Headlines

  • Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension
  • Orioles Re-Sign Zach Eflin
  • Cubs Sign Hunter Harvey
  • Marlins Sign Pete Fairbanks
  • Pirates To Sign Ryan O’Hearn
  • White Sox Sign Sean Newcomb
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

MLBTR Originals

MLB Mailbag: Arenado, Bellinger, Phillies, Reds, A’s, Mariners, Brewers, More

By Steve Adams | November 27, 2024 at 11:59pm CDT

It's time for another edition of the weekly MLB Mailbag here at MLBTR. I'm pinch-hitting for MLBTR owner Tim Dierkes this week.

We received more questions than usual, with a heavy focus on some recent rumors/reporting on big-name NL Central players like Nolan Arenado and Cody Bellinger. We'll address that, plus questions on the Phillies' options, the Reds' outlook following a few early moves, the recent wave of non-tendered players, how the A's can actually spend some money and more.

Onto the questions!

Mark asks:

Should the Cardinals not find a trade partner for Nolan Arenado (or one that he agrees to), how do they sort out the logjam?  Gorman, Donovan, Saggese--and eventually Wetherholt--at 2B/3B, and 1B/DH is kind of occupied now with Contreras and Burleson.  Seems like if they plan to let the younger guys play, tough to see how there is enough playing time to go around.

Eldon asks:

The Yankees are rumored to have interest in Nolan Arenado. Wouldn't this be too much like the Donaldson fiasco of just a very short time ago Hopefully Steinbrenner and/or Cashman wouldn't dare do that again...would they? An aging player with a big contract who seems to be in decline? Why?

Unlock Subscriber-Exclusive Articles Like This One With a Trade Rumors Front Office Subscription

BENEFITS
  • Access weekly subscriber-only articles by Tim Dierkes, Steve Adams, and Anthony Franco.
  • Join exclusive weekly live chats with Anthony.
  • Remove ads and support our writers.
  • Access GM-caliber tools like our MLB Contract Tracker
Share Repost Send via email

Front Office Originals MLBTR Originals Membership

44 comments

What Would It Take To Extend Tarik Skubal?

By Nick Deeds | November 24, 2024 at 12:15pm CDT

The Tigers recently attempted to extend reigning AL Cy Young award winner Tarik Skubal, according to a report from Evan Petzold of the Detroit Free Press, but Petzold suggests the offer from Detroit was not competitive and the sides ultimately did not come close to hammering out a deal. It’s certainly understandable that Detroit would have interest in locking up their ace long-term, as they’re just beginning to enter their competitive window and have just two years of team control over the southpaw remaining before he can depart in free agency. With that being said, Skubal is a client of Scott Boras, who typically encourages his players to test free agency to maximize value, and the lefty certainly has plenty of leverage coming off a 2024 season that saw him win the AL Triple Crown and become the club’s first Cy Young award winner since Max Scherzer in 2013.

That’s not to say an extension is necessarily impossible, however. A handful of high-profile Boras clients, including Jose Altuve and Xander Bogaerts, have previously signed extensions with their clubs prior to testing free agency. And there’s certainly precedent for Cy Young-caliber hurlers signing extensions, as well. The Tigers famously signed future Hall of Famer Justin Verlander to two extensions across his 13 years in Detroit, the first being a five-year, $80MM contract that bought out his final two arbitration years and three free agent years prior to the 2010 season, and the second being a five-year deal signed prior to the 2013 season that covered the 2015-19 seasons and guaranteed Verlander an additional $140MM.

Verlander’s first contract stands as a fairly straightforward comparison point to Skubal given that the lefty is also two years away from free agency and Verlander had just finished third in AL Cy Young award voting prior to the deal being signed. However, that deal is a decade and a half old at this point and prices around the league have risen considerably in the ensuing years. Verlander’s second extension may serve as a more accurate point of comparison when discussing the possibility of another Cy Young winner extending his stay with the Tigers, given the high-end deals players such as Gerrit Cole (nine years, $324MM), Stephen Strasburg (seven years, $245MM), and Zack Greinke (six years, $206.5MM) have signed over the past decade.

Perhaps the best comparison for Skubal’s situation can be found in right-hander Jacob deGrom, who inked an extension with the Mets prior to the 2019 season that covered the 2020-23 seasons. The deal guaranteed him $120.5MM in new money and included a club option for 2024 that could have raised the total guarantee to $153MM over five years. More importantly, the deal afforded deGrom the opportunity to opt out following the 2022 season. That deal was inked in a very similar situation to the one Skubal and the Tigers find themselves in now; deGrom was just two years from free agency and had secured his first career Cy Young award on the heels of an otherworldly season that saw him post a 1.70 ERA and 1.98 FIP in 217 innings of work.

That season was even more dominant than the one Skubal posted in 2024, and deGrom at the time had a much less checkered injury history than Skubal currently does. While those factors may suggest that deGrom’s deal ought to be a target for the lefty to shoot for, he has one major factor on his side that could substantially boost his earning power beyond even that of deGrom: age. Skubal just turned 28 last week, but deGrom was nearly three years older than Skubal during his Cy Young-winning age-30 season back in 2018. In other words, Skubal is not only younger now than deGrom was at the time of his extension, but he’ll actually still be younger than deGrom was at the time of the deal when he’s slated to reach free agency following the 2026 season.

Being able to market an age-30 season in free agency is a huge boost to a player’s overall value on the open market, particularly for pitchers who teams are often hesitant to guarantee lengthy deals for. Cole’s massive nine-year deal with the Yankees came prior to his age-29 season, suggesting that a $300MM payday could be a stretch for Skubal, but Strasburg was a year older than Skubal will be upon reaching free agency when he secured his $245MM contract on the open market and even had a similarly checkered injury history to the southpaw. Strasburg’s deal wound up being among the worst contracts in recent memory due to subsequent injury woes, which could make clubs skeptical of replicating it, but it’s easy to imagine Skubal landing a deal north of $200MM should he reach free agency during the 2026-27 offseason.

That’s a hefty price tag for the Tigers to contend with, but it’s certainly feasible they could put a compelling offer on the table. After all, the club has just two players signed to guaranteed contracts for the 2026 season: Javier Baez and Colt Keith. Keith won’t make more than $5.3MM annually until and unless his club option for the 2030 season is picked up, while Baez’s $23.3MM AAV will drop off the books following the 2027 season. For a club that was able to afford hefty annual salaries to both Verlander and Miguel Cabrera a decade ago, it should be fairly manageable to commit an AAV in the $25-30MM range to Skubal.

Skubal is projected by MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz for an $8MM salary via arbitration this year, and would presumably be in line for a healthy raise next winter as well. If the Tigers were willing to guarantee Skubal a combined $25MM for his final two trips through arbitration, then perhaps a seven-year, $175MM extension could make sense for both sides. Such a deal would guarantee Skubal a total payday through his age-34 season that approaches the $200MM guarantee he could hope to land in free agency, while allowing the Tigers to lock up their ace through his prime years. It’s also possible that Skubal could take a page out of deGrom’s playbook and sacrifice some total guarantee in order to get a second bite at the apple in the form of an opt-out, perhaps following his age-32 season in 2029.

Share Repost Send via email

Detroit Tigers MLBTR Originals Tarik Skubal

87 comments

The Best Fits For Juan Soto

By Steve Adams | November 22, 2024 at 1:19pm CDT

Last offseason, MLBTR took extensive looks at how the market for each of the top free agents might shake out, providing those pieces to our Front Office subscribers. We're doing the same this winter, kicking things off with a look at the likely bidders for Juan Soto and where each stands with regard to payroll and the luxury tax, among other aspects that ought to be considered.

At this point, there's little need to chronicle Soto's greatness to this point in his career. In our Top 50 Free Agent rankings, I penned over 1000 words on Soto alone, outlining just some of the reasons he's rightly referred to as a "generational" talent (a term that perhaps is used a bit too cavalierly these days). To borrow a couple excerpts from that:

"It’s rare for a player to even make his big league debut at 19, let alone to immediately break out as a star. That’s precisely what Soto did, however, belting an opposite-field home run off Chad Green in his second big league plate appearance. One home run doesn’t make anyone a star, of course, but Soto was completely unfazed by MLB pitching and went on to post a .292/.406/.517 batting line and swat 22 homers all before turning 20. In the entire history of the game, no one as young as Soto has turned in a season that good. Soto’s 142 OPS+ in his rookie season is the best in MLB history (min. 300 plate appearances). Soto’s debut harkened back to Hall of Famer Mel Ott’s jaw-dropping 19-year-old rookie season with the New York Giants exactly 90 years prior."

That, of course, is just looking at his rookie year. Soto's only gotten better since then, recording more walks than strikeouts in five consecutive seasons. He belted a career-high 41 homers this past season while slashing .288/.419/.569. By measure of wRC+, he was 80% better than league average at the plate (and somehow still only his team's second-best hitter; we see you, Aaron Judge). Yet Soto and all of his career accolades are hitting the open market at just 26 years of age. Judge, by comparison, played his first full season at age 25. He was entering his age-31 season in free agency. Shohei Ohtani was entering his age-29 campaign. Free agents rarely hit the market this young, and it's feasible we haven't even seen the best version of Soto yet.

When it comes to contract expectations, throw precedent and norms out the window. If you're not willing to put down at least a decade -- and likely 12, 13, 14 or even 15 years -- you're not likely to get a seat at the table. (Though it's fun to at least think of a clean-payroll club offering an extreme AAV on a shorter-term deal with an opt-out; six years, $450MM anyone?)

We know most of the teams that have already met with Soto by now, but let's take a look at each and try to identify which clubs might emerge as the ever-popular "mystery team" based on their payroll, tax status, and other factors.

Unlock Subscriber-Exclusive Articles Like This One With a Trade Rumors Front Office Subscription

BENEFITS
  • Access weekly subscriber-only articles by Tim Dierkes, Steve Adams, and Anthony Franco.
  • Join exclusive weekly live chats with Anthony.
  • Remove ads and support our writers.
  • Access GM-caliber tools like our MLB Contract Tracker
Share Repost Send via email

Front Office Originals MLBTR Originals Membership Juan Soto

47 comments

2024 Non-Tender Candidates

By Anthony Franco | November 21, 2024 at 11:59pm CDT

The non-tender deadline is tomorrow evening. Teams need to decide whether they want to offer contracts to their arbitration-eligible (and pre-arbitration) players. Those who are not tendered contracts are sent directly into free agency without exposing them to waivers.

As is the case each winter, MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz has projected salaries for the arbitration class. Teams have already made a few cuts among that group — either at the beginning of the offseason when players returned from the injured list or prior to Tuesday’s deadline to keep prospects out of the Rule 5 draft. The Cubs, for instance, have already taken Adbert Alzolay and Patrick Wisdom off the 40-man roster and could officially non-tender them tomorrow.

Not everyone who is tendered a contract will know their salary this week. Some players will sign “pre-tender” deals that lock in guaranteed money. Many of them are borderline non-tender candidates who will take salaries below their projection to ensure they stay on the roster at all. (Scott Kingery and Seth Brown have already signed deals of that ilk.) Those who don’t sign but are tendered a contract could have a few months of uncertainty. They’re free to continue negotiating with their clubs to find a mutually agreeable salary until the date of their arbitration hearing.

As we do each offseason, we’ll take a look at arb-eligible players we believe have a realistic shot at being let go. To be clear, this is not a list of players we think are likelier than not to be non-tendered. These are players we consider to have at least a 10-20% chance of being cut — a broad group who wouldn’t strike us as completely surprising.

At least a few of these players will likely be traded, as some teams will have more willingness than others to accommodate various projected salaries. MLBTR covered a few candidates for that kind of deal in a post for Front Office subscribers yesterday.

Onto the list, with Matt’s projected salaries:

Catchers

  • Riley Adams (Nationals): $1.1MM
  • Nick Fortes (Marlins): $1.6MM
  • Eric Haase (Brewers): $1.8MM
  • Garrett Stubbs (Phillies): $1.2MM
  • Luis Torrens (Mets): $1.1MM

First Basemen

  • Connor Joe (Pirates): $3.2MM
  • Gavin Sheets (White Sox): $2.6MM
  • Andrew Vaughn (White Sox): $6.4MM

Second Basemen

  • Nick Madrigal (Cubs): $1.9MM
  • Brendan Rodgers (Rockies): $5.5MM

Third Basemen

  • Jon Berti (Yankees): $3.8MM
  • Santiago Espinal (Reds): 4MM
  • Emmanuel Rivera (Orioles): $1.4MM
  • Josh Rojas (Mariners): $4.3MM

Shortstops

  • Jorge Mateo (Orioles): $3.2MM
  • Zach McKinstry (Tigers): $1.3MM
  • Tyler Wade (Padres): $900K
  • Taylor Walls (Rays): $1.3MM

Center Fielders

  • Trent Grisham (Yankees): $5.7MM
  • Mickey Moniak (Angels): $1.8MM
  • Leody Taveras (Rangers): $4.3MM
  • Eli White (Braves): $800K

Corner Outfielders

  • Miguel Andujar (Athletics): $2.8MM
  • Akil Baddoo (Tigers): $1.6MM
  • Dylan Carlson (Rays): $2.7MM
  • Bryan De La Cruz (Pirates): $4MM
  • Jake Fraley (Reds): $3.3MM
  • Sam Haggerty (Mariners): $900K
  • Austin Hays (Phillies): $6.4MM
  • Sam Hilliard (Rockies): $1.7MM
  • Ramon Laureano (Braves): $6.1MM
  • MJ Melendez (Royals): $2.5MM
  • Jesus Sanchez (Marlins): $3.2MM
  • Mike Yastrzemski (Giants): $9.5MM

Starting Pitchers

  • Tyler Alexander (Rays): $2.8MM
  • Paul Blackburn (Mets): $4.4MM
  • JT Brubaker (Yankees): $2.275MM
  • Griffin Canning (Braves): $5.1MM
  • Aaron Civale (Brewers): $8MM
  • Dane Dunning (Rangers): $4.4MM
  • Austin Gomber (Rockies): $5.6MM
  • Ben Lively (Guardians): $3.2MM
  • Dustin May (Dodgers): $2.135MM
  • Triston McKenzie (Guardians): $2.4MM*
  • Cal Quantrill (Rockies): $9MM
  • Trevor Rogers (Orioles): $2.8MM
  • Tyler Wells (Orioles): $2.1MM
  • Huascar Ynoa (Braves): $825K

Right-Handed Relievers

  • Justin Anderson (White Sox): $1.1MM
  • David Bednar (Pirates): $6.6MM
  • Enyel De Los Santos (White Sox): $1.7MM
  • Camilo Doval (Giants): $4.6MM
  • Scott Effross (Yankees): $900K
  • Ian Gibaut (Reds): $800K
  • Hunter Harvey (Royals): $3.9MM
  • Carlos Hernandez (Royals): $1.2MM
  • Dany Jimenez (Athletics): $1MM
  • Alex Lange (Tigers): $1.3MM
  • Derek Law (Nationals): $3MM
  • Justin Lawrence (Rockies): $1MM
  • Mark Leiter Jr. (Yankees): $2.1MM
  • Julian Merryweather (Cubs): $1.3MM
  • Luis Patino (Padres): $800K
  • Zach Pop (Blue Jays): $1MM
  • Tanner Rainey (Nationals): $1.9MM
  • Sean Reid-Foley (Mets): $900K
  • Jordan Romano (Blue Jays): $7.75MM
  • Jose Ruiz (Phillies): $1.2MM
  • Josh Sborz (Rangers): $1.3MM
  • Cole Sulser (Rays): $1MM
  • Erik Swanson (Blue Jays): $3.2MM
  • Dillon Tate (Blue Jays): $1.9MM
  • Mason Thompson (Nationals): $800K*
  • Michael Tonkin (Twins): $1.5MM
  • Justin Topa (Twins): $1.3MM
  • Austin Voth (Mariners): $2.2MM
  • Steven Wilson (White Sox): $1MM

Left-Handed Relievers

  • Lucas Gilbreath (Rockies): $900K
  • Sam Hentges (Guardians): $1.4MM
  • Tim Mayza (Yankees): $4MM
  • Hoby Milner (Brewers): $2.7MM
  • Kyle Nelson (Diamondbacks): $800K
  • Colin Poche (Rays): $3.4MM
  • Gregory Soto (Orioles): $5.6MM
  • Gabe Speier (Mariners): $900K
  • José Suarez (Angels): $1.2MM
  • Alex Young (Mets): $1.4MM

* Have avoided arbitration since the list was published

Share Repost Send via email

MLBTR Originals Newsstand Non-Tender Candidates

146 comments

Free Agent Faceoff: Max Scherzer/Walker Buehler

By Nick Deeds | November 17, 2024 at 2:17pm CDT

Three years ago today, the results of voting for 2021’s NL Cy Young award were announced. The top of the ballot featured a somewhat controversial battle between the elite rate production of then-Brewers ace Corbin Burnes and the volume offered by Phillies ace Zack Wheeler, with Burnes ultimately taking home the trophy. Finishing just below them in balloting, however, was a pair of hurlers from the playoff rotation that took the Dodgers to the NLCS: right-handers Max Scherzer and Walker Buehler.

Flash forward three years, and things have gone quite well for the first- and second-place finishers for that year’s Cy Young in the NL. Burnes enters this winter as the consensus top free agent pitcher available and could be in line for a guarantee that reaches $200MM, while Wheeler opted against returning to the open market in favor of extending with the Phillies on a three-year, $126MM contract earlier this year and now stands as a Cy Young finalist once again alongside Chris Sale and Paul Skenes. Scherzer and Buehler are also headed into free agency this winter, although neither figures to be in line for a nine-figure guarantee like those of Burnes and Wheeler.

Instead, both hurlers figure to enter the open market hoping to re-establish themselves as front-of-the-rotation talents after facing adversity in recent years. Scherzer and Buehler landed the 33rd and 37th spots on MLBTR’s annual Top 50 MLB Free Agents list this winter, as we predicted one-year deals worth $16MM and $15MM respectively for each player. While both hurlers boast ace-level pedigrees and could wind up signing similar contracts this winter, the pair took different paths to get to this point over recent years and their unique challenges and assets could inform the preferences of prospective suitors.

Scherzer’s struggles in recent seasons have been almost entirely about health rather than performance. After turning in 11 utterly dominant starts for the Dodgers down the stretch following a trade from the Nationals at that summer’s trade deadline, the veteran right-hander’s season came to an abrupt end when he was forced out of Game 2 of the NLCS due to a dead arm after just 4 1/3 innings of work. Scherzer was unable to bounce-back in time to pitch again for L.A. in that series and ultimately departed the club on the heels of their loss to the eventual World Champion Braves in the series.

After landing with the Mets on a three-year guarantee worth $130MM, Scherzer turned in a dominant 2022 campaign for New York but was limited to just 23 starts due to oblique issues. It was the fewest starts he had made in a full season during his career, and his 145 1/3 innings of work, while hardly out of the ordinary for a starter in recent years, was similarly a full-season career low. The right-hander bounced back in terms of volume in 2023, making 27 starts for the Mets and Rangers throughout the regular season, but suffered on the performance front as he posted a somewhat middling 3.77 ERA (112 ERA+) in 152 2/3 innings of work. Those results improved significantly (3.20 ERA, 135 ERA+) down the stretch following his trade to Texas, but much like 2021 Scherzer struggled with injuries late in the season and was hampered during the playoffs, ultimately pitching just 9 2/3 innings total during the club’s championship run.

While Scherzer’s declining volume and production were somewhat concerning, the future Hall of Famer was still clearly among the top pitchers in the sport even as he began to struggle with injury. Over those aforementioned two seasons, Scherzer combined for 50 starts where he posted an excellent 3.03 ERA (133 ERA+) with a 3.49 FIP and a 29.3% strikeout rate in 298 innings of work. That performance was good for 6.7 fWAR, good for 23rd among all starters across those two seasons and sandwiched between the likes of Max Fried and Clayton Kershaw.

Unfortunately for the veteran, however, things took a substantial turn for the worse in 2024 as he suffered from the first truly injury-plagued season of his career. After undergoing back surgery last offseason, Scherzer’s was expected to miss at least the first couple of months of action. That timetable was further delayed by nerve issues, and by the time shoulder fatigue brought his season to an early end in September he had made just nine total starts this season. Those nine starts saw Scherzer pitch effectively, though not close to the ace-level production he had flashed even two years prior. In 43 1/3 innings of work this season, he pitched to a 3.95 ERA with a 4.18 FIP, striking out 22.6% of opponents faced while walking just 5.6%.

