Headlines

  • Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski
  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Let’s Name The Defining Trade Of The Past Decade

By Jeff Todd | May 8, 2020 at 8:33pm CDT

Back at the start of the year, I ran down the most memorable trades of the preceding decade. It was tough to nail down the swaps that I found most compelling; many folks wrote in with others that I added in an honorable mention section. In some cases, people suggested deals that were highly notable to them but relatively unexciting to me. Just as with the game itself, we all experience the hot stove differently.

At the time, I was gathering up the most notable deals. I thought about doing a ranking, but dismissed the idea. It was tough enough to pull together a list. Now I’ve come to wonder … in spite of our differing experiences, and the inherent subjectivity of it all, can we find some amount of consensus on the topic?

I don’t want to spread this too thin, so I’m not going to include every deal mentioned in the original post. Oh, and I went ahead and included a new entrant! You should read the original post on the subject — or click the links below to the deals themselves — for more details on the swaps. I’ll present them here in chronological order.

Brewers Acquire Zack Greinke (12/19/10)

Royals Acquire James Shields, Wade Davis (12/9/12)

Red Sox, Dodgers Complete Nine-Player Blockbuster (8/25/12)

Blue Jays, Marlins Complete 12-Player Blockbuster (11/13/12)

Blue Jays Acquire Josh Donaldson (11/28/14)

Padres Acquire Craig Kimbrel (4/5/15)

Wilmer’s Tears: Astros Acquire Carlos Gomez, Mike Fiers / Mets Acquire Yoenis Cespedes (7/31/15)

Diamondbacks Acquire Shelby Miller (12/9/15)

Cubs Acquire Aroldis Chapman (7/25/16)

Red Sox Acquire Chris Sale (12/6/16)

Astros Acquire Justin Verlander (9/1/17)

Marlins Trio: Yankees Acquire Giancarlo Stanton / Cardinals Acquire Marcell Ozuna / Brewers Acquire Christian Yelich (12/17-1/18)

Dodgers Acquire Mookie Betts, David Price (2/9/20)

You have a baker’s dozen to choose from. The response order is randomized in the poll. Let’s name the defining trade of the past decade! (Poll link for app users.)

Share 0 Retweet 6 Send via email0

MLBTR Originals MLBTR Polls

Dr. Christopher Ahmad Warns Of Rash Of Tommy John Surgeries
Main
Pittsburgh’s Promising Middle Infield
View Comments (107)
Post a Comment

107 Comments

  1. bigdaddyt

    5 years ago

    The marlins jays blockbuster was so big because it did so little for both teams

    3
    Reply
    • jeterleader

      5 years ago

      yup

      Reply
    • SpiderManFromMars

      5 years ago

      Agreed – and they had just signed them to big FA contracts too. Then it got expounded on when TOR flipped Reyes for Tulo and somehow made it worse.

      Reply
      • bluejays92

        5 years ago

        How was it made worse?

        Reply
        • neo

          5 years ago

          Because Tulo cried as much as Wilmer did but the management in Colorado just didn’t care since they were acquiring pitching that was finally going to deliver them a championship.

          Worse by expanding overall lunacy.

          Reply
        • johnnydubz

          5 years ago

          Taking on more dead money for less results…. hate hate hate hate hate

          Reply
        • cptstupendous

          5 years ago

          Ha. Not sure if the response is what was originally meant but damn that’s funny! Expanding on the overall lunacy

          Reply
    • Vladguerrerojr20

      5 years ago

      I would say both deals that brought an MVP award and multiple post season births to their new clubs, Josh Donaldson and Christian Yelich. The Verlander and Cole trades were huge for Houston but I mean, their club was doing other things to help them win. The sale deal was huge too, again some shady things probably happened in their WSC season.

      Reply
  2. acarneglia

    5 years ago

    Chapman to Cubs

    6
    Reply
    • MWeller77

      5 years ago

      Yeah, I went with Chapman to Cubs, too.

      * Yankees get Torres
      * Cubs end a 9,000-year title drought

      3
      Reply
      • saavedra

        5 years ago

        I agree. The only real competition is the Verlander trade because it gave them a title, but it’s tarnished, or the Dodgers-Red Sox trade from 2012, it shaped both teams for the decade.

