MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Mets, Pirates, Papelbon, Rivera | Main | Sheets May Not Pitch This Year »

Stark On Royals, Phillies, Holliday

ESPN.com's Jayson Stark asks some thoughtful baseball people why we're not greeting Manny Ramirez like the "team-wrecking, alibi-distorting, female-fertility-drug-popping scoundrel he is." And, of course, Stark has piles of rumors. Here they are:

  • The Mets were never willing to move Bobby Parnell or other top young arms for Mark DeRosa, so they weren't as close to acquiring him as the Reds and Cubs were. The Phillies, Marlins and Giants were also in the mix.
  • The Indians are more interested in dealing Rafael Bentancourt than Kerry Wood, whose contract ($15MM remaining) would be hard to move.  
  • The Royals will listen on anyone but Zack Greinke, but that doesn't mean they're looking to deal starters. They're "reluctant" to deal Brian Bannister, Kyle Davies or Gil Meche, who has a no-trade clause.
  • The Phillies were looking at Juan Cruz, who the Royals say they'd only deal for an upper-tier prospect ready to make a big-league impact.  
  • The Reds will wait it out and ramp up their pursuit of a bat if they're in the race later in the month.  
  • One executive says Pedro Martinez didn't look bad in last month's workout; Pedro's just demanding too much money. 
  • The Phillies haven't given up on pursuing Cliff Lee, Erik Bedard or Roy Oswalt 
  • The Braves are trying to deal Jeff Francoeur everywhere, but no one's interested. One front-office guy says his team would be interested if Francoeur's non-tendered.  
  • Officials are divided on whether Yunel Escobar could be dealt, but a trade is unlikely at best.  
  • Rangers GM Jon Daniels says he is now looking to bolster his rotation.  
  • As expected, Daniels confirmed that the Rangers will have "limited" ability to take on salary at the deadline. 
  • The A's will want "two prospects with tremendous upside" for Matt Holliday if they deal him. It's unclear how much of the $6.75MM remaining on his contract the A's would pick up.
  • Could Josh Willingham be the next-best bat on the market? One exec says he might be if Russell Branyan and Miguel Tejada don't become available.  
  • Another official says Willingham's unappealing because of his back issues.  


Comments

If Atlanta wants to get rid of these guys...

Escobar
Francoeur

for

Lugo
Baldelli
Kalish
Hagadone
Pimental
$9M

The Braves would be fools to deal escobar away to any trade less than equal value. and they do not need anymore rental players! shouldve signed mark T. and francoeur has zero value so i see why they wanna trade him. even tho he's getting a little better his value is still nill at best. might get a kfc dinner for him and thats only because of his arm. Braves need a right feilder than can hit simple. prado is doing a great job at second but knowing bobby he'll put kelly back in. (dumb decision by the way)

Willingham would be a nice upgrade for Atlanta, but I don't see it happening. Maybe they should try to put Francouer in a platoon situation. His numbers against Lefties are respectable .306/.346/.432

yeah agreed willingham would be a nice upgrade it'd be nice if they could some how platoon diaz and frenchy because bobby plainly loves anderson in left. diaz deserves a little more playing time at the least

braves for life, kelly is on the DL so you don't have to worry

"The Mets were never willing to move Bobby Parnell or other top young arms for Mark DeRosa, so they weren't as close to acquiring him as the Reds and Cubs were. The Phillies, Marlins and Giants were also in the mix."

OMG, who were we offering?

I find it hard to believe we could match up with a Perez and PTBNL rumored to possibly be Todd unless we were willing to chop the top off our system. Doing that for a player we dumped for 3 bottom tier prospects only months ago? Seeing this sentence alone make me kind of angry thinking about what we might have been willing to do.

"If Atlanta wants to get rid of these guys...

Escobar
Francoeur

for

Lugo
Baldelli
Kalish
Hagadone
Pimental
$9M"

This is beyond stupidity.

No way the Braves make that deal, ever.

Oh, new Escobar mention! Time for me to once again toss out my idea, lol.

Escobar
Francoeur
Pitching Prospect

Choo
Peralta

Get it done Atlanta and Cleveland! As an outsider, this is the trade I am dying to see.

