MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Stark's Latest: Clemens, Pettitte, Lowell | Main | Pirates Fire Dave Littlefield »

White Sox May Shop Jon Garland

The White Sox have shopped Jon Garland around in the past.  You may recall the failed deal with the Astros at the last Winter Meetings - the Sox were supposed to receive Jason Hirsh, Willy Taveras, and Taylor Buchholz.  There was even a press conference scheduled for that one.  Apparently the deal died when Kenny Williams demanded Hunter Pence as well.

Many teams have had discussions with the White Sox regarding Garland since then.  The Red Sox, Rockies, Braves, Yankees, Mariners, Dodgers, Mets, and Phillies all expressed interest.  The Braves reportedly offered Edgar Renteria and a top pitching prospect (pre-Teixeira trade) and were denied.

According to Joe Cowley of the Chicago Sun-Times, Garland is "without question that most likely starter to be moved" by Kenny Williams this winter.  He says Williams will shoot for at least two relievers, one proven.  Garland makes $12MM in 2008 before reaching free agency.  Garland's got a 4.75 ERA this year; you have to wonder whether he'd be worth the price for an AL team.  And even in the NL, is he that much better than Josh Towers right now?

Off the cuff, here are some relievers I think the White Sox might pursue: Manny Corpas, Jonathan Broxton, Jeremy Accardo, Joaquin Benoit, Tony Pena, Jose Valverde, Brad Lidge, Chad Qualls, and Huston Street.  What are your predictions for fair Garland trades that could actually happen this winter?



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e554e086eb8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference White Sox May Shop Jon Garland:

Comments

I don't think Houston can afford to give up any of the two decent relievers that they have, so I don't think Lidge and Qualls will be involved. Maybe Broxton...

Broxton has 33 strikeouts and only 3 walks post-asb, I seriously doubt the Dodgers move him. If the Dodgers are that desperate for a mediocre 4th starter they can just exercise Randy Wolf's 2008 option.

Based on salaries, you can say starting pitchers are worth 5 times as much as a middle reliever, so I think the Astros would be dumb not to involve Qualls or Lidge in a deal for Garland, ditto for Broxton in LA, albeit he is younger.

Garland is not a mediocre 4th starter in the National League. He's would be, at least the #2-3 on the Braves, Cubs, Mets, Phillies, D'Backs, Padres, Brewers, Cardinals, Dodgers...etc. Those are all the top teams in the N.L., how is that a #4 starter?

I think the Mariners would matchup well ... they could send OF Wladimir Balentien, 2B Yung Chi Chen and possibly a LH Middle Reliever (George Sherrill?) without disrupting their core or any future plans. This would allow them to avoid the Jeff Weaver adventure next year. I'd like to see what Garland could do in that ballpark with that defense behind him.

That package from Seattle is overpaying. Jon Garland isn't that good. It sounds like a reliever as the centre piece and something else would get it down. It's just 1 year of Garland isn't it anyway?

Williams wanted Hunter Pence! Besides, were Garland to be a free agent this year, he'd be the best SP on the market (with the exception of Andy Pettitte, who isn't a typical free agent anyway since there's probably only 3-4 teams that he would realistically suit up for) ... The Mariners gave up Rafael Soriano for Haracio Ramirez last year. I'd say that demonstrates a willingness to overpay for starting pitching.

Williams is going to want way too much for Garland, and he's just not worth that much for a one year rental. Teams will pay it though, look at what the Astros paid for Jennings last year.

idk what they're asking for but i doubt it would be better than taveras, buchholz, and hirsh. idk if i would have done pence for hirsh this time last year, let alone the four of them...the market for pitching gets more depressing by the day

I think whomever Houston hires as GM might dictate how likely they will move Qualls or Lidge. I think either or both might go in a deal depending on return. I think Bob Watson is favorite to return as GM. Scott Linebrink I would expect to return to Houston, and they do have some lively arms like Matt Albers who might be better suited to relief.

dontrelle willis is better than jon garland, teams should go after the younger and better pitcher Willis. i could see something maybe like matt kemp or andre either plus some pitching prospect for willis

Hong-Chi Kuo maybe as the other part of the deal?