        2
        Reply
        • ripaceventura30

          5 years ago

          The Greinke deal and the Shields / Davis deals brought a title to KC.

          2
          Reply
        • johnnydubz

          5 years ago

          Verlander to Yankees where he should’ve went but Cash was cheap. Changes things but the guy is a Yankee killer so perhaps he kills them from within in 17. I felt Astros won the WS when they got him in that August day since they were head to head.

          1
          Reply
        • g4

          5 years ago

          Agreed. With the Cubs bankroll + years of tanking was more inevitable than shocking. Losing Chapman may have shortened their peak, but we’ve seen that trade before (e.g. Doyle for Smoltz)

          The Royals winning it all with nothing but bullpen studs was a miracle and defined the decade.

          Reply
      • bigdaddyt

        5 years ago

        9000 year drought! Toronto maple leafs fans looking at each other and doin the Ralph Wiggams meme “chuckles I’m in danger”

        2
        Reply
  3. LouisianaAstros

    5 years ago

    Forgot the Chris Archer trade.

    Actually got a GM fired

    3
    Reply
    • Brixton

      5 years ago

      That, plus giving away Gerrit Cole for a quantity over quality package

      1
      Reply
      • LouisianaAstros

        5 years ago

        Cole was on his way out.
        But Cole had value before the 2018 season
        When a team knows they won’t resign a player why wait until the last minute to trade him.
        Decreases his value. Give a team 2 years and get a bunch of players back.
        Might see the A’s do this with Olson and Chapman.

        The Archer trade was in response.
        It was a business move by the Pirates to create hype.
        Reading the response from the trade they were trying to get people back in the seats and show them they wanted to win.

        Backfired on them and actually could end up much worse because there is a third player as well.

        Just imagine the Pirates giving up three All Stars for Archer.

        Reply
  4. Kayrall

    5 years ago

    It’s definitely Red Sox / Dogers but the 2nd is not even on the list and that’s Jake Arrieta / Pedro Strop.

    2
    Reply
    • LouisianaAstros

      5 years ago

      The first was a salary dump pretty much created by MLB.
      Dodgers wanted Adrian Gonzalez and took on a bunch of salary.

      But the trade itself wasn’t the story.
      If you ask what is the most defining moment in baseball this decade.

      It probably would be MLB forcing the sale of the Dodgers.
      This trade is included in this.

      3
      Reply
      • JustCheckingIn

        5 years ago

        Lmao. Mlb forced the sale of the Dodgers because McCourt couldn’t make payroll in the middle of June

        Why? Because both McCourts were using Dodger funds to buy vacation homes and cars

        It’s definitely the most defining moment. It set off the Dodgers run of making the playoffs every full season since, and set Boston up to win 2 more titles. No other single trade has had that much impact

        5
        Reply
        • LouisianaAstros

          5 years ago

          I wouldn’t say the trade itself had that much of an impact

          One of the defining moments during the decade was MLB forcing the sale.

          The impact of the trade…
          Dodgers didn’t make the playoffs that year.
          The Giants did and won the WS.

          The defining moment of the Dodgers were that off-season
          Signing Greinke
          Signing Puig

          Those two helped in 2013 along with Adrian Gonzalez but the trade itself didn’t put the Dodgers in the playoffs.
          The trade itself didn’t cause the RS to win the World Series.

          It helped them sign Napoli but the RS won the WS the following year because of the impact Jon Farrell made on their pitching staff
          Some said they cheated. But that is up in the air.

          Reply
        • johnnydubz

          5 years ago

          Yet Wilpons couldn’t make it for April but got a pass and a loan. Unfortunately that was a perfect example of baseball being BS. Utley attacked a player facing CF on the throw didn’t get suspended because the dean of discipline was the same manager who had no problem with Clemens throwing bats and balls at people. That person was Joe “HOF” Torre

          Reply
        • g4

          5 years ago

          Yes, the Red Sox got salary relief but not much in talent. Hardly directly responsible for their titles.