Looking ahead to 2025, it’s certainly easy to imagine Scherzer providing high quality production whenever he’s on the field, given the league average results he posted while fighting through injury this year and his pedigree as a three-time winner and six-time finalist of the Cy Young award. With that being said, the veteran will celebrate his 41st birthday in July of 2025, and his increasingly detrimental injury woes in recent years leave plenty of questions about just how many starts Scherzer can be counted on for in 2025, particularly in the postseason given the injury questions he faced in 2023, 2021, and even 2019 with the Nationals.

By contrast, Buehler comes with far fewer questions regarding his overall health. That’s to be expected from a player who is a decade and a day Scherzer’s junior. That’s not to say Buehler hasn’t had health issues of his own, of course, as Buehler had nearly two full calendar years of his career wiped out by Tommy John surgery. Buehler returned to the mound for the Dodgers on May 7 of this year after having last pitched in a major league game on June 10 of 2022. The righty has had few injury woes throughout his career aside from his two career elbow surgeries, with a bout of hip inflammation this year and a rib injury back in 2018 representing the only other significant injuries of his big league career.

With that being said, it’s worth noting that the aforementioned Tommy John surgery was actually the second of Buehler’s pitching career. It’s not uncommon for players to struggle after going under the knife a second time, though some pitchers such as Nathan Eovaldi and Jameson Taillon have undergone the procedure twice and gone on to be effective for years following their second surgery. Buehler also averaged 95 mph on his fastball in 2024, an encouraging sign as it’s right in line with his average prior to going under the knife.

That’s not to say Buehler lacks question marks, however. The right-hander’s 2024 season was nothing short of atrocious. He surrendered a 5.38 ERA and 5.54 FIP that were both more than 30% worse than league average by ERA- and FIP-, while his 18.6% strikeout rate and 8.1% walk rate were both the worst marks of his career since he became a full time player in 2018. While Buehler’s solid 15 innings of work during the playoffs (3.60 ERA, 3.50 FIP) offer some reason for optimism, particularly as he struck out a third of his opponents in the NLCS and World Series, his atrocious regular season results are difficult to ignore. While Scherzer seems to be a reasonable bet to produce when healthy enough to take the mound, Buehler will need to improve his overall production substantially to be an even league average starter next year even as he flashed his front-of-the-rotation upside late in the Dodgers’ championship run this postseason.

If your team was in the market for a bounce-back starter this winter, which would you rather sign? Would you value Scherzer’s strong results and lengthy track record of success when healthy despite his age and injury questions, or would you prefer Buehler’s youth and upside despite his brutal results in 2024?

Which Starter Would You Rather Have For 2025?
Walker Buehler 86.96% (4,810 votes)
Max Scherzer 13.04% (721 votes)
Total Votes: 5,531
Share Repost Send via email

Free Agent Faceoff MLBTR Originals Max Scherzer Walker Buehler

62 comments

The Yankees’ Wave Of Former Top Prospects

By Steve Adams | November 15, 2024 at 4:05pm CDT

Prospects in baseball aren't a sure thing, but they're fun to dream on. As fans, pundits and onlookers of all varieties -- heck, even for team employees -- it's easy to get swept up in what might eventually be. There's nothing more alluring than the idea of a potential star-caliber player, or even a solid regular, earning at or close to the league minimum with six or even seven years of club control ahead of them. The more players of this ilk on which a team can successfully convert, the more space there is to be aggressive in free agency, in extending homegrown talent and in acquiring players on notable salary in trades.

The flip side of that equation, however, lies in the moves teams sometimes decline to make. Trades are passed on and free agents looked over, as that promise of a better tomorrow looms on the horizon. "There's no such thing as a pitching prospect" (or "TINSTAAPP") is a common idiom in baseball circles. For every Juan Soto, Gunnar Henderson, Jackson Merrill and Jackson Chourio, there are ten others whose names fall to the wayside and eventually change hands via a minor trade/claim or pass through waivers entirely. Prospects are fun to dream on ... but more often than not, they're just that: a dream.

Every team is susceptible to this. Look up and down the league and you'll probably find at least one former top prospect among each club's crop of minor league free agents this offseason, along with several more who cleared waivers and were assigned to their clubs' top affiliate in hopes they reestablish something.

This isn't intended to be a knock on the Yankees in particular. Again, it's a common problem. But the Yankees currently have four out-of-options players who've yet to establish themselves and who have ranked among their top 10 prospects in the organization within the past three years. None has established himself, and now each is facing an uncertain future, particularly with the looming Nov. 19 deadline to protect players from next month's Rule 5 Draft. The Yankees have five open 40-man spots at the moment, so perhaps they don't feel a huge push to free up some space, but those vacancies will be filled by prospects, free agent signings and trade acquisitions -- all beginning within the next few days. Someone's going to have to get pushed off eventually.

Again, other clubs have this issue every year. But in 2024 specifically, there's no club with quite as many out-of-options players on the roster bubble as the Yankees.

Unlock Subscriber-Exclusive Articles Like This One With a Trade Rumors Front Office Subscription

BENEFITS
  • Access weekly subscriber-only articles by Tim Dierkes, Steve Adams, and Anthony Franco.
  • Join exclusive weekly live chats with Anthony.
  • Remove ads and support our writers.
  • Access GM-caliber tools like our MLB Contract Tracker
Share Repost Send via email

Front Office Originals MLBTR Originals Membership New York Yankees

40 comments

The Cardinals’ Trio Of Bullpen Trade Candidates

By Anthony Franco | November 12, 2024 at 7:01pm CDT

The Cardinals’ direction is one of the key storylines of the offseason. The franchise has made clear they’re prioritizing the future while giving more playing time to young players in 2025. They’ve pushed back on initial chatter about a complete teardown, at least in part because a couple veterans with no-trade clauses prefer to see things through in St. Louis.

Even if they’re not in a complete rebuild, the Cardinals should gauge interest on players with limited windows of contractual control. That’s especially true in the bullpen. Their star closer will get the most calls from other teams, but St. Louis has a few relievers who could come up in talks. Projected salaries are courtesy of MLBTR contributor Matt Swartz.

  • Ryan Helsley (eligible for arbitration through 2025, $6.9MM projected salary)

The Cards are down to one year of control over Helsley. If they’re not all-in for 2025, he should move either this winter or at next summer’s deadline. An offseason deal would give an acquiring team a few extra months of Helsley’s services and allow them to consider a qualifying offer when he hits free agency.

Katie Woo of the Athletic wrote last week that the Cardinals were already receiving quite a bit of interest. Derrick Goold of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch suggested the Cards may need to be “overwhelmed” to deal the righty, but they should be able to weigh multiple compelling offers.

Helsley is among the best few relievers in MLB. He’s coming off three straight fantastic seasons. Helsley broke out with a 1.25 earned run average across 64 2/3 innings in 2022. A forearm strain wiped out a few months of his ’23 campaign, but he posted a 2.45 ERA through 36 2/3 frames when able to take the mound. Helsley’s arm held up over a completely healthy season this year. He fired a career-best 66 1/3 innings with a 2.04 mark over 65 appearances.

After beginning his career in a setup role, Helsley proved himself an elite closer this past season. He led the majors with 49 saves while surrendering only four leads. He paced the National League with 62 games finished. Helsley punched out nearly 30% of opposing hitters against a tolerable 8.6% walk rate. Going back to the start of the ’22 season, he carries a 1.83 ERA with a huge 34.6% strikeout percentage through 167 2/3 innings.

Helsley has the kind of overpowering arsenal teams want in the late innings. His four-seam fastball sits above 99 MPH. Opponents had a surprising amount of success against that heater this year, but the ability to reach back for triple digit heaters makes it tough for hitters to adjust to his wipeout slider. Opponents whiffed on more than half their swings against the Helsley slider in 2024. He got swinging strikes at a 17.3% clip overall, a top 15 mark among relievers with at least 20 innings.

Alongside Devin Williams, Helsley is one of this winter’s top two bullpen trade candidates. He’d fit for any contender. Teams that already have a closer could push him into the eighth inning. Clubs like the Phillies, Rangers and Red Sox have seen their closers hit free agency. The Blue Jays, Yankees, Orioles, Royals and Diamondbacks are other potential suitors.

  • JoJo Romero (eligible for arbitration through 2026, $1.9MM projected salary)

Romero has had a nice two-plus year run at Busch Stadium. Acquired from the Phillies at the 2022 deadline for utility player Edmundo Sosa, Romero has emerged as skipper Oli Marmol’s top lefty reliever. He has posted consecutive seasons with a sub-4.00 ERA, turning in a career-best 3.36 mark through 59 innings this year.

There are some concerns. After striking out 28.6% of batters faced in 2023, he posted a middling 21% strikeout rate this year. Romero had a much more difficult time missing bats within the zone in 2024. That’s an issue for a pitcher who has never excelled at getting batters to chase off the plate. Romero has intriguing stuff, pairing a 94 MPH sinker with a slider and changeup. The breaking ball is by far his best offering and served as the putaway pitch for 40 of his 51 strikeouts this year.

As one might expect given that profile, Romero has been much better against same-handed hitters. Lefties have a .172/.267/.270 slash against him in his career, while right-handed hitters have teed off at a .280/.337/.472 clip. His 2024 platoon splits are just as extreme. Romero might be best suited for a situational role, but perhaps another team feels there’s a tweak they can make to get better production against righty hitters. While Romero has increased the usage on his slider in every season since 2021, he still only used it about a third of the time this year.

Romero finished the year on the injured list due to forearm inflammation. The Cardinals announced that he isn’t expected to require surgery and should have a normal offseason. Assuming that’s the case, he should attract interest.

John King (eligible for arbitration through 2027, $1.5MM projected salary)

The 30-year-old King isn’t as well known as Helsley or Romero, but he’s coming off a nice season. The southpaw turned in a 2.85 ERA through a career-high 60 innings spanning 56 appearances. King is a pure ground-ball specialist. He kept the ball on the ground at a massive 61.7% rate this year and has a career rate just north of 62%. Among the 160 relievers who threw at least 50 innings, only three (Tim Hill, Clay Holmes and Yennier Cano) had a higher grounder percentage.

King doesn’t miss bats, but he’s a situational lefty who should appeal to teams looking to deepen their middle relief group. (The Yankees make for a speculative fit considering New York’s love of relievers with plus grounder rates.) King is cheaply controllable for another three seasons and has held left-handed batters to a .250/.300/.320 slash over 308 career plate appearances. While the Cardinals aren’t under any contractual pressure to deal him, this isn’t the type of player that St. Louis would refuse to entertain in trade talks. If the Cards could pull a mid-level prospect or two, King could be on the move.

————————

The Cards have two other bullpen arms who’d attract interest, though they’re less likely to move. Rule 5 pick Ryan Fernandez had a strong rookie season. With five more years of team control, St. Louis probably prefers to hold him in a leverage role. Former top prospect Matthew Liberatore looks to have found a home in relief. He’s also still controllable for five seasons. The Cardinals aren’t likely to find an offer that pushes them to move the 25-year-old southpaw this early in his career.

Share Repost Send via email

MLBTR Originals St. Louis Cardinals JoJo Romero John King Ryan Helsley

73 comments

Do We Need To Rethink The Athletics?

By Darragh McDonald | November 11, 2024 at 11:59pm CDT

Back in January, Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reported on the future of the Athletics, suggesting a big jump in payroll was coming over the horizon. However, Rosenthal himself expressed serious doubt that any of it would actually come to pass.

“According to a source briefed on their plans,” Rosenthal wrote at the time, “the A’s project payrolls in the $130 to $150 million range during the ramp-up period before they move into their new park, then $170 million-plus once they are established in their fixed-roof stadium.”

Rosenthal remained skeptical of what he was hearing and even titled the piece “Why I remain skeptical about the A’s grandiose Vegas plans.” The skepticism, from Rosenthal or anyone else reading it, was and is completely understandable. Owner John Fisher has done little to earn any benefit of the doubt. In fact, he had given plenty of people to do the opposite.

Since Fisher took over as the club’s managing partner in November of 2016, the A’s have arguably received more attention for their bolt to Las Vegas than their on-field performance. They did put a nice run together from 2018 to 2020, making the playoffs three straight years. But when their win total dropped modestly to 86 in 2021, it was full-blown fire sale time. Matt Chapman, Chris Bassitt, Sean Manaea and Matt Olson were traded prior to the 2022 season, with Sean Murphy, Cole Irvin, Frankie Montas and others to follow.

The A’s have been one of the worst teams in baseball over the past three years while the headlines have mostly been about the club abandoning its fans in Oakland and the surrounding area, absconding to the east. The plan is for a new stadium to open in Las Vegas for the 2028 season, with a three-year stopover in a Triple-A ballpark in West Sacramento. The club didn’t seem to have much interest in staying in Oakland, as negotiations for a new stadium there didn’t gain much traction. Nor did the talks about staying beyond the end of the lease, even on an interim basis, hence the temporary move to West Sacramento.

Given the way the franchise has behaved, it’s natural to doubt that there is some massive pivot coming. According to Cot’s Baseball Contracts, their payroll has been in the bottom third of the league for over a decade now, including being dead last for the past two years and 29th in 2022.

Getting up to the range described by Rosenthal above would be a massive jump. The club had a payroll of just $61MM in 2024, so we’re talking about more than doubling that. The franchise record payroll was $92MM back in 2019, so the proposed numbers are coming close to doubling that as well.

While that kind of leap might be extreme, it’s not impossible to imagine a scenario where Fisher is more motivated to support the Las Vegas Athletics than he was the Oakland Athletics. Even if he doesn’t care about the team or its fans in a direct sense, there’s the cold-hearted business angle. If you’ve seen the movie Major League, you get the gist here. The recent lack of investment in the club may have been an intentional way of lowering fan engagement, thus manufacturing the justification for the move.

After going through all the trouble of moving the club, all the paperwork and meetings involved, he’s undoubtedly hoping for some kind of benefit at some point. Per Mick Akers of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, the Fisher family are willing to put down roughly a billion of the $1.5 billion needed to build the stadium. Akers says that U.S. Bank reviewed the Fisher family finances and “concluded the Fishers have more than sufficient assets for the equity required to fund the stadium’s construction.”

That’s not especially surprising, considering the family situation. John’s parents Donald and Doris founded The Gap, the clothing chain. Donald died in 2009 but Forbes lists the family net worth as just under $9 billion, with John Fisher personally listed as having a net worth of just over $3 billion.

That gives them plenty of ability to pay for the stadium, but it seems fair to assume they’re not doing that out of the kindness of their hearts and envision getting that money back someday. It’s been speculated that the Vegas setting might mean the club is relying more on tourists to come to games as opposed to locals, when compared to other franchises. If that’s the case, there could be motivation to make more of an effort to sign stars and generate interest outside of Vegas. Many clubs are hemorrhaging TV money as the cable model collapses and the A’s reportedly got $70MM as part of their deal in 2024. That deal is supposed to end if the club leaves the Bay Area though it’s been reported that they may be able to rework it for the West Sacramento years, although presumably at a lower price point.

They will presumably find a new broadcast deal for Vegas down the line, but likely not at that price point. That will only put more pressure on the club to make money off attendance. Their new stadium only projects to have a capacity of 33,000, which will be the lowest in the majors and barely half of the stadium they are leaving. If they want to charge big money for tickets, they will need big demand. Ideally for ownership, that demand would be big right from the get-go, so winning some games while in West Sacramento could be a big priority.

We can’t know if this is actually the case, but perhaps it’s worth considering. The family largesse which allows the Fishers to cover the stadium costs could also allow them to run higher payrolls than they have in the past. They could simply decide to become a mid-market club if they wanted to. Many will take a “believe it when I see it” approach to this speculative scenario and that’s probably the smartest position to take, but there’s an argument that it’s in the Fishers’ own interest to take this path. Even if you’re the type of fan who considers John Fisher to be a cold-blooded lizard person with no warm feelings towards baseball or people, which would be understandable if you’re from Oakland and he has stolen your team from you, that wouldn’t necessarily conflict with him putting a good team on the field since that would be a good business decision.

These are all big ifs but they could have significant ramifications if there’s even partial truths within them, including shaking up baseball’s winter landscape. One more club willing to give out big contracts would be good for the players, as another bidder always helps with the supply-and-demand equation.

RosterResource has the club projected for $37MM next year, meaning they would have to spend over $20MM just to get up to 2024’s last-place figure. Many free agents won’t be excited about playing in a Triple-A park, so the A’s might have to wait out the market and pitch themselves to guys who don’t find the contract they were looking for. Taking on unwanted contracts from another club via trade would be another option to add payroll, without the player having a say in it. But that could also work to the benefit of players, as the other club could use their freed-up spending capacity to spend on someone else.

The American League West already has four fairly aggressive teams in it. The Astros have been one of the strongest clubs over the past decade. The Rangers spent aggressively in recent years, leading to a World Series title. The Angels haven’t been successful lately but it’s not for lack of trying, as they’ve been a top ten payroll club for most of this century. The Mariners don’t run massive payrolls but are one of the most active clubs on the trade market and have finished above .500 for four straight years. If the A’s take things up a notch, it could ramp up the level of competition in an already-strong division.

Despite the behavior of ownership, there have been some encouraging signs on the field lately for the A’s. They went 39-37 in the final three months of 2024, bolstered by strong performances from players like Mason Miller, Brent Rooker, Lawrence Butler and plenty of others.

If the club didn’t care about how it performed during its three-year exodus in West Sacramento, it would make sense to trade Rooker, since he’s slated for free agency after 2027. But they didn’t trade him at the deadline and general manager David Forst recently said they don’t plan to trade him this winter either. As mentioned, they don’t need to save money because there’s almost nothing on the books, but trading Rooker could surely bring in a haul of prospects that they are deciding not to reel in. That aligns with Forst recently saying the club is focused on adding to the major league roster, not trading big leaguers for prospects.

Whether the club has enough talent to compete in the immediate future is obviously debatable and depends on many factors. One of them is how much the club spends on bolstering the roster in that time frame. The general expectation of many people seems to be that the A’s will be as cheap as they have been in Oakland but it’s possible to imagine that they have been intentionally waiting to leave town before opening the proverbial purse strings. This would be especially frustrating for the fans in the Bay Area who have watched the club be starved for years, only to see them start living high on the hog after bolting. But after how much they’ve been hurt by Fisher already, would they really be that surprised?

Share Repost Send via email

Athletics MLBTR Originals

239 comments

Trade Candidate: Brandon Lowe

By Leo Morgenstern | November 10, 2024 at 3:06pm CDT

When Brandon Lowe was healthy in 2020 and ’21, he was arguably the best second baseman in baseball. The Rays slugger led primary second basemen in home runs, RBI, OPS, wRC+, and FanGraphs WAR over those two seasons. Unfortunately, he has missed significant time with various injuries in each of the three years since. When he takes the field, however, Lowe is still a highly productive player. He launched 21 homers in 107 games this past season while producing a 123 wRC+ and 2.2 fWAR. His .350 xwOBA ranked in the 85th percentile of major league hitters.

Earlier this month, Tampa Bay picked up a $10.5MM team option for Lowe’s services in 2025, rather than paying him a $1MM buyout and sending him off to free agency. The Rays might be notoriously close-fisted, but still, there was little doubt they’d exercise the option. A net $9.5MM is a bargain for a player like Lowe, even if he sits out a third of the season with injuries once again. That being said, a $10.5MM salary puts Lowe in a tie with Jeffrey Springs for the highest paycheck on the club next year. To put it another way, it’s approximately 12% of the team’s estimated payroll for 2025 (per RosterResource). Thus, it’s more than fair to wonder if the Rays would rather spread that money across multiple roster spots rather than give it all to one injury-prone player. In other words, it’s fair to wonder if Lowe will be wearing a new uniform by Opening Day next March.

Tampa Bay has a long track of trading veteran players once their salaries start to increase, even when the team is still planning to contend. As the Rays enter the 2024-25 offseason coming off their worst finish since 2017, and coming off a season in which they sold big at the trade deadline, it seems even more believable that they would consider trading Lowe. Furthermore, the Rays have multiple internal options who could replace Lowe in the lineup (even if they can’t necessarily replace his production). One of Junior Caminero or José Caballero could potentially slide over to second base, while Christopher Morel could slot in for Caminero at third base or Taylor Walls could replace Caballero at shortstop. Former top prospect Curtis Mead is another infielder to keep in mind.

Then again, the fact that the Rays didn’t trade Lowe at last year’s deadline could be an indication that they’d like to hold onto him for 2025. After all, they might be cheap, but they also love a good value play. If the Rays shop Lowe around and come to the conclusion that he is severely undervalued around the league, they might prefer to hold onto him.