ESPN is an abortion! Ken Rosenthal belongs on that network with his horseshit trade rumors and all his supposed facts polluted by his opinions. Matt Kemp for Robinson Canoe right Kenny. Sounds like a yankee fan wishing!

i really dont think escobar is on the trading block unless the braves get an offer they cant refuse.

Whatever it takes to get a deal done, please, Billy/Wolff. If that means all of it, do it. The A's have eaten large chunks of money to get better prospect value in the past.

"OMG, who were we offering?

I find it hard to believe we could match up with a Perez and PTBNL rumored to possibly be Todd unless we were willing to chop the top off our system"

If I had to wildly guess, I'd say Jay Jackson + PTBNL or maybe Andrew Cashner with no PTBNL. If the Cubs reportedly came "second" in the bidding, its somewhat safe to say they offered only slightly less than the Cards. If they offer Vitters, they win the bidding, because if someone offers you an elite position prospect for DeRosa, you take it.

The Braves are fools for even considering trading Yunel Escobar.

As a braves fan, I like the idea of acquiring Choo who is under team control for a few more years. The thing I'm worried about is if he has to go serve in the Korean military.

Can the A's really ask for two prospects with huge upside for Holliday? I mean isn't that return based more off of past history and what they gave up rather than fair market value for a guy who's currently @ .275/.373 w/ 8 hr and 40 rbi? Holliday is a rental and just based off of what he might do over the next 3 months wouldn't Dye, Branyan, Thome, Huff and A. JOnes be better value trade candidates? Obviously player position and defense would come into play and distinguish one players appeal from other but still. Aren't the A's in danger of pricing themselves out of the market?

Their not really considering trading Escobar, thats why it is just a rumor. The people who write this nonsense and the people who believe it are the real fools.

ESPN is an abortion! Ken Rosenthal belongs on that network with his horseshit trade rumors and all his supposed facts polluted by his opinions. Matt Kemp for Robinson Canoe right Kenny. Sounds like a yankee fan wishing!

Posted by: MattsdodgersSD | July 03, 2009 at 01:41 PM

----------------

????? ......maybe an "abomination"?

I can't help but laugh that the braves would trade Escobar for a good bat when he leads the team in batting average and rbi, and he is second in hr's and third in OBP and OPS. He is the third best bat they have.

Atlanta needs to trade for a hitting coach. The idea that they give away Francouer when His swing got corrected in a couple of weeks of work this winter away from Braves coaching. Can we think of anyone else swing who got ruined recently in Atlanta? Shafer, A. Jones et al. The only guys who don't get messed up there are guys who have their own pitching coaches. Chipper(Dad), Yunel(doesn't speak English) and McCann(Dad)

"Escobar
Francoeur

for

Lugo
Baldelli
Kalish
Hagadone
Pimental
$9M""

I can't help but laugh at that.. Sorry..

MAYBE, once Hagedone shows he has fully overcome his TJ surgery next year the Braves would jump all over it, but as of right now, there is absolutely no way.

While being great talents, neither Cashner nor Jackson meet what the Indians were rumored to be looking for (ready to help, impact arms – with the ready to help part stressed). They haven’t had true success above A ball, and only Jackson has even been to AA. Because of that, and if the PTBNL is what is being talked about talent wise, I can imagine it would possibly have to be both being offered.

We just have too big a drop off after those guys, and Cleveland was targeting almost exclusively arms. I really do just cringe to think what we might have been willing to do to bring back someone we gave away.


“As a braves fan, I like the idea of acquiring Choo who is under team control for a few more years. The thing I'm worried about is if he has to go serve in the Korean military.”

Been paying some attention because of my fantasy team. And I could be wrong, but I believe his having a job in the majors was enough to make that concern go away. I thought we heard the last year and a half or so was the time in which he would have been taken, if he ever was to be forced to go. Anyone have more info?

Braves give:
Jorden Schafer
Jeff Francour
Brandon Jones

Braves get:
Matt Holliday

Braves give:
Jorden Schafer
Jeff Francour
Brandon Jones

Braves get:
Matt Holliday


Holliday is a RENTAL. You do not give up a blue chip 5 tool prospect like Schafer for a 2 month rental.

