Headlines

  • Diamondbacks To Sign Merrill Kelly
  • Brewers Trade Isaac Collins To Royals For Angel Zerpa
  • Cardinals To Sign Dustin May
  • Blue Jays, Tyler Rogers Agree To Three-Year Deal
  • Tigers To Sign Kenley Jansen
  • Mets To Sign Jorge Polanco
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Diamondbacks To Sign Merrill Kelly

By Nick Deeds | December 14, 2025 at 11:19pm CDT

The Diamondbacks are in the final stages of completing a two-year, $40MM contract with right-hander Merrill Kelly, according to Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic.  The deal will be official once Kelly passes a physical (as per Jon Heyman of The New York Post) and Arizona will need to clear a space on its currently full 40-man roster.  Kelly is represented by Apex Baseball.

The 37-year-old Kelly returns to the team with which he has spent nearly his entire major league career. Though initially drafted by the Rays in the eighth-round of the 2010 draft, Kelly made his big league debut with the Diamondbacks back in 2019 after a four-season stay in Korea as a member of the KBO’s SK Wyverns (now known as the SSG Landers). After a pedestrian rookie campaign in the majors where he pitched to a league-average ERA in 32 starts, Kelly managed to fashion a role for himself as one of the better mid-rotation arms in the majors.

Since the start of the 2022 campaign, Kelly has pitched to a 3.47 ERA in 108 starts. He’s struck out 23.1% of his opponents while walking 7.7% in that time, leaving him with a 3.81 FIP. While a 4.03 SIERA and other so-so peripherals cast him as a step down from your prototypical front-end starter, the veteran has managed to remain a talented and mostly durable rotation piece. Kelly particularly endeared himself to Arizona fans when he delivered a brilliant 2.25 ERA over 24 postseason innings during the club’s run to the World Series in 2023.

Amid a disappointing 2025 season where the Diamondbacks were ravaged by injuries to everyone from star closers Justin Martinez and A.J. Puk to newly-signed ace Corbin Burnes, the team engaged in a sell-off at this year’s trade deadline and shipped Kelly to the Rangers in exchange for a trio of pitching prospects. Kelly put up uninspiring numbers across ten starts with the Rangers, posting a 4.23 ERA and near-matching 4.18 FIP across 55 1/3 innings of work. Even while the veteran was in Texas, an offseason reunion with the Diamondbacks was already being speculated upon.  “Definite” interest in a reunion with Kelly was reported on Arizona’s side shortly before last week’s Winter Meetings, and now the sides have come together on a deal.

Turning to the deal itself, Kelly’s $40MM guarantee clocks in just ahead of the two years and $36MM MLBTR predicted for the right-hander when ranking him as the #25 free agent in this offseason’s Top 50 MLB Free Agents list. Perhaps that slight premium the Diamondbacks paid for Kelly’s services was the cost of jumping the market; while the free agent market for position players and especially relievers has kicked into gear in a big way already, Kelly is just the third starting pitcher from MLBTR’s Top 50 to sign a contract this offseason. He joins Dylan Cease and Cody Ponce, both of whom received guarantees that slightly eclipsed MLBTR’s prediction.

Now that he’s set to return to Arizona, Kelly stands as the favorite to start for the Diamondbacks on Opening Day this year. He’ll join a rotation that already added Michael Soroka earlier this offseason while reuniting with former teammates Eduardo Rodriguez, Brandon Pfaadt, and Ryne Nelson. Burnes could be a factor later in the season but is not expected to pitch until sometime in the second half of the season. While the team’s rotation certainly looks much more complete with Kelly back in the fold, bringing the right-hander back into the fold shouldn’t stop the team from pursuing other rotation additions after the club’s pitching staff finished 19th in the majors with a 4.29 ERA last year.

Of course, adding beyond this could prove to be easier said than done. The Diamondbacks are projected for a payroll just north of $171MM in 2026, according to RosterResource. That rises to north of $205MM for luxury tax purposes. GM Mike Hazen has suggested that, while Arizona’s payroll would likely be moving downward from its 2025 level, that would still leave the team with room to spend. The club spent $188MM on its payroll last season, however, meaning they currently sit less than $17MM from that mark.

Perhaps that leaves enough wiggle room to reunite with Paul Goldschmidt on an affordable one-year deal, a move the Diamondbacks have been said to be contemplating, but Kelly will surely go down as the team’s biggest expenditure unless an increase in payroll is approved or the team makes a trade that clears salary. To that latter point, the hot stove has been burning with Ketel Marte trade buzz in recent weeks. Moving Marte would certainly clear payroll off the books, though Hazen has consistently downplayed the likelihood of a deal surrounding Marte actually coming together.

Share Repost Send via email

Arizona Diamondbacks Newsstand Transactions Merrill Kelly

107 comments

Brewers “Open To” Using Angel Zerpa As A Starter

By Mark Polishuk | December 14, 2025 at 11:04pm CDT

The Brewers and Royals officially announced the three-player trade (reported yesterday) that sent Isaac Collins and Nick Mears to Kansas City in exchange for Angel Zerpa.  Brewers president of baseball operations Matt Arnold spoke to Curt Hogg of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel about the trade today, and revealed the interesting detail that the club was “open to” the idea of Zerpa moving from the bullpen back to rotation work.

“We have some scouts that think he can do it.  He has done it in the past,” Arnold said.  “This guy also has postseason experience, too, which we obviously value a lot.  Having a guy with that kind of versatility and experience in big games is something we think will really help us.”

As we’ve seen teams move away from traditional pitching roles in recent years, there has been an increased willingness to explore turning relievers (sometimes even career relievers) into starting pitchers.  If clubs no longer expressly need their starters to throw more than five innings or take more than two turns through an opposing lineup, stretching a reliever out to handle this increased workload is more of a realistic goal than stretching a reliever to handle seven-plus innings.

Zerpa began his pro career as a starting pitcher, and worked as a starter in three of his first four career games in the majors (in 2021-22).  He started only three of his 15 appearances for the Royals in 2023, however, and hasn’t since started a game in anything outside of an opener capacity.  Instead, K.C. used Zerpa as a southpaw bullpen weapon, and the hurler posted a 4.03 ERA, 20.8% strikeout rate, 8.0% walk rate, and a whopping 60.6% groundball rate over 118 1/3 innings in 2024-25.

Right-handed hitters were quite productive against Zerpa even as he mostly dominated lefty swingers, and he allowed a lot of hard contact along with his uninspiring strikeout and walk numbers.  Zerpa is a hard thrower whose fastball averaged 96.2mph in 2025, but his standard four-seamer hasn’t been very effective over the last two years, while his 96.6mph sinker is his top pitch.  The slider was thrown 44.6% of the time in 2025, with a slider used 31.9% of the time and the four-seamer 19.8% of the time.  As Hogg noted, increased usage of a changeup might be necessary to help the 26-year-old Zerpa adjust back to starting pitching.