Back in August, Rays hitting coach Chad Mottola told Marc Topkin of the Tampa Bay Times, “I don’t think the industry and even our own fans understand the impact [Lowe] makes in our lineup.” If president of baseball operations Erik Neander shares that opinion, he might be hesitant to part with his All-Star second baseman. Neander recently expressed confidence in Lowe’s bat and glove, telling Topkin, that Lowe is “most valuable” as a second baseman but that the team could continue to give him some time at first base and DH next season to have his powerful bat in the lineup as often as possible.

It’s also worth mentioning that Lowe has another team option for 2026 (valued at $11.5MM with a $500K buyout), which means Tampa Bay could keep him around for the start of next season and still have the flexibility to trade him at a later date. What’s more, the Rays have numerous other trade candidates on the roster. Lowe isn’t the only player they can flip if they’re facing pressure to cut payroll in light of the damage to Tropicana Field or the team’s current lack of a broadcast deal.

First baseman Yandy Díaz and closer Pete Fairbanks are two of the top 10 players on MLBTR’s list of the top 35 trade candidates of the offseason. Díaz (no. 5) will be making $10MM next year, and he has a $12MM team option for the following season. His contract also includes a $1MM trade assignment bonus. Fairbanks (no. 7) is set to collect $3.67MM in 2025, and he has a $7MM club option with a $1MM buyout for 2026. One more name to keep in mind is Zack Littell. He doesn’t have the same star power as Díaz or even Fairbanks, but he has proven himself to be a capable mid-rotation starter over the last year and a half. He made just $1.85MM this past season, but he is projected to earn close to a $3MM raise in his final year of arbitration eligibility.

Another factor to consider is the market for second baseman this offseason, both in terms of free agents and trade candidates. Only two of MLBTR’s top 50 free agents are primary second basemen: Gleyber Torres (no. 20) and Hyeseong Kim (no. 26). One could easily imagine why teams would prefer Lowe over either of them, especially on such a team-friendly contract. However, things could get more complicated if any teams are seriously pursuing Alex Bregman (no. 3), Willy Adames (no. 5), or Ha-Seong Kim (no. 43) to play second base. Ha-Seong Kim was a primary second baseman as recently as 2023, while both Adames and Bregman have expressed a willingness to switch positions.

As for the trade market, second basemen who could be on the move include Luis Arraez (no. 17 on MLBTR’s top trade candidates list), Brendan Donovan (no. 20), and Nolan Gorman (no. 21). However, none of those players seem particularly likely to be dealt, and they all fill different niches than Lowe. Funnily enough, all four bat left-handed, but Lowe is the only one who offers proven, middle-of-the-order power against both left- and right-handed pitching.

So, do you think the Rays will hold onto Lowe this winter? Or will they have a new second baseman on Opening Day 2025? Have your say in the poll below!

(poll link for app users)

Will the Rays trade Brandon Lowe this offseason?
Yes 62.11% (1,944 votes)
No 37.89% (1,186 votes)
Total Votes: 3,130

 

Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.

Share Repost Send via email

MLBTR Originals MLBTR Polls Tampa Bay Rays Brandon Lowe

126 comments

2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions

By Steve Adams,Anthony Franco,Darragh McDonald and Tim Dierkes | November 4, 2024 at 11:09pm CDT

MLB Trade Rumors is proud to present our 19th annual Top 50 Free Agents list! These are the top 50 MLB free agents by our estimation of their earning power. To view the full 2024-25 free agent list, click here.

This list is a labor of love that represents more than a month of work by Anthony Franco, Tim Dierkes, Darragh McDonald, and Steve Adams. We live and breathe MLB free agency at this website, and we’ve spent countless hours debating these contract projections. While we reached a general consensus on the contracts, points of disagreement certainly remain. We’ve each made our own set of team picks as well, but it’s worth noting the difficulty in getting even one-fifth of those correct.

Please note that some clubs are under-represented in our team picks, but there will be notable free agent signings outside of our top 50, and some teams prefer to supplement via trade. A team “only” having one top-50 signing or not signing any of our top 50 free agents is not an indication that we feel said team will idly sit on its hands all offseason.

Making team picks is part of the fun, which is why we hold a free agent prediction contest every year! This year’s contest is currently open and closes at 11pm central time on November 11th.  Click here to enter! You can change your picks up until the deadline. Keep in mind that any player who signs prior to the deadline will be excluded from the results.

We’re proud to be an independently-owned baseball website providing high-quality MLB hot stove analysis for the last 19 years. We appreciate that you’ve chosen us over the alternatives, most of which are massive corporations. Please consider supporting us directly with a Trade Rumors Front Office subscription. Benefits include ad-free browsing, access to our awesome contract tracker research tool, access to our annual Offseason Outlook series (providing deep dives on what the winter may hold for all 30 clubs), access to our agency database, exclusive weekly articles from Anthony and Steve, an exclusive weekly mailbag with Tim and exclusive weekly live chats with Anthony. It’s well worth your while if you’re a regular MLBTR reader, and it comes with a 100% money-back guarantee.

Also, be sure to keep up with the offseason madness by signing up for MLBTR’s free newsletter!

The 2024-25 MLB free agent market is headlined by arguably the most in-demand position player since Alex Rodriguez redefined free agent expectations with a 10-year, $252MM contract from the Rangers back in 2000. We vetted these as much as possible, but with 50 predictions and a volatile free agent and trade marketplace, we know we’ll be off on some. Have your say on all of this in the comment section!

One free agent of note who is not ranked on our list is Japanese phenom Roki Sasaki, the ace of Nippon Professional Baseball’s Chiba Lotte Marines. It’s possible that Sasaki will be posted this winter, and it’s an inevitability that he’ll make his way to MLB at some point, even if not this offseason. For the time being, we’re operating under the assumption that Sasaki will remain in Japan. Were he to be posted right now, he’d be considered an “amateur” under MLB’s international free agency guidelines, as the league stipulates that a player must be at least 25 years of age and have six-plus seasons of professional ball under his belt to be considered a “professional”. Sasaki just turned 23 yesterday. As an amateur, he would be restricted to a minor league deal with a signing bonus coming from the league’s hard-capped bonus pool system. He’d earn well under $10MM. If Sasaki waits even two years until he’s a 25-year-old, he could take aim at Yoshinobu Yamamoto’s $325MM contract. Sasaki has pitched in four NPB seasons and boasts a career 2.10 ERA, 32.7% strikeout rate and 5.7% walk rate.

Thanks to Anthony and Darragh for helping to split the workload on some of the player write-ups on this year’s list!

On to our top 50 free agents:

1. Juan Soto: Thirteen years, $600MM

Tim Dierkes’ prediction: Yankees / Anthony Franco’s prediction: Yankees / Darragh McDonald’s prediction: Mets / Steve Adams’ prediction: Mets

Soto isn’t just one of the best hitters on the planet, he’s one of the youngest and thus most appealing free agents in recent history. Given how long he’s been in league and how dominant he’s been since day one, it’s easy to forget that Soto played the entire 2024 regular season at just 25 years of age. Teammate Aaron Judge didn’t even play a full big league season until he was 25.

It’s rare for a player to even make his big league debut at 19, let alone to immediately break out as a star. That’s precisely what Soto did, however, belting an opposite-field home run off Chad Green in his second big league plate appearance. One home run doesn’t make anyone a star, of course, but Soto was completely unfazed by MLB pitching and went on to post a .292/.406/.517 batting line and swat 22 homers all before turning 20. In the entire history of the game, no one as young as Soto has turned in a season that good. Soto’s 142 OPS+ in his rookie season is the best in MLB history (min. 300 plate appearances). Soto’s debut harkened back to Hall of Famer Mel Ott’s jaw-dropping 19-year-old rookie season with the New York Giants exactly 90 years prior.

Good as Soto was in 2018’s rookie showing, he’s only gotten better. Soto never struck out at even a league-average clip, but he sat at 20% in his first two seasons and has cut back since, bottoming out at 14.2% in 2021 and checking in at 16.7% with the Yankees in 2024. He’s walked more often than he’s struck out in each of the past five seasons (19.8% walk rate, 15.8% strikeout rate in that span) and belted 145 home runs along the way. Soto set a new highwater mark in that regard this season, clubbing 41 big flies in the first of what will very likely be multiple 40-homer campaigns in a career that’s squarely on a Hall of Fame trajectory.

Soto’s greatness has extended beyond the regular season. His reaction after obliterating a high fastball from Guardians standout reliever Hunter Gaddis and effectively sending the Yankees to the World Series is still fresh in everyone’s memory, but this isn’t his first October rodeo. Soto starred for the Nationals’ 2019 World Series club. The Cardinals kept him quiet during that year’s NLCS, but he had a big showing against the Dodgers in the NLDS and caught absolute fire under the bright lights of the World Series, going 9-for-27 with three homers, a pair of doubles and five walks. This year’s postseason went even better; Soto was the Yankees’ most consistently (and at times only) productive hitter. He reached base in all 14 playoff games and turned in a huge .327/.469/.633 slash with four homers, three doubles and more walks (14) than strikeouts (9).

There’s little Soto hasn’t already accomplished. At 25, he’s a former Home Run Derby winner, National League batting champion and four-time All-Star. He’s won a World Series and participated in another. Soto hasn’t won an MVP — at least not yet — but will assuredly pick up his fourth top-six finish in seven big league seasons in a few weeks. He’s not going to win this year’s award in the AL, thanks to outrageous seasons from Judge and Bobby Witt Jr., but Soto’s 2024 numbers would have made him a favorite in many other years.

When it comes to Soto’s contract, any and all historical norms can be tossed out. You could argue that the last time a superstar of this caliber reached free agency at such a young age is Soto’s former teammate Bryce Harper, but we’d posit that this is the most appealing blend of youth and statistical dominance since Alex Rodriguez stunned the entire sports world with a 10-year, $252MM contract to sign with the Rangers.

There’s little doubt Soto will sign a contract of at least a decade in length. The question becomes one of how long a team will be willing to go at what figures to be a new record average annual value (setting aside Shohei Ohtani’s overwhelmingly deferred $700MM contract, which came with an NPV closer to $43.7MM, using the MLBPA’s number). A 12-year deal would pay Soto through age-37, but it’s not out of the question that a team will go later into his career than that. The Yankees guaranteed Judge $40MM annually through his age-39 season.

Soto and agent Scott Boras already rejected a reported 15-year, $440MM extension offer from the Nationals  in 2021, before he was traded to the Padres. Soto has since pocketed $54MM in arbitration and now seems a lock to top the $386MM remainder; his historic bet on himself has paid off, and Boras will now surely be taking aim at both a precedent-setting average annual value and guarantee. In the wake of the Ohtani contract, Boras told The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal and Evan Drellich: “The market remains status quo. No average annual value at or above $44 million. Clear evidence of a strategic and managed effort.”

That’s a reference to the MLBPA’s present-day valuation of $437,830,563 of Ohtani’s contract (which, of course, was announced as a ten-year, $700MM deal but defers $68MM annually). A mega-contract that lacks deferrals and sets a more concrete AAV record and present-day value record seems likely to be the target, and based on the expected bidders, Soto and Boras have a very good chance of reaching it.

The Yankees, of course, are prepared to get into a bidding war to retain the star for whom they traded last offseason. The crosstown Mets enter the offseason with with nearly $200MM of contractual obligations coming off the books and a spendthrift owner who’ll be emboldened by his club’s unexpected run to the NLCS. Soto’s original club, the Nationals (who took care of a massive portion of their rebuilding effort in one fell swoop with the trade that sent Soto to San Diego), would reportedly “love” a reunion with him. Their president of baseball operations, Mike Rizzo, has stated on record he’s in the market for middle-of-the-order bats this winter.

Newly minted Giants president of baseball operations Buster Posey has lamented the lack of star power on the team’s roster in recent years and spoke at his introductory press conference and invoked the names of Willie Mays, Barry Bonds, Willie McCovey, Will Clark, Tim Lincecum and more in pledging to get the Giants back into the “memory-making business.” Nary a star player hits the market without Padres president A.J. Preller throwing his hat into the ring. The Dodgers will surely look into the possibility, and the Blue Jays could get involved, too; they made a spirited run at Ohtani last offseason.

Many expect the bidding to come down to the two New York clubs, but Soto is a unique free agent who could well command genuine interest from an out-of-the-blue suitor with a clean payroll outlook and a team on the rise. No one’s going to call the Tigers or Orioles anything more than a dark-horse (or perhaps just a pipe dream), but both have nearly blank-slate payrolls. Soto received a qualifying offer and will naturally reject that. The draft compensation attached to him won’t matter one iota. This is a once-every-quarter-century free agent. The bidding for Soto will be wild, and we’re expecting him to indeed topple the present-day total and average annual value of Ohtani’s contract.

Signed with Mets for 15 years, $765MM.

2. Corbin Burnes: Seven years, $200MM

Tim: Red Sox / Anthony: Mets / Darragh: Mets / Steve: Red Sox

Burnes headlines a strong class of free agent pitchers, leading the pack as a former Cy Young winner (2021) with an appealing blend of durability and relative youth. He’s younger and/or healthier than the other top starting pitchers who’ll follow him on this list.

Burnes didn’t exactly hit the ground running in his MLB career — he lost his rotation spot early in 2019 and was torched for an 8.82 ERA that season overall — but Burnes made good on his top prospect billing and status as an analytics darling the following year when he broke out with a 2.11 ERA in the shortened 2020 campaign. He’s been a dominant workhorse since. The only two IL placements of Burnes’ career have been for an oblique strain and for Covid. He’s never had an arm injury. Burnes has pitched at least 193 innings in each of the past three seasons (and 167 or more in each of the past four).

The Orioles gave up two top prospects (Joey Ortiz and DL Hall) and their 2024 Competitive Balance draft pick in order to acquire one year of Burnes from the Brewers. It was a strong return that speaks to the manner in which Burnes is perceived around the sport. He rewarded that weighty price by giving the O’s 32 starts and his fourth sub-3.00 ERA in the past five seasons. Burned tallied 194 1/3 innings in Baltimore, notched a 2.92 ERA, and then held the Royals to just one run in eight innings, coming out on the losing end of a masterful playoff pitcher’s duel against Cole Ragans.

Dating back to 2021, Burnes ranks fourth among all big league pitchers with 757 innings pitched. He’s sixth in ERA in that time, with a 2.94 mark that’s a near-mirror image of his 2024 season. Burnes threw harder than ever with the Orioles, averaging a career-best 95.3 mph on his devastating cutter and 97 mph on his seldom-used two-seamer. This year’s 6.1% walk rate was the second-best of his career and his lowest mark since the 5.2% rate he turned in during his Cy Young-winning 2021 campaign.

Burnes checks so many boxes for what teams would seek in a playoff-caliber starter, but he’s not without red flags. The right-hander might be throwing as hard as he ever has been, but he’s also missing bats at the lowest rate of his big league career. His 2024 strikeout rate clocked in at 23.1%. The league-average pitcher this season sat at 22.6% (22% flat, for starters). Burnes allowed more contact on pitches within the strike zone than he has at any point in his career. Hitters connected on 86.8% of their swings at in-zone pitches against Burnes — a massive increase from the 80.5% mark he showed back in 2021.

It’s possible there’s still upside for a bit more, as Burnes’ 12.9% swinging-strike rate is two percentage points north of league-average, but Burnes is no longer the bat-missing strikeout monster he was earlier in his career, when he punched out 36% of opponents in 2020-21.

Even if Burnes never gets that strikeout rate back up into the 30s, he’s still a durable pitcher who throws hard, rarely walks opponents, misses bats at an above-average level and manages contact well. He received a qualifying offer and will turn it down without a second thought. While Burnes’ reputation might lead some to think he could top $250MM, we’re predicting a more “modest” total based on the dip in strikeouts and swinging strikes. Burnes is still clearly a very good pitcher who’d be the No. 1 arm on the majority of pitching staffs around the league, and a $200MM guarantee is nothing to sneeze at. Only eight pitchers have ever reached that threshold in the past. Burnes will look to become the ninth, and he’ll have no shortage of interested suitors. Beyond the incumbent Orioles, it’s likely that the Red Sox, Cubs, Dodgers, Giants, Padres, Tigers and Mets (where former Brewers president of baseball ops David Stearns is now running the show) will all show some degree of interest.

Signed with Diamondbacks for six years, $210MM.

3. Alex Bregman: Seven years, $182MM

Tim: Blue Jays / Anthony: Astros / Darragh: Astros / Steve: Mariners

At the beginning of the 2024 season, Bregman looked lost. The two-time All-Star and former Silver Slugger winner flailed through the 2024 campaign’s first six weeks, slashing an anemic .201/.270/.264 through May 12 — his first 159 plate appearances of the season. It’s hard to start a platform season before free agency much worse.

On May 13, Bregman connected on a pair of home runs — his second and third of the season — and things began to click. By Memorial Day weekend, he looked fully back on track, homering five times in a span of seven games as he continued to pull his batting line out of the gutter. From the point of that two-homer breakout onward, Bregman tallied 475 plate appearances and posted a .279/.331/.515 batting line — 39% better than league-average, by measure of wRC+. He finished out the season with 26 homers, 30 doubles, a pair of triples and three steals. Both Defensive Runs Saved (6) and Outs Above Average (6) agree that his defense remained quite strong.

As is always the case, Bregman was one of the sport’s toughest strikeouts, fanning in only 13.6% of his plate appearances — practically a dead match for his career 13.4% mark. Outside of a 24% strikeout rate in his 49-game rookie showing back in 2016, Bregman has never punched out in even 16% of his plate appearances during a season. It was nearly impossible to get a fastball by him in 2024. Statcast measured his whiff rate against fastballs at 8.7%, the lowest rate he’s ever posted in a full season. Only 2% of big league hitters had a lower overall whiff rate in 2024 than Bregman. His bat-to-ball skills are elite.

On top of the on-field performance, Bregman will draw interest because of his clubhouse presence. He’s regarded as a fiery clubhouse leader. Jose Altuve has publicly campaigned for Astros ownership to keep Bregman in Houston several times throughout the season’s second half. One rival general manager who hopes to sign Bregman told ESPN’s Jeff Passan late in the season: “He would completely change our clubhouse for the better.”

Bregman isn’t without red flags, however, even setting aside that rough start in 2024. The 30-year-old former No. 2 overall draft pick saw his walk rate nearly cut in half, dropping from 12.7% in 2023 to 6.9% in 2024. From 2018-23, Bregman drew a free pass in nearly 14% of his trips to the plate. The resulting .315 on-base percentage this year was downright pedestrian. If there’s a silver lining, it’s that Bregman clearly didn’t suddenly lose all recognition of the strike zone. His chase rate on pitches off the plate spiked, but only relative to his own excellent standards. In the six prior seasons, Bregman chased only 17.1% of pitches off the plate. In 2024, that jumped to 22.2% — a notable increase but also still way below the 28.6% leaguewide average. The uptick in chases was reflective of a generally more aggressive approach. Bregman swung at 44.9% of the pitches he saw in ’24, compared to just 38% from 2018-23. His contact rates remained elite.

There’s perhaps some temptation to think that a pull-oriented righty hitter like Bregman is a product of Minute Maid Park’s short left-field porch: the Crawford Boxes. He indeed hit for more power in Houston this season than on the road, but his career splits tell another story. Since his 2016 debut, Bregman has slashed .270/.369/.476 at home and .275/.362/.489 on the road. He’s been effectively the same hitter, regardless of setting, and if anything has shown slightly more power away from Minute Maid Park.

It’s also worth mentioning Bregman’s participation in the Astros’ sign-stealing efforts during the 2017-18 seasons.  Bregman issued a vague apology in the wake of the scandal breaking.  The scandal did not seem to affect the markets of other participants such as George Springer and Carlos Correa, though it’s likely not all executives and players would welcome Bregman.

Bregman isn’t hitting free agency at the ideal time. He’ll play next season at 31. That’s not “old” for a free agent, but it’ll likely prevent him from securing anything larger than a seven-year deal. In fact, only two hitters in the past decade have signed a free-agent deal of seven years or more heading into free agency ahead of their age-31 season or later: Marcus Semien and Aaron Judge. Good as a player as Bregman is, he’s not Judge. Semien stands as a more plausible comp, however. Bregman and agent Scott Boras will surely be seeking a $200MM+ guarantee, but that’s a lofty target for someone who’s already completed his age-30 season.

Whether a seven-year deal (or more) is there remains to be seen, but he should find offers of at least six years. Matt Chapman just signed a six-year, $151MM extension beginning in his age-32 season. That’s going to be viewed as something of a floor for Bregman, and he should top that as the younger and more consistent offensive player.

