never good enough to seriously be considered a possibility to displace Kotchman, pretty much confirming Casey to be the superior player. Also, I realize that Kotchman is probably little more than a stopgap for most teams himself, and will likely always be replaced on a contender as soon as a better option presents itself. This has already happened once in his young career – being traded for his rental replacement even.

But finally,
“And, projection systems are especially wonky/weird in projecting young players with minimal MLB playing time. I think an .800 OPS”

That 800 OPS you can see is actually fairly realistic with the 300/340/430 translated stats he has posted in AAA, and I would not argue against him possibly being around that at some point. One concern I would however have comes in the fact that he might see a rather drastic drop in BA considering he does not have a very strong eye. If his BA is more in the 275 range, his OBP might not be that far above 300 and an OPS of 800 would be hard to obtain at that point. If you take a look, the real reason the projection sites have OPS so far under 800 is because of the low BA and subsequent low OBP that comes with it. Showing it is most likely a very valid concern. And of course, in that instance, playing time would also be difficult to find I imagine (in fact, I think he would have ‘career AAA player’ written all over him if he was posting around a .275/.320/.450 line in the majors)

Notin,

There isnt much else to talk about here, so why not speak on Morales? It is rarely ever done, and a nice change of pace off the normal players/rumors discussed to death.

True its hardly Hot Stove anymore.

But this all started with a Konerko/GMJ suggestion. To me, that seems unrealistic if the only additional enticement is Kendry Morales, and the kind of player that could get it done is probably not available from LA. OTOH, a Fields/Willets deal does make more sense. The question is, does it make enough?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.