![]() |
|
|
| |
« Heyman On Top Free Agents | Main | Bonser Not Discussed In Washburn Talks »
FRIDAY: The Orioles reached an agreement with Matusz on a Major League deal worth $3.47MM.
THURSDAY, 12:51pm: MLB.com's Spencer Fordin says the O's and Matusz inched closer to a deal, perhaps for a Major League contract worth $3.1MM. However, no agreement is confirmed.
11:16am: Roch Kubatko confirms Matusz's presence in Baltimore for a physical, but stresses that the pitcher has not signed yet. All signs point to a deal getting done though.
9:43am: According to Jeff Zrebiec of the Baltimore Sun, Orioles top draft pick Brian Matusz is expected in Baltimore today for a physical and a deal is close. Zrebiec believes Matusz sought a big league contract for $5MM.
Nationals fans have to hope the Matusz deal is wrapped up early and can be used as a benchmark to sign Aaron Crow.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5540077168834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Orioles Sign Brian Matusz:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
In contrast to the Nats situation with Crow, I believe giving a ML deal to Matusz would not be a mistake. Matusz is expected to move extremely fast through the minors, and could very well start at AA-ball. A ML deal would give him 2 seasons at both AA and AAA - more than enough development time. If Matusz isn't ML ready by that time, he is probably considered a bust anyway. Matusz, by all reports, is already extremely polished, so I believe giving him a ML deal would be a great idea, and a show of good faith.
Posted by: dorfmac | August 14, 2008 at 09:50 AM
This is good news for the O's. They agreed to a major league deal with a 3.1 million signing bonus. I don't think that is bad for the number four pick in the draft. Now hopefully the Orioles can sign Martin and Landers and then we will have had an excellent draft.
Posted by: rebuilding | August 14, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Ugh last time the O's gave a ML contract to a top pitcher it was Loewen. And that didn't go well.
Posted by: XD23 | August 14, 2008 at 01:58 PM
IIRC, Loewen was a raw high school pitcher with a lot of potential, who had great strides to make during his progression to the majors. Obviously, injuries and inconsistency was his downfall. Matusz is a completely different situation, though. As I mentioned before, Matusz is already pretty polished, and if it takes him more than the 4 years to get to the majors and ML deal requires, then he will basically be a bust anyways. He is expected to need one - two seasons max - development to get to the ML level. That still leaves him with 2 seasons left to get hurt/suck before it's an issue. That's a lot of fudge factor for an arm like Matusz.
Posted by: dorfmac | August 14, 2008 at 02:19 PM
Just so I have this straight: a major league deal doesn't effect a player's service time clock, does it? I mean...if we give Matusz the big league deal he's looking for, would he become arbitration eligible (and, thus, free agency eligible) sooner? I can't imagine it would work like that, since no one would agree to such a provision, but I just want to make sure. Also, if that IS NOT the case, I can't figure out why these kids want the MLB deal SOOOOO bad that they'd be willing to walk away from the table. It doesn't seem to offer anything of real value. What is it that's so alluring? Getting to tell people you're on the 40 man roster? Getting the league minimum (after you got a $4 mil bonus)? Getting rushed to the majors before you're ready in some cases? I agree that this wouldn't be much of a concern with Matusz (as opposed to someone like Crow, for instance) due to his expected time line and polish, but it's a matter of principle.
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 14, 2008 at 06:23 PM
No, the ML deal does not affect service time. It earns them the league minimum, as you mentioned, and ensures that they are on a ML team sooner. With a ML deal, players can be optioned a maximum of 4 times. So that means, by their 5th season of pro ball, they are guarenteed to be in the majors, or released to another team who will play them in the majors. Players who don't get this provision, I believe, have 3 years prior to being forced on the 40-man, and then have the same 4 options. Not 100% sure on all of that, but i'm pretty sure thats the deal.
Posted by: dorfmac | August 14, 2008 at 09:24 PM
Strikes me as a pretty stupid thing to hold out for...on both sides (but particularly the player's).