The incumbent Astros have would surely love to have Bregman back, but GM Dana Brown has already foreshadowed some payroll constraints. They’ve also never given out a contract longer than Yordan Alvarez’s six-year extension ($115MM) or larger than Jose Altuve’s $151MM pact. Re-signing Bregman would very likely require setting a new benchmark for the organization. It seems likelier that he’ll reject a qualifying offer and net them a draft pick.

If not Houston, Bregman could see interest from the Yankees, Mets, Mariners, Tigers and Royals. Detroit will draw plenty of rumors due to Bregman’s ties to manager A.J. Hinch. The Mets could move Mark Vientos to first base if Pete Alonso departs. The Mariners have never given out a contract of this magnitude under Jerry Dipoto but have been looking to reshape their offense and cut their strikeout rate for several years. The Royals have never spent like this in free agency but did just sign Bobby Witt Jr. to a mega-deal. It’s not completely out of the question that a team could sign Bregman to play shortstop for a season or two before moving him to third base, either, which could lead to some surprise suitors.

Signed with Red Sox for three years, $120MM.  Includes deferred money.

4. Blake Snell: Five years, $160MM

Tim: Mets / Anthony: Red Sox / Darragh: Red Sox / Steve: Dodgers

Snell won the second Cy Young Award of his career in 2023, rejected a qualifying offer from the Padres and hit the market in search of the rare $200MM deal for a starting pitcher. That’s an understandable goal for a two-time Cy Young winner, but it didn’t happen. After languishing on the market all winter, he signed a two-year deal with the Giants in spring training — one that allowed him to opt out following the contract’s first year.

The contract immediately looked like a mistake. Snell rushed through his ramp-up to the season and was absolutely shelled in his first three starts as a Giant: 11 2/3 innings, 15 earned runs. The Giants placed him on the injured list with an adductor strain, though plenty of cynics chalked it up to a phantom IL stint for a pitcher who’d overplayed his hand in free agency and was paying the price. Snell’s return only further fueled that narrative. He was activated, made three more starts with a 7.50 ERA, and went back on the IL with a groin strain. He’d made six starts and posted a 9.51 ERA. Snell’s start was so catastrophic that he wasn’t even a consideration for the June edition of our Free Agent Power Rankings.

Then, Snell got healthy. The left-hander returned on July 9 with five shutout innings over the Blue Jays and never looked back. He yielded only two earned runs over five starts, spanning 33 innings. That was headlined by a no-hitter against the Reds at Cincinnati’s Great American Ball Park and by a similarly eye-popping 15-strikeout performance against the Rockies. From July 9 through season’s end, Snell didn’t just recapture his Cy Young form — he improved upon it. He was the best pitcher on the planet for three months, rattling off 80 1/3 innings with a downright comical 1.23 ERA. He fanned a whopping 38.1% of his opponents. Snell won a Cy Young in ’23 in spite of a 13.3% walk rate; down the stretch in ’24, he walked 10% of his opponents. That’s still higher than the 8.2% league average but is nevertheless a major improvement.

The very idea of Snell opting out of his contract would’ve seemed laughable at the season’s halfway point. Now, he’s made those first six starts look like an aberration. What was once a screaming red flag now looks more like a genuine injury-related outlier. Over his past 84 big league starts (dating back to the Padres’ pitching coach change in 2021, when Snell noticeably altered his pitch usage), Snell has posted a 2.72 ERA and fanned 33.1% of his opponents against an 11.2% walk rate. That’s including that calamitous start to the 2024 season. We can’t simply ignore those starts — they happened — but if you’re willing to genuinely chalk it up to injury and the lack of a proper spring training and set those six games aside, Snell’s ERA in that same span drops to 2.35.

Snell will perhaps always have some degree of ups and downs. It’s inevitable for a pitcher who has elite stuff but below-average command. But, even if he’s something of a slow starter, he finds his groove practically every season. I took a look at Snell’s resurgence late in the 2024 campaign and came to the conclusion that he could stake a claim as being one of the greatest second-half pitchers in MLB history. Snell has by no means been a “bad” first-half pitcher, but his career ERAs in July, August and September are 2.43, 2.44 and 2.14. He has a 3.33 ERA in 48 1/3 postseason innings.

The biggest flaw for Snell at this point doesn’t have anything to do with his raw ability — it’s simply that he’ll pitch next season at 32. There’s been exactly one deal longer than five years for a pitcher beginning in his age-32 season or later over the past decade: Zack Greinke’s six-year, $206.5MM deal with the Diamondbacks. That deal stunned the baseball world at the time and has been proven a clear outlier since.

Snell and Boras could try to repeat that feat and secure six years. Snell has pitched at such a high level that it’s easy to see his argument for doing so. But the likelier outcome is a shorter-term deal — four years at a super-premium annual rate or five years at a very strong (but slightly lesser) annual rate. We’re going with the latter for our prediction. The Giants aren’t likely to re-sign him, as deftly laid out by Andrew Baggarly of The Athletic, but Snell will have no shortage of big-money and/or clean-payroll teams pursuing him. The Mets, Red Sox, Dodgers, Orioles, Tigers, Padres and Cubs will all be in the market for starting pitching this winter. The Yankees had interest last offseason and could consider another run at Snell if Soto signs elsewhere. Snell can’t receive a second qualifying offer, which only helps his case.

Signed with Dodgers for five years, $182MM.  Includes deferred money.

5. Willy Adames: Six years, $160MM

Tim: Giants / Anthony: Giants / Darragh: Giants / Steve: Giants

Adames has rare power for a shortstop, topping 30 homers in two of the past three seasons — including in 2024, when he swatted a career-high 32 taters. Over the past four seasons, no shortstop has hit more than Adames, who’s tied with Corey Seager for the lead at the position (112). Strikeouts have been an issue in the past, but Adames has dropped his strikeout rate in four straight seasons now and just posted the best in-zone contact rate of his career (84.2%). Adames’ 25.1% strikeout rate is the lowest he’s posted in a full season. He doesn’t have elite exit velocity or hard-hit rates, but his barrel rate (as measured by Statcast) is consistently excellent. The average MLB player carried a 7.8% barrel rate in 2024; Adames was at 12% and owns a combined 12.2% barrel rate over the past four seasons.

Heading into the 2024 season, Adames was regarded as one of the best defensive shortstops in baseball — perhaps the second-best. Swanson won the NL Gold Glove at the position in both 2022 and 2023, but Adames combined for 25 Outs Above Average and 17 Defensive Runs Saved in that time. (Dansby Swanson was at 40 and 27, respectively.) His 2024 season, however, brought a surprising and substantial decline. Adames made a career-worst 20 errors. DRS pegged him at a stunning -16, while OAA dropped his glovework to average. Statcast still measured Swanson’s range and arm strength to both be well above average, which is more encouraging if he’d had a stark decline in either.

Adames’ reps at CAA Baseball will need to convince interested teams that the rash of errors isn’t something that will repeat itself. Eight of the 20 errors came in a span of just three weeks from late July through mid-August, and perhaps they’ll try to sell that as a brief period where his defensive mechanics slipped or where he was playing through a minor injury. Regardless of whatever explanation is offered, it’s an alarming trend for a typically surehanded defender with plus range.

As Adames’ defense slipped, his baserunning strengthened. He stole a career-high 21 bases in 2024 and was extremely efficient in doing so, getting caught just four times (84% success). Adames entered the season with only 30 total steals in his career. The uptick in running was perhaps due to the Brewers’ managerial change, as multiple members of the Milwaukee roster posted career-high totals and the team ranked second in MLB after not placing higher than tenth since 2019. Whatever the reason, Adames showed himself to be a savvy base stealer despite possessing exactly average sprint speed (27.4 ft/sec).

Adames hits the market having just turned 29. That puts him at the same age each of Swanson ($177MM), Trevor Story ($140MM) and Javier Baez ($140MM) each scored highly lucrative long-term deals. Granted, none of those contract has panned out as hoped so far, but the outcome of other contracts typically hasn’t prevented players of similar ages/profiles from doing well on the market. The incumbent Brewers love Adames but probably won’t be in the mix if the bidding reaches the point we’re predicting here at MLBTR. Other possibilities include the Giants, Dodgers and Tigers. Some clubs could also view Adames as a third base option, which would open up fits with any of the Yankees, Royals, Mariners, and Mets. The Braves are an oft-cited fit and have a clear need at shortstop, but they’re already facing a massive luxury tax bill and typically haven’t spent at this level in free agency, preferring to extend younger players.

Signed with Giants for seven years, $182MM.

6. Max Fried: Six years, $156MM

Tim: Cubs / Anthony: Dodgers / Darragh: Cubs / Steve: Cubs

Fried doesn’t have the Cy Young Awards of the earlier pitchers on the list, but he has a pair of top-five finishes (including a 2022 runner-up showing) and has been the anchor of Atlanta’s rotation for more than a half decade. He’s all but a lock to post a low-3.00s or upper-2.00s ERA every season, with his earned run average clocking in at 3.25 or lower in each of the past five. Fried has a combined 2.81 ERA in 112 starts in that time.

While he’s not the prototypical bat-missing ace who’ll regularly pile up strikeouts in droves, Fried has solid and consistent velocity from the left side, averaging either 93.9 mph or 94.0 mph on his four-seamer in each of the past four seasons, per Statcast. His strikeout rate in that time is slightly above-average but not elite, at 23.7%. What has been elite is Fried’s command (combined 6.1% walk rate over the past four seasons) and his ability to pile up grounders. Fried has never posted a ground-ball rate lower than 51% — league-average in 2024 was 42.2% — and he peaked with an outstanding 58.8% this past season. Framber Valdez was the only qualified starter in baseball with a better mark.

That penchant for grounders helps Fried avoid the long ball better than most pitchers; he hasn’t averaged even 0.9 homers per nine innings since his first full season, in 2019. Since 2020, the only qualified starters in MLB with a lower HR/9 mark are the aforementioned Valdez and fellow ground-ball wizard Logan Webb. During that same time, not one of the qualified 143 starting pitchers has  a lower opponents’ barrel rate than Fried’s 4.7%. Zack Wheeler is the only pitcher in that time with a lower average exit velocity on his batted balls; he’s at 86 mph to Fried’s 86.1. Fried might not reach double-digit strikeouts as often as many of his fellow aces, but he’s also going to avoid hard contact better than just about any of them.

While it’d be a misnomer to label Fried an injury-prone pitcher, the past two seasons have raised some degree of red flags. Fried was limited to 14 starts in 2023 by a forearm strain. He did not require surgery and was excellent both before and after the injury. He bounced back with 29 starts and 174 1/3 innings during the 2024 regular season, but the few starts he missed were due to an injury in that same forearm. This wasn’t a strain but rather an inflamed nerve. Still, he’ll enter next year as a 31-year-old starter who’s had IL stints owing to forearm troubles in consecutive seasons. The 2024 workload and the nature of his 2024 injury aren’t nearly as worrying as their 2023 counterparts, but it’s not an ideal set of circumstances for any pitcher.

Furthermore, while Fried has generally avoided major injuries aside from that 2023 strain, he’s also a bit less than a consummate workhorse who’ll provide bulk innings. He’s never started more than 30 games in a single season and only topped 180 innings once. He might not get hurt for long periods of time, but he’s not consistently turning out 32-33 starts and 180-200 innings per season, either. It’d be fair for any club to expect that even in a good season, Fried will miss two or three starts. That’s not a backbreaking factor but is still something a club will consider, given the magnitude of the contract he’ll be seeking and quite likely will command.

The Braves love Fried and would love to have him back. He made his feelings toward Atlanta clear in an emotional interview after the team’s season ended. That said, the Braves have had more than six years to hammer out an extension and haven’t gotten there. Atlanta hasn’t gone past $22MM in annual salary on any of the long-term extensions they’ve doled out to their core. Fried seems overwhelmingly likely to command a good bit more than that on a per-year basis, and because of their immense swath of extensions, the Braves are now facing a weighty luxury-tax bill. Re-signing Fried would effectively cement them as perennial luxury payors — likely requiring them to go into the upper tiers of penalization on a yearly basis. The Athletic’s David O’Brien recently suggested that the Braves aren’t likely to get into a bidding war for Fried, but has since taken note of how the team has moved money off the books. It’s still worth considering how long they’ve gone without an extension, and that jam-packed luxury ledger.

Atlanta will probably be involved to a point, but the years and dollars being discussed will likely quickly escalate beyond their comfort zone, given those factors. Other teams who could make a play for Fried include the Mets, Giants, Red Sox, Padres (who originally drafted him), Cubs, Orioles, Tigers, Angels and Dodgers. Six-year deals for pitchers beginning at age-31 or later are rare, with only five in the past decade (Greinke, Aaron Nola, Stephen Strasburg, Yu Darvish and Jon Lester). Fried is all but a lock to command a five-year deal and stands a good chance at becoming the sixth 31-year-old to reach that six-year term, even after he makes the obvious decision to reject a qualifying offer.

Signed with Yankees for eight years, $218MM.

7. Pete Alonso: Five years, $125MM

Tim: Nationals / Anthony: Nationals / Darragh: Nationals / Steve: Mets

Alonso will be among the more divisive free agents on this year’s class. On one hand, he’s been among the game’s most consistent power threats from the moment he set foot in MLB. Only Aaron Judge (232) has more home runs than Alonso’s 226 dating back to 2019. Third place isn’t especially close. Kyle Schwarber sits at 212. Matt Olson (206) and Shohei Ohtani (203) are the only others who have even topped 180. Alonso’s raw power is elite, and he generally has little problem getting to it in a game setting.

Durability plays a significant role in Alonso’s power totals as well and will be a big marketing point in his favor. He’s never missed more than 10 games in a given season, nor has he checked in south of 637 plate appearances in a 162-game campaign. Only Marcus Semien and Freddie Freeman have drawn more plate appearances than Alonso since 2019. Any team that signs Alonso can feel good about the fact that they’re adding a day-in, day-out source of game-changing power to the middle of their order.

The rest of Alonso’s skill set, however, is at odds with many of the traits modern front offices value when shopping on the open market. He’s limited to first base and isn’t an especially good defender there. Defensive Runs Saved has him about average in his career but a negative (-3) in 2024. Statcast’s Outs Above Average has consistently panned his glovework, never more so than in 2024 (-8). He’s also a well below-average runner, with his sprint speed landing at 26.1 feet per second — just in the 20th percentile of big league hitters.

Alonso doesn’t strike out or walk as often as the prototypical “three true outcomes” hitter. He’s fanned in 22.8% of his career plate appearances (24.7% in 2024). His 9.9% walk rate (10.1% in ’24) is above average but far from plus. He’s never walked at a higher clip than the 10.4% he did as a rookie and never walked in fewer than 9.4% of his plate appearances. Between his good-not-great walk rate, penchant for infield flies and plodding speed, Alonso tends to have fairly pedestrian on-base percentages. He’s at .339 for his career but just .324 over the past two seasons. He popped 34 homers in his platform year, but that’s a career-low mark in a 162-game season (as was his .219 ISO).

Supporters of Alonso will tout his consistent power, his durability and his flair for the dramatic. He’s a regular participant in the Home Run Derby and won the event in 2021. The Polar Bear was at his best under the bright lights of October, hitting .273/.431/.568 (176 wRC+) with four homers during the Mets’ postseason run. That includes a ninth-inning three-run shot off Milwaukee closer Devin Williams that effectively propelled the Mets from the Wild Card round into the NLDS.

Detractors will label Alonso as one-dimensional. He’s as prominent a source of power as you’ll find in the game but isn’t really plus in any other area. He’s heading into his age-30 season, which is fairly standard. He’s not “old” but also doesn’t have the benefit of youth on his side.

Back in 2023, the Mets reportedly offered Alonso a seven-year, $158MM extension that would’ve covered his the 2024-30  seasons. He (obviously) did not accept. Alonso took home a $20.5MM salary in his final arbitration season, which would’ve been year one of that contract. With anything north of $138MM, he can come ahead in that bet on himself. Even if he takes a heftier AAV on a five-year arrangement, that can be considered a win.

We debated a wide range of contracts for Alonso. He’s an imperfect free agent who 15 years ago would’ve likely been a lock for $200MM+, given his gaudy counting stats. Today’s front offices care more about defensive utility and on-base percentage, however. If Alonso and Scott Boras go out seeking $200MM+, there’s a real possibility for a Cody Bellinger situation where he’s left to take a short-term deal with opt-outs. We’re going with a five-year deal at a heftier AAV than the one he turned down, and it’s possible there’ll be some opt-outs or convoluted options woven throughout as well. Alonso technically comes out “behind” his reported extension offer with this prediction, but only because we’re putting him down for one fewer season. If he tops $12MM after a five-year deal — certainly plausible — or secures some kind of opt-out or player option, he could realistically end up ahead in the end. He’ll reject a qualifying offer and could draw interest from the Yankees, Tigers, Angels, Giants, Cubs, Nationals and (of course) the incumbent Mets.

Signed with Mets for two years, $54MM.

8. Jack Flaherty: Five years, $115MM

Tim: Dodgers / Anthony: Angels / Darragh: Yankees / Steve: Tigers

As far as “prove-it” deals go, Flaherty stands as one of the most successful cases in recent memory. The former first-round pick and top prospect went from one of the National League’s burgeoning young aces to an injury reclamation in a span of just a few years, as shoulder injuries derailed his momentum after a brilliant 2019 campaign. He had a full, healthy season between the Cardinals and Orioles in 2023 but hit the market on the heels of a 4.99 ERA. Baltimore had acquired him in hopes of unlocking some of his prior form and cashing in down the stretch and into the playoffs. Instead, they dropped him to the bullpen after he posted a 7.11 ERA in seven starts.

The Tigers signed Flaherty, still just 28 last offseason, to a one-year deal worth $14MM. It took very little time for the move to look prescient. Flaherty pitched to a 4.00 ERA through the end of April but ended the month on a high note, with starts featuring 10 and 14 strikeouts. By mid-June, he was sitting on a 2.92 ERA through 14 starts and had emerged as one of the clearest trade candidates on the market. (Little did anyone know that the Tigers would break out as the game’s hottest post-deadline team and reach the postseason, even after trading Flaherty to the Dodgers.)

Flaherty posted a 2.95 ERA, 32% strikeout rate and 4.6% walk rate in 18 brilliant starts with Detroit. He wasn’t quite as good with Los Angeles, but he still gave the Dodgers 55 1/3 innings of 3.58 ERA ball, fanning 26.1% of his opponents against an 8.1% walk rate. The season-long numbers remained strong overall, and Flaherty will now return to the open market ahead of his age-29 season — making him the youngest of the top end starters available — and without a qualifying offer, as he’s ineligible to receive one after being traded midseason.

There could be some questions about his health over a long-term deal. Beyond the previously noted shoulder injuries that hampered him earlier in his career, there were concerns about the health of his back leading into the trade deadline. The Yankees reportedly reached a preliminary agreement on a deal to acquire Flaherty but nixed the trade after reviewing the right-hander’s medical records. That eventually led Flaherty to instead be traded to the Dodgers for what some at the time considered a light return. (Catcher Thayron Liranzo has since mashed his way onto top-100 rankings, while Trey Sweeney came to the majors and became Detroit’s starting shortstop down the stretch, all of which has presumably altered some perceptions of the deal.)

Flaherty reached the majors as a touted prospect, had some early success before injuries clouded his outlook and then required multiple changes of scenery before truly breaking out. There are some Kevin Gausman and Robbie Ray parallels in terms of career arc, but Flaherty is reaching the market two years younger than Gausman and one year younger than Ray. Those aren’t perfect comps, as Gausman had consecutive excellent seasons under his belt while Ray won a Cy Young prior to his own free agency. That pair of pitchers signed five-year deals worth $110MM and $115MM, respectively. Between age and the lack of a QO, we’re expecting Flaherty to land a somewhat improved version of that deal, though it’s certainly possible that his injury history stops things at four years (or that interest is fierce enough to push to six at a slightly lower AAV).

Both of Flaherty’s 2024 teams could pursue a reunion. The Dodgers and Tigers will both be in the mix for starters this winter. We know the Yankees had deadline interest. The same teams listed as viable suitors for Burnes, Snell and Fried all apply here, though it’s hard to imagine the Orioles handing out a nine-figure deal after their trade for Flaherty didn’t pan out well in 2023. The contract we’re predicting is far enough below that top trio that some smaller-market clubs could plausibly join the Red Sox, Mets, Giants, etc. in pursuit.

Signed with Tigers for two years, $35MM.