It isn’t the kind of arsenal that immediately stands out as a rotation candidate, and it might be that Zerpa just winds up as a reliever if the Brewers decide against the role change in Spring Training.  That said, the fact that the Brewers in particular see starting potential in Zerpa is probably a plus in favor of the experiment working.  Milwaukee’s ability to turn unheralded pitchers into capable or even elite starters or relievers has been perhaps the key element of the team’s success over the last decade, so nobody should rule out the possibility that the Brew Crew could help Zerpa unlock another level of performance no matter his role.

Arnold said the Brewers had “been trying to access [in a trade] for a long time,” as “I think that our group felt like this was a really strong arm to access with really, really good ingredients.  We’re very excited to get him with our coaches who have done a great job tapping into arms like this for a number of years.”

Zerpa is arbitration-eligible for the first time this offseason, and is arb-controlled through the 2028 season.  Because he has primarily operated as a non-closer, Zerpa’s first-year arbitration projection is only $1.2MM.  This is a solid price tag even if the left-hander stays in the pen, but he can successfully move into the rotation, he’ll be even more of a bargain over Milwaukee’s period of team control.

One reason why Zerpa may remain in the Brewers’ pen is the club’s current rotation surplus.  Freddy Peralta, Brandon Woodruff, Quinn Priester, Chad Patrick, and Jacob Misiorowski line up as the projected starting five, and plenty of other starting candidates (i.e. Logan Henderson, Robert Gasser, Carlos Rodriguez, Tobias Myers) are depth options.  The “you can never have too much pitching” mantra applies here since this group is likely to be naturally thinned out by injuries, plus Woodruff and Peralta are both set to become free agents next winter.  As trade rumors persist about Peralta, it is even possible the Brewers could suddenly have a big hole atop their rotation this offseason.

Share Repost Send via email

Milwaukee Brewers Angel Zerpa

5 comments

MLBTR Chat Transcript

By Mark Polishuk | December 14, 2025 at 9:41pm CDT

Mark P

  • The Weekend Chat is here! We’ll get things rolling after a few questions get into the queue….

Giants fan

  • Any truth to the rumors of the Giants being close on a Ketel Marte trade? Chances of that happening and what would the Giants have to give up to get him?

Mark P

  • I’d find it surprising if the D’Backs moved Marte to a division rival, of all teams.  One would imagine SF would have to significantly outbid other teams to make that happen, which might mean Eldridge would have to be involved.

Bloom

  • Is there a way you’d see the cardinals both buying and selling?

Mark P

  • As in, trying to make an effort to contend in 2026?  Probably not, though the Cardinals aren’t turning up their noses at players who can be MLB contributors immediately.  Fitts, for instance, can help next year.

CBA

  • What’s one thing you want to see in the next CBA?  Any chance the league would go after establishing max contracts?

Mark P

  • The union would push back hard on max contracts, as they would anything directed at limiting salaries.

    One thing I’d like to see in the next CBA is a longer-term agreement, so we only have to suffer through all of this depressing lockout talk every 6-7 years instead of every four years

Dave

  • Hi mark, do you think the royals make  another trade for a bat?

Mark P

  • I’d think so.  Collins and Thomas are upgrades over what they had, but I’d suggest more is needed to really get things cooking.

Motor City Beach Bum

  • Who is the best non-Bregman bat the Tigers will realistically pursue?

Mark P

  • A quick glance at the Tigers’ entries on MLBTR this winter reveals a real push towards pitching.  Bregman, Ketel Marte, and HS Kim are the only position players really linked to Detroit so far, which makes sense since Jeff Greenberg literally said pitching was the Tigers’ priority this winter.

    The link to Marte was a little odd since Gleyber will be back at 2B.  I’d think Detroit fans wouldn’t be too enamored by Kim as the fallback plan to Bregman, but that might be as realistically big as it gets for Detroit on the position-player side

Read more

nym fan

  • what in gods name are the mets thinking letting alonso and diaz walk?

Mark P

  • Seems like Stearns has been pretty ready to let Alonso walk for over a year now, and signing him to any sort of truly long-term contract never seemed to be the Mets’ plan.  Same with Diaz, as I suspect the Mets didn’t want to take the risk of paying big money deeper into his 30’s

    Obviously letting both go is a risk unto itself, since that’s a lot of high-caliber talent that now has to be replaced.  Polanco can only replace a portion of Alonso’s offense, and that’s assuming Polanco can replicate what he did in 2025.  Trying to build a pen out of strategic spare parts carries a lot of question marks, and that tactic tends to work better if you have a stabilizing closer like Diaz (or, like Hader or Williams for Stearns in Milwaukee)

Front Office

  • What is your initial reaction to Colorado’s new Front Office and Coaching staff?

Mark P

  • A step in the right direction.  It’s funny, some people speculated on Byrnes as the Rockies’ next front office boss since he worked for them back in the day, but he’ll instead return as the number two behind DePodesta.

    Sure, there’s the oddity of DePodesta being out of baseball for the last decade, but the bottom line is that these are some new voices who can bring some fresh ideas into an organization that badly needs a shake-up.

draft

  • The draft is supposed to help competitive balance. How does ending up with a team like the SF Giants picking 4th help ?

Mark P

  • That’s the magic of the draft lottery.  And, given how the Giants have had just one winning season in the last nine years, maybe they need the extra help!

Park M

  • idc if CY said he isn’t shopping Seager, he didn’t say he’s untouchable. Could Seager bring back Anthony +?

Mark P

  • There is no world where the Red Sox trade Roman Anthony.  Zero.
  • If the Red Sox actually did offer Anthony for Seager, then Young would quickly change his mind about Seager’s availability.

Dan S.

  • Any word on how teams are feeling about Michael King’s durability? Does 3/75 still feel like the right gamble? Would there be an opt-out?

Mark P

  • I think a lot of teams would happily take a three-year deal on King, with the added AAV perhaps a necessary cost.

Ghost of Mike Rizzo

  • What would it take for the Nats to move Gore? With Toboni’s focus so far on coaching and analytics, wouldn’t it make more sense to develop Gore into a better pitcher, and try to move him at deadline or next year?

Mark P

  • I think the Nationals have that same idea, as it would take a huge offer to get them to swap Gore right now.  There’s no real immediate incentive for the Nats to move Gore unless another team really levels up with something Toboni can’t refuse

Blue Jays fan

  • If the jays don’t sign Bo or Tucker is there a plan B or do they just go with a lineup of 1. Springer 2. Lukes 3. Vladdy 4. Santander 5. Barger 6. Kirk 7. Varsho 8. Clement 9. Gimenez

Oil Can Boyd

  • You want to get back to the world series. Does Tucker fill the void of Bo’s 200 hits ability?

Mark P

  • Toronto absolutely needs to add another bat to that lineup.  Going with that lineup means that you’re putting a lot of faith in everyone to match or top their 2025 numbers, and counting on Santander to have enough of a bounce-back year that he can replicate Bichette’s contributions.
  • If forced to pick one, I’d take Tucker over Bichette.  He’s just a better overall offensive force, and his LH bat works better in the Blue Jays’ lineup

Kyle

  • How serious do you think the Red Sox are in their interest in Michael King? Curious how they’d make that work and still be able to get two bats

Mark P

  • No reason to think they don’t have legitimate interest.  If King did get signed, then the Red Sox get more serious about shopping their young pitching depth for offense.