          1
          Reply
        • bosoxforlife

          5 years ago

          There is a lot be said for addition by subtraction and this was the best example in the history of baseball. Getting rid of Carl Crawford was the equivalent of adding 5 WAR. Gonzalez was the worst whiner in the game and Beckett was on the express to oblivion.
          .

          Reply
        • Michael Birks

          5 years ago

          I remember thinking when the trade went down Webster was going to be the answer to all of our problems….

          Reply
        • LouisianaAstros

          5 years ago

          Like I said I believe the bigger impact came the following year with the pitching staff.

          There are rumors about what Farrell did.

          But in 2013 he got the most out of Lackey, Lester and the others.

          Only thing that move probably did was allow the RS to sign Napoli.

          Reply
        • JustCheckingIn

          5 years ago

          They used that money to win the title Literally the next year… really?

          Reply
        • LouisianaAstros

          5 years ago

          How?

          They only signed one major FA.
          Napoli

          The difference between the 2012-2012 compared to 2013 Red Sox was pitching

          Their ERA dropped by almost one run.

          Jon Farrell more than the trade was responsibile.

          Some said their staff cheated. That is up on debate. But even then Farrell made the difference and not the trade

          They didn’t go out and sign a big free agent pitcher.

          Dumping salary didn’t help them win a WS.

          Reply
        • MLB-what-ifs

          5 years ago

          It worked out for Red Sox freeing up cash and contracts, and new ownership for Dodgers has had a great business model for trades, scouting and drafting, and free agent signings.

          No greater impact than 2 World Series appearances and an NLCS in the last three years, and 2 WS championships for RS.

          Reply
        • MLB-what-ifs

          5 years ago

          Bosoxforlife- yes, they got rid of three malcontents and $260 million in payroll. If the trade does not happen the Red Sox would not have been able to sign the 8 free agents they did that winter…..no: Mike Napoli, Steven Drew, Jonny Gomes, Shane Victorino, David Ross, Koji Urhara, Ryan Dempster, and resigning of David Ortiz. That was almost 1/3 of their WS team from 2013.

          Reply
  5. Cosmodogs

    5 years ago

    I don’t see how the Marlins trio of OF’s can’t be #1. Even forgetting about Ozuna, they traded the biggest contract in baseball at the time, and possible MLB’s best player(Yelich) in his prime and locked into a great team friendly contract.

    1
    Reply
    • andyg37

      5 years ago

      Yelich was not the best player in the MLB, nor close to it, at the time. Should they have received more for a very controllable 25 year old who was an above average contributor? Sure. But no one knew his OPS was going to jump 200 points in a year and then another 100 points after that.

      1
      Reply
  6. mlbnyyfan

    5 years ago

    I would say Verlander going to Astros. They don’t beat Yankees without him. Cheating and Verlander gave them HUGE advantage.

    1
    Reply
    • I’mJustBetter

      5 years ago

      Idk, the Yankees scored 3 runs in 4 games at MMP. But the Dodgers is a different story

      Reply
    • Rocker49

      5 years ago

      knew someone would have to cry in the comments about the Astros, typical ny clown

      Reply
  7. gofish 2

    5 years ago

    Jake Odorizzi involved in the first two chronologically (Brewers –> Royals –> Rays).

    Side note: I do not believe the Marlins make that trade with Toronto if they had stayed the Florida Marlins. New branding + new ballpark = insane trade idea.

    Reply
    • gofish 2

      5 years ago

      Aaaand I got mixed up. The Marlins made the trade AFTER already establishing themselves as the new Marlins. The signings were because of the move.

      1
      Reply
  8. DarkSide830

    5 years ago

    Marlins Jays simply because of size

    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      5 years ago

      my bad. it was actually the Wilmer non-trade because of Fiers to HOU

      1
      Reply
  9. house_barnes

    5 years ago

    Wilmers tears nixed the Gomez trade, Astros acquire Gomez & Fiers, Fiers dropped dime on the astros, got 3 managers and a GM fired. Wilmers tears brought down the Astros.

    3
    Reply
  10. Rangers29

    5 years ago

    Tulo trade should be on here because of how big people thought of it at the time. Besides that I chose the Red Sox – Dodgers explosion. Huge trade.

    Reply
    • LouisianaAstros

      5 years ago

      The Saga of Cespedes is another one.