9. Anthony Santander: Four years, $80MM

Tim: Royals / Anthony: Blue Jays / Darragh: Giants / Steve: Yankees

If you’re a fan of old school sluggers who mash taters and rack up ribbies, Santander is your kind of guy. “Tony Taters” left the yard a career-high 44 times in 2024 and plated 102 runs along the way. The 30-year-old switch-hitter battered opponents with total disregard of handedness, showing huge power against righties and lefties alike. (Notably, he was a bit more strikeout prone as a right-hander facing lefties.) Santander has now clubbed 105 homers and driven in 286 runners over the past three seasons — all while running a lower-than-average 20.5% strikeout rate.

Unfortunately for Santander, today’s brand of front office isn’t as enamored of counting stats as the prior generation. On-base percentage and defense are en vogue, and as thunderous as his bat has been, his rate stats and glovework are less encouraging. Santander has only posted an average walk rate twice in his career, and both times (2022 and 2024) he did so by less than half a percentage point. This past season’s 8.7% walk rate was his career-high, but it was accompanied by a career-low .235 average and thus a below-average .308 on-base percentage. Santander ranks 19th among 364 qualified hitters with 154 home runs dating back to 2019 … and is tied for 250th with a .310 OBP.

Defensively, Santander hasn’t necessarily been a butcher, but he’s a below-average corner outfielder. Statcast measures his average sprint speed at 26 feet per second, which puts him in just the 18th percentile of big leaguers. Unsurprisingly, his range in the outfield is well below average, landing in the 28th percentile. Santander has above average life on his throws from the outfield but isn’t the most accurate. A team could certainly live with his defense in right or left field for a couple seasons, but it’s unlikely to improve at this stage of his career and certainly isn’t going to be an asset. It’s not had to envision a scenario where Santander looks like a player who needs to be limited to DH work by the second or third season of a multi-year deal.

The good news, of course, is that he has plenty of bat to be a designated hitter — or perhaps to try his hand at first base, if the signing team prefers. Santander has been 24% better than the average hitter, by measure of wRC+, over the past three seasons (19% over the past five). This year’s home run barrage could prove to be a high point in his career, but he belted 28 homers in 2023 and 33 in 2022. He’s a genuine 30-homer bat who handles himself well from both sides of the plate and can at least capably handle a corner spot for a year or two. That’s an undeniably nice player to have.

We’ve seen this type of profile command multi-year deals in the $20MM range. Kyle Schwarber signed for four years and $79MM with the Phillies, who then gave Nick Castellanos five years and $100MM that same offseason. It’s been seven years since J.D. Martinez signed for five years and $110MM with the Red Sox, but that’s another example. Santander’s minimal walk rates and low averages create a more worrisome OBP floor than those sluggers, but he has more defensive value right now than any of them did at the time they reached free agency. He’ll very likely reject his qualifying offer and market his big bat to a slew of power-hungry teams. The Reds, Giants, Blue Jays, Tigers, Royals, Nationals and Guardians all make some sense.

Signed with Blue Jays for five years, $92.5MM.  Includes deferred money.

10. Sean Manaea: Three years, $60MM

Tim: Mets / Anthony: Cubs / Darragh: Tigers / Steve: Mets

This is the third straight offseason in which Manaea is a free agent. During his previous trips, he signed two-year pacts for under $30MM that allowed him to opt out after the first season. This winter should be a different story. Manaea declined a $13.5MM player option with the Mets and is poised to secure the biggest deal of his career.

Manaea had spent most of 2023 in a swing role with the Giants. He signed in Queens for a rotation spot and made the most of it. Manaea took all 32 turns and logged 181 2/3 innings of 3.47 ERA ball. He fanned a quarter of his opponents against an 8.5% walk rate while running a solid 11.7% swinging strike percentage. He was dominant down the stretch, working to a 3.16 ERA while holding opponents to a .182/.251/.327 slash after July 1. That didn’t quite carry into October, as Manaea turned in a 4.74 ERA in four playoff starts.

The strong finish coincided with a mechanical tweak. The left-hander dropped his arm angle gradually over the final couple weeks of the season. He leaned more heavily into a sinker while essentially dropping his four-seam fastball by September. The early returns were promising. Manaea has performed at a mid-rotation level before. He turned in a trio of sub-4.00 ERA campaigns early in his career with the A’s. This was the best year of his career, as he set a career high in innings while running his lowest ERA in a full season.

As expected, the Mets issued a qualifying offer to Manaea, which figures to dampen his market for certain suitors.

Manaea turns 33 in February. There’s no much recent precedent for teams going to four years for a pitcher’s age 33-36 seasons. Manaea should get three years, though, with his camp presumably shooting for a deal like the $63MM contract that Chris Bassitt secured at age 34. Tyler Anderson’s $39MM deal feels like the floor. The Mets could bring Manaea back. They’ll face competition from teams like the Angels, Rangers, Tigers, Orioles, Blue Jays, Nationals, Cubs and Dodgers, among others.

Signed with Mets for three years, $75MM.

11. Teoscar Hernandez: Three years, $60MM

Tim: Dodgers / Anthony: Reds / Darragh: Royals / Steve: Tigers

Apparently we’re sticking with the “prove-it” crowd here, as Hernandez wasn’t able to land the multi-year deal he was seeking last offseason and instead pivoted to a short-term deal with a contender. Agent Rafa Nieves of Republik Sports tweeted in October that Hernandez had been seeking a three-year contract last offseason — not an unreasonable ask for a player of his caliber, but Hernandez was coming off a down season in Seattle at a time when many of his potential suitors were tightening the purse strings amid uncertainty regarding their television broadcasts. Putting down a relatively weighty three-year deal on a rebound candidate was apparently a bridge too far.

The Dodgers benefited from the market’s inactivity, swooping in with a one-year, $23MM offer that installed Hernandez as their primary left fielder and a heart-of-the-order fixture. Hernandez appeared in 154 games and slashed .272/.339/.501 with a career-high 33 home runs. His 134 wRC+, indicating he was 34% better than a league-average hitter, fell right back in line with his 2020 (142), 2021 (132) and 2022 (130) marks — making the 106 he notched in his lone year with the Mariners look like an anomaly.

Hernandez makes consistent, thunderous contact. He’s never posted an average exit velocity under 90 mph nor a hard-hit rate under 46%. His barrel rate over the past is a whopping 14.3% — nearly double the 7.8% league average from 2024. He strikes out too much (28.8% in 2024) and hits far more grounders than one would expect from such a prodigious slugger (46.5% in 2024; 44.6% over the past three seasons).

However, Hernandez is also a deceptively fast runner, clocking into the 83rd percentile of MLB hitters. That allows him to turn some of those grounders into hits and to take the occasional extra base, stretching a single into a double. He swiped 12 bags this past season, tying a career-high, and was caught only three times. Because Hernandez hits the ball so hard and runs better than many realize, his batting average is typically high enough to offset a perennially below-average walk rate. He has a .328 OBP since 2020 (including a .339 mark in 2024) despite carrying a 6.6% walk rate in that span (8.1% in ’24).

While his speed once allowed him to at least handle center field on a part-time basis, the now-32-year-old Hernandez is strictly limited to corner work. He also graded quite poorly there in 2024, though some of that could be playing in left field for the first time since 2021. With the Dodgers, he posted far better marks in his more limited time in right field — his primary position with the Jays and Mariners from 2021-23.

The three-year deal that eluded Hernandez should be there this time around, even though he’s now saddled with a qualifying offer. Hernandez will surely reject — he’s not taking a pay cut after the year he just had — and there are enough teams looking for power bats that he’ll be a coveted name. We’ve marked him down below Santander simply due to the fact that he’ll play next season at 32 to Santander’s 30, but they’re comparable players who’ll have overlapping markets. The Tigers are specifically looking for a big right-handed bat this winter, and the Red Sox — who according to Hernandez himself offered him a two-year, $28MM deal last winter — are also looking to add a righty outfielder to balance out the lineup. The Reds, Blue Jays, Giants, Royals, Nats and Guards all make sense as well.

Signed with Dodgers for three years, $66MM.  Includes deferred money.

12. Yusei Kikuchi: Three years, $60MM

Tim: Orioles / Anthony: Mets / Darragh: Orioles / Steve: Orioles

“Mercurial” and “roller coaster” don’t really begin to describe Kikuchi’s big league tenure. The hard-throwing lefty has looked on the cusp of stardom at multiple points since coming to MLB in 2019 after a fine career with the Seibu Lions of Japan’s Nippon Professional Baseball. He’s also lost his rotation spot more than once and saw the Mariners decline a multi-year club option when the first three seasons of his contract came to an end.

Back at the 2021 All-Star break, MLBTR’s Steve Adams wrote about what looked to be a breakout season for Kikuchi. His velocity, strikeout rate, walk rate and grounder rate had all taken strides. Kikuchi pitched to a 3.18 ERA with plus rate stats through the season’s first half and looked to suddenly be putting himself in position to see the Mariners exercise a weighty four-year, $66MM club option. He promptly faded, running out of gas as he pitched to a 6.62 ERA and yielded an average of 1.70 HR/9 down the stretch.

Even with that poor finish, Kikuchi declined a $13MM player option, betting that a team would be interested in his blend of velocity, whiffs, grounders and solid command. He and the Boras Corporation were correct. The Jays signed him for three years and $36MM, and his tenure in Toronto had a similar vibe to his time in Seattle. Plenty of high points, but also quite a few lows and even a demotion from the rotation. Kikuchi was a hotly sought-after name on the summer trade market, drawing interest from clubs like the Twins, Cardinals and others. But the Astros blew everyone out of the water to acquire two months of Kikuchi, and while the price they paid was steep, his results in Houston showed why they were so intrigued.

With the Astros, Kikuchi more than doubled the usage of his slider, reducing his four-seam usage and nearly shelving his curveball. The results were eye-popping. In 60 innings, he pitched to a 2.70 ERA with a gaudy 31.8% strikeout rate against an excellent 5.9% walk rate. Kikuchi’s 13.7% swinging-strike rate was well north of the 11.1% league average. His grounder rate increased. The quality of contact against him decreased. Down the stretch, he looked like a clear, playoff-caliber No. 2 type of starter.

Just which version of Kikuchi a new team gets will be an open question. Is he the at-times dominant lefty who can pile up strikeouts in droves and limit walks to the point that an ERA in the low-3.00s or upper-2.00s seems plausible? Or is he the same enigmatic, homer-prone southpaw he’s always been? Kikuchi’s individual skills have impressed for years now, but the sum of those parts has somehow been lesser than those individual components.

That said, Kikuchi can’t receive a qualifying offer and is a hard-throwing lefty who’s posted a plus strikeout rate five years running — including a plus walk rate to match in each of the past two seasons. He’s also been ultra-durable in his MLB career, with his only two IL stints coming due to Covid in 2021 and a neck strain in 2022. Toronto gambled on his upside in the form of a three-year deal when he was coming off a poor finish. The inverse is true now. Kikuchi will turn 34 next June, but his stock is still up relative to his last trip to the market. The Astros would surely love to have him back but have foreshadowed payroll constraints. Other viable suitors include the Tigers, Dodgers, Giants, Orioles, Red Sox, Rangers and Royals.

Signed with Angels for three years, $63MM.

13. Christian Walker: Three years, $60MM

Tim: Tigers / Anthony: Yankees / Darragh: Yankees / Steve: Astros

In April 2020, Steve Adams wrote a piece for the site entitled “The D-backs replaced Paul Goldschmidt with a waiver claim — and it worked.” At the time, Walker had waited five years for an everyday opportunity in the majors, languishing in Triple-A behind names like Chris Davis, Mark Trumbo, Freddie Freeman, Joey Votto and the titular Goldschmidt while being passed around on waivers. The Snakes even succeeded in passing Walker through waivers unclaimed.

At the time, Walker was coming off one breakout season but had plenty of questions surrounding him. He’d hit 29 home runs but done so in the juiced-ball season of 2019. Was the power legitimate? Yes, he could play defense, but could he sustain his offensive production over a longer period and truly become a starting-caliber first baseman?

Yes. To all of it. And then some.

Walker has been one of the game’s most underrated and overlooked stars for the past several seasons. He’s a premium defender who has emerged as a consistent threat to swat 30 home runs in a given season. He no longer runs that well, but at his best he even had above-average speed. Walker has won a Gold Glove in each of the past two seasons and will probably win his third in 2024 after posting terrific marks in Outs Above Average (13) and Defensive Runs Saved (7). He made just two errors in 2024, his second straight season with only two on the year.

That defense and a sharp 9.9% walk rate across the past three seasons give Walker a nice floor even in the absence of offensive production, but that hasn’t been an issue for him. The slugger hit .251/.335/.468 with 26 homers in just 130 games this season. Were it not for an oblique strain that resulted in his first IL placement since 2021 (also for an oblique strain), he’d have topped 30 homers for a third straight season. Since Opening Day 2022, Walker is a .250/.332/.481 hitter. He torched lefties in 2022-23 while posting merely above-average numbers against righties, but his 2024 splits (and his career-long splits) are more balanced.

The sole reason that Walker seems limited to a three-year deal is age. He played this past season at 33 and will turn 34 during spring training next year. Were Walker a few years younger, he’d likely rank ahead of Alonso on this list, given his vastly superior defense. Three-year deals for first base/DH types at this age are rare but all generally fall in the same range. Jose Abreu received an ill-fated $58.5MM guarantee beginning in his age-36 season. Edwin Encarnacion and Carlos Santana both signed for three years and $60MM — Encarnacion starting in his age-34 season and Santana in his age-32 season. Walker should follow suit with a three-year guarantee at around $20MM, give or take a million or two. The Astros, Mariners, Yankees, D-backs, Giants and Nats could be involved (as could the Mets, depending where Alonso signs).

Signed with Astros for three years, $60MM.

14. Tanner Scott: Four years, $56MM

Tim: Red Sox / Anthony: Blue Jays / Darragh: Red Sox / Steve: Yankees

This year’s class doesn’t feature an Edwin Diaz or a Josh Hader — an elite closer who has pitched at an All-Star level for the bulk of their career. Scott, the best reliever in this year’s class, lands in the next tier down. A former Orioles draftee, Scott tantalized with huge arm strength but didn’t have the command necessary to hold a leverage spot in Baltimore. That initially continued when he was traded to the Marlins over the 2021-22 offseason, but the past two seasons have been a different story.

Scott fired 78 innings of 2.31 ERA ball with a career-low 7.8% walk rate in 2023. He picked up 12 saves and 24 holds while working at the back of Skip Schumaker’s bullpen. Scott’s wildness returned early this past season, as he walked 13 of 61 batters faced through the end of April. He dialed back in once the calendar flipped to May, walking a manageable 9.9% of batters faced over the season’s final five months. Scott fanned nearly 31% of opponents while turning in a 1.52 ERA in 59 1/3 innings over that stretch.

The Padres acquired Scott alongside Bryan Hoeing in a deadline deal with the Marlins. The 30-year-old southpaw had an excellent second half and tossed 4 1/3 scoreless postseason innings with seven strikeouts (including a trio of punchouts of Shohei Ohtani in as many at-bats). Scott now has two seasons of elite production. Of the 97 relievers with at least 100 innings since the start of 2023, Scott trails only Emmanuel Clase with a 2.04 earned run average. His 31.3% strikeout rate checks in 15th among that group, while his 50.4% ground-ball percentage ranks 22nd.

Scott has two pitches: a 97 MPH heater and a slider that typically lands in the 88-89 MPH range. Even in an era with a ton of power bullpen arms, he has rare velocity for a southpaw. This year, Scott trailed only Jose A. Ferrer, Gregory Soto, Aroldis Chapman and Rays’ rookie Mason Montgomery in that regard. The arsenal plays against hitters of either handedness.

The Padres can’t make Scott a qualifying offer he was a midseason acquisition. San Diego seems unlikely to bring him back with the other needs on the roster. Scott is better than the relievers who have landed in the three-year, $30MM range (i.e. Robert Stephenson, Taylor Rogers, Rafael Montero). He should get four years and has an outside shot at five. The four-year, $58MM deal which Raisel Iglesias signed with the Angels could be a target for his camp.

Signed with Dodgers for four years, $72MM.  Includes deferred money.

15. Luis Severino: Three years, $51MM

Tim: Nationals / Anthony: Tigers / Darragh: Mets / Steve: Giants

Somewhat similar to Flaherty, Severino looked the part of an emergent young ace before injuries completely upended his trajectory. A trio of lat strains (2019, 2022, 2023), a rotator cuff strain (2022) and Tommy John surgery (2020) limited Severino to just 209 innings from 2019-23. His 2023 campaign, preceding his first trip into free agency, resulted in a disastrous 6.65 ERA in 89 1/3 innings.

The Mets signed Severino to a one-year, $13MM deal in the hope that he could rediscover some of the prior form that saw him reel off 384 2/3 innings with a 3.18 ERA and gaudy strikeout/walk rates from 2017-18 in the Bronx. Severino indeed bounced back, but not as well as the aforementioned Flaherty and not to the same level he showed early in his career. The right-hander logged 31 starts — his most since 2018 — and recorded a solid 3.91 earned run average.

There’s no denying that the 2024 season was a success for Severino. He’s now positioned to land a multi-year deal in free agency and should be coveted by a wide range of teams. However, his 21.2% strikeout rate is nowhere near its 29.4% peak. His 7.9% walk rate, while better than average, is a fair bit worse than the 5.9% mark he posted in his terrific 2018 season. A four-seamer that once averaged 97.6 mph instead sat at 96.2 mph in 2024. Again, that’s a strong mark, but Severino doesn’t have the same power profile he did during his age-23 and age-24 breakout seasons.

Nothing about Severino’s 2024 season was inherently bad. He pitched like a very solid No. 3/4 starter. But while Severino carries plenty of name value from his early days as a Yankee, he’s pitched more like another pair of former New York hurlers — Jameson Taillon (Yankees) and Taijuan Walker (Mets) — did ahead of their trips to free agency. Taillon landed four years and $68MM from the Cubs. Walker landed four years and $72MM from the Phillies.

Without a qualifying offer, we felt it was possible Severino might have gotten into that four-year, $70MM territory of Taillon and Walker.  But having received such an offer, we’ve reduced our expectations to a three-year pact in the realm of the Royals’ new deal with Michael Wacha. Severino would improve the vast majority of big league rotations, and teams like the Red Sox, Reds, Giants, Orioles, Royals, Tigers, Angels, Padres and Nats could all be in play. A return to Queens, remains a distinct possibility as well, particularly with the issuance of the qualifying offer.

Signed with Athletics for three years, $67MM.

16. Jurickson Profar: Three years, $45MM

Tim: Padres / Anthony: Royals / Darragh: Padres / Steve: Padres

Profar finally turned in the kind of season that most evaluators anticipated a decade ago. The sport’s #1 prospect when he reached the majors with the Rangers in 2012, Profar has had a frustratingly inconsistent career. Throwing woes pushed him from second base to left field. That put more pressure on his bat, which has bounced from decent to poor over the years.

Things hit a new low in 2023. Profar signed with the Rockies for $7.75MM. He had a sub-replacement showing and was released late in the season. He returned to the Padres for the final few games of the season and re-signed on a $1MM pact for 2024. San Diego gave Profar the starting left field job almost by default. Even Padres president of baseball operations A.J. Preller, who has acquired the switch-hitter multiple times in his career, wouldn’t have foreseen a season like this.

Profar hit .280/.380/.459 with 24 homers while playing in 158 games. He set career marks in longballs and in all three slash stats. Profar deservedly earned his first All-Star nod. He finished seventh in MLB (minimum 500 plate appearances) in on-base percentage. The six players above him in OBP: Aaron Judge, Juan Soto, Vladimir Guerrero Jr., Yordan Alvarez, Shohei Ohtani and Bobby Witt Jr.

When a player has this kind of an outlier season, it’s easy to assume it to be luck. That’s not the case here. Profar pushed his average exit velocity up nearly five miles per hour. He raised his hard contact rate (the percentage of batted balls hit 95+ MPH) by a staggering 13 percentage points. In 2023, Profar ranked between Willi Castro and Harrison Bader in hard contact. This year, he slotted between Carlos Correa and Jorge Soler. He got to that power without losing any of the plate discipline or bat-to-ball skills that have always been his best asset. He showed he could maintain that level for one season. Do teams believe he has finally found an All-Star level or view this year as punching above his weight?

The payroll-strapped Padres chose not to issue Profar a qualifying offer, so he’ll reach the market without the burden felt by players like Santander and Teoscar Hernandez.

Profar returns to free agency in line for a much more lucrative deal than he got last winter. He’ll be 32 in February. His camp could look for four years, but that essentially hasn’t been attainable for non-star hitters at that age. Mitch Haniger landed three years and $43.5MM as a corner bat at the same age. Profar’s camp will aim higher than that. The Padres would certainly love to have him back, but it remains to be seen if they’ll be able to make that work with other needs at shortstop and in the rotation. The Royals, Reds, Blue Jays, Angels, Pirates, Phillies and Braves could also have interest.

