Offseason In Review: St. Louis Cardinals

The Cardinals are next in our Offseason In Review series.

Major League Signings

International Signings

  • Leobaldo Pina, Fernando Gonzalez, Jorge Araujo

Notable Minor League Signings

Trades and Claims

Notable Losses

Summary

February was a painful month for the Cardinals, as they failed to sign Pujols to an extension and lost Adam Wainwright to Tommy John surgery.  Still, Pujols and Tony La Russa will be in St. Louis for at least one more season, so let's take a look at how GM John Mozeliak augmented his team.

Last year's significant one-year gamble was righty Brad Penny; this time it's a position player in Lance Berkman.  In both cases the Cardinals paid a little more than I would have predicted, but it's hard to complain much about a one-year contract.  Berkman can probably still hold a spot in the middle of a lineup – ZiPS projects .262/.379/.449 – but expecting the 35-year-old to play more than 400 innings in the outfield for the first time since 2004 seems unrealistic.  You have to think his injury risk is heightened and the defense he does provide will be a negative.

Westbrook

The Westbrook contract represents a bargain, in both the $8.25MM salary and avoidance of a third year.  The need for 200 respectable innings from Westbrook (pictured) became much stronger when Wainwright went down.  The dropoff from Wainwright to Kyle McClellan might have pushed most pundits to pick the Reds or Brewers in the NL Central, but the Cardinals still have enough pitching to contend. 

Theriot didn't cost much to acquire, since the Dodgers probably would have non-tendered him.  He's a stretch as an everyday shortstop; a run at J.J. Hardy would have been better, though he may have been too expensive at $5.85MM.  Failing a Hardy trade I would have retained Brendan Ryan, who at least provides significant defensive value.

What about Pujols?  The Cardinals reportedly offered eight or nine years at $19-23MM annually.  While that might have been the third-largest contract in baseball history, I feel that $225MM over nine years would be the floor for an acceptable deal.  That'd still represent a hometown discount.  The Cardinals will need to enter that uncharted territory in the crucial five-day negotiating period after the World Series ends, having failed to resolve the Pujols situation during the 2010-11 offseason.

Photo courtesy of Icon SMI.


7 Responses to Offseason In Review: St. Louis Cardinals Leave a Reply

  1. I can’t wait until the 2012 Offseason in Review for St. Louis.
    -wtk

    • Lunchbox45 4 years ago

      going to be a lot more interesting than signing brian tallet thats for sure

  2. timmytwoshoezzz 4 years ago

    The STL Cards have a new look, but they are not a very good defensive ballclub outside of Yadi, AP, Hollliday, and occasionally Rasmus. Their difficulty in turning in play balls into outs has to hurt their pitching staff you would think.

  3. RedbirdRuffian 4 years ago

    I’ve got a bad feeling about this year. Too much mediocrity in key places. Westbrook a good deal at $8 milion? He was never anything but mediocre in his best years and those were at least 4-5 years ago. Cards farm system just isn’t producing like it was 4-5 years ago, and the payroll is way out of whack with the huge contracts for Puhols, Holliday, Carpenter, Wainwright and then the huge dropoff in talent…

    • Waino is making what, 6/7 million this year? anyway he is a bargain at any price, even when hurt. The lohse contract is what is killing them, 11.5 this year and 12 next. That hurts

    • aaronanderson16 4 years ago

      I am dying to really hear who you think the Cardinals system was producing 4-5 years ago. The last 3 years have been pretty good for the farm and it is still producing more talent. Here is what has come out within the last three years- Rasmus, Boggs, Motte, Perez(all good relievers), Jay, Craig, McClellan, Wallace(how we got Holliday) just to name a few. If you have any amount of role players or potential star player like Rasmus that the Cards produced 4-5 years ago let me know.

    • Michael Smith 2 years ago

      Looking at this two years later, it appears your concerns for 2011 were unwarranted

Leave a Reply