Back at the start of the year, I ran down the most memorable trades of the preceding decade. It was tough to nail down the swaps that I found most compelling; many folks wrote in with others that I added in an honorable mention section. In some cases, people suggested deals that were highly notable to them but relatively unexciting to me. Just as with the game itself, we all experience the hot stove differently.
At the time, I was gathering up the most notable deals. I thought about doing a ranking, but dismissed the idea. It was tough enough to pull together a list. Now I’ve come to wonder … in spite of our differing experiences, and the inherent subjectivity of it all, can we find some amount of consensus on the topic?
I don’t want to spread this too thin, so I’m not going to include every deal mentioned in the original post. Oh, and I went ahead and included a new entrant! You should read the original post on the subject — or click the links below to the deals themselves — for more details on the swaps. I’ll present them here in chronological order.
Brewers Acquire Zack Greinke (12/19/10)
Royals Acquire James Shields, Wade Davis (12/9/12)
Red Sox, Dodgers Complete Nine-Player Blockbuster (8/25/12)
Blue Jays, Marlins Complete 12-Player Blockbuster (11/13/12)
Blue Jays Acquire Josh Donaldson (11/28/14)
Padres Acquire Craig Kimbrel (4/5/15)
Wilmer’s Tears: Astros Acquire Carlos Gomez, Mike Fiers / Mets Acquire Yoenis Cespedes (7/31/15)
Diamondbacks Acquire Shelby Miller (12/9/15)
Cubs Acquire Aroldis Chapman (7/25/16)
Red Sox Acquire Chris Sale (12/6/16)
Astros Acquire Justin Verlander (9/1/17)
Marlins Trio: Yankees Acquire Giancarlo Stanton / Cardinals Acquire Marcell Ozuna / Brewers Acquire Christian Yelich (12/17-1/18)
Dodgers Acquire Mookie Betts, David Price (2/9/20)
You have a baker’s dozen to choose from. The response order is randomized in the poll. Let’s name the defining trade of the past decade! (Poll link for app users.)
bigdaddyt
The marlins jays blockbuster was so big because it did so little for both teams
jeterleader
yup
SpiderManFromMars
Agreed – and they had just signed them to big FA contracts too. Then it got expounded on when TOR flipped Reyes for Tulo and somehow made it worse.
bluejays92
How was it made worse?
neo
Because Tulo cried as much as Wilmer did but the management in Colorado just didn’t care since they were acquiring pitching that was finally going to deliver them a championship.
Worse by expanding overall lunacy.
johnnydubz
Taking on more dead money for less results…. hate hate hate hate hate
cptstupendous
Ha. Not sure if the response is what was originally meant but damn that’s funny! Expanding on the overall lunacy
Vladguerrerojr20
I would say both deals that brought an MVP award and multiple post season births to their new clubs, Josh Donaldson and Christian Yelich. The Verlander and Cole trades were huge for Houston but I mean, their club was doing other things to help them win. The sale deal was huge too, again some shady things probably happened in their WSC season.
acarneglia
Chapman to Cubs
MWeller77
Yeah, I went with Chapman to Cubs, too.
* Yankees get Torres
* Cubs end a 9,000-year title drought
saavedra
I agree. The only real competition is the Verlander trade because it gave them a title, but it’s tarnished, or the Dodgers-Red Sox trade from 2012, it shaped both teams for the decade.
ripaceventura30
The Greinke deal and the Shields / Davis deals brought a title to KC.
johnnydubz
Verlander to Yankees where he should’ve went but Cash was cheap. Changes things but the guy is a Yankee killer so perhaps he kills them from within in 17. I felt Astros won the WS when they got him in that August day since they were head to head.
g4
Agreed. With the Cubs bankroll + years of tanking was more inevitable than shocking. Losing Chapman may have shortened their peak, but we’ve seen that trade before (e.g. Doyle for Smoltz)
The Royals winning it all with nothing but bullpen studs was a miracle and defined the decade.
bigdaddyt
9000 year drought! Toronto maple leafs fans looking at each other and doin the Ralph Wiggams meme “chuckles I’m in danger”
LouisianaAstros
Forgot the Chris Archer trade.