Guest

  • Long term preference – Nick Kurtz or Roman Anthony.

Mark P

  • Who would you rather have over the long term?

    Roman Anthony (49.0% | 941 votes)
    Nick Kurtz (50.9% | 978 votes)

    Total Votes: 1919

Guest

  • Kind of a role player, but has anyone shown interest in Dominic Smith?  He had a resurgence with SF last year. Great dude, easy to root for.

Mark P

  • Smith probably isn’t going to get much attention until a lot of the bigger, everyday player types land contracts.  Smith is indeed coming off a nice year, but most every team probably views him as a part-timer at best

Shaker Moseby

  • How much of a fantasy is it to hope the Jays sign both Tucker and Bo?  And if that fantasy comes true, what would you do with Clement and Barger?

Mark P

  • This wild scenario isn’t happening, as much as the Jays are in all-in mode.

    If it somehow did happen, the lineup is Bichette at 2B (presuably?), Barger 3B, Gimenez SS, Clement getting at-bats against lefties spelling either Barger/Gimenez, Tucker in one corner OF spot, and Santander/Springer in the other OF corner and the DH spot.

    Realistically, the Jays would probably then try to unload Santander for as much of a salary dump as possible, to save some money and to open up at-bats

Guest

  • What do you think of the Tyler Rogers deal?  I thought we were looking for a closer, but…

Mark P

  • I loved that signing for the Jays.  Rogers just gets results, and he brings a lot of durability to the bullpen.
  • I also wonder if the Jays made that signing in part as free advertising for Rogers Communications, haha

Joe

  • why do guys use baseball reference instead of FanGraphs for player pages?

Mark P

  • We’ve been using the B-Ref player tracker for years and years, and since it has worked just fine for us, I don’t think there’s any impetus to change?  But, we reference both B-Ref and Fangraphs all the time….heck, I’ve got a Fangraphs page open right now

Major League Bros

  • HEY MARK BRO… how many pull-ups can you do?

Mark P

  • I can pull up stats on that Fangraphs tab but that’s about it

Steven Kwan

  • Are fans overvaluing Steven Kwan? He has had health issues in each of the last two seasons and his sprint speed is plummeting. I’m sure front offices are taking that into consideration, but are teams willing to “overpay” for a good leadoff bat? Guardians have been noted as having a high asking price for him last trade deadline. Was that at any way in compensation for losing Clase’s trade value?

Mark P

  • It may surprise some fans to learn that Kwan had only a 99 wRC+ last year, and he had a similar number in 2023 while posting much more impressive offensive seasons in 2022 and 2024.

    So in that even-odd sense, he’s due for another big season next year!  But, you’re also leaving out the fact that Kwan is an elite defender, and his injury history is pretty light in comparison to most players.

    The Guardians’ financial situation means they’re always open to moving any player nearing free agency, but don’t forget….the Guards are also always trying to win, and Kwan has filled as outsized void as basically the only reliable player in Cleveland’s outfield for a few years now.

    My stance has always been that Kwan will be dealt next winter when he’s a year away from free agency, but that could potentially change if the younger OFs have started to emerge enough that the Guards felt comfortable moving Kwan at the deadline

  • That….was a lot more words than I realized I was writing, haha

Angel Fan

  • Who closing out games for us next season, Thought it would have been a no brainer to bring back Jansen. He said he liked playing here and only got a 1M dollar raise from the tigers

Mark P

  • Jansen may have preferred the idea of playing for a winning team that will help him get to 500 saves in much quicker fashion.  Due to their lack of success, the Angels aren’t going to win a ton of bidding wars unless they’ve got the clear top offer.

    As to who could step in, it’s asking a lot for Joyce or Stephenson to become the new closer, yet teams have often turned to any number of random relievers to close games.  Chances are the Angels bring in someone with a decent ninth-inning track record, but a committee might not be out of the question.

JaysVladdy

  • I think the Rays had a mutual option with Fairbanks. Considering the level of interest other teams have in him, why didn’t the Rays accept the $11 million option and then trade him afterward?

Mark P

  • Good question.  This was what I think most pundits figured the Rays would do, yet it seems like the Rays’ early forays into the trade market didn’t yield all that much interest.  Or, teams that were keen on Fairbanks might be open to paying him $11MM but not giving up prospects to Tampa to obtain him.
  • That $11MM weighs more heavily on the Rays’ budget than for most teams, yet it would seem like Fairbanks would still have been reasonably easy to move at full salary.  Or, Tampa Bay might have linked him to another trade chip in a multi-player deal?

Josh

  • I’m not a Mclain believer, does he have any trade value for the Reds?

Mark P

  • It would be a major sell-low situation for the Reds, so I doubt they’d have much interest in a trade.

Marky Mark

  • Mark Happy Weekend Chat!! So what is on ye ol’ Playlist this week?

Mark P

  • “Keep It Between The Lines” by Sturgill Simpson

Murakami

  • There’s only about a week left for me to sign and there’s been barely any rumors about interest in signing me? Does my market end up shifting to a shorter term deal?

Mark P

  • It’s been pretty quiet on the Murakami front, but Alonso leaving the market shakes up the 1B market.  It could be that Murakami’s camp is keeping a tight lid on rumors, moreso than interest is mild.

Rick Rude

  • Bold prediction for the rest of the Rays offseason?

Mark P

  • Lowe and Baz are both traded

Not Breslow

  • Asking for a friend. After the postseason push are the Red Sox fumbling the offseason so far? Any trade recommendations to right the ship? Im seeing a lot of negativity from the fanbase.

Mark P

  • Gray and Oviedo are very noteworthy pickups.  Keep in mind that Sox fans were having the same criticisms until Crochet was acquired at the winter meetings last year, and even then the criticism continued until Bregman signed in February.

    Boston’s roster is in good shape at the moment, they’ve already made the rotation better, and there’s still plenty of time for more significant moves.

Bobby Cox

  • You like the Yaz signing? I dont love it, good vs rh but a 4th outfielder and Eli white was good for us

Mark P

  • Really good move by the Braves. Yaz provides a lot of OF and bench depth, raises the team’s talent floor.

rando

  • Is it me or does it feel like the international/NPB signings have been oddly quiet? Aside from the usual west coast + some east teams. being interested, haven’t really heard any momentum

Mark P

  • Imai/Okamoto/Murakami don’t have the same big-name buzz of some of the other recent NPB additions.  Plus, I do wonder if some of the rumor mill is muted due to fan perception that the Dodgers will somehow sign all of these guys.

Snakes

  • Why would any GM trade away Marte. He is on a team friendly contract

Mark P

  • It could be that there’s some heat to the rumors of clubhouse discord over Marte.  Or, the D’Backs are simply open to offers, just in case some team makes a crazy bid that can’t be refused.

    Chris Young made comments to this effect today, talking about Corey Seager….all front offices “check in” on star players, just out of due diligence and just in case.  Like, take this scenario…

    GM #1: Hi, what would it take for me get your best player?
    GM #2: Haha, you and every other team, buddy! Ok, I’ll play along, what would you be willing to offer?
    GM1: I’ll offer prospect X and prospect Y, and eat the entire contract.
    GM2: …haha, I like your thinking, but I’ll still pass. Take care!