Akinori Otsuka thrived in SD in 2004, regressed in 2005 and thrived when he was traded to the Rangers in 2006.

This same scenario could play out for Cla Meredith who has regressed after his breakout 2006.

How about Cla Meredith & Nick Hundley?

Another interesting scenario would be for the A's to send Huston Street & Mark Kotsay. It's an even swap of salary for the cost-conscious A's and Kotsay could fill Erstad's role for the White Sox.

The Padres could add Scott Hairston or Terrmel Sledge as well...

Jesus Christ people, you think starting pitchers come cheap? You can't get a guy who has averaged 216 IP the previous 3 years in the American League, for an average reliever (since people have written off Lidge, Qualls, and Broxton....above average but not elite relievers).

GOOD middle relievers make about 4 million per year on the open market. The worst pitcher in the league last year got 7 mil per year. Discuss....

He's not coming cheap. That's the problem. To give up an established solid reliever, plus a good prospect, plus taking on $12m in salary is awfully steep for a guy with an ERA near 5.

This comes back to the discussion around Joe Blanton in the A's post. Joe Blanton is certainly as good as John Garland. Big difference is that you can control him longer AND he doesn't cost you $12m. If teams were hesitant to offer good packages for Blanton why would they unload their system for Garland.

Barroid Bonds


Are you kidding me! The Dodgers would be fools to trade Kemp for Willis! Willis sucks! Willis is a descent #3, and Good #4! Maybe the Dodgers give up Andre Eithier(or however you spell it) like you said, without Anybody else involved! Straight up trade! Willis is the MOST overated pitcher in baseball! What has he done since 2005? Please answer me that! This is TWO years of Mediocrity! Plain and Simple! Willis is Worth a Solid Outfielder, but the dude is a free agent in 08 OR 09! Then teams will overpay for the bumb! I just dont get the lovefest for the dude! Yes he is young and a Lefty, but thats about it!

Garland is not all that different from Contreras. They both could be simple salary dumps if they start off bad next year. Or they could land a prospect if the Sox eat part of the salary. Either way, I'm not trading anything decent so that I can the privilege of having Jon Garland pitch on my team for $12m next year.

Garland's never gonna be a number 1 or 2, but he's a hell of a lot better than most of the free agent options this year. I think he'll be more than decent on a National League team. I still think the Sox will offer him up to the Orioles for Tejada, but it'll definitely take more than just Garland.

I think the post about San Diego might have soemthing there...

Garland in that park would be a very good #3 pitcher...and if they sign Maddux again, that would make an absolutely FILTHY rotation. Garland's ERA going from one of the better offensive parks in baseball to SanDiego would probably make him around a 3.4ish ERA pitcher.

Don't get me wrong, Garland's second half has been pretty bad (although he had a very good last start), but the Padres have a plethora of relievers who are always a bit of a crapshoot the next year. I guess it all depends on what williams is demanding, he can get absolutely ridiculous.

When did the Red Sox express interest in John Garland? For what to throw BP?

I think Atlanta is going to make a strong push for Garland. I would bet dollars to donuts that 2008 is Scheurholz's final year as GM of the Braves (final year in baseball period) and he is looking to go out with a bang (reason for the Teixera deal IMO). I would not be surprised if the Braves end up overpaying for a guy like Garland just to ensure that Jo Jo Reyes or Lance Cormier does not even sniff a big league mound next season. Now remember I said he'd be willing to overpay, so, I'd offer Yunel Escobar and maybe Ascanio? And before Braves fans blow a gasket over trading Yunel, I say why not? Go for it all next year with a rotation of Smoltz-Hudson-Garland-Hampton-James and a pretty solid bullpen. The offense is still going to be very good (better in my opinion with strikeout/DP machine Andruw Jones gone). So why not? Make a run in 2008 and worry about 2009 in 2009...