Actually got a GM fired
Brixton
That, plus giving away Gerrit Cole for a quantity over quality package
LouisianaAstros
Cole was on his way out.
But Cole had value before the 2018 season
When a team knows they won’t resign a player why wait until the last minute to trade him.
Decreases his value. Give a team 2 years and get a bunch of players back.
Might see the A’s do this with Olson and Chapman.
The Archer trade was in response.
It was a business move by the Pirates to create hype.
Reading the response from the trade they were trying to get people back in the seats and show them they wanted to win.
Backfired on them and actually could end up much worse because there is a third player as well.
Just imagine the Pirates giving up three All Stars for Archer.
Kayrall
It’s definitely Red Sox / Dogers but the 2nd is not even on the list and that’s Jake Arrieta / Pedro Strop.
LouisianaAstros
The first was a salary dump pretty much created by MLB.
Dodgers wanted Adrian Gonzalez and took on a bunch of salary.
But the trade itself wasn’t the story.
If you ask what is the most defining moment in baseball this decade.
It probably would be MLB forcing the sale of the Dodgers.
This trade is included in this.
JustCheckingIn
Lmao. Mlb forced the sale of the Dodgers because McCourt couldn’t make payroll in the middle of June
Why? Because both McCourts were using Dodger funds to buy vacation homes and cars
It’s definitely the most defining moment. It set off the Dodgers run of making the playoffs every full season since, and set Boston up to win 2 more titles. No other single trade has had that much impact
LouisianaAstros
I wouldn’t say the trade itself had that much of an impact
One of the defining moments during the decade was MLB forcing the sale.
The impact of the trade…
Dodgers didn’t make the playoffs that year.
The Giants did and won the WS.
The defining moment of the Dodgers were that off-season
Signing Greinke
Signing Puig
Those two helped in 2013 along with Adrian Gonzalez but the trade itself didn’t put the Dodgers in the playoffs.
The trade itself didn’t cause the RS to win the World Series.
It helped them sign Napoli but the RS won the WS the following year because of the impact Jon Farrell made on their pitching staff
Some said they cheated. But that is up in the air.
johnnydubz
Yet Wilpons couldn’t make it for April but got a pass and a loan. Unfortunately that was a perfect example of baseball being BS. Utley attacked a player facing CF on the throw didn’t get suspended because the dean of discipline was the same manager who had no problem with Clemens throwing bats and balls at people. That person was Joe “HOF” Torre
g4
Yes, the Red Sox got salary relief but not much in talent. Hardly directly responsible for their titles.
bosoxforlife
There is a lot be said for addition by subtraction and this was the best example in the history of baseball. Getting rid of Carl Crawford was the equivalent of adding 5 WAR. Gonzalez was the worst whiner in the game and Beckett was on the express to oblivion.
.
Michael Birks
I remember thinking when the trade went down Webster was going to be the answer to all of our problems….
LouisianaAstros
Like I said I believe the bigger impact came the following year with the pitching staff.
There are rumors about what Farrell did.
But in 2013 he got the most out of Lackey, Lester and the others.
Only thing that move probably did was allow the RS to sign Napoli.
JustCheckingIn
They used that money to win the title Literally the next year… really?
LouisianaAstros
How?
They only signed one major FA.
Napoli
The difference between the 2012-2012 compared to 2013 Red Sox was pitching
Their ERA dropped by almost one run.
Jon Farrell more than the trade was responsibile.
Some said their staff cheated. That is up on debate. But even then Farrell made the difference and not the trade
They didn’t go out and sign a big free agent pitcher.
Dumping salary didn’t help them win a WS.
MLB-what-ifs
It worked out for Red Sox freeing up cash and contracts, and new ownership for Dodgers has had a great business model for trades, scouting and drafting, and free agent signings.