    /hangs up phone

    GM2 to his staff: Holy crow, they were willing to give X and Y?!  How long should I wait before calling back?!

Guest

  • Yanks had a quiet winter meetings. Something in the works or are they going to run it back again next year?

Mark P

  • The Yankees feel (with cause) that they’re in good shape already for 2026, and can afford to be relatively patient in seeing how the market develops on a number of fronts.  Who knows, maybe they’ll sign Bellinger or King tomorrow, or they’ll swing some trade that wasn’t even known to be on their radar.

Bucco B

  • What’s it going to take for a FA to sign in the ‘Burgh? No one wants to play in that beautiful ballpark? For a losing organization?!

His excellence, Mark Polishuk

  • Are the Pirates for real with their interest in high end free agents? Or this a mirage to say they tried for the fanbase?

Guest

  • What do you think is the biggest realistic target left for the Bucs? And do you think they’ll actually make any kind of splash?

Mark P

  • It only takes one Jayson Werth-esque signing to change a perception of a team for other free agents.  The real question now is that if the Pirates were willing to pay Schwarber $120MM, that theoretically means they have $120MM in spending capacity over the next four years.  So why not use most or all of that money on two or even one big bat, and really try to go for it while Skenes is still on the roster?

Cards in NY

  • What kind of return can we expect to see for Romero based on what seattle gave up for Ferrer

Mark P

  • Ferrer is a high-velo strikeout pitcher who comes with multiple years of team control.  Romero is a grounder specialist with so-so strikeout numbers, a lot of walks, and only one year remaining of team control.

    In short, the Cardinals will be getting a heck of a lot less than Harry Ford in a trade return.

Jerry R.

  • Was it probably a mistake for the White Sox to pick up Luis Robert’s club option for the year? 20m is quite a lot for him on a low-spending team, and it even looks like an obstacle to a trade that nets decent prospects. What’s the deal, you think?

Mark P

  • There seems to still be enough interest that Robert will probably get dealt.  I can understand Chicago’s logic in not wanting to just cut him for nothing, and if Robert does end up staying put this winter but then has a strong first half, he’ll get a good return at the deadline.

Ray Oyler

  • You got anything to say about the athletics tonight or are you gonna talk about the beads?

Mark P

  • Kurtz is narrowly beating Anthony in the poll, so that’s something!

    Perhaps just by dint of their unusual geographic situation, there are fewer A’s rumors than for most teams, so there usually isn’t a ton to really discuss.  Leiter is an okay signing for them.  Severino should be included in every discussion about any “unwanted contract swap” since he’s an interesting trade chip, and it’ll be interesting to see where he lands and for what return

Fred Bird

  • When will the Arenado saga end? Cards can’t move forward with him on the team

Mark P

  • Arenado is one of the more difficult players to move, so if anything, it would’ve been more surprising if the Cardinals had dealt him by Dec. 14

Caught

  • Answering CBA question, you snuck in a 67. I caught ya

Mark P

  • lol, that was pure happenstance.  I am too old for that meme stuff.

JB Reds

  • I’m upset Schwarber didn’t sign with Reds obviously.  But ownership saying the main reason they tried is because he would boost ticket sales it about as bad as “where are you gonna go”….

Mark P

  • Wouldn’t the Reds signing ANY major player bring in extra attendance?  Like, what fan is saying “well, I’ll order a season ticket package because Schwarber is from the Cincy area, but I won’t do it for Cody Bellinger”?

John

  • Alonso the fix to the orioles underperforming lineup?

Mark P

  • It makes retaining Mountcastle look like even more of a head-scratcher, but I like the signing.  Perfectly fair to wonder if Alonso will be productive over the full five years, but he should absolutely make the O’s a better team in 2026.

Giants

  • There was a lot of talk that the Giants aren’t interested in spending long term on a pitcher, but now we have reports from a trustworthy local Giants reporter Susan Slusser that she spoke to agents and the Giants are in fact talking to agents and pursuing the “top starters”. I’m assuming she meant Framber Imai and Ranger. Were the Giants just throwing out a smokescreen with all the “we arent going to commit to long term 100 mil+ starter deals”, or is Posey just doing his own thing separate from ownership

Mark P

  • I think every owner/chairman would prefer to not sign pitchers (or anyone) to pricey long-term contracts.  And, Greg Johnson didn’t expressly say that the Giants would never sign such deals, just that it wasn’t his preference.

    This is a team that has added Chapman, Adames, and Devers just within the last 15 months, so it’s not like the Giants are adverse to spending.  It’s just that SF may be more willing to open the checkbook for a hitter than for a pitcher.  As to the reports of the Giants checking in on available starters, that’s at the very least a due diligence move, or maybe some explorations to see if any of these pitchers are open to a shorter-term deal.

Ebenezer_Batflip

  • Do you think the Padres move Miller?

Mark P

  • Doubtful, after giving such a ton to the A’s at the deadline.  Miller is both controllable and relatively inexpensive for now, plus he is both the anchor of the Padres’ bullpen and still a potential candidate to move back into the rotation if SD wants to roll the dice.

    The fact that credible reporters like the Athletic’s crew were noting that story makes it at least some kind of a possibility, but I do enjoy how most reports about the Padres include some version of “A.J. Preller floats a lot of wild offers or trade ideas, so bear with us.”

Stros

  • Where do you think Christian walker plays next year? Seems like the Astros have get rid of him given the logjam at the corners. Would a McNeil for walker trade make sense for the Mets?

Mark P

  • Since the Mets plan to use Polanco at first base, Walker probably isn’t realistic at this point.  McNeil-for-Walker doesn’t totally work either since that locks McNeil into just OF work, which is a slightly inefficient use of his skillset.

    Walker is another player that probably isn’t being dealt outside of “unfavorable contract swap” territory.  Which leaves the Astros in kind of a bind unless someone gets hurt in Spring Training.

Rays Fan

  • It seems like the Nationals have exactly what we need in Abrams and Ruiz.  What kind of a package would they require back for that duo?

Mark P

  • Ruiz is owed a lot of money on his contract, and his bat has gone ice-cold over the last two seasons as he’s dealt with injuries.  Doesn’t seem like a fit for Tampa at all.

    Abrams is a better fit in theory, but I don’t see the Rays meeting the Nats’ big asking price for the remaining three years of Abrams’ control.

Colton T

  • Do you think Seattle was smart by not matching Met’s offer for Polanco?

Mark P

  • Polanco had a good season and would’ve been a good fit returning to Seattle’s lineup, plus there’s the added value of what he brought to their clubhouse. For a $20MM AAV, however, I’m not sure I’m too broken up if I’m a Mariners fan.

    Really, retaining Naylor was the biggest need for the Seattle offseason.  Polanco or Suarez would’ve been gravy, and we shouldn’t rule out Suarez still possibly returning.

Guest

  • Tork for hunter greene. Who says no

Mark P

  • Cincinnati.  Greene is far more valuable

Guest

  • Poll results- have you ever had a poll closer than the Kurtz/Anthony poll?