      As
      Red Sox
      Tigers
      Mets

      Forced the Mets to handcuff their franchise when they resigned him
      But those couple of months with the Mets he absolutely crushed the ball.

      Reply
      • The Human Rain Delay

        5 years ago

        Ces was great with Oakland and helped lead Mets to a Ws – Idk if Saga would be the right word

        Reply
        • LouisianaAstros

          5 years ago

          You get traded three times in one year there is something there.

          He was the key to the Mets success..
          When he played they were a playoff caliber team. Since he hasn’t they haven’t.

          Reply
  11. echozulu88

    5 years ago

    I would say the Brewers- Royals trade. It set part of the foundation for KC to appear in two WS & win one. I think what the end result was is the biggest factor for these trades. Chapman helping the Cubs was huge but he was a late addition to a core of the team that was already a favorite. Same with Verlander and Houston. I could be mistaken but did any of the other trades lead to WS wins? Or turn around a franchise as much as it did with KC?

    1
    Reply
    • echozulu88

      5 years ago

      Side note. If you are going by biggest news that shook baseball I’d go with the Monster Boston-LAD trade.

      1
      Reply
    • LouisianaAstros

      5 years ago

      The foundation of the Royals was a combination of things.
      That trade alone didn’t cause them to win the WS.
      Majority of their core wasn’t in that trade.

      Greinke’s impact in Milwaukee wasn’t much.
      He did bring Segura.

      I can do the research but who did Milwaukee trade Segura for.
      Greinke was traded to the Angels for Segura in 2012

      Reply
      • lambeau gang

        5 years ago

        In 2016, the Brewers got Aaron Hill, Chase Anderson and Isan Díaz from the D-Backs in exchange for Segura and Haniger. Segura and Haniger brought back Ketel Marte for the D-Backs, and Díaz was one of the pieces in the Yelich deal. So that deal was super impactful for a few franchises.

        Reply
      • g4

        5 years ago

        Not true. Greinke led the Crew to 96 wins in 2011, first division title in 30 years, two games from making the World Series. He got flipped the next year for usual small market reasons, but impact was huge for a rental.

        Reply
    • dvail1979

      5 years ago

      Id agree with you on the Tampa/San Diego/Kansas City trade … James Shields was huge for the Royals and Wade Davis was part of a truly dominant bullpen … That trade helped KC become what they became

      Reply
  12. ChangedName

    5 years ago

    Blue Jays/Marlins deal and the Davis/Shields deal because of how much controversy they generated and how polarizing they were in some circles. The Blue Jays/Marlins deal for the Marlins shameless salary dump so quickly after signing Reyes and Buehrle and the Davis/Shields deal for the Royals giving up Wil Myers. The Royals and Dayton Moore got the last laugh there.

    Reply
  13. Deleted Userrr

    5 years ago

    James Shields wasn’t even on the Royals team that won the World Series and the year before that he was complete garbage in the postseason.

    1
    Reply
    • brandons-3

      5 years ago

      Yeah, but he was a good starter for them and really gave them the mindset that they could win. Sometimes, it’s not just about the player but what a move represents. Parting with a top five prospect in BASEBALL? You’re not just getting Shields (or Wade Davis). You’re creating a winning culture. That matters.

      It helps that they were a great team. That’s usually what wins, but when you have a losing culture that isn’t used to playing for anything meaningful it’s hard to turn that corner.

      It’s risky because though “culture” is important, it’s hard to put a value on it. Just ask Dave Stewart or the 2012 Red Sox. They made similar moves and it went the other way.

      Reply
      • Deleted Userrr

        5 years ago

        Trading for James Shields didn’t represent anything or establish any kind of culture. They won because of the talent on the roster.

        Reply
  14. Sabermetric Acolyte

    5 years ago

    Red Sox/Dodgers trade even though the players themselves as the trade were essentially meaningless. The results of the trade though were meaningful:
    1) The next year the Dodgers began a streak of winning the division. Something they’ve done 7 years in a row. Was it the trade? Well no… it was just what the trade symbolized. The new ownership was going to do whatever it took to win.
    2) Red Sox win the 2013 WS becoming one of the few teams in history to win the Series a year after ending the season in last place.