No greater impact than 2 World Series appearances and an NLCS in the last three years, and 2 WS championships for RS.
MLB-what-ifs
Bosoxforlife- yes, they got rid of three malcontents and $260 million in payroll. If the trade does not happen the Red Sox would not have been able to sign the 8 free agents they did that winter…..no: Mike Napoli, Steven Drew, Jonny Gomes, Shane Victorino, David Ross, Koji Urhara, Ryan Dempster, and resigning of David Ortiz. That was almost 1/3 of their WS team from 2013.
Cosmodogs
I don’t see how the Marlins trio of OF’s can’t be #1. Even forgetting about Ozuna, they traded the biggest contract in baseball at the time, and possible MLB’s best player(Yelich) in his prime and locked into a great team friendly contract.
andyg37
Yelich was not the best player in the MLB, nor close to it, at the time. Should they have received more for a very controllable 25 year old who was an above average contributor? Sure. But no one knew his OPS was going to jump 200 points in a year and then another 100 points after that.
mlbnyyfan
I would say Verlander going to Astros. They don’t beat Yankees without him. Cheating and Verlander gave them HUGE advantage.
I’mJustBetter
Idk, the Yankees scored 3 runs in 4 games at MMP. But the Dodgers is a different story
Rocker49
knew someone would have to cry in the comments about the Astros, typical ny clown
gofish 2
Jake Odorizzi involved in the first two chronologically (Brewers –> Royals –> Rays).
Side note: I do not believe the Marlins make that trade with Toronto if they had stayed the Florida Marlins. New branding + new ballpark = insane trade idea.
gofish 2
Aaaand I got mixed up. The Marlins made the trade AFTER already establishing themselves as the new Marlins. The signings were because of the move.
DarkSide830
Marlins Jays simply because of size
DarkSide830
my bad. it was actually the Wilmer non-trade because of Fiers to HOU
house_barnes
Wilmers tears nixed the Gomez trade, Astros acquire Gomez & Fiers, Fiers dropped dime on the astros, got 3 managers and a GM fired. Wilmers tears brought down the Astros.
Rangers29
Tulo trade should be on here because of how big people thought of it at the time. Besides that I chose the Red Sox – Dodgers explosion. Huge trade.
LouisianaAstros
The Saga of Cespedes is another one.
As
Red Sox
Tigers
Mets
Forced the Mets to handcuff their franchise when they resigned him
But those couple of months with the Mets he absolutely crushed the ball.
The Human Rain Delay
Ces was great with Oakland and helped lead Mets to a Ws – Idk if Saga would be the right word
LouisianaAstros
You get traded three times in one year there is something there.
He was the key to the Mets success..
When he played they were a playoff caliber team. Since he hasn’t they haven’t.
echozulu88
I would say the Brewers- Royals trade. It set part of the foundation for KC to appear in two WS & win one. I think what the end result was is the biggest factor for these trades. Chapman helping the Cubs was huge but he was a late addition to a core of the team that was already a favorite. Same with Verlander and Houston. I could be mistaken but did any of the other trades lead to WS wins? Or turn around a franchise as much as it did with KC?
echozulu88
Side note. If you are going by biggest news that shook baseball I’d go with the Monster Boston-LAD trade.
LouisianaAstros
The foundation of the Royals was a combination of things.
That trade alone didn’t cause them to win the WS.
Majority of their core wasn’t in that trade.
Greinke’s impact in Milwaukee wasn’t much.
He did bring Segura.
I can do the research but who did Milwaukee trade Segura for.
Greinke was traded to the Angels for Segura in 2012
lambeau gang
In 2016, the Brewers got Aaron Hill, Chase Anderson and Isan Díaz from the D-Backs in exchange for Segura and Haniger. Segura and Haniger brought back Ketel Marte for the D-Backs, and Díaz was one of the pieces in the Yelich deal. So that deal was super impactful for a few franchises.
g4
Not true. Greinke led the Crew to 96 wins in 2011, first division title in 30 years, two games from making the World Series. He got flipped the next year for usual small market reasons, but impact was huge for a rental.