Signed with Braves for three years, $42MM.

17. Nathan Eovaldi: Two years, $44MM

Tim: Yankees / Anthony: Orioles / Darragh: Giants / Steve: Rangers

This is the fourth free agency trip for Eovaldi, who remains a strong mid-rotation starter. The Rangers benefited handsomely from signing the veteran righty to a two-year, $34MM guarantee during the 2022-23 offseason. Eovaldi logged enough innings to unlock a $20MM player option for 2025 but declined it anyway, as he’s set for a similar or better salary on a multi-year deal.

Eovaldi has posted an ERA between 3.63 and 3.87 in five consecutive seasons. He misses bats at an above-average level and has excellent command. Over his two years in Arlington, he worked to a 3.72 earned run average with a 23.4% strikeout rate against a 7% walk percentage. His velocity hasn’t tailed off into his mid-30s. The two-time All-Star averaged 95.4 MPH on his fastball and 88.4 MPH on the splitter that serves as his best swing-and-miss offering.  He also owns a 3.05 ERA in 79 2/3 career postseason innings, including a win in Game 5 of last year’s World Series.

Durability has been a concern in the past. Eovaldi has two Tommy John surgeries on his medical chart. Shoulder inflammation sidelined him late in the 2022 season, adding uncertainty to his previous free agent trip. His arm held up fairly well over his stint with the Rangers. He missed a month in ’23 with a forearm strain that didn’t require surgery. His only IL stint this past season was a three-week stint for a groin tweak. Eovaldi managed 170 2/3 innings of 3.80 ERA ball across 29 starts in his walk year.

The Rangers could not make him a qualifying offer. The Red Sox made Eovaldi a QO during his last free agent trip, rendering him ineligible. He won’t cost a signing team draft compensation. He turns 35 in February, so he’ll be limited to a short-term commitment. Even three years at that age is a tough sell. Eovaldi is likely looking at a high-AAV, two-year pact that beats the guarantee which he landed from Texas. He should top the $18.5MM AAV that Marcus Stroman landed last winter. Chris Bassitt signed for $21MM per season covering his ages 34-36 campaigns. Eovaldi should get a similar or slightly better salary over two years.

Texas president of baseball operations Chris Young said the Rangers hope to bring Eovaldi back. A return to Boston could make sense, while the Orioles, Rangers, Angels, Mets, Braves, Nationals, Tigers, Dodgers and Cubs are other possibilities.

Signed with Rangers for three years, $75MM.

18. Jeff Hoffman: Four years, $44MM

Tim: Blue Jays / Anthony: Red Sox / Darragh: Angels / Steve: Athletics

Hoffman has had a winding career arc. A former top ten pick of the Blue Jays, he was a top prospect who went to the Rockies in the Troy Tulowitzki blockbuster. Hoffman never made good on that promise in Colorado, posting a 6.40 ERA in parts of five seasons. He had a pair of up-and-down years with the Reds before catching on with the Phillies on a minor league deal early in 2023.

By that point, Hoffman looked to be heading into journeyman territory. Things clicked in Philadelphia. Hoffman found an extra three ticks on his fastball and broke out as an elite reliever. He tossed 52 1/3 innings of 2.41 ERA ball while striking out a third of batters faced in 2023. The Phils made the easy call to bring him back for his final year of arbitration. Hoffman had an even better second season, working to a 2.17 ERA while striking out 33.6% of batters faced. He picked up 21 holds and 10 saves while only surrendering three leads in the regular season. While a rough Division Series ended the year on a sour note, Hoffman’s two-year track record is going to generate broad interest.

Hoffman has a 2.28 ERA since the start of 2023. That’s sixth lowest among relievers with 100+ innings. He’s sixth among that group in strikeout rate and seventh in swinging strike percentage, getting whiffs on 16.4% of his offerings. Hoffman has better command than Scott, the top reliever in the class. After struggling with home runs in Colorado, he has avoided the longball since landing in Philadelphia.

There are some similarities between Hoffman and last winter’s breakout free agent reliever, Robert Stephenson. (The two were ironically traded for one another when both were struggling former top prospects in 2020.) Where Stephenson had four months of excellence, Hoffman has multiple seasons. Stephenson’s three-year, $33MM deal feels like the floor. Hoffman could have enough buzz to get four years, though that’s not common for relievers going into their age-32 season. Raisel Iglesias signed for four years and $58MM at the same age, but he was an established closer as opposed to a setup arm.

Any contender could use Hoffman. The Phillies will need to replace him if they don’t bring him back. The Dodgers, Rangers, Red Sox, Orioles, Blue Jays, Giants and Nationals are other potential fits.

Signed with Blue Jays for three years, $33MM.

19. Tyler O’Neill: Three years, $42MM

Tim: Orioles / Anthony: Giants / Darragh: Pirates / Steve: Pirates

Initially drafted by the Mariners, O’Neill was traded to St. Louis as a prospect in a swap for Marco Gonzales. He spent parts of six seasons with the Cardinals. That tenure was headlined by a brilliant 2021 season in which the chiseled slugger drilled 34 home runs while playing Gold Glove defense in left field. O’Neill finished eighth in NL MVP balloting.

The Canadian-born outfielder hasn’t maintained that production with any kind of consistency. Nagging injury concerns and elevated strikeout tallies have made him a high-variance player. The Cards moved on from O’Neill last winter, dealing him to the Red Sox for a minimal return. The trade panned out for Boston, as he rebounded with his best season since the aforementioned ’21 campaign.

O’Neill drilled 31 home runs in just 473 plate appearances across 113 games. He hit .241/.336/.511 while drawing walks at a career-best 11.2% rate. He punched out in more than a third of his trips to the plate, so strikeouts remain a significant red flag. O’Neill has top-of-the-scale raw power, though, and he now has a pair of 30+ homer seasons to his name.

This year’s production skewed heavily in a platoon capacity. The righty-swinging O’Neill absolutely feasted on lefty pitching, tattooing them at a .313/.429/.750 clip with 16 homers in 156 plate appearances. He hit 15 longballs over 317 PAs versus righties, hitting .208/.290/.403 with a near-35% strikeout rate. O’Neill’s career splits aren’t quite that extreme, but it’s true that he’ll do most of his damage against southpaws. He’s a career .270/.376/.547 hitter against lefties. That drops to .239/.305/.446 against right-handed pitching.

The other red flag is the injury history. O’Neill has had 14 IL stints, including three this past season, over his MLB career. They’ve mostly been minor issues — only a 2023 lower back strain cost him more than a month at any one time — but the ’21 season remains the only time he has gotten to 120 games or 500 plate appearances.

O’Neill doesn’t turn 30 until June. He should at least command two years and has a shot at a three-year pact similar to last winter’s Lourdes Gurriel Jr. contract. The lack of a qualifying offer can only help. The Tigers are looking for right-handed bats, while teams like the Phillies, Reds, Braves, Pirates, Blue Jays, Angels and Royals could look for corner outfield help.

Signed with Orioles for three years, $49.5MM.

20. Gleyber Torres: Two years, $36MM

Tim: Royals / Anthony: Mariners / Darragh: Mariners / Steve: Royals

Torres has been a high-profile name for years. He was a top prospect in the Cubs’ system when the Yankees landed him as part of the return for Aroldis Chapman. Torres debuted as a 21-year-old in 2018 and turned in an All-Star season. He followed up with a 38-homer showing in the juiced ball campaign in 2019. Torres looked like one of the most impactful middle infielders in the game.

He hasn’t maintained that level, though he remains a good hitter. Torres topped 20 homers in both 2022-23. The Yankees had long since moved him off shortstop, but he’s one of the sport’s better offensive second basemen. Had he turned in another 25-homer showing in his walk year, he’d likely have been looking at a four- or five-year contract.

That might have been weighing on him, as he began the season in a major slump. Torres hit .220/.295/.254 through the end of April. That terrible start continued to wear down his overall numbers even as he found his stride in May. He posted slightly above-average numbers for the next few months before a huge .292/.361/.419 showing in September. The overall line sits right around league average: .257/.330/.378 with 15 home runs across 665 plate appearances. His production from May 1 onward (.267/.339/.409) is about what we’ve come to expect from Torres. He carried that into the postseason, hitting .241/.348/.397 with more walks than strikeouts in 14 postseason games.

Torres has good strike zone awareness with plus contact skills and the potential for 20-homer power. It’s a well-rounded offensive profile, albeit one that is more good than great. The bat is the calling card. There’s value in being able to play a middle infield position, but Torres is a mediocre defender who is limited to second base. He hasn’t played regularly at any other position in three seasons.

The market has devalued players who only play the keystone. Jean Segura, Brandon Drury and Eduardo Escobar have been limited to two-year deals in the $15-20MM range. Torres is younger and better than everyone in that group, but he’s coming off a similar walk year as those players had.

There’s a wide range of outcomes with his free agency. Torres has youth on his side, as he’ll play all of next season at 28. He’s the best pure second baseman available, and he doesn’t come with a qualifying offer attached. A three-year contract isn’t unreasonable, and there’s an outside chance he could still nab a four-year deal. At the same time, he’s hitting the market coming off a platform year that wasn’t especially impressive in aggregate. Torres could look for one year or a two-year contract that allows him to opt out and try again at age 29. We’re predicting he’ll sacrifice a bit on the overall guarantee to secure that market flexibility. The Mariners, Pirates, Red Sox, Giants, Rockies, Royals, Angels and Blue Jays could look for second base help.

Signed with Tigers for one year, $15MM.

21. Clay Holmes: Three years, $30MM

Tim: Orioles / Anthony: Phillies / Darragh: Red Sox / Steve: Royals

Holmes had a rocky showing in leverage situations this past season, blowing an unfathomable 13 saves that more than doubled his career total. He unsurprisingly lost a grip on the closer’s job in the Bronx. Even with those struggles, however, Holmes turned in a tidy 3.14 ERA on the season and still picked up 30 saves. The velocity on his power sinker sat at 96.6 mph, nearly as strong as ever, and he logged better-than-average strikeout and walk rates (25.1% and 8.1%, respectively) for a third straight season. Holmes is one of the game’s preeminent ground-ball pitchers, sitting at 65% in 2024 and 68.7% over the past four seasons.

Holmes will turn 32 just prior to Opening Day next year. Age, paired with an uncharacteristically shaky showing in save settings, won’t do his earning potential any favors. There are some parallels with Taylor Rogers, another closer with a nice track record who experienced some out-of-character struggles in his platform year despite maintaining terrific rate stats. Rogers got three years and $33MM from the Giants (the same figure given to Robert Stephenson based on three quarters of a season of dominance last winter). A three-year pact should still be there for Holmes, though it seems unlikely to come from the Yankees after his tumultuous season. Other big-money clubs with needs in the bullpen will be interested, though.

Signed with Mets for three years, $38MM.

22. Carlos Estevez: Three years, $27MM

Tim: Phillies / Anthony: Rangers / Darragh: Athletics / Steve: Blue Jays

This is the second career free agent trip for Estevez. Two years ago, he was an intriguing upside play as a power arm who had never put it all together with the Rockies. He’s much more established this time around. Estevez developed into an All-Star closer during his two-year deal with the Angels. He picked up 31 saves with a 3.90 ERA while striking out nearly 28% of opponents in 2023.

In some respects, he’s coming off an even better season. This year’s 2.45 earned run average was a career low by more than a full run. He nearly halved his walk rate from an elevated 11% clip to an excellent 5.7% mark. Estevez locked down 26 of 31 save chances in the regular season. He didn’t allow a single earned run between May 21 and a deadline trade to the Phillies. Estevez was one of the top relievers available over the summer, leading the Phils to relinquish a pair of well-regarded pitching prospects to acquire him.

The right-hander didn’t necessarily pitch poorly in Philadelphia, but it wasn’t the most resounding finish. He managed a 2.57 ERA across 21 innings despite striking out just 20.5% of batters faced. His final appearance couldn’t have gone much worse, as he surrendered a grand slam to Francisco Lindor to put the Phils in a hole in their elimination game in the NLDS. Estevez finished the season with a pedestrian 23.6% strikeout rate and 12.6% swinging strike percentage — marks more often seen with a solid setup arm than a star closer.

Despite the dip in swinging strikes, Estevez should do well for himself. He has a 3.22 ERA with a 26% strikeout percentage and an 8.7% walk rate across 117 1/3 innings since leaving Colorado. He has proven himself up to the task as a closer. He hasn’t lost any zip off a fastball that checks in around 97 MPH on average. Like former teammate Jeff Hoffman, he’s entering his age-32 season. Hoffman’s superior swing-and-miss numbers give him a better chance of getting to four years, but Estevez should be able to find a three-year contract. The Phillies aren’t likely to bring them both back. There’s a decent chance Estevez lands elsewhere.

Signed with Royals for two years, $22MM.

23. Matthew Boyd: Two years, $25MM

Tim: Guardians / Anthony: Cardinals / Darragh: Mets / Steve: Athletics

Boyd underwent Tommy John surgery in June 2023 and waited until he was largely healthy to sign a modest one-year deal with the Guardians. Injuries have hit Boyd hard in the past few years. He also required flexor tendon surgery back in 2021 and missed considerable time mending from that procedure. He looked healthy and plenty effective in Cleveland, however, starting eight games and pitching to a 2.72 ERA with a very strong 27.7% strikeout rate and sharp 7.8% walk rate in 39 2/3 innings. Boyd tacked on another 11 2/3 innings of one-run ball with a 14-to-6 K/BB ratio in the postseason as well.

Because of that pair of injuries, Boyd hasn’t topped 88 innings in a season since 2019. Despite that fact and a career 4.85 ERA, there’s a good chance that Boyd will draw substantial interest this winter. His strikeout and walk rates have long been far better than his baseline ERA, but a penchant for home runs has consistently inflated his earned run averages in spite of those intriguing underlying skills. He signed a $10MM guarantee in the 2022-23 offseason after just pitching 13 1/3 innings the year prior (while rehabbing that flexor surgery). His 2024 sample is larger than that and looks largely back in line with pre-injury form. A two-year deal could be there this time around, even with the limited workload in recent seasons.

Signed with Cubs for two years, $29MM.

24. Joc Pederson: Two years, $24MM

Tim: Mets / Anthony: Mets / Darragh: Diamondbacks / Steve: Blue Jays

Pederson is about as specialized a player as you can find. He’s carved out a niche as an absolute tormentor of right-handed pitching, but he rarely takes at-bats against lefties, doesn’t run well (12th percentile sprint speed) and has become a full-time designated hitter as he heads into his age-33 season. That doesn’t sound like a particularly enthusiastic review, but the one thing Pederson does well — he does very well.

In 407 plate appearances against right-handed pitching in 2024, Pederson delivered a superlative .281/.392/.531 batting line. He ripped 22 of his 23 homers while holding the platoon advantage, walked at a stout 11.8% pace and fanned at a slightly lower-than-average 21.4% clip. The D-backs only trusted him enough to give him 42 plate appearances against southpaws, and he held his own thanks to a handful of walks (.219/.405/.344). That output isn’t sustainable, though, as Pederson also punched out in 43% of his left-on-left plate appearances. Pederson is a .210/.300/.330 hitter in his career against southpaws.

It’s tough for this profile to get a multi-year deal. Just look at his past trips through free agency. That said, Joc was so good against righties this year — and with elite batted-ball metrics, no less — that he’ll at the very least get a raise on last year’s $12.5MM salary, if not the multi-year deal that’s eluded him in four prior trips to free agency. The fact that there aren’t many other left-handed bats of note on the market will only help him. Clubs like the Blue Jays, Nationals, Mariners, Pirates and Reds could get involved.

Signed with Rangers for two years, $37MM.

25. Andrew Heaney: Two years, $24MM

Tim: Giants / Anthony: Athletics / Darragh: Rangers / Steve: Nationals

During his last two trips through free agency, Heaney was considered something of an upside play. The Dodgers signed him for a year and $8.5MM on day one of the 2021-22 offseason, setting aside his woeful run-prevention numbers and instead honing in on his strikeout and walk rates. They tweaked his pitch mix and the shape of his slider, ramped up the usage of that breaking pitch to new heights, and watched as Heaney punched out a whopping 35.5% of his hitters against a tiny 6.1% walk rate. Shoulder trouble limited Heaney to 72 2/3 innings, but it was a big enough performance for the Rangers to give him two years and an opt-out the following winter.

Much of that perceived upside has faded, as Heaney has instead settled in as a quality fourth starter. He still possesses interesting strikeout and walk rates, but not to the same extent as in his half-season in L.A. He’ll always be susceptible to homers — he posted a 1.73 HR/9 even in that standout Dodgers showing — but he provided stable innings for two seasons in Texas. In 307 1/3 innings as a Ranger, Heaney logged a 4.22 ERA, 23.2% strikeout rate and 7.6% walk rate. We’ve seen plenty of two-year deals for mid-30s veterans of this caliber in recent seasons (e.g. Sean Manaea, Ross Stripling, Alex Wood, Alex Cobb).

Rangers president Chris Young already said he considers Heaney a “priority,” but if a reunion isn’t in the cards, then the Tigers, Orioles, Braves, Royals, Red Sox and Giants could all shop in this aisle. Heaney probably wouldn’t be the Dodgers’ sole target, but a return could make sense if he’s the second of two arms they bring in this winter.

Signed with Pirates for one year, $5.25MM.

26. Hyeseong Kim: Three years, $24MM

Tim: Mariners / Anthony: Angels / Darragh: White Sox / Steve: Mariners

A former teammate of fellow free agent infielder Ha-Seong Kim in South Korea, the younger Kim (no relation) will be posted by the KBO’s Kiwoom Heroes this offseason. Still just 25 (26 in January), he’s coming off a strong season in which he slashed .326/.383/.458 with career-best marks in home runs (11) and strikeout rate (10.9%). While he lacks the power of his former Kiwoom Heroes teammate, Hyeseong Kim is regarded as a plus runner and plus defender at second base. He’s played plenty of shortstop in his KBO career, but the 2024 campaign was his third straight year calling second base his primary home on the diamond.

A second base profile isn’t great for any impending free agent. The MLB market simply doesn’t compensate second basemen at a high rate. Kim will benefit from the fact that he’s still just 26 years old, however, and from athleticism that could lead a club to see how he looks at shortstop. He doesn’t have the same upside Ha-Seong Kim brought to the table, but a plus runner with strong defensive tools and high-end bat-to-ball skills coming off a terrific KBO run ahead of his age-26 season is nevertheless intriguing. Predicting contracts for foreign professionals is always hard, as it takes just one team to love the player and blow industry expectations out of the water (as the Giants did with Jung Hoo Lee and Red Sox did with Masataka Yoshida).

There’s a broad range of outcomes possible with Kim, though it’s tough to see him beating the $28MM in guaranteed money Ha-Seong Kim landed in San Diego unless one or two teams simply love the skill set. That contract could be something of a template here. Multi-year deals ranging from three to five years at sub-premium AAVs seem feasible, to varying extents. Contracts for KBO and NPB stars also often contain opt-outs and multi-year club options that can override those opt-outs. Again, they’re tough to predict. Based on Hyeseong Kim’s defensive/contact/speed-driven floor and his age, we’re going with a three-year deal at a reasonable enough price point to make him a potential flier for teams like the Mariners, Pirates, Royals, A’s and Brewers, to say nothing of bigger-payroll clubs with infield needs (Yankees, Padres, Red Sox, Braves).

Signed with Dodgers for three years, $12.5MM.

27. Frankie Montas: Two years, $22MM

Tim: Athletics / Anthony: Giants / Darragh: Guardians / Steve: Padres

There are some parallels between Montas and Heaney. From 2018 to 2022, Montas posted a 3.70 ERA over 545 1/3 innings. He struck out 24.1% of batters faced in that time with a 7.3% walk rate and 44.2% ground ball rate. Some shoulder problems cropped up in that 2022 season but the Yankees still liked him enough to send four prospects to the A’s in order to acquire him and reliever Lou Trivino.

But shoulder surgery wiped out essentially all of his 2023, making him an unknown quantity coming into 2024. The Reds took a shot on him with a one-year, $16MM deal. They didn’t really get the bounceback they were hoping for, as Montas had a 5.01 ERA in his 19 starts for Cincinnati. His 19% strikeout rate, 10% walk rate and 42% ground ball rate were all a bit worse than his previous marks and league-wide averages.