"Escobar
Francoeur

for

Lugo
Baldelli
Kalish
Hagadone
Pimental
$9M""

What?? How about Francoeur and Escobar for Buccholz, Bowden, and Jacoby Ellsbury. That makes about as much sense as your offer.

"Escobar
Francoeur
Pitching Prospect

Choo
Peralta"


Why the hell would the Indians trade Choo? And for Escobar (newsflash Tribe has Asdrubal Cabrera) and Francoeur (who flat out blows). Then the Indians should just throw in Peralta too for some reason...

Unless that "pitching prospect" is Hanson, your trade proposal is complete idiocy.

Hanson is worth Choo and Peralta alone, why does every fan of another team think they should get Hanson just because the deal is slightly favored to the braves fans. We do have other pitching prospects

As for the Boston idea, if the braves move Yunel they would have to be getting back Lowrie and either Buchholz or Bowden + one of Boston's young bullpen arms (bard, masterson, etc.). If you don't think that's fair then i understand because that's a lot but the braves can ask for the moon if they decide to trade him bc they don't have to

So a decent fielding/hitting SS (Lowrie), a potential front of the rotation starter (Buccholz) AND a power bullpen arem/potential closer (Bard) for a soon to be 27 year old SS who hits about .295/.355 w/ about 10-15 hrs? That's it? That's all you want? No 1st born child? You're selling low.

"Hanson is worth Choo and Peralta alone, why does every fan of another team think they should get Hanson just because the deal is slightly favored to the braves fans. We do have other pitching prospects"

Apparently you can't read. The whole point is that the Indians would not consider trading Choo, especially for Escobar (when they have a similar player in Cabrera) and Francoeur (who the Braves would love to pawn off on anybody).

Then on top of all that, he has the Indians also throwing in Peralta for no apparent reason.

So what I said was that "pitching prospect" had better be Hanson to even make the trade remotely interesting for the Tribe, but apparently you didn't understand.

I figured the phrase "unless... your trade proposal is complete idiocy" would have made that clear, but apparently not for you.

Choo is a 120 OPS+ bat with below average defense in RF and 3-4 years of control
Escobar is a 110 OPS+ bat with above average Def at Short and 4 years of control
No matter what side you want to argue, the value is close. Escobar easily gets the nod in my mind since short is so hard to fill.

Peralta would be bringing you Francoeur and a pitching prospect, or maybe just his weight in prospect arms, or maybe Fancoeur and two prospects - it is always open to play. But Peralta has 2 years at 11.6 Million left on his deal. (or one, 4.85 million if option not picked up). Francoeur is on a 1/3.75 deal with 2 years of control left if you even wanted to keep him after 09. Either way, you saved quite a bit of cash. You made an improvement, both now and for the future at SS, and since middle infield is a weakness in your system, you would no longer have to think about it at all with the middle infield being set for years between Escobar and Cabrera at 2B.

Skip to 2011. Peralta would be gone either way, and you don’t have a middle infielder to replace him. Which do you think is easier to find off the FA market, or even from within, a SS/2B or a corner OF? Having Cabrera, Escobar and Chisenhall manning 2nd to 3rd with Sizemore in center and Santana behind the plate would cover every hard to fill position on the field with plus players. (well, I question Cabrera being a plus, but whatever) Add in LaPorta and only a single OF, a1B, and a DH (if not Hafner) would need to be thought of over the next 2.5 years. Weglarz, Brantley, Hodges, Mills – you probably have guys internally to fill each of those spots. Hafner and Sizemore would be the only two really making large money as well, so plenty to spend elseware.

Replacing Choo with Escobar doesn’t hurt at all. If anything, it helps you a ton. Peralta would then be expendable, and he can go in the same deal for someone like Francoeur (who you can use in the meantime) and a pitching prospect or even two – I don’t know specifically what the Indians front office would demand. Or maybe he is a separate move, who knows. Just something centered around these guys just seems to make a ton of sense for both teams. Better then watching Peralta walk for 2010 (due to contract) or 2011 and having that hole in the infield yet again while having to deal an OF anyway because of the abundance of talents gathered for OF, 1B and DH.


PS, Cabrera has a BAbip of .369 right now. His real production level is much closer to what you saw last year then this. Just so you know.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.