Mark P

  • Currently 50.7% for Kurtz, and that’s about as narrow a margin I can remember in any pure 1-v-1 poll question

Philly Love

  • The Phils are an extremely loyal organization always looking to bring back their aging stars.  Although I love the loyalty, mixing in young players is the biggest key to any organization.  I’d love to see Crawford be able to play CF instead of settling for LF and Miller start at 3rd but ultimately play SS moving Turner out to the OF.  Thoughts?

Mark P

  • Philly will give Crawford every chance at sticking in CF, and he can play at least a decent center field, that’s a particularly enormous win for the team.  Given all the big contracts on their books, getting help from the farm system is key to adding some inexpensive depth and quality to the roster, since the Phillies can’t just spend their way to filling every roster hole.

Trip

  • Are the Braves done adding to the bullpen?

Mark P

  • I thought they were done just by re-signing Iglesias, so the Suarez deal really caught me off guard.  One would imagine the rest of Atlanta’s bullpen adds will be minor league signings or very low-guarantee MLB deals, given how much has already been invested in Iglesias/Suarez

Ritch

  • Is Detroit going after Verlander?

Mark P

  • Strangely no buzz at all about Verlander thus far, though perhaps he’s taking his time to evaluate what I’m guessing are a limited amount of preferred landing spots.  Verlander’s not going to sign with the Rockies or someone just to keep pitching — he wants to join a team with a decent-to-great chance at contending in 2026.

    The rotation market as a whole hasn’t really picked up steam yet apart from Cease.  Probably a few more of the bigger names need to find contracts before teams start to really look at second-tier, shorter-term options like Verlander

MoonBeamMcSwine

  • GE Mark…Who gets the accolades as GM for signing the most valuable extension during this offseason.. runner ups?

Mark P

  • Last year’s title went to Jerry Dipoto, for wisely locking up Cal Raleigh just before Raleigh had the season of his life.
  • I’ll provide more of an answer in April, since most extensions get worked out once the bigger offseason business is through

Bobby

  • Scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the most likely. How likely is it that the Dodgers will trade Teoscar Hernandez this offseason? I feel like he would not yield a great return (propects at most) and his postseason bat carries a lot of value.

Mark P

  • Teo’s postseason numbers aren’t great, just a career .792 OPS.  LA probably wouldn’t mind flipping Hernandez elsewhere to open up an outfield spot and free up some money, since even the Dodgers have a budget.  Now, the Dodgers would then surely re-invest those savings into another name player, potentially another outfielder L.A. thinks is a better long-term investment.

Friend

  • Severino for Cronenworth straight

Mark P

  • I feel like this was mentioned in a recent chat.  Makes sense on paper, but it could be that the A’s are wary of locking Cronenworth in at second base, since Kurtz/Rooker have 1B/DH spoken for

Me

  • Verlander to Detroit HAS TO happen, right?

Mark P

  • Oh yeah, I guess I didn’t address the Verlander/Detroit possibility in that last JV question.  Oops!

    It would be fun to see it happen, and the Tigers both need pitching and have a preference for shorter-term signings.  It’s a match on paper, but who knows how Harris and company might feel about Verlander, or if Verlander has interest in returning to Motown

Chatman

  • Have you seen running man?

Mark P

  • The new one, not yet.  The old one, several times.  Richard Dawson was legit robbed of an Oscar nomination.

Curious A’s Fan

  • Trading Severino would mean having to overpay for another SP. Why do that?

Mark P

  • Severino openly hates playing at the ballpark, the A’s can’t love that he is so public with his displeasure, and Severino doesn’t pitch well at home anyway, so his value to the team is limited.
  • We’ve over two hours into this chat now, so time to wrap things up.  Thanks so much for all the questions!
  • If you’re interested in more baseball Q&A, one of the many benefits of our Trade Rumors Front Office subscription is the exclusive weekly live chats. The more limited field means you’re about 10 times more likely to get a question answered, as opposed to battling for space with hundreds of other questions in today’s chat. For more on our memberships, check out this link:

    https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/membership?ref=chat-12-14-25

Share Repost Send via email

MLBTR Chats

18 comments

Chris Young: Rangers “Are Not Shopping Corey Seager”

By Steve Adams | December 14, 2025 at 7:20pm CDT

TODAY: “We are not shopping Corey Seager, I want to make that very clear,” Rangers president of baseball operations Chris Young said today during an interview with MLB Network Radio on SiriusXM.  Reiterating many of his same statements to media from earlier in the week, Young today said the trade buzz on Seager was “a little bit overblown,” as interest from rival teams was more in the line of standard due diligence.  “Maybe they thought by trading Marcus [Semien], we’d be open on Corey….We call and check in on great players with other teams as well.  So teams are doing their job, I get it,” Young said.

DECEMBER 10: The Rangers, as they look to address several areas of need on the roster while simultaneously scaling back payroll, have received numerous calls on star shortstop Corey Seager. However, while Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News lists the Red Sox (as was reported last night), Yankees and Braves as teams that have inquired, he adds that the Rangers are not at all motivated to move Seager and haven’t had any meaningful trade talks regarding the five-time All-Star.

On the surface, it sounds like a fairly similar situation to that of Ketel Marte in Arizona. Seager, like Marte, is an MVP-caliber talent on a weighty long-term contract whose current club is hoping to walk the line of simultaneously addressing multiple roster needs and scaling back the payroll. The Rangers aren’t expressly turning teams away but also aren’t shopping Seager and would surely need multiple controllable young big leaguers who could help immediately if they were to even entertain the idea of a trade.

Seager, 32 in April, was limited to 102 games last season thanks to multiple hamstring strains but continued to produce at an elite level when on the field. He hit .271/.373/.487 last season and touts a huge .294/.372/.544 batting line in his past 1514 plate appearances as a Ranger. That’s 52% better than league-average production after weighting for his home park, by measure of wRC+. Seager also walked at a career-best 13% clip in 2025 and notched the second- or third-best marks of his career in average exit velocity (92.9 mph), barrel rate (15.3%) and hard-hit rate (53.6%). He also posted a career-high 16 Defensive Runs Saved, while Statcast’s Outs Above Average credited him as a positive defender (+4) for the third time in the past four seasons.

The Rangers signed Seager to a 10-year, $325MM contract prior to the 2022 season. He’s lived up to that massive payday thus far but is still owed $186MM over the next six seasons (paid out evenly at $31MM per year). Adding that type of commitment would send the Yankees careening into the top tier of luxury penalization for a third straight season. They’re currently just shy of the third-tier cutoff ($284MM), per RosterResource. As soon as they cross that line, they’ll be subject to a 95% tax on subsequent additions and will see their top pick in next year’s draft dropped by 10 places. Effectively, Seager could cost them double the remaining commitment on his contract.

It’s not quite so extreme in Boston, where the Red Sox are about $20MM shy of the first luxury tier. Seager would push them into the first tier for a second straight season. They’d owe a 30% tax on the roughly $11MM of Seager’s contract that clocks in beyond that first penalty line. Once they’re more than $20MM over the limit, that’d jump to 42%. Crossing the threshold by more than $40MM would push the Red Sox’ top draft pick back 10 spots and bump the tax on subsequent additions to 72.5%.