However, he ended the season on a positive note after being traded to the Brewers at the deadline. He made 11 starts with Milwaukee and had a 4.55 ERA in that time. That was only marginally better than his starts with the Reds but his strikeout rate shot up to 28.7% after the deal. He was a bit prone to homers in that time, which is why the extra Ks didn’t improve his ERA much, but his 3.73 SIERA is a reason for more optimism. It’s a small sample but his velocity also improved after the deal, perhaps buttressing his results somewhat. His fastball averaged 95.2 mph with the Reds but 96.3 mph with the Brewers, with slight upticks for his other pitches as well.

As mentioned with Heaney, even solid mid-rotation or back-end guys can get two-year deals in this range. If any club feels the strong second half points to some upside, that could help out Montas. He was ineligible to receive a qualifying offer because he was traded midseason.

Signed with Mets for two years, $34MM.

28. Nick Pivetta: One year, $21.05MM.

Tim: Red Sox / Anthony: Red Sox / Darragh: Red Sox / Steve: Red Sox

Pivetta was an up-and-down starter early in his career with the Phillies. Philadelphia moved him to the Red Sox for a pair of middle relievers in 2020. That trade was a win for the Sox even if Pivetta continued to frustrate with his inconsistency around flashes of upper mid-rotation upside.

The biggest selling points: durability and a strong strikeout and walk profile. Pivetta hadn’t had a single injured list stint in his MLB career (aside from virus-related placements) until this past April. A flexor strain in his elbow shelved him for a month early this year. That’s a concerning injury for an impending free agent, but Pivetta returned in early May and held up for the final five months of the season. Pivetta has topped 130 innings in each of his six full seasons in the big leagues.

The quality of those innings has been more variable. Pivetta has plus stuff and misses a lot of bats. He has a career 26% strikeout rate and has fanned an even 30% of opponents over the past two seasons. Unlike a lot of pitchers with that kind of bat-missing ability, Pivetta doesn’t have an issue throwing strikes consistently. While he has the K/BB profile of a #2 starter, the bottom line results have never matched.

Pivetta’s contact management is subpar. He has allowed home runs at an elevated rate in every season of his career. He is always near the top of the league in allowing hard contact. When hitters make contact, they routinely square him up. Pivetta has never had a season with an ERA below 4.00. He has allowed between 4.04 and 4.56 earned runs per nine in each of the last four years.

Surprisingly, the Red Sox chose to issue Pivetta a qualifying offer.  Without one, he seemed like a three-year deal candidate.  Given how much a QO could drag down Pivetta’s market as a mid-range starter, he might be wise to accept and return to the market after 2025.

Pivetta presents an interesting evaluation for teams. His repertoire — headlined by a 94 MPH fastball and a low-80s slider — grades very well in models. ERA estimators that emphasize a pitcher’s strikeout and walk profile love Pivetta. Yet he has more than 1000 MLB innings with a career 4.76 ERA because of an annual inability to stay off barrels. He’s at least an innings eater who can fit into the back of a rotation for a team with a spacious ballpark, but Pivetta’s untapped potential might be outweighed by the qualifying offer.

Signed with Padres for four years, $55MM.

29. Nick Martinez: One year, $21.05MM

Tim: Reds / Anthony: Reds / Darragh: Reds / Steve: Reds

The 34-year-old Martinez hits free agency for a fourth consecutive offseason. He has built opt-out clauses into each of his previous three deals. In each case, Martinez pitched well enough to opt out. That happened again this season after his first (and potentially only) year in Cincinnati. Martinez declined a $12MM player option after collecting a $14MM salary.

Every team has pitchers who bounce between the rotation and long relief. Few perform as well in that swing role as Martinez does. He has turned in three straight seasons with an ERA between 3.10 and 3.47. He had no issue moving to Cincinnati’s hitter-friendly Great American Ball Park, working 142 1/3 innings of 3.10 ball. He fanned 20.4% of opponents with a microscopic 3.2% walk percentage. While he’s unlikely to sustain that level of command, Martinez is a good strike thrower with a real knack for staying off barrels. Martinez has ranked among the league’s best in limiting hard contact and opponents’ exit velocity in consecutive seasons.

Successful as he’s been, he hasn’t gotten a full-time rotation opportunity. The Padres only gave Martinez 19 starts between 2022-23. He started 16 of 42 appearances with Cincinnati. That hasn’t been for a lack of trying. Martinez has spoken a few times about preferring a rotation job, but multiple teams have preferred for him to open the season in the bullpen. He has indeed been more effective in relief, though he excelled in either capacity this year. Martinez posted a 1.86 ERA with a 22.5% strikeout rate over 53 1/3 frames out of the bullpen; he worked to a 3.84 mark while striking out 19.1% of batters faced from the rotation.

Prior to the Reds’ somewhat surprising decision to tag Martinez with a qualifying offer, we’d penciled him in for a three-year, $39MM contract. The two sides could still work out an extension in that range, but if they can’t hammer out a long-term deal, our expectation is that Martinez accepts that $21.05MM offer.

Accepted one-year, $21.05MM qualifying offer from Reds.

30. Danny Jansen: Two years, $20MM

Tim: Cubs / Anthony: Guardians / Darragh: Braves / Steve: Cubs

Jansen is one of the more difficult players to evaluate right now because his overall track record is quite strong but he’s heading into free agency after the worst three-month stretch of his career. From 2021 to 2023, he hit .237/.317/.487 for a wRC+ of 121. His defense was generally considered to be a bit above average. He was limited by injuries to just 228 games in that three-year period but produced 6.1 wins above replacement, in the eyes of FanGraphs.

He came into 2024 strong, hitting .287/.371/.535 for a 157 wRC+ through the end of May. It was a nosedive from there, as Jansen produced a dismal line of .158/.274/.243 over the final four months of the year. His defensive metrics were also uncharacteristically poor for the year. Jansen had eight Defensive Runs Saved in his career coming into 2024 but then was tagged with -11 this year. His framing metrics also seemed to take a step back.

Jansen has cost himself millions of dollars with that awful finish, but should still be able to get a solid deal from a club banking on a bounceback. Atlanta gave Travis d’Arnaud a two-year extension worth $16MM late in 2021, despite d’Arnaud being injured for much of that season and finishing with a line of .220/.284/.388. Omar Narvaez, Yan Gomes and Victor Caratini have also received strong two-year deals recently. Jansen is coming into free agency at a lower point than those guys but has shown more recent upside. Several clubs need catching and there’s no clear standout in free agency this winter, which could work in Jansen’s favor.

Signed with Rays for one year, $8.5MM.

31. Jose Quintana: Two years, $20MM

Tim: Athletics / Anthony: White Sox / Darragh: Reds / Steve: Tigers

The last time Quintana was a free agent, he got a two-year deal from the Mets worth $26MM. It took a while for the club to get much out of that investment, as Quintana missed most of the first half of 2023 with a left rib fracture. He returned in July and eventually finished the year with 13 starts and a 3.57 ERA.

2024 was far more steady, as Quintana took the ball 31 times and logged 170 1/3 innings with a 3.57 ERA. Under the hood, things were a bit less exciting. His 8.8% walk rate was close to league average and his 47.4% ground ball rate a few ticks better than par, but his 18.8% strikeout rate was on the low side. He had the same K rate last year, which was a drop from his 20.2% mark in 2022.

He’s not the most exciting arm, especially now that he’s turning 36 in January, but reliable veteran starters can still get decent money. Kenta Maeda got two years and $24MM going into his age-36 season last winter. Kyle Gibson only got one year and $13MM but had an ERA above 4.00 in three straight seasons.

Signed with Brewers for one year, $4.25MM.

32. Michael Conforto: Two years, $18MM

Tim: Rangers / Anthony: Pirates / Darragh: Blue Jays / Steve: Royals

Conforto had an okay year but is coming into free agency with some reasons for optimism. He hit 20 home runs this year and slashed .237/.309/.450, production that leads to a 112 wRC+. However, he did so in up-and-down fashion. He was hitting .280/.331/.490 for a 129 wRC+ until he suffered a right hamstring strain in mid May. He came off the IL a couple of weeks later and struggled, hitting .164/.267/.321 over June and July. He got in a groove from there, slashing .265/.329/.529 over August and September for a 137 wRC+.

The last time Conforto was a free agent, the Giants gave him $36MM over two years, but that was largely an upside play. He had a line of .265/.369/.495 and a 133 wRC+ from 2017 to 2020, but then slumped in 2021 and missed all of 2022 due to shoulder surgery. If he bounced back to his peak form, he would have been a bargain. But he was essentially league average in 2023 before his aforementioned seesaw campaign in 2024.

Conforto will turn 32 in March, meaning clubs won’t view him as having as much upside as two years ago. But he’s a passable defender in a corner outfield spot and is clearly still capable of being an above average left-handed batter. Teams like the Royals, Pirates, Blue Jays, Reds, Phillies, Guardians or Nationals could get involved.

Signed with Dodgers for one year, $17MM.

33. Max Scherzer: One year, $16MM

Tim: Tigers / Anthony: Yankees / Darragh: Dodgers / Steve: Phillies

Amazingly, Scherzer just had the first real injury-plagued season of his career at the age of 39. In every full season from 2009 to 2023, he tossed at least 145 innings. That included a run of at least 170 innings in each full campaign from 2009 to 2021 and 200-plus in each season from 2013 to 2018.

But in 2024, he hit a series of speed bumps. Offseason back surgery put him on the IL to start the season but he was hoping to be back in May. That didn’t come to pass as Scherzer’s rehab was waylaid thanks to an injury that involved thumb soreness and a nerve issue running down his arm. He eventually got off the IL but also battled shoulder fatigue and missed more time. He finished the season with 43 1/3 innings pitched over just nine starts.

Despite all the health concerns, Scherzer was still good when on the mound. He posted a 3.95 ERA, 22.6% strikeout rate and 5.6% walk rate. He won’t be able to get the massive $43.33MM average annual value he got on his last deal, but plenty of late-career veterans have secured solid one-year deals lately. Zack Greinke got $13MM from the Royals a few years ago to serve as a veteran innings eater. He didn’t have health flags like Scherzer but his effectiveness was waning. Scherzer has an elite track record and can still compete at a high level when on the hill.

Signed with Blue Jays for one year, $15.5MM.

34. A.J. Minter: Two years, $16MM

Tim: Mets / Anthony: Cubs / Darragh: Dodgers / Steve: Phillies

Minter had a strong run as one of the better left-handed relievers in the game. From 2021 to 2023, he tossed 187 innings with a 3.13 ERA, 31% strikeout rate and 7.4% walk rate. He recorded 15 saves and 78 holds for Atlanta in that time. Among lefty relievers with at least 150 innings pitched in that frame, Minter’s ERA was in the top five, behind Josh Hader, Tim Mayza, Wandy Peralta and Andrew Chafin. His strikeout rate was also fifth, behind Hader, Aroldis Chapman, Taylor Rogers and Tanner Scott.

Unfortunately, he’s not going into free agency on a high note. He went on the IL multiple times in 2024 due to left hip inflammation and eventually underwent surgery in the middle of August, spending the final few weeks of the season on the 60-day IL.

That creates some uncertainty going into the offseason but there’s nothing to suggest his injury will linger into next season. At the time of his surgery, it was still up in the air as to whether it was season-ending or not, which perhaps indicates he could be healed up early in the offseason. Perhaps he will wait until he’s fully rehabbed to showcase his health to clubs as spring training approaches. Guys like Chris Martin, Aaron Loup, Hector Neris, Joe Kelly, Emilio Pagan, Matt Strahm and plenty of others have received two-year deals in this range in recent years. Minter’s health gives him a bit of uncertainty but he’s a southpaw with mid-90s velocity and strong results prior to his injury.

Signed with Mets for two years, $22MM.

35. Paul Goldschmidt: One year, $15MM

Tim: Astros / Anthony: Diamondbacks / Darragh: Tigers / Steve: Diamondbacks

Goldschmidt has had a great career and won an MVP award just two years ago, but the big question is what’s left in the tank. He hit .245/.302/.414 in 2024, production that was considered to be exactly league average by wRC+. His 7.2% walk rate was easily the lowest of his career. He’s now 37 years old.

The optimist could point to his strong finish. He slashed .230/.291/.373 through the first half but put up a stronger .271/.319/.480 line in the second half, leading to respective wRC+ marks of 87 and 120. However, even in that improved second half, his 6.8% walk rate was well below his career marks and even league average. For the whole year, 53.7% of pitches thrown to him were in the zone, the highest rate of his career. Perhaps pitchers are less afraid him now and more willing to attack. The fact that he seems to have adjusted is a good sign but he still didn’t get near his previous peak form.

Despite the yellow flags, there’s still a lot to like. His first base defense was still considered around league average and he stole 11 bases. He’s well respected in the game for his veteran presence and leadership qualities. His age will limit him to one year but players like Justin Turner, Nelson Cruz, Michael Brantley and J.D. Martinez have been able to get one-year deals in this range even after pushing through their mid-30s. Teams like the Astros, Mariners, Yankees, D-backs, Giants, Mets and Nats could use some help at first base. Pete Alonso and Christian Walker are also available but Alonso figures to have a big asking price that many clubs won’t want to meet and Walker can only be signed by one club.

Signed with Yankees for one year, $12.5MM.

36. Kyle Higashioka: Two years, $15MM

Tim: Padres / Anthony: Rays / Darragh: Marlins / Steve: Rays

The Yankees packaged Higashioka as the fifth piece of the Juan Soto trade return. He was an affordable glove-first veteran catcher whom the Padres planned to use in a backup role. Higashioka simply outplayed Luis Campusano all season and took over as Mike Shildt’s primary catcher by the postseason.

This was a career year for the 2008 seventh-round pick. Higashioka connected on a personal-best 17 home runs across 263 plate appearances. His .220/.263/.476 slash line was slightly better than league average. Higashioka rarely gets on base, but he’s a legitimate threat to take a pitcher deep anytime he comes to the plate. He popped three more homers in seven playoff games.

The Yankees never viewed Higashioka as a viable starting catcher. He hasn’t reached 300 plate appearances in any MLB season. Yet he rates well as a pitch framer and has a strong reputation for his work with a pitching staff. He’s a limited player, but there’ll be teams that view him as a solid role player even if he doesn’t find a role as a clear #1 option. He’s coming off perhaps the best walk year of anyone in a very weak catching class. Higashioka turns 35 in April. He’ll be limited to two years but could land a total guarantee in the $12-15MM range secured by Victor Caratini and Omar Narvaez in recent offseasons. San Diego could look to bring him back, while teams like the Rays, Cubs, Rangers, Blue Jays, Red Sox and Nationals could also fit.

Signed with Rangers for two years, $13.5MM.

37. Walker Buehler: One year, $15MM

Tim: Tigers / Anthony: Guardians /Darragh: Tigers / Steve: Braves

Much of the 2024 season couldn’t have gone much worse for Buehler. The righty has looked like a shell of his former self since returning from the second Tommy John surgery of his career. Buehler made 16 starts in the regular season and was tagged for a 5.38 earned run average across 75 1/3 innings. He allowed nearly two home runs per nine innings while striking out just 18.6% of batters faced. His 8.2% swinging strike rate was more than three points lower than his career average.

Buehler’s fortunes changed in October. After the Padres rocked him for six runs over five innings in his first start, he tossed consecutive scoreless appearances with 11 strikeouts over nine frames against the Mets and Yankees. As a heavily worked Dodger bullpen threatened to run out of steam in Game 5 of the World Series, Dave Roberts called upon Buehler. He fired a perfect inning with two strikeouts, locking down the title with a strikeout of Alex Verdugo.

That gives Buehler some positive momentum in free agency, but we’re skeptical it’ll dramatically change the market’s perception. Even as his World Series heroics cemented him in Dodger lore, the vast majority of Buehler’s walk year was a struggle. His 95 MPH average fastball velocity is on par with pre-surgery levels, but none of his pitches missed bats at the same rates.

Buehler is perhaps the top reclamation project in this year’s rotation class. It’s a stretch to expect the ace form he showed back in 2021, when he rode a 2.47 ERA to a fourth-place finish in Cy Young voting. Buehler still has arm talent, though, and this was the first time he’s allowed more than 4.02 earned runs per nine (excluding a 9 1/3 inning debut season). It’s not out of the question that’ll lead to enough interest to get a two-year deal with an opt-out. One year feels likelier given the regular season numbers. Buehler will try to follow in the path taken by Severino and Flaherty last winter. If he figures things out, four years could be viable next offseason.

Signed with Red Sox for one year, $21.05MM.

38. Kirby Yates: One year, $14MM

Tim: Yankees / Anthony: Blue Jays / Darragh: Blue Jays / Steve: Phillies

The Rangers took a $4.5MM flier on Yates last offseason. It was one of the best pickups of the offseason. The veteran righty deservedly earned his second All-Star nod amidst a dominant showing at the back of Bruce Bochy’s bullpen. Yates twirled 61 2/3 innings of 1.17 ERA ball. He locked down 33 saves while blowing just one lead all season. He punched out 35.9% of opponents while generating swinging strikes at a huge 15.2% clip.

Were it not for an all-time season from Emmanuel Clase, Yates probably would’ve been the Reliever of the Year in the American League. Only Clase had a better earned run average among relievers with 50+ innings. Yates ranked seventh in MLB in strikeout rate and landed in the top 25 in whiffs. It was a performance reminiscent of his 2019 season, when he led the majors with 41 saves and posted a 1.19 ERA over 60 2/3 innings for the Padres.

Excellent as Yates was, there are some red flags. Age is the biggest issue. He’ll be 38 in Spring Training. That’s an age at which teams almost never give a reliever a multi-year contract. The only two-year deals for relievers at age 38 over the past decade: a $3.2MM guarantee for Darren O’Day and the Rockies’ ill-advised $19MM Daniel Bard extension. Yates has also undergone two Tommy John surgeries in his career, the second of which came in March 2021 and essentially wiped out his next two seasons.

While there’s not much to nitpick in his performance, it’s worth noting that Yates hasn’t shown pristine command since his most recent surgery. He walked nearly 12% of batters faced with Texas and has handed out free passes at a lofty 13.2% clip over the last two seasons. He also succeeds a bit unconventionally. Yates doesn’t have huge velocity, averaging 93.2 MPH on his four-seam fastball. Opponents have never been able to differentiate the heater from his wipeout split-finger offering. The velocity probably isn’t a huge issue on what’ll likely be a one-year contract. Yates is coming off a better season than Aroldis Chapman and Craig Kimbrel were when they signed for $10.5MM and $13MM, respectively, last winter.

Signed with Dodgers for one year, $13MM.

39. Michael Soroka: Two years, $14MM

Tim: Astros / Anthony: Brewers / Darragh: Dodgers / Steve: Dodgers

When Soroka pitched to a 6.39 ERA with as many walks (24) as strikeouts through his first nine starts of the season, projecting him to even land a big league deal would’ve seemed questionable. A multi-year deal would’ve seemed laughable. But when the White Sox dropped Soroka to the bullpen in mid-May, his season quietly took off. It was easy to overlook silver linings on a historically awful team that lost a modern-day-record 121 games, but Soroka’s transformation in the bullpen was legitimately intriguing.

Beginning with a four-inning long relief showing at Yankee Stadium, Soroka punched out seven batters. He went on to fan 15 in 9 1/3 frames over his first three relief outings. From May 18 through season’s end, Soroka pitched to a 2.75 ERA and struck out a gargantuan 39% of his opponents. That includes a two-month absence due to a shoulder strain, but Soroka returned in late September averaging an improved 94.5 mph on his heater and closed out the season with 7 1/3 shutout innings and a 13-to-2 K/BB ratio. His overall command was an issue, as Soroka walked 13% of opponents even after his move to relief.

Still just 27 years old, Soroka is uncharacteristically young for a free agent. He broke into the majors as a 20-year-old with the 2018 Braves and looked immediately ticketed for stardom, notching a 2.79 ERA over his first 200 1/3 innings. A cavalcade of injuries has derailed Soroka since, including consecutive seasons ruined by a torn right Achilles tendon. Beyond this year’s shoulder strain, he’s had two prior IL stints due to shoulder inflammation.

Health is an obvious concern, but Soroka is a former top prospect who fanned nearly 40% of his opponents following a move to the bullpen and who won’t turn 28 until next August. Some teams might be interested in plugging him back into the rotation. Others could view him as a potential high-end reliever based on the swing-and-miss he’s shown in relief. Whichever role he’s in, Soroka’s pedigree, age and ability to miss bats make him a sneaky candidate for a multi-year deal.

Signed with Nationals for one year, $9MM.