Jon Garland led the AL in hits allowed last year. His ERA has been over 4.5, in 5 of the last 6 years. Like many White Sox players, he had a career year in 2005. That said, some knucklehead GM will over pay for him.

renteria and someone would be to much for garland, maybe straight up but not add more guys. the sox would be saving like 3-4 million dollars as it is. the braves could go the whole year with escobar at short. in a few years move him to 3rd and bring in lilbridge to play ss the braves NEED pitching. hamptopn scares the heck out of me, i cant wait till we can buy his contract out and not WASTE 15 million for a guy not to pitch. All that being said i wouldnt mind seeing garland in braves uni next year for the right price

Carlos Gomez and Mike Carp for Jon Garland.

curgle I couldnt have said it myself. KW has made me mad as a fan this year. He has made some bad moves, and then he is trying to sell his guys away for like 2 dollars on the dollar. I mean, 2 top prospects for Jermaine Dye? Jose Contreras? Now Garland? Come on man wow. I would love to see the braves trade away some pieces for this guy. I am sure some of the boppers in the NL East wouldnt mind either. Broxton for Garland would most likely get Colletti killed, and he would deserve to be fired if he made that trade. Broxton could be the next great closer the game has. I am not completely sure on whether the Dodgers want him to close at some point or start at some point, but his stuff is filthy. I wouldnt even give up Mike Carp for Jon Garland, let alone Gomez with him.

Bravesfanuc, you will never see Omar Minaya involved when it comes to these scrubby guys like Jon Garland. If he wants a guy like Garland, he will find him in the offseason for crumbs, like he did with Maine, Lawrence, Perez, El Duque, Sosa, you name it. You dont have to pay 12 million dollars plus give up your best youngsters for overated number 4/5 guys like Jon Garland. They are all over you just have to know where to find them. Omar has built the pen with bigger sort of free agent signings, retaining Glavine and brining in Pedro, and then with small time trades like the El Duque, Maine, and Perez deals. Not by overpaying for a scrubby guy that is being shopped around like he is Don Sutton. Teetz, I dont know about you, but Jon Broxton is an elite reliever in my book, and only getting better.

Meant to say Omar has built the rotation with free agent signings and small time trades, not the pen.

The posters that call Garland over-rated are idiots.

Garland is a young,durable, experienced winning pitcher that dominated in the playoffs and World Series. He has won 18 games twice. He might even get better as his 6'6" frame gets stronger.

The fact that Houston offered that enormous package and Atlanta offered Renteria AND a top pitching prospect is proof of how other GM's view Garland. Few teams are not interested in Garland.

KW turned those 2 deals down. Time will tell if he was wrong. Personally, I wish that he had taken the Houston offer.

I doubt very much that he'll take or won't be offered more than a couple of relievers.

I would rather see the Sox extend Garland than trade him but if they do move him I suspect that they'll get a pitcher and a position player to fill 2 holes.

cachhubguy and Nrmax, very on point there you two, great posts!

Garland is a near dead on *LgERA guy each and every year (save the 05 fluke). Know what that means? Well, about 4.3-4.5 ERA for most NLC teams if based on 07 ~ doesn't scream "wow" does it...

KW is stupider than Sht for not trading him at the deadline when his stock was inflated due to weak comp to that point. He could have had ERent+TopSP-Pros but turned it down because he didn't want to admitt he was out of the race. Asking for the moon and keeping all these bums when no one pays it will be Kennys death in Chi ~ that Championship will only hold bad moves and bad teams for so long...

Again (as I was saying at the break), trade Garland, JoseC, Thome, Dye and everything else not nailed down if you want to see this team competiting again in the next 4-5 years. KW sticking to his "well, what if all the stars align again" mindstate will make for some bad baseball on the southside...

Shut up Blu.

Jon Garland.
Year W-L ERA WHIP K/BB
2001- 6-7 3.69 1.52 61/55
2002-12-12 4.58 1.41 112/83
03- 12-13 4.51 1.37 108/74
04- 12-11 4.89 1.38 113/76
*05- 18-10 3.50 1.17 115/47
06- 18-7 4.51 1.36 112/41
07- 9-10 4.75 1.40 82/51

You know what Blu, your absolutely right, Garland is the best pitcher in the history of baseball. And he is only 28. Somebody offerup the farm for this guy. Come on, are you serious man? His whip is awful every year during that span, his K/BB were terrible for the most part, his ERA was consistently bad besides in 05. That was a career year and it is not happening again. Garland is just simply not very good, sorry.