The Braves are currently the furthest of this group from the luxury tax threshold, sitting about $33MM shy on RosterResource’s projections. They could technically add Seager without hitting the tax line, though acquiring him would effectively signal a willingness to pay the tax, as they’d be about $2MM away from the first-tier cutoff and have several other acquisitions they’d like to make. However, Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reported last month that Atlanta is one of eight teams on Seager’s limited no-trade list. That only further reduces the likelihood of a deal. Seager will gain full no-trade protection after the 2026 season, by virtue of 10-and-5 rights.

It’s still not entirely clear what type of payroll figure Rangers ownership has in mind. Texas currently projects for a payroll around $169MM, which is about $47MM shy of last year’s Opening Day mark. They’re looking for help behind the plate, at first base and on the pitching staff. That’s a lot of boxes to check, clearly, but there should be at least some room for modest spending. There are also various trade avenues to explore that don’t involve shipping out their best all-around position player (or one of their best but expensive arms like Jacob deGrom or Nathan Eovaldi, for that matter).

It’s of at least moderate note that Texas didn’t outright dismiss the possibility of trading Seager, but it’s more notable that they’re not digging deeply into the possibility. If one of the interested parties presents a compelling enough offer, perhaps the Rangers would ponder such a switch, but this appears to be a very different scenario than, say, the Cardinals — a rebuilding club with motivation to shed several veteran contracts and a willingness to pay down some of that salary. Seager’s name may well continue to surface in rumors, just as we’ve seen with Marte in Arizona or Tarik Skubal in Detroit, but that doesn’t mean he’s all that available or that the Rangers are eager to deal him.

Share Repost Send via email

Atlanta Braves Boston Red Sox New York Yankees Texas Rangers Corey Seager

71 comments

Giants Showing Interest In Cody Bellinger

By Mark Polishuk | December 14, 2025 at 6:26pm CDT

It’s been a pretty quiet offseason so far in the Bay Area, though the Giants have at least been linked to several notable trade candidates and free agents.  The San Francisco Chronicle’s Susan Slusser adds another big name to the list, writing that the Giants “have checked in on” Cody Bellinger.

While Bellinger’s ability to play first base probably wouldn’t be a factor for a team with Rafael Devers and Bryce Eldridge lined up for first base/DH duty, Bellinger would slot perfectly into the Giants’ vacancy in right field.  San Francisco could also slide Bellinger into left field or center field on occasion, depending on how Heliot Ramos or Jung Hoo Lee are deployed.  Bellinger is more of a serviceable center field candidate than a true regular, but he is a strong defender in the corners — his work as a left fielder and right fielder for the Yankees in 2025 earned +15 Defensive Runs Saved and +6 Outs Above Average.

Bellinger’s bat would also be a nice fit in the Giants’ lineup, as the 30-year-old is coming off a 125 wRC+ season (29 home runs, .272/.334/.480 in 656 plate appearances) in New York.  Bellinger hit far better at Yankee Stadium than he did on the road, which could be a concern for the Giants if Bellinger was playing his home games at pitcher-friendly Oracle Park.  On the plus side, the left-handed hitting Bellinger hits both right-handed and left-hand pitchers well, and he has one of the harder batters in the sport to strike out over the last three seasons.

The Giants have been linked to Bellinger a couple of times during his past forays into free agency, though that was back when Farhan Zaidi was in charge of San Francisco’s front office.  Current president of baseball operations Buster Posey was still on the team’s board of directors at the time, and of course Posey has plenty of on-field experience in facing off against Bellinger back during Bellinger’s days as a staple of the Dodgers lineup.  Posey has also done business with another Scott Boras client in Matt Chapman, as Posey was instrumental in getting Chapman’s extension finalized late in the 2024 season.

It is possible the Giants’ call on Bellinger might have been routine due diligence, or just to test the waters to gauge Bellinger’s interest in coming to San Francisco.  The larger question, of course, is whether or not the Giants are willing to meet Bellinger’s asking price.  MLB Trade Rumors projected the former NL MVP (who ranked eighth on our top 50 free agents list) for a five-year, $140MM contract, as Boras is surely looking to finally land the guaranteed long-term deal that eluded Bellinger during the 2023-24 offseason.

Giants team chairman Greg Johnson has been openly wary over long-term contracts in general, particularly for pitchers.  Bellinger being a position player might mean the Giants would be more open to signing him to a big contract, yet the team already has a lot of money invested in Devers, Chapman, Lee, and Willy Adames through at least the 2029 season.

For as many holes as San Francisco has in its lineup, starting pitching is a more glaring need, as the Giants have only Logan Webb, Robbie Ray, and Landen Roupp lined up for rotation spots.  If the Giants are truly hesitant about heavy investments in starting pitchers, they could look to address their rotation needs via trade, and perhaps use any free agent dollars to sign a prominent position player (like Bellinger).

The Yankees have been the team most directly linked to Bellinger’s services, as New York was known to be prioritizing a known quantity in Bellinger ahead of other top targets like Kyle Tucker.  The Mets, Angels, Blue Jays, and Phillies have also reportedly shown interest in Bellinger this winter, though Philadelphia is probably a less likely suitor now that Kyle Schwarber has re-signed.

Share Repost Send via email

San Francisco Giants Cody Bellinger

83 comments

Phillies, Mets, Padres, Pirates Interested In Luis Robert Jr.

By AJ Eustace | December 14, 2025 at 5:34pm CDT

TODAY: The Phillies also had recent interest in Robert, as per The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal and Will Sammon, continuing Philadelphia’s explorations in a Robert deal back at the trade deadline. Robert’s right-handed bat would be a nice complement to lefty-swingers Brandon Marsh and Justin Crawford in the Philadelphia outfield, and having an experienced center field option like Robert provides the Phillies cover if Crawford isn’t quite ready for prime time as he makes his MLB debut.

DECEMBER 13: Last month, the White Sox picked up their $20MM option on Luis Robert Jr. General manager Chris Getz signaled that the club planned on Robert being their starting center fielder in 2026. That has not stopped clubs from inquiring on his availability in trade talks, as Francys Romero of Beisbol FR reports that the Mets, Padres, and Pirates have expressed interest in acquiring Robert.

The 28-year-old batted .223/.297/.364 with an 84 wRC+ across 110 games for the White Sox this year. His first half was particularly brutal, as he only hit .185/.270/.313 with a 63 wRC+ in 70 games through June 25, when he incurred a left hamstring strain that would send him to the injured list a few days later. Robert was striking out in 30.9% of his plate appearances, only marginally improved from his 33.2% rate last year. He did have a 10.2% walk rate, but for the most part, he was continuing an offensive decline that started with an 84 wRC+ season in 2024.

His second half was a clear improvement. Robert returned from the IL on July 8 and batted .293/.349/.459 with a 124 wRC+ in his next 146 plate appearances. After experiencing poor batted ball luck in the first half of the season (.245 BABIP), he benefited from positive regression upon his return (.317 BABIP). He also dropped his strikeout rate to 16.4% in the second half, bringing that mark down to 26.0% on the season. His rebound was enough for the White Sox to hold onto Robert at the deadline, despite interest from several clubs. Unfortunately, he suffered another left hamstring strain and was placed on the IL in late August, which ultimately ended his season.