    Reply
  15. Vizionaire

    5 years ago

    angels acquisition of simmons!

    1
    Reply
  16. deal1122

    5 years ago

    Wow, I bet the Cubs wish they would’ve just given up Schwaber instead of Gleybar. NY absolutely stole Gleybar

    Reply
    • deal1122

      5 years ago

      Chicago got a WS out of it, so I guess it’s worth it for them

      Reply
    • Ry.the.Stunner

      5 years ago

      Schwarber was key in that World Series, so no, I don’t think they do wish that.

      Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      5 years ago

      agreed

      Reply
    • brandons-3

      5 years ago

      The Cubs could be offered a do-over and would make the trade again. It brought a World Series trophy to Wrigley. Any other team or situation, sure you may want to have a redo.

      To put it into Avengers terms, Dr. Strange “gave away Torres” to ensure the outcome that ended with a World Series that year.

      Reply
      • lambeau gang

        5 years ago

        Except nothing is assured in baseball. That Game 7 in the WS was so unpredictable. Chapman gave up a homer to Rajai Davis of all people, and the Indians could very well have won the WS. Yes, both Chapman and Schwarber were instrumental in bringing the Cubs that championship, but it was never a given. Transactions mean nothing else f the players don’t perform as expected.

        Reply
        • The Human Rain Delay

          5 years ago

          The trade was bad if you take out hindsight

          It IS literally one of the main reasons why you will not see high profile prospects dealt for rentals anymore-

          This trade was literally the last of its kind- Other Owners arent looking at it like Chapman made the deal bc of the ring they are seeing Torres and all those slave-labor controlled years left

          Chi bet big and won, it doesnt mean it was a smart bet at the time

          Reply
  17. raiders

    5 years ago

    Arietta and Strop to cubs. Both were huge for 2015 and 2016 team (obviously Jake was more of the stud). Cost them just Scott Feldman and Steve Clevenger

    2
    Reply
  18. hOsEbEeLiOn

    5 years ago

    Marlins and trading their entire OF. You trade a HOF type talent OF in Yelich and two hall of very good talents in Stanton and Ozuna you should have been able to get a kings ransom. Pretty much got nothing.

    To make matters worse they trade one of the useful pieces in gallen who could have been very good for them for a long time……

    Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      5 years ago

      so true

      Reply
    • andyg37

      5 years ago

      Yelich has been a “HOF talent” for 2 years, so lets pull back a bit. He was the worst of the 3 at the time. He finished with an 800 OPS the year he was traded.

      Reply
      • hOsEbEeLiOn

        5 years ago

        He’s only played 6 full seasons and already has four 4+ war seasons.

        He’s a HOF type talent.

        He’s one of the purest hitters in the game even when he was with the Marlins.

        Even if his power fades his contact skills and walk skills make up for that.

        Reply
    • g4

      5 years ago

      Can’t be ignored that Stanton’s contract limited potential trade partners. Sadly, part of the Marlins return was hefty salary relief.

      Reply
      • andyg37

        5 years ago

        Stanton also had full veto power of any trade, the return from the Cardinals was better, but he didn’t want to go there

        Reply
    • The Human Rain Delay

      5 years ago

      They were lucky to get a bag of balls for Stanton-Big win to get him off the books

      Ozuna- They won that deal, Oz couldnt even fetch a multi year deal this year- Highly overated

      Yelich- Yea that was a big loss no doubt

      Love Gallen but how valuable is a Pitcher who wastes bullets on a last place team…….by the time Mia is relevant its payday for Gallen and 700 more inns on the arm to boot

      Reply
  19. Philliesfan89

    5 years ago

    How about the Phillies getting Cliff Lee and Roy Halladay?!

    Reply
    • drew ford

      5 years ago

      That was more than a decade ago.

      Reply
  20. mlbnyyfan

    5 years ago

    I would definitely take Schwerber now. Yankees lineup definitely needs a legitimate left handed hitter for Yankees stadium. They are mostly all right handed.

    Reply
  21. drew ford

    5 years ago

    Donaldson to Toronto ended a 22 year playoff drought.