* ABERRATION

Braves would be silly to trade Renteria for Garland. Raise your payroll, lose a good offensive shortstop and add a league average pitcher. How does that make sense?

Renteria is hitting .336 w/ 11HR's this year. Last year he hit close to .300 w/14 HR's. The guy plays solid defense. Folks in the NL are just spoiled in the SS position w/ Ramirez/Rollins/Reyes, etc.

Garland is a fine back of the rotation guy. Just don't give up your shortstop to get him.

bjsguess,

Yeah, you're very right and that's why KW is so stupid when he didn't do the deal ~ it was there for his taking because ATL was in "win now" mode.

At the time Garland saw his ERA somewhere between 2.8-3.1 and was looking like he was something special mainly because he had played such weak teams to that point. Nearly instantly he had to face teams like Bos and Cle and watched his ERA grow to what everyone would expect it to be. That deal was turned down right before the trade for Tex. KW would have looked great getting an AS SS with a 6aYR deal (huge need w/fairly cheap contract) + a TopSP-Pros for a pitcher about to implode; but he was still implying he could be adding pieces!

Now, well I can't imagine the return would be that great. Teams will trade for LgAvg SPs, but when they are making more than they should be and only have a year on the contract then you really have to find one of those GMs about to be fired if you want a good return ~ ie like Houston last offseason... Otherwise you need to find a team looking to dump some salary at the same time as needing a 3-4 type in a major way.

Garland for ERent right now? Nah, that ship has sailed... KW *might* be able to get Escobar, but I even doubt that now...

bjsguess,

Yeah, you're very right and that's why KW is so stupid when he didn't do the deal ~ it was there for his taking because ATL was in "win now" mode.

At the time Garland saw his ERA somewhere between 2.8-3.1 and was looking like he was something special mainly because he had played such weak teams to that point. Nearly instantly he had to face teams like Bos and Cle and watched his ERA grow to what everyone would expect it to be. That deal was turned down right before the trade for Tex. KW would have looked great getting an AS SS with a 6aYR deal (huge need w/fairly cheap contract) + a TopSP-Pros for a pitcher about to implode; but he was still implying he could be adding pieces!

Now, well I can't imagine the return would be that great. Teams will trade for LgAvg SPs, but when they are making more than they should be and only have a year on the contract then you really have to find one of those GMs about to be fired if you want a good return ~ ie like Houston last offseason... Otherwise you need to find a team looking to dump some salary at the same time as needing a 3-4 type in a major way.

Garland for ERent right now? Nah, that ship has sailed... KW *might* be able to get Escobar, but I even doubt that now...

braves#1


What has Jon Garland ever done since his '05 season?
nothing

i want a poll here.

Who would you rather have on your team?
Dontrelle Willis
or
Jon Garland


Me clearly I would want Willis this guy is 25 years old while Garland is 28 years old. Add on the fact Dontrelle Willis can HIT. He could the best pitcher that actually hits. Just check this article out http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/hitting-pitchers/ This guy is so athletic off the mound and he plays like every game is his last.

I could see a Furcal for Garland swap [though with Furcal still owed $17 mill still fro 2008, the sox might seek an arm like Jonathan Meloan]. With both players potential free agents after 2008, the sox and Dodgers would try and re-sign the guys they got in trade. Signing Furcal to a 3, 4 yr deal would be smart for the sox, to team with rookie 2b Danny Richar, [and fellow Dominican]. While signing Garland to a 4 yr deal makes sense for LA, as they could have some stability in their rotation.

Garland is a good bet to stay in LA, as he grew up in CA. Furcal and Ozzie Guillen know each other from Atlanta.

The dodgers would eat some salary before throwing in Meloan. Atleast I hope so. I would rather have any of the young dodger pitchers right now then Garland.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.