DVail1979
Id agree with you on the Tampa/San Diego/Kansas City trade … James Shields was huge for the Royals and Wade Davis was part of a truly dominant bullpen … That trade helped KC become what they became
ChangedName
Blue Jays/Marlins deal and the Davis/Shields deal because of how much controversy they generated and how polarizing they were in some circles. The Blue Jays/Marlins deal for the Marlins shameless salary dump so quickly after signing Reyes and Buehrle and the Davis/Shields deal for the Royals giving up Wil Myers. The Royals and Dayton Moore got the last laugh there.
Deleted Userrr
James Shields wasn’t even on the Royals team that won the World Series and the year before that he was complete garbage in the postseason.
brandons-3
Yeah, but he was a good starter for them and really gave them the mindset that they could win. Sometimes, it’s not just about the player but what a move represents. Parting with a top five prospect in BASEBALL? You’re not just getting Shields (or Wade Davis). You’re creating a winning culture. That matters.
It helps that they were a great team. That’s usually what wins, but when you have a losing culture that isn’t used to playing for anything meaningful it’s hard to turn that corner.
It’s risky because though “culture” is important, it’s hard to put a value on it. Just ask Dave Stewart or the 2012 Red Sox. They made similar moves and it went the other way.
Deleted Userrr
Trading for James Shields didn’t represent anything or establish any kind of culture. They won because of the talent on the roster.
Sabermetric Acolyte
Red Sox/Dodgers trade even though the players themselves as the trade were essentially meaningless. The results of the trade though were meaningful:
1) The next year the Dodgers began a streak of winning the division. Something they’ve done 7 years in a row. Was it the trade? Well no… it was just what the trade symbolized. The new ownership was going to do whatever it took to win.
2) Red Sox win the 2013 WS becoming one of the few teams in history to win the Series a year after ending the season in last place.
Vizionaire
angels acquisition of simmons!
deal1122
Wow, I bet the Cubs wish they would’ve just given up Schwaber instead of Gleybar. NY absolutely stole Gleybar
deal1122
Chicago got a WS out of it, so I guess it’s worth it for them
Ry.the.Stunner
Schwarber was key in that World Series, so no, I don’t think they do wish that.
PutPeteRoseInTheHall
agreed
brandons-3
The Cubs could be offered a do-over and would make the trade again. It brought a World Series trophy to Wrigley. Any other team or situation, sure you may want to have a redo.
To put it into Avengers terms, Dr. Strange “gave away Torres” to ensure the outcome that ended with a World Series that year.
lambeau gang
Except nothing is assured in baseball. That Game 7 in the WS was so unpredictable. Chapman gave up a homer to Rajai Davis of all people, and the Indians could very well have won the WS. Yes, both Chapman and Schwarber were instrumental in bringing the Cubs that championship, but it was never a given. Transactions mean nothing else f the players don’t perform as expected.
The Human Rain Delay
The trade was bad if you take out hindsight
It IS literally one of the main reasons why you will not see high profile prospects dealt for rentals anymore-
This trade was literally the last of its kind- Other Owners arent looking at it like Chapman made the deal bc of the ring they are seeing Torres and all those slave-labor controlled years left
Chi bet big and won, it doesnt mean it was a smart bet at the time
raiders
Arietta and Strop to cubs. Both were huge for 2015 and 2016 team (obviously Jake was more of the stud). Cost them just Scott Feldman and Steve Clevenger
hOsEbEeLiOn
Marlins and trading their entire OF. You trade a HOF type talent OF in Yelich and two hall of very good talents in Stanton and Ozuna you should have been able to get a kings ransom. Pretty much got nothing.