    Reply
  22. PutPeteRoseInTheHall

    5 years ago

    Marlins outfield trio for sure. 3 of the best players in the mlb. Yelich is probably top 10, ozuna and stanton top 100

    Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      5 years ago

      maybe top 150

      Reply
    • The Human Rain Delay

      5 years ago

      Ozuna is not close to a top 100 player, i wouldnt even go top 250

      Stanton has the worst contract in all of Mlb

      Reply
  23. dshires4

    5 years ago

    I voted for the Chapman trade because the Yankees got an uber talented prospect, the Cubs won the WS for the first time since Abraham Lincoln was in office, and in the end the Yankees resigned Chapman.

    I think this trade definitely has question marks on it, from the Cubs side. Was selling off an elite prospect worth one title? Could other guys have been traded for without selling off such a massive piece? It has a ripple effect, to this day.

    Now, if it were an option, I’d have voted for the Cano/Diaz acquisition by the Mets since I think the defining moment here is that BVW has zero idea how to evaluate acquisitions from an organizational stance. He gave up WAY too much. As a Mariners fan, that makes me happy. But are we ever going to see another baseball outsider get a job leading a franchise? I doubt it.

    1
    Reply
    • lambeau gang

      5 years ago

      Pretty sure the Cubs weren’t around during the Civil War or Lincoln’s 1865 assassination. The Reds weren’t even founded yet.

      1
      Reply
      • dshires4

        5 years ago

        Wow, thank you Ken Burns. Do I need to do /s next time?

        Reply
        • Lanidrac

          5 years ago

          Nah, you weren’t really being sarcastic. A [/hyperbole] tag would make more sense.

          1
          Reply
    • The Human Rain Delay

      5 years ago

      Great post and yes that ripple effect will be teams wont give up elite prospects for a rental-

      I voted Chapman deal as well due to this fact that I think you are eluding to as well

      Think its a little early of BVW – He has made some nice moves like stroman porcello Jd Davis in his short tenure……… At least Mets have broken the “cheap” mold that has haunted them for so long under BVW

      Reply
  24. Amazin_Oz

    5 years ago

    The answer is clearly Wilmers tears, not because he cried, not because The Mets got Cespedes…the real reason is because the Astros got Mike Fiers, the famed whistle blower

    Reply
  25. homerheins

    5 years ago

    Shelby Miller trade defines the stupidity of that historically bad front office, but didn’t lead to that much overall.

    Reply
  26. R.D.

    5 years ago

    I like the arguments for the fiers deal, they make a lot of sense.

    I’m gonna ignore the 3 separate trades since they shouldnt count.

    I think the jays/marlins deal set a standard of “it’s ok to sign a bunch of players and trade them for pieces a year later.”

    That’s been recreated quite a few times since then and salary related moves arent all as shocking as they were before that deal.

    John Buck was used to acquire RA Dickey from the mets while Escobar, Hech, desclafani, Reyes, and marisnick all were hurled around the hot stove a whole bunch following this trade.

    I’d say this move, while not being the most directly impactful, had the most repercussions.

    Reply
  27. lowtalker1

    5 years ago

    In reality, there is only one trade on this s list that is franchise altering that’s the massive deal that changed the course for the Red Sox and Dodgers

    1
    Reply
  28. frankf

    5 years ago

    Though viewed as a “change of scenery” move at the time, it’s hard to argue against Rizzo to the Cubs being as, if not more, impactful as any on this list.

    Reply
  29. frankf

    5 years ago

    And you can’t forget Arrietta/Strop to the Cubs.

    Reply
  30. frankf

    5 years ago

    And you can’t forget the trades that brought Arrietta/Strop, Hendricks, and the now despised Addison Russell to the Cubs. Theo was a master at pulling rabbits out of trash cans for his first few years.

    Reply
  31. jimmertee

    5 years ago

    In 1919 Boston trades Babe Ruth to the Yankees for $25,000. Nothing else compares.

    Reply
    • HubcapDiamondStarHalo

      5 years ago

      So “the past decade” kinda got overlooked there? Or maybe you read it as “a passed decade?”

      Reply
      • mike127

        5 years ago

        This being 2020, the Babe Ruth trade doesn’t even fit the past century category. Jimmer must live in a part of the country that allows bars to be open really late on Fridays….or open really early on Saturdays.