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 15, 2008 at 01:09 PM
Keep rolling O's. Getting rid of bradford payed this by itself not to metion the player we'll pick up for bradford.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | August 15, 2008 at 03:10 PM
milehigh78,
It's far from stupid to hold out for. An MLB deal puts the player on the 40 man and makes him an MLB player. As such, he is represented by the MLB players union and also receives the MLB health care and pension plans. Yes those might be considered mild in some regards, but there are plenty of ancillary benefits that go along with it as well.
Posted by: usctrojans31 | August 15, 2008 at 03:35 PM
I had no idea about the union and those other benefits you mentioned. Just glad to have him in the fold. I doubt we'll see him get into the minors this season, but hopefully winter ball somewhere.
Posted by: dorfmac | August 15, 2008 at 03:49 PM
A player wants a ML deal because they want to play i the MLB. If they sign a normal deal and are a bust, they could be in the minors for a long time and might never pitch in the MLB. If you sign a ML deal, tou almost definatley will make it to the MLB. A lot quicker, too.
Posted by: Joe | August 15, 2008 at 05:10 PM
Ah screw it, happy day!!! Now, if the O's can work that Arrieta magic again and tweak Matusz's mechanics (short leg stride, in particular) without effecting his command; maybe pump up that velocity a little... What? I'm never satisfied! And this kid can be a flat-out ACE with three or four more MPH to his heater. At a lanky and not exceptionally strong 6'4" with the aforementioned short stride and some other minor mechanical things, there's enough projection there to think it possible. And if not...he still looks like a helluva 2!!!
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 15, 2008 at 07:02 PM
Couple other things...
USCtrojans- hadn't thought of it that way. Don't think it changes my opinion ENTIRELY- I still don't think it should mean the difference between a kid signing or not- but you DO make a very interesting point and I appreciate the insight.
Also, I agree with dorfmac... It's not such a big deal with Matusz, given his polish and poise. The funny thing is, I wasn't really that psyched about this pick when we first made it (I had been holding out hope for Alvarez or Hosmer until the last second and even after they were gone, I wasn't sold on Matusz over Smoak), but now I love it. I have a very good feeling this kid is going to be special; particularly if he adds a few ticks, as mentioned. There something about the way he carries himself and the way he just seems to exude success. You never know, but I'm feeling very good about this signing (which actually seems pretty reasonable/cheap- maybe I'm just thrown off by Wieters' deal and the numbers being thrown around by some of the other unsigned guys). And I'm not just saying that because of my sneaking suspicion that USCtrojans is actually Brian Matusz (or someone closely related to him; California...very insightful about the motivations for wanting an MLB deal...? Think about it).
Finally, like I said, I'm never satisfied. To that end, I really hope we turn our attention toward/work something out with Keith Landers, Jarrett Martin, and Kevin Brady. If we get those three signed, it'll be an excellent draft, I think (though it's looking pretty good now, to be honest). Has anyone heard anything?
Landers is exciting given his projection and I know Martin had a falling out with the coaching staff of the college team he was going to sign with. Don't know much about Brady, but apparently he throws hard and has looked awesome this summer. Let's keep the good news coming!!! Go O's!!!!
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 15, 2008 at 07:13 PM
It doesn't matter what the early reports say and what the experts predict. They're wrong consistently enough (esp. in the Baseball Draft) to not buy into it 100%. The prospect won't tell you how fast or slow they rise until they start playing. Who knows how health might factor in? Not a small point with pitchers. An ML contract limits a teams' flexibility. What it does is accelerate the clock on that player by 3 or so years so that he has to immediately be protected on the 40 Man roster. The bottomline right now is he has to be on the ML roster in 4 years at minimum. If health or command issues or whatever else can pop up factors in, it will stunt his development.
An ML contract is attractive to a prospect because: A. It garuantees being in the majors, and, B. It cuts down their service time until they see a big Major League payday by 3 or so years. Think of it a difference of 8-10 years until they hit Free Agency or a big extension vs. 4-6 years. That's a big difference.
Posted by: basemonkey | August 16, 2008 at 12:00 AM