The end result was a season worth 1.3 WAR according to FanGraphs. Looking at the bigger picture, it’s clear that Robert has fallen from the height of his 2023 season, when he posted a 129 wRC+ and hit 38 home runs in a career-high 145 games while earning an All-Star nod. That was the fourth season of a six-year, $50MM extension that Robert had signed in January 2020, which was then a record for a player who had not yet debuted in the majors. Robert’s production from 2020-23 made it look like a good deal, but his drop-off in 2024-25 (second-half rebound notwithstanding) made the $20MM club option for 2026 look a lot more expensive.

In the end, the team picked up the option in lieu of paying Robert a $2MM buyout. On the surface, that $18MM net amount was a lot for an injury-prone player who had posted below-average offense for two years, especially for a rebuilding club. The move may have been motivated by the lack of standout center fielders in free agency. Trent Grisham had a strong year in 2025 but accepted the qualifying offer rather than test the market. Cody Bellinger is still available, but he is a corner outfielder at this stage of his career. Harrison Bader is an exceptional defender and will do well on a multi-year deal, although his career-best offensive showing in 2025 was partly the product of good batted ball fortune (.359).

The club is hoping that Robert will have a decent offensive showing in 2026, which would make him a solid trade candidate at next year’s deadline. Still, it’s not surprising to see teams doing their due diligence now, despite Getz’s earlier comments. Eight teams were interested in Robert at this year’s deadline, including the Mets and Padres. The Mets mostly used Tyrone Taylor in center in 2025, but he only posted a 70 wRC+ in 341 plate appearances. They attempted to upgrade by trading for Cedric Mullins, but he himself posted a 66 wRC+ in 143 plate appearances and departed for the Rays in free agency. The club has prospect Carson Benge knocking on the door. A trade for Robert would be affordable for a high-payroll club and would give them an everyday center fielder if they want to ease Benge into the majors.

The Padres and Pirates are more curious fits. The former has Jackson Merrill firmly entrenched in center. He is coming off a 3.0 fWAR season and signed an extension in April that will guarantee him $135MM through 2034. Robert could be an upgrade at DH, but that wouldn’t be the best use of him since he is still a solid defender, posting 7 OAA in center in 2025. RosterResource currently pegs San Diego for a $201MM payroll in 2026, compared to $211MM this year. Team chairman John Seidler recently indicated that the team will operate at around the same level of payroll. They would need the White Sox to cover at least half of Robert’s salary to facilitate an offseason trade, and that’s before leaving room for other additions.

Meanwhile, the Pirates have shown an increased willingness to spend this offseason. They made an $80MM offer to Josh Naylor and were willing to pay Kyle Schwarber $120-$125MM before he re-upped with the Phillies. That said, Robert is obviously not on the same level as Naylor or Schwarber. Pittsburgh also has Oneil Cruz under control through 2028. Like Robert, Cruz had a below-average offensive showing in 2025 (86 wRC+), but Cruz is much more affordable, with a projected $3.6MM salary in his first turn through arbitration compared to Robert’s guaranteed $20MM. Pittsburgh may just be doing their due diligence, though the likeliest outcome is that Robert stays put in Chicago through the offseason.

Photo courtesy of Matt Marton, Imagn Images

Share Repost Send via email

New York Mets Philadelphia Phillies Pittsburgh Pirates San Diego Padres Luis Robert

190 comments

Mets Sign Daniel Duarte To Minor League Contract

By Mark Polishuk | December 14, 2025 at 5:21pm CDT

The Mets signed right-hander Daniel Duarte to a minor league deal, as first noted on Duarte’s MLB.com profile page earlier this week.  Duarte spent the 2025 season on a minors contract with the Twins but didn’t pitch while recovering from a May 2024 UCL revision surgery.

A veteran of three MLB seasons, the bulk of Duarte’s 38 1/3 career innings came as a member of the Reds bullpen in 2023, when he tossed 31 2/3 frames across 31 games.  Duarte has a respectable 3.99 ERA across his limited time in the Show, though with only a 17% strikeout rate and a troublingly comparable 14.5% walk rate.  An extreme groundball pitcher early in his minor league career, Duarte still has a 47.3% grounder rate in the majors, but batters have capitalized when they’ve been able to get the ball in the air — Duarte has given up seven homers across his 38 1/3 career innings.

It remains to be seen how Duarte will look after such a long absence, though his return to the mound in Mexican winter league play this offseason has resulted in 19 2/3 scoreless innings.  A 5.71 BB% and 21.43% strikeout rate are further steps in the right direction.

New York was impressed enough to extend a contract to the 29-year-old, and Duarte will get a chance to show the team his progress first-hand during Spring Training.  There’s no risk for the Mets in bringing Duarte and several other pitchers to camp on minors deals, and there figures to be plenty of opportunity given how the Mets so often cycle relievers up and down between Triple-A and the active roster.  Duarte has a minor league option year remaining, so this gives up some advantage over out-of-options players in the competition for roster spots.

Share Repost Send via email

New York Mets Transactions Daniel Duarte

13 comments

Chris Martin Planning To Pitch In 2026

By Mark Polishuk | December 14, 2025 at 4:22pm CDT

In September 2024, Chris Martin said that he was “95%” sure that 2025 would be his final season before retirement.  It appears as that five percent chance of a return has now grown into a reality, as MassLive.com’s Chris Cotillo reports that Martin is planning to return in 2026 for his 11th MLB season.  The Red Sox have interest in Martin for what would be a return engagement between the two sides, as Martin pitched for Boston during the 2023-24 seasons.

Martin spent the 2025 season with the Rangers on a one-year, $5.5MM deal, and the fact that the Arlington native turned down larger offers from the Red Sox and other teams to join the Rangers only added to the narrative of what seemed to be a farewell season.  The right-hander delivered yet another strong season, posting a 2.98 ERA, 24.7% strikeout rate, and an elite 4.6% walk rate over 42 1/3 innings out of the Texas bullpen.

For the second straight season, Martin made multiple trips to the injured list.  The righty missed time due to right shoulder fatigue, a left calf strain, and (most troublingly) thoracic outlet syndrome, with the TOS diagnosis emerging in September.  Since the assumption was that Martin was retiring, there wasn’t any word on whether or not Martin underwent TOS surgery, but it would appear he is foregoing the procedure or his diagnosis wasn’t serious enough to require surgery.

Between the TOS situation, Martin’s other recent injuries, or the simple fact that he turns 40 in June, there is certainly some question about whether Martin can continue to defy Father Time.  That said, Martin is still one of baseball’s best control pitchers and he is still getting strong results, so it makes sense that he would still want to keep playing as long as he still has gas in the tank.

Since he pitched for the Red Sox so recently, Boston has plenty of direct knowledge of Martin’s health, and the team is therefore ideally suited to perhaps manage Martin’s usage in order to keep him as healthy as possible in 2026.  A one-year deal for Martin on a modest salary wouldn’t represent much of a risk for the Red Sox, and the upside is high if Martin can stay off the IL and keep posting his usual numbers.  The Sox are known to be looking for experienced bullpen help, and Cotillo reported yesterday that other former Boston hurler Justin Wilson is another reunion candidate, plus left-hander Danny Coulombe drawing interest.