        Reply
    • Sabermetric Acolyte

      5 years ago

      It was $100,000 cash and $350,000 as a loan.

      Reply
  32. driftcat28 2

    5 years ago

    I love looking back at the “lesser” names involved in past trades and remembering asking myself “who the heck is this bum”. Now they’re known major leaguers lol

    Reply
    • g4

      5 years ago

      To that point, while everyone was yakking about Wilmer bawling, Stearns pivoted to acquire Josh Hader. That trade + Yelich define his career up to this point.

      Reply
      • lambeau gang

        5 years ago

        Actually Doug Melvin was the main GM for Milwaukee at the time. Stearns took over full-time after the season.

        Reply
  33. jam

    5 years ago

    These posters are missing the question: you asked for the defining trade of THE PAST decade but they are privy using trades that happened THIS decade. Simple numbers tell us that a decade begins with the number 1 and ends with 00 (unless the first decade began with 0). So we all need to be suggesting trades made from 2001-2010–you know: the LAST decade

    Reply
    • mike127

      5 years ago

      jam—you probably should go back to school….by definition a decade is “a period of ten years”. As the title states “the PAST decade” indicating the past ten years. I know you tried to be cute with your “literal” definition, but the article is not titled the “decade that includes the teen years”—if that was the case THEN you would be correct as that decade is still ongoing and by definition is 2011–thru the end of 2020.

      I totally agree with you that 98% of the population thinks we are in the first year of the “decade of the 20s” when we are not….but no need to insult the masses and try to stir up trades that happened 15-20 years ago.

      1
      Reply
  34. WildRemote

    5 years ago

    kinda shocked to see the dodgers/redsox trade so far ahead. That trade was irrelevant outside of the scope of those two teams and none of the players did anything for their new team, outside of Adrian Gonzales and ~10 games of Josh Beckett.
    Wilmer’s Tears has had a massive impact on 3 different teams (with additional trades branching) and lasting repercussions on the league as a whole, how can you vote for a salary dump over that?

    Reply
    • Sabermetric Acolyte

      5 years ago

      That’s the point though. The trade more defined the franchises. For the Dodgers it was the new ownership looking to make a splash and showing the league what they were willing to do. For the Red Sox it directly lead to the 2013 WS win,

      Reply
  35. tcostant

    5 years ago

    I think getting Trea Turner and Joe Ross for a 4th OF’er was better than most of these.

    Reply
  36. JoeBrady

    5 years ago

    I picked the Sale trade. It was the most talent trade, helped the RS finish 1st three years running, plus a WSC, and the WS got a pretty good haul to rebuild.

    Reply
  37. nutbunnies

    5 years ago

    The wheels had been in motion in other regards, but the Red Sox-Dodgers trade to me has to be it. It’s the first big money laundering trade in a decade of a handful. It symbolizes how ownership and front offices transitioned from viewing players as “assets” like they were stock options or something.

    Reply
    • JustCheckingIn

      5 years ago

      Money laundering!? Do you even know what that is?

      Having one party pay a contract originally signed by another isn’t money laundering. Jeez

      And if you’re trying to point to the CBA deals, that’s still not money laundering. Maybe tax evasion. But really, it’s just a loophole. Like every other tax law. Just find it

      Reply
  38. Lanidrac

    5 years ago

    What about the Cardinals dumping Colby Rasmus for the missing pieces needed to stage epic comeback for the 2011 Championship?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Brewers To Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Recent

    Blue Jays To Promote Will Robertson

    Diamondbacks Outright Aramis Garcia; Scott McGough Elects Free Agency

    Pirates Re-Sign Tanner Rainey To Minor League Deal

    Giants Place Matt Chapman On 10-Day Injured List

    Mariners’ Bryce Miller Out Four To Six Weeks With Elbow Inflammation

    Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is “North Of Zero”

    Diamondbacks Place Justin Martínez On IL With UCL Sprain

    Orioles Select Luis Vázquez

    Rangers To Sign Craig Kimbrel To Minor League Deal

    Akil Baddoo Accepts Outright Assignment With Tigers

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version