To make matters worse they trade one of the useful pieces in gallen who could have been very good for them for a long time……
PutPeteRoseInTheHall
so true
andyg37
Yelich has been a “HOF talent” for 2 years, so lets pull back a bit. He was the worst of the 3 at the time. He finished with an 800 OPS the year he was traded.
hOsEbEeLiOn
He’s only played 6 full seasons and already has four 4+ war seasons.
He’s a HOF type talent.
He’s one of the purest hitters in the game even when he was with the Marlins.
Even if his power fades his contact skills and walk skills make up for that.
g4
Can’t be ignored that Stanton’s contract limited potential trade partners. Sadly, part of the Marlins return was hefty salary relief.
andyg37
Stanton also had full veto power of any trade, the return from the Cardinals was better, but he didn’t want to go there
The Human Rain Delay
They were lucky to get a bag of balls for Stanton-Big win to get him off the books
Ozuna- They won that deal, Oz couldnt even fetch a multi year deal this year- Highly overated
Yelich- Yea that was a big loss no doubt
Love Gallen but how valuable is a Pitcher who wastes bullets on a last place team…….by the time Mia is relevant its payday for Gallen and 700 more inns on the arm to boot
Philliesfan89
How about the Phillies getting Cliff Lee and Roy Halladay?!
drew ford
That was more than a decade ago.
mlbnyyfan
I would definitely take Schwerber now. Yankees lineup definitely needs a legitimate left handed hitter for Yankees stadium. They are mostly all right handed.
drew ford
Donaldson to Toronto ended a 22 year playoff drought.
PutPeteRoseInTheHall
Marlins outfield trio for sure. 3 of the best players in the mlb. Yelich is probably top 10, ozuna and stanton top 100
PutPeteRoseInTheHall
maybe top 150
The Human Rain Delay
Ozuna is not close to a top 100 player, i wouldnt even go top 250
Stanton has the worst contract in all of Mlb
dshires4
I voted for the Chapman trade because the Yankees got an uber talented prospect, the Cubs won the WS for the first time since Abraham Lincoln was in office, and in the end the Yankees resigned Chapman.
I think this trade definitely has question marks on it, from the Cubs side. Was selling off an elite prospect worth one title? Could other guys have been traded for without selling off such a massive piece? It has a ripple effect, to this day.
Now, if it were an option, I’d have voted for the Cano/Diaz acquisition by the Mets since I think the defining moment here is that BVW has zero idea how to evaluate acquisitions from an organizational stance. He gave up WAY too much. As a Mariners fan, that makes me happy. But are we ever going to see another baseball outsider get a job leading a franchise? I doubt it.
lambeau gang
Pretty sure the Cubs weren’t around during the Civil War or Lincoln’s 1865 assassination. The Reds weren’t even founded yet.
dshires4
Wow, thank you Ken Burns. Do I need to do /s next time?
Lanidrac
Nah, you weren’t really being sarcastic. A [/hyperbole] tag would make more sense.
The Human Rain Delay
Great post and yes that ripple effect will be teams wont give up elite prospects for a rental-
I voted Chapman deal as well due to this fact that I think you are eluding to as well
Think its a little early of BVW – He has made some nice moves like stroman porcello Jd Davis in his short tenure……… At least Mets have broken the “cheap” mold that has haunted them for so long under BVW
Amazin_Oz
The answer is clearly Wilmers tears, not because he cried, not because The Mets got Cespedes…the real reason is because the Astros got Mike Fiers, the famed whistle blower
homerheins
Shelby Miller trade defines the stupidity of that historically bad front office, but didn’t lead to that much overall.
R.D.
I like the arguments for the fiers deal, they make a lot of sense.
I’m gonna ignore the 3 separate trades since they shouldnt count.
I think the jays/marlins deal set a standard of “it’s ok to sign a bunch of players and trade them for pieces a year later.”
That’s been recreated quite a few times since then and salary related moves arent all as shocking as they were before that deal.
John Buck was used to acquire RA Dickey from the mets while Escobar, Hech, desclafani, Reyes, and marisnick all were hurled around the hot stove a whole bunch following this trade.