Share Repost Send via email

Boston Red Sox Chris Martin Danny Coulombe Justin Wilson

27 comments

White Sox Sign Oliver Dunn, Tim Elko To Minor League Deals

By Mark Polishuk | December 14, 2025 at 3:44pm CDT

The White Sox have signed infielders Oliver Dunn and Tim Elko to minor league contracts (SoxMachine’s James Fegan was among the beat writers to report the news.)  Dunn’s deal contains an invitation to Chicago’s big league Spring Training camp, though Elko will presumably miss camp due to his ongoing recovery from ACL surgery in October.

Elko was a 10th-round pick for the White Sox in the 2022 draft, and he’ll continue his career with the organization after being non-tendered in November.  That move cleared a space on Chicago’s 40-man roster, and it is fair to guess that the two sides probably had a handshake deal to bring Elko back in relatively short order.  Elko’s surgery came with an eight-month recovery timeline, so he won’t be a factor for a potential return to the 26-man roster until at least July.

The torn right ACL was a sour end to Elko’s first big league season, as he made his debut in May.  Elko hit only .134/.194/.328 in 72 plate appearances over 23 games, while also spending four weeks on the injured list due to a right knee sprain that now seems like a precursor to his ACL problems.  The White Sox are expected to do something to address their first base position, but if they more or less stand pat, it could give Elko some more opportunity to see what he can do against MLB competition when he’s healthy.

Dunn’s MLB resume consists of 55 games with the Brewers over the last two seasons, and only a .206/.261/.290 slash line to show for 145 PA.  A large portion of Dunn’s 2024 rookie was spent on the injured list due to a back injury, but while Dunn was still in the mix for regular infield duty with Milwaukee going into this season, his lack of offensive made him an afterthought.  The Brewers designated Dunn for assignment and outrighted him off their 40-man roster in September, and Dunn elected minor league free agency at season’s end.

The 28-year-old Dunn has mostly played at second and third base during his pro career, but he has a handful of appearances as a left fielder, shortstop, and a couple of cameos at first base.  The White Sox will see what Dunn can do in competing for a bench job this spring, and he could be retained as minor league depth even if he doesn’t break camp.

Share Repost Send via email

Chicago White Sox Transactions Oliver Dunn Tim Elko

11 comments

Tyler Glasnow Does Not Expect To Be Traded

By Nick Deeds | December 14, 2025 at 3:02pm CDT

Dodgers right-hander Tyler Glasnow’s name reportedly “came up” in trade talks with other teams in recent days, but Glasnow made an appearance on MLB Network Radio’s Sunday Sliders program with Dani Wexelman of SiriusXM and made clear that he does not expect to be traded. Per Wexelman, Glasnow went on to noted that president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman had spoken to him directly and told him that he isn’t being traded.

That more or less puts to bed trade speculation regarding Glasnow this offseason. A California native, Glasnow was dealt from the Dodgers to the Rays two seasons ago and promptly signed on an extension with his new team that runs through the 2028 season. Glasnow is owed $30MM annually for each of the next two seasons, and in 2028 the Dodgers hold a $30MM club option on his services that converts into a $21,562,500 player option is declined. For a player headed into his age-32 campaign who has delivered a 3.37 ERA, 3.24 FIP, and a 30.9% strikeout rate across 40 starts as a Dodger (not to mention a 1.69 ERA and 2.95 FIP in six playoff outings), that contract is something of a bargain.

Given the relatively short-term commitment to Glasnow, the Dodgers’ surplus of elite pitching talent, and a market for free agent arms that some teams seem less than enthused to spend in, it’s easy to see why some clubs may have asked after Glasnow in trade talks. At the same time, however, the Dodgers’ deep group of rotation options comes with an equally lengthy injury history. The quantity of arms Los Angeles has in its stable is more important for them than the average team given the number of oft-injured players the team has in the fold. Considering that reality, it’s not exactly a surprise that the Dodgers seem to have no intention of trading Glasnow this winter.

Glasnow isn’t the only Dodgers player whose name has entered the rumor mill this winter. Outfielder Teoscar Hernandez similarly had his floated in trade conversations, and while Dodgers brass suggested that a deal involved Hernandez was unlikely that hasn’t stopped the Royals from expressing interest in him. Of course, that interest was before yesterday’s trade with the Brewers that sent Angel Zerpa to Milwaukee while bringing outfielder Isaac Collins and right-hander Nick Mears back to Kansas City. With Collins and Lane Thomas in the fold, it’s possible that the Royals are done with external additions on the grass and will rely on players like Kyle Isbel and Jac Caglianone to fill out the rest of the outfield mix.

While deals involving Glasnow and Hernandez don’t seem likely at this point, the fact that multiple veteran pieces of the Dodgers’ roster have come up in trade talks could suggest an openness to creativity on the part of the World Series champs this offseason. Friedman previously suggested that the club’s aging core of talent and finding ways to get younger players opportunities to contribute is something that the club has begun weighing this winter, and it’s not hard to see how a deal involving a veteran or two could allow MLB’s oldest team to get younger and clear the deck for the next wave of young talent in L.A.’s lauded farm system.

Share Repost Send via email

Los Angeles Dodgers Tyler Glasnow

65 comments
Load More Posts
    Top Stories

    Diamondbacks To Sign Merrill Kelly

    Brewers Trade Isaac Collins To Royals For Angel Zerpa

    Cardinals To Sign Dustin May

    Blue Jays, Tyler Rogers Agree To Three-Year Deal

    Tigers To Sign Kenley Jansen

    Mets To Sign Jorge Polanco

    Rangers To Sign Danny Jansen

    Dodgers Sign Edwin Diaz

    Red Sox Showing Interest In Willson Contreras

    Diamondbacks Sign Michael Soroka

    Royals Finalizing Extension With Maikel Garcia

    Guardians Manager Stephen Vogt Signed Multi-Year Extension

    Braves Sign Robert Suarez

    Royals To Sign Lane Thomas

    Orioles Sign Pete Alonso

    Preller: Fernando Tatis Jr. Not Available In Trade Talks

    Blue Jays Sign Cody Ponce To Three-Year Deal

    Braves Sign Mike Yastrzemski

    Yankees, Astros Among Various Clubs Interested In Freddy Peralta Trade

    Support MLBTR With A Trade Rumors Front Office Subscription

    Recent

    Diamondbacks To Sign Merrill Kelly

    Brewers “Open To” Using Angel Zerpa As A Starter

    MLBTR Chat Transcript

    Chris Young: Rangers “Are Not Shopping Corey Seager”

    Giants Showing Interest In Cody Bellinger

    Phillies, Mets, Padres, Pirates Interested In Luis Robert Jr.

    Mets Sign Daniel Duarte To Minor League Contract

    Chris Martin Planning To Pitch In 2026

    White Sox Sign Oliver Dunn, Tim Elko To Minor League Deals

    Tyler Glasnow Does Not Expect To Be Traded

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version