40. Andrew Kittredge: Two years, $14MM

Tim: Athletics / Anthony: Twins / Darragh: Blue Jays / Steve: Rangers

Kittredge doesn’t necessarily stand out in terms of his rate stats, but he has a solid track record and is fresh off a season in which he paced the National League with 37 holds. In 70 2/3 innings with the Cardinals, he worked to a sharp 2.80 ERA. His 23.3% strikeout rate, 7% walk rate and 45.2% grounder rate were all better than average but something less than elite.

Injuries have limited Kittredge to just 182 innings since Opening Day 2020, but he’s notched a tidy 2.47 ERA in that time and regularly delivered quality rate stats along the way. He’ll turn 35 next spring but is still averaging just under 95 mph on his sinker. This year’s 13.7% swinging-strike rate and huge 39% chase rate also suggest that there could be more in the tank in terms of strikeouts, as we saw in 2021, when Kittredge fanned 27.3% of his opponents with the Rays.

Two-year deals for relievers beginning in their age-35 season aren’t necessarily common, but there’s enough precedent that Kittredge could get there. Adam Ottavino, Chris Martin, Mark Melancon and Ryan Brasier are among the names who’ve done so. Kittredge could join them.

Signed with Orioles for one year, $10MM

41. Kyle Gibson: One year, $13MM

Tim: Angels / Anthony: Rangers / Darragh: Nationals / Steve: Blue Jays

Gibson’s mantra may as well be “have innings, will travel.” The only two pitchers with more innings dating back to 2014 are Max Scherzer and Gerrit Cole. Gibson was a fixture in the rotation for the Twins, who selected him in the first round of the ’09 draft, from 2014-19. He’s since pitched for four different clubs and is now likely to land with a new club yet again after the rebuilding Cardinals began their offseason by declining his 2025 club option.

St. Louis didn’t decline Gibson’s option due to anything performance-related. It was a move solely designed to reduce payroll and open innings for younger arms. Gibson did everything they could’ve asked in 2024, starting 30 games and turning in a solid 4.24 ERA with a 20.9% strikeout rate, 9.4% walk rate and 44.8% grounder rate. Since breaking in as a full-time starter, Gibson has been a regular source of 29+ starts per year, only falling shy in 2020 (when he started a full slate of 12 games in the shortened schedule) and in 2016, when he started 25 games. If you’re a team looking for league-average innings in bulk and a respected veteran leader in the clubhouse, Gibson’s your guy. He’ll command another one-year deal in the same $10-14MM range he’s resided for several offseasons now.

Signed with Orioles for one year, $5.25MM

42. Tommy Kahnle: Two years, $13MM

Tim: Angels / Anthony: Angels / Darragh: Nationals / Steve: Rangers

Health has been an issue for Kahnle for much of his career. Effectiveness hasn’t. Since 2019, Kahnle has been limited to just 158 1/3 innings. He’s also logged a tidy 2.90 ERA with a huge 30.9% strikeout rate in that time. It was more of the same in 2024. Kahnle pitched 42 2/3 innings and missed time due to shoulder inflammation. His 94.2 mph average fastball was a career-low. Despite that, Kahnle turned in a 2.11 ERA and fanned nearly 26% of his opponents. His 16.4% swinging-strike rate was tied for 14th among the 402 pitchers who logged at least 40 MLB innings this season.

The Yankees signed Kahnle to a two-year, $11.5MM deal coming off a stretch where he pitched just 13 2/3 innings from 2020-22. He’s older now but also healthier than he was at the time, and he’s missing bats in droves with his at-times almost comedic reliance on his changeup (73% in 2024; 61 consecutive changeups in the postseason). A slightly better two-year deal could be there again this time around, even as he heads into his age-35 season.

Signed with Tigers for one year, $7.75MM

43. Ha-Seong Kim: One year, $12MM

Tim: Braves / Anthony: Padres / Darragh: White Sox / Steve: Braves

Were it not for the shoulder injury that required surgery that will delay his start to the 2025 season, Kim would have ranked prominently on this list — likely settling into the top 10. The 29-year-old has proven himself a plus defensive player at three infield spots (shortstop, second base, third base), a plus runner (60-for-74 in steals over the past two seasons, 76th percentile sprint speed) and at least an average hitter at the plate. Kim doesn’t have huge over-the-fence power, topping out with 17 homers and sitting between .132 and .138 with his ISO over the past three seasons. However, he has clear gap power, draws plenty of walks (12.1% since Opening Day 2023) and fanned in a career-low 16.4% of his plate appearances this season.

A healthy Kim would profile as a clear everyday shortstop heading into next year, his age-29 season. It’s certainly possible that if a team feels comfortable with his medical outlook, they’ll largely overlook the rehab process and attempt to sign him long-term anyhow. Kim could also ponder two-year deals with opt-out opportunities, following in the footsteps of fellow Boras clients Michael Conforto and Rhys Hoskins after their own injuries of note. That type of deal would come with significant downside for a signing team, however. Both Conforto and Hoskins were expected to be ready for Opening Day in the first seasons of their two-year deals. Padres president of baseball ops A.J. Preller recently put forth a rough timeline of “May, June, July” when asked when Kim would be ready for game action.

More than most free agents on this list, Kim has a broad range of contractual outcomes. And, because so much of it depends on how his shoulder progresses in its rehab, it’s impossible to know exactly which path is the likeliest. What’s certain is that on a one-year deal — which could contain incentives based on playing time — could pave the way for a return to the open market next year and a chance at the type of substantial payday he might’ve commanded in absence of his current shoulder injury. The Padres, Braves, Giants and Tigers are among the on-paper landing spots, though Kim’s ability to play multiple positions could make him a fit on the majority of rosters.

Signed with Rays for two years, $29MM.

44. Shane Bieber: One year, $12MM

Tim: Dodgers / Anthony: Orioles / Darragh: Orioles / Steve: Orioles

The 2020 AL Cy Young winner, Bieber underwent Tommy John surgery in April and will likely be out into next summer. In a recent appearance on the Baseball Isn’t Boring podcast, Bieber told host Rob Bradford he’s recently begun throwing weighted balls but added that his doctors have not provided him with a specific timetable for his return to game action.

Even before he had Tommy John surgery, Bieber had been operating at something less than his peak form. He posted a sub-3.00 ERA in 200 innings during his last full, healthy season (2022) but did so with a fastball averaging 91.5 mph — nowhere close to the 94.3 mph he averaged during his Cy Young campaign. The following season, Bieber averaged 91.6 mph on his heater in 21 starts but missed about one-third of the year due to elbow discomfort.

Bieber will turn 30 next May. Some teams might hope to land him on a two-year deal that pays him more in 2026 with a lesser 2025 salary in what’ll be an injury-shortened season. For Bieber, however, it’s likely more appealing to sign a deal that’ll allow him to get back to market next offseason. A two-year deal would put him back on the market ahead of his age-32 season, and the gap between free agent deals for pitchers starting at age 31 and age 32 is significant. One year versus two years will ultimately come down to personal preference, but Bieber could have a chance at nine figures off a healthy one-year rebound.

Signed with Guardians for two years, $26MM.

45. Justin Verlander: One year, $12MM

Tim: Phillies / Anthony: Phillies / Darragh: Giants / Steve: Dodgers

The 2024 season was a nightmare for Verlander, who was delayed early by shoulder troubles and returned to the IL for what wound up being a monthslong stay thanks to a neck strain. Upon returning, the three-time Cy Young winner and future Hall of Famer was hit so hard that the Astros left him off their playoff roster. He finished out the season with a career-worst 5.48 ERA in 17 starts, while his 93.5 mph average heater was his slowest in nearly a decade.

Those struggles notwithstanding, Verlander has enough track record to command a relatively weighty guarantee and name value and aura alone. He’s also only two years removed from his third career Cy Young Award and one season removed from 162 1/3 innings of 3.22 ERA ball with the Mets and Astros. Another reunion with the Astros feels unlikely, given GM Dana Brown’s comments foreshadowing some payroll issues. Verlander will prioritize win-now clubs, and he’ll be of interest to teams that can afford to withstand the financial blow if his late-season struggles continue. The Yankees, Red Sox, Mets (again), Dodgers, Giants, Padres, Cubs, Orioles and perhaps his old friends in Detroit could all offer an eight-figure guarantee with enough workload-based incentives to push the total closer to $20MM.

Signed with Giants for one year, $15MM.

46. Tomoyuki Sugano: One year, $12MM

Tim: Rangers / Anthony: Angels / Darragh: Brewers / Steve: Mets

Sugano looked destined to come to MLB in the 2020-21 offseason but wound up receiving a compelling offer to stay in Japan: four years and $40MM with multiple opt-out opportunities with the Yomiuri Giants. He’s now coming to the majors at 35 years old, which won’t help his earning power, but he’ll do so as one of the most successful active pitchers in NPB.

A two-time winner of the Sawamura Award — Japan’s Cy Young equivalent — Sugano boasts a sensational 2.43 ERA in a dozen NPB seasons, all coming with the Giants. He’s pitched 1857 innings and gone 136-74 while punching out 21.4% of his opponents against a 4,6% walk rate. His strikeout numbers have dipped to the 17-18% range over the past three seasons, though his command has been sensational: 3.8% walk rate in that time, including just a 2.6% mark in 2024. Sugano pitched 156 2/3 innings this past season and turned in a 1.67 ERA.

While the run-prevention numbers are great, Sugano is 35 years old and missed substantial time with an elbow issue in 2023. Per Jason Coskrey of the Japan Times, Sugano’s 2023 season was delayed until June 11. He came back to make 16 strong starts and followed that with 24 more in 2024, but a recent elbow issue for a pitcher in his mid-30s is something clubs will consider.

Sugano’s age seems like it’ll limit him to shorter-term arrangements. It’s possible he’ll get a two-year contract, but anything longer would register as a surprise. Dating back to 2010, only three pitchers — Scherzer, Rich Hill and Jacob deGrom — have received pacts of at least three years beginning in their age-35 season or later. A one-year deal could allow Sugano the chance to show his ability to handle big league opposition, perhaps setting the stage for a weightier two-year deal next offseason if he can indeed make the transition to North American ball.

An eight-figure guarantee on a one-year deal is something the majority of clubs could stomach. Sugano’s former agent said at the time that six MLB clubs made offers. The Padres and Jays were reportedly among them. Other teams reported to have interest that offseason included the Red Sox, Mets, Giants and Rangers.

Signed with Orioles for one year, $13MM.

47. David Robertson: One year, $11MM

Tim: Pirates: Anthony: Nationals / Darragh: Cardinals / Steve: Dodgers

Robertson will turn 40 in April, but you’d never know it by watching him pitch. It’s hard to believe he was practically out of baseball from 2019-21, because he’s come roaring all the way back as a premium high-leverage arm. In 72 innings with the Rangers this past season, Robertson turned in a flat 3.00 ERA while punching out 33.4% of his opponents against a 9.1% walk rate. His signature cutter sat 93.3 mph, incredibly tied (with 2023!) for the highest mark of his 16-year big league career.

This was arguably Robertson’s best overall showing since 2017. His age is going to prevent him from landing a multi-year deal, but as long as he keeps pitching like this, Robertson will be able to command one-year deals with eight-figure guarantees on them until he decides he wants to hang ’em up. A lot of clubs can’t afford to take that kind of financial risk on a 40-year-old reliever, so a big-payroll club like the Mets, Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers, Giants, etc. seems likeliest to sign the veteran late-inning star.

48. Shinnosuke Ogasawara: Two years, $12MM

Tim: Brewers / Anthony: Padres / Darragh: Guardians / Steve: Athletics

Like many NPB and KBO stars who come to the majors, Ogasawara is something of a wild card. He’s not the type of power arm typically coveted by MLB clubs, but he’s quite young, as he’ll pitch next season at 27 years of age. That alone will pique the interest of some clubs. He also has a generally strong track record in NPB, with a career 3.67 ERA that includes a stronger 3.27 mark over the past four seasons and a 3.12 mark in 2024.

Ogasawara is a somewhat confounding player to evaluate, at least based on his platform year. That 3.12 ERA is obviously quite sharp, and he coupled it with elite command, walking just 3.7% of his opponents. However, a strikeout rate that sat a respectable, if unspectacular 22% from 2022-23 plummeted to just 13.7% in 2024. Ogasawara also radically improved his walk rate, which sat at 6.4% in 2022-23. Was this season’s dearth of missed bats due to a conscious focus on improved command and pounding the strike zone early? That’ll be for big league scouts to determine.

From a pure stuff standpoint, Ogasawara doesn’t exactly jump out, but he has enough velocity to succeed in the big leagues. He sits 91-93 mph with his heater and pairs it with a low-70s curveball and low-80s changeup. His 5’11”, 183-pound frame isn’t imposing but is actually slightly larger than countryman Shota Imanaga (5’10”, 175 pounds), who clearly didn’t have any issue carrying his NPB success over to MLB. Imanaga, like Ogasawara, doesn’t have plus velocity, averaging 91.7 mph on his heater with the Cubs this season. However, he had a much better track record in Japan. Imanaga had a career 3.18 ERA in NPB, including three straight sub-3.00 seasons with plus command and much stronger strikeout rates than Ogasawara has shown.

Based on their track records, Ogasawara should come in south of Imanaga’s $53MM guarantee by a fair margin. It only takes one team to come in with a surprising offer, and it wouldn’t be all that surprising to learn that a club think Ogasawara’s youth and track record is something that can be molded into a fourth starter against MLB lineups. That said, there’s no real track record for someone coming off a 13-14% strikeout rate getting paid decent money by MLB clubs. Again, these are the hardest contracts to predict every offseason. A two- or three-year deal with a modest AAV feels perfectly plausible, but some clubs may be offput entirely by this year’s drop in punchouts and shy away entirely. Teams like the A’s, White Sox, Angels, Twins, Rangers, Brewers, Padres and Cardinals might feel this is a chance to land an Erick Fedde-esque bargain, though.

Signed with Nationals for two years, $3.5MM.

49. Harrison Bader: One year, $8MM

Tim: Reds / Anthony: Angels / Darragh: Athletics / Steve: Marlins

Bader is the top center fielder available in a very weak class at the position. The defensive stalwart signed a $10MM deal with the Mets last offseason and is likely in line for a similar contract this time around. Bader posted a middling .236/.284/.373 slash through 437 plate appearances. His bat cratered after the All-Star Break, leading the Mets to curtail his playing time going into the postseason.

Despite the poor finish, Bader should benefit from market scarcity. He’s a viable low-end regular at a position where essentially no others are available. Bader is a plus runner and a stellar defensive player. The glove makes him a viable bottom-of-the-order option against right-handed pitching. Bader has a bit more juice when he carries the platoon advantage, touting a career .249/.315/.461 batting line versus southpaws. He’s likely looking at a one-year deal, though there’s an outside chance he snags a second year. The Pirates, Phillies, Astros, Angels and Giants are possible fits.

Signed with Twins for one year, $6.25MM.

50. Spencer Turnbull: One year, $7MM

Tim: Padres / Anthony: Rockies / Darragh: Blue Jays / Steve: Twins

There are a handful of veterans from the Honorable Mention section to follow who have a decent chance to out-earn Turnbull, but the 50th spot on our list tends to be something of a wild card ranking every year. (In that sense, it could well have gone to Ogasawara as well.) Turnbull is regularly effective when healthy enough to take the mound. He’s pitched 356 2/3 career innings and logged a 4.26 ERA. That’s an unremarkable number but is also skewed by an ugly rookie showing (6.06 ERA) and a 7.26 ERA in 2023 when he was returning from Tommy John surgery.

In two of his past three seasons, Turnbull has an ERA south of 3.00 in a sample of 50 or more innings. He’s sporting an overall 3.79 ERA in that time and has posted a 22.2% strikeout rate against an 8.3% walk rate. Early in the season, he looked like one of the best bargain additions of the year for the Phillies, who signed him to a one-year, $2MM deal last winter. In 54 1/3 frames, Turnbull recorded a career-best 2.65 earned run average with a 26.1% strikeout rate and 9% walk rate. He’s 92-93 mph with his four-seamer and sinker, regularly generating grounders at a plus clip.

Turnbull missed the final three months of the season due to a lat strain. He’s also been shelved by the aforementioned Tommy John procedure, a neck injury and forearm, back and shoulder strains in his career. Durability is not his strong suit, to put it mildly. He’s probably looking at a one-year deal with a fair bit of incentives, though something along the lines of Trevor Williams’ two-year, $13MM deal with the Nationals wouldn’t necessarily be a shock. On a per-inning basis, Turnbull could be one of the better rotation buys of the winter if a team gets lucky and he holds up for 100-plus innings for what would only be the second time in his career.

Honorable Mentions:

  • Blake Treinen – signed with Dodgers for two years, $22MM
  • Kenley Jansen – signed with Angels for one year, $10MM
  • Paul Sewald – signed with Guardians for one year, $7MM
  • J.D. Martinez
  • Charlie Morton – signed with Orioles for one year, $15MM
  • Clayton Kershaw – signed with Dodgers
  • Jose Leclerc – signed with Athletics for one year, $10MM
  • Carson Kelly – signed with Cubs for two years, $11.5MM
  • Justin Turner – signed with Cubs for one year, $6MM
  • Max Kepler – signed with Phillies for one year, $10MM
  • Lance Lynn
  • Alex Cobb – signed with Tigers for one year, $15MM
  • Aroldis Chapman – signed with Red Sox for one year, $10.75MM
  • Chris Martin – signed with Rangers for one year, $5.5MM
  • Travis d’Arnaud – signed with Angels for two years, $12MM
  • Jakob Junis – signed with Guardians for one year, $4.5MM
  • Randal Grichuk – signed with Diamondbacks for one year, $5MM
  • Trevor Williams – signed with Nationals for two years, $14MM

Notable deals for unlisted/non-tendered players:

  • Patrick Sandoval – signed with Red Sox for two years, $18.25MM
  • Yimi Garcia – signed with Blue Jays for two years, $15MM
  • Carlos Santana – signed with Guardians for one year, $12MM
  • Gary Sanchez – signed with Orioles for one year, $8.5MM
  • Jordan Romano – signed with Phillies for one year, $7.75MM
  • Jorge Polanco – signed with Mariners for one year, $7.75MM
  • Jesse Winker – signed with Mets for one year, $7.5MM
  • Michael Lorenzen – signed with Royals for one year, $7MM
  • Enrique Hernandez – signed with Dodgers for one year, $6.5MM
  • Josh Bell – signed with Nationals for one year, $6MM
  • Chris Martin – signed with Rangers for one year, $5.5MM
  • Andrew McCutchen – signed with Pirates for one year, $5MM
  • Martin Perez – signed with White Sox for one year, $5MM
  • Austin Hays – signed with Reds for one year, $5MM
  • Yoan Moncada – signed with Angels for one year, $5MM

This list was originally published on 11-4-24.

A portion of Steve’s team picks (Nos. 10-15) were initially listed incorrectly due to a formatting issue on our master spreadsheet. They were updated correctly at 8:55pm on the night of publishing and are now accurate. We apologize for the error. Unless they prove to be correct. In that case, I totally called it.

Share Repost Send via email

2024-25 Top 50 Free Agents MLBTR Originals Newsstand

261 comments
« Previous Page
Load More Posts
Show all
    Top Stories

    Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension

    Orioles Re-Sign Zach Eflin

    Cubs Sign Hunter Harvey

    Marlins Sign Pete Fairbanks

    Pirates To Sign Ryan O’Hearn

    White Sox Sign Sean Newcomb

    Athletics Acquire Jeff McNeil

    Mets Sign Luke Weaver

    Nationals Sign Foster Griffin

    Padres Sign Sung-Mun Song

    Rangers Re-Sign Chris Martin

    Red Sox Acquire Willson Contreras

    White Sox To Sign Munetaka Murakami

    Blue Jays Interested In Alex Bregman

    Tigers Re-Sign Kyle Finnegan

    Astros, Pirates, Rays Finalize Three-Team Trade Sending Brandon Lowe To Pittsburgh, Mike Burrows To Houston, Jacob Melton To Tampa

    Rays Trade Shane Baz To Orioles

    Nine Teams Exceeded Luxury Tax Threshold In 2025

    Royals Acquire Matt Strahm

    Twins Sign Josh Bell

    Recent

    Kazuma Okamoto Travels To U.S. For In-Person Meetings With Teams

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat Transcript

    Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension

    Andy Kosco Passes Away

    Mitch White, Guillermo Heredia Re-Sign With KBO’s SSG Landers

    The Opener: Red Sox, Pending Free Agent Contracts, Mets

    Orioles Re-Sign Zach Eflin

    Joe Kelly Announces End Of His Playing Career

    Rangers Sign Nabil Crismatt To Minors Contract

    Orioles Designate Will Robertson For Assignment

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version