I’d say this move, while not being the most directly impactful, had the most repercussions.
lowtalker1
In reality, there is only one trade on this s list that is franchise altering that’s the massive deal that changed the course for the Red Sox and Dodgers
frankf
Though viewed as a “change of scenery” move at the time, it’s hard to argue against Rizzo to the Cubs being as, if not more, impactful as any on this list.
frankf
And you can’t forget Arrietta/Strop to the Cubs.
frankf
And you can’t forget the trades that brought Arrietta/Strop, Hendricks, and the now despised Addison Russell to the Cubs. Theo was a master at pulling rabbits out of trash cans for his first few years.
jimmertee
In 1919 Boston trades Babe Ruth to the Yankees for $25,000. Nothing else compares.
HubcapDiamondStarHalo
So “the past decade” kinda got overlooked there? Or maybe you read it as “a passed decade?”
mike127
This being 2020, the Babe Ruth trade doesn’t even fit the past century category. Jimmer must live in a part of the country that allows bars to be open really late on Fridays….or open really early on Saturdays.
Sabermetric Acolyte
It was $100,000 cash and $350,000 as a loan.
driftcat28 2
I love looking back at the “lesser” names involved in past trades and remembering asking myself “who the heck is this bum”. Now they’re known major leaguers lol
g4
To that point, while everyone was yakking about Wilmer bawling, Stearns pivoted to acquire Josh Hader. That trade + Yelich define his career up to this point.
lambeau gang
Actually Doug Melvin was the main GM for Milwaukee at the time. Stearns took over full-time after the season.
jam
These posters are missing the question: you asked for the defining trade of THE PAST decade but they are privy using trades that happened THIS decade. Simple numbers tell us that a decade begins with the number 1 and ends with 00 (unless the first decade began with 0). So we all need to be suggesting trades made from 2001-2010–you know: the LAST decade
mike127
jam—you probably should go back to school….by definition a decade is “a period of ten years”. As the title states “the PAST decade” indicating the past ten years. I know you tried to be cute with your “literal” definition, but the article is not titled the “decade that includes the teen years”—if that was the case THEN you would be correct as that decade is still ongoing and by definition is 2011–thru the end of 2020.
I totally agree with you that 98% of the population thinks we are in the first year of the “decade of the 20s” when we are not….but no need to insult the masses and try to stir up trades that happened 15-20 years ago.
WildRemote
kinda shocked to see the dodgers/redsox trade so far ahead. That trade was irrelevant outside of the scope of those two teams and none of the players did anything for their new team, outside of Adrian Gonzales and ~10 games of Josh Beckett.
Wilmer’s Tears has had a massive impact on 3 different teams (with additional trades branching) and lasting repercussions on the league as a whole, how can you vote for a salary dump over that?
Sabermetric Acolyte
That’s the point though. The trade more defined the franchises. For the Dodgers it was the new ownership looking to make a splash and showing the league what they were willing to do. For the Red Sox it directly lead to the 2013 WS win,
tcostant
I think getting Trea Turner and Joe Ross for a 4th OF’er was better than most of these.
JoeBrady
I picked the Sale trade. It was the most talent trade, helped the RS finish 1st three years running, plus a WSC, and the WS got a pretty good haul to rebuild.
nutbunnies
The wheels had been in motion in other regards, but the Red Sox-Dodgers trade to me has to be it. It’s the first big money laundering trade in a decade of a handful. It symbolizes how ownership and front offices transitioned from viewing players as “assets” like they were stock options or something.
JustCheckingIn
Money laundering!? Do you even know what that is?
Having one party pay a contract originally signed by another isn’t money laundering. Jeez
And if you’re trying to point to the CBA deals, that’s still not money laundering. Maybe tax evasion. But really, it’s just a loophole. Like every other tax law. Just find it
Lanidrac
What about the Cardinals dumping Colby Rasmus for the missing pieces needed to stage epic comeback for the 2